Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

Breast (in situ) (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Colorado 6 N/A 27.6 (26.7, 28.4) N/A 888 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 29.3 (29.2, 29.4) N/A 57,211 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.1, 3.7)
Douglas County 6 Urban 37.4 (33.7, 41.5) 1 (1, 5) 76 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.1, 3.5)
Routt County 6 Rural 35.8 (23.5, 53.0) 2 (1, 20) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.0, 4.4)
Boulder County 6 Urban 32.6 (28.9, 36.6) 3 (1, 11) 61 stable stable trend 11.4 (-0.3, 18.5)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 31.2 (28.5, 34.0) 4 (2, 11) 114 falling falling trend -2.3 (-12.3, -0.4)
Arapahoe County 6 Urban 30.6 (28.1, 33.3) 5 (2, 12) 113 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 3.4)
Eagle County 6 Rural 30.4 (21.8, 41.5) 6 (1, 21) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.4, 6.7)
Broomfield County 6 Urban 30.2 (23.1, 39.0) 7 (1, 19) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 3.1)
El Paso County 6 Urban 28.6 (26.2, 31.1) 8 (3, 14) 111 falling falling trend -4.0 (-8.3, -0.8)
Park County 6 Urban 28.6 (15.6, 50.0) 9 (1, 24) 3
*
*
Denver County 6 Urban 28.3 (25.8, 30.9) 10 (4, 15) 98 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Adams County 6 Urban 26.1 (23.3, 29.1) 11 (6, 18) 65 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.1)
Pueblo County 6 Urban 25.9 (21.5, 30.9) 12 (3, 20) 28 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.6, 2.6)
La Plata County 6 Rural 25.3 (17.9, 34.8) 13 (2, 23) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.6, 6.2)
Larimer County 6 Urban 23.4 (20.4, 26.7) 14 (9, 21) 47 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Fremont County 6 Rural 23.2 (14.8, 34.9) 15 (2, 24) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.5, 3.1)
Elbert County 6 Urban 23.0 (13.4, 37.5) 16 (1, 24) 4
*
*
Mesa County 6 Urban 22.7 (18.5, 27.6) 17 (8, 23) 23 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.9, -2.4)
Weld County 6 Urban 21.7 (18.6, 25.2) 18 (11, 23) 36 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 3.4)
Summit County 6 Rural 21.3 (12.4, 34.8) 19 (2, 24) 4
*
*
Delta County 6 Rural 19.3 (11.6, 30.9) 20 (4, 24) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-5.7, 8.5)
Teller County 6 Urban 18.9 (10.4, 32.9) 21 (3, 24) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.9, 7.0)
Montezuma County 6 Rural 17.7 (9.6, 30.5) 22 (4, 24) 3
*
*
Garfield County 6 Rural 17.2 (11.3, 25.2) 23 (10, 24) 6 stable stable trend -2.5 (-8.5, 3.6)
Montrose County 6 Rural 15.9 (10.0, 24.4) 24 (12, 24) 5 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.8, -1.3)
Alamosa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archuleta County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baca County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bent County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chaffee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clear Creek County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conejos County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Costilla County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grand County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gunnison County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huerfano County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kit Carson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Las Animas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moffat County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otero County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ouray County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pitkin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prowers County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Blanco County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rio Grande County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Saguache County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Miguel County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sedgwick County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yuma County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/14/2024 8:07 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alamosa, Archuleta, Baca, Bent, Chaffee, Cheyenne, Clear Creek, Conejos, Costilla, Crowley, Custer, Dolores, Gilpin, Grand, Gunnison, Hinsdale, Huerfano, Jackson, Kiowa, Kit Carson, Lake, Las Animas, Lincoln, Logan, Mineral, Moffat, Morgan, Otero, Ouray, Phillips, Pitkin, Prowers, Rio Blanco, Rio Grande, Saguache, San Juan, San Miguel, Sedgwick, Washington, Yuma

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top