Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

Breast, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 6,10 *** 123.5 (121.7, 125.4) 3,587 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 124.7 (124.4, 124.9) 234,445 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
Adams County 6,10 *** 111.3 (105.1, 117.8) 248 stable stable trend 1.0 (-7.5, 10.4)
Alamosa County 6,10 *** 122.1 (89.0, 163.5) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-36.4, 55.3)
Arapahoe County 6,10 *** 134.6 (129.0, 140.5) 447 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.0, 4.5)
Archuleta County 6,10 *** 126.4 (91.9, 170.9) 11 stable stable trend -5.9 (-35.7, 37.9)
Baca County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bent County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boulder County 6,10 *** 134.9 (126.9, 143.2) 226 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.6, 5.1)
Broomfield County 6,10 *** 121.2 (104.9, 139.4) 41 stable stable trend 0.9 (-11.9, 15.6)
Chaffee County 6,10 *** 126.2 (97.3, 161.9) 16 stable stable trend -7.3 (-42.0, 48.2)
Cheyenne County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clear Creek County 6,10 *** 113.3 (76.4, 164.5) 7 stable stable trend -11.3 (-38.4, 27.7)
Conejos County 6,10 *** 84.4 (52.3, 130.3) 4 stable stable trend -14.5 (-36.6, 15.1)
Costilla County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County 6,10 *** 104.2 (63.1, 179.5) 5 stable stable trend -40.3 (-73.4, 34.1)
Delta County 6,10 *** 90.4 (72.2, 112.1) 21 stable stable trend -12.2 (-25.9, 4.0)
Denver County 6,10 *** 128.9 (123.3, 134.7) 415 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.3, 4.0)
Dolores County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County 6,10 *** 140.3 (131.6, 149.3) 220 stable stable trend 5.7 (-4.8, 17.2)
Eagle County 6,10 *** 116.3 (95.7, 140.2) 28 stable stable trend 0.3 (-15.8, 19.6)
El Paso County 6,10 *** 119.9 (114.6, 125.3) 410 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.5, 7.2)
Elbert County 6,10 *** 134.9 (108.8, 166.1) 22 stable stable trend -3.5 (-29.0, 31.1)
Fremont County 6,10 *** 120.3 (102.2, 141.1) 37 stable stable trend 3.2 (-12.5, 21.9)
Garfield County 6,10 *** 117.2 (99.2, 137.5) 32 stable stable trend -2.6 (-16.2, 13.1)
Gilpin County 6,10 *** 110.5 (67.1, 179.2) 5 falling falling trend -12.4 (-22.2, -1.5)
Grand County 6,10 *** 90.6 (62.0, 128.7) 8 stable stable trend 11.2 (-30.2, 77.1)
Gunnison County 6,10 *** 105.5 (73.5, 147.0) 8 stable stable trend -4.7 (-27.5, 25.2)
Hinsdale County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huerfano County 6,10 *** 108.9 (67.1, 171.3) 6 stable stable trend -11.0 (-49.2, 56.0)
Jackson County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6,10 *** 127.3 (121.9, 132.9) 442 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.4, 3.8)
Kiowa County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kit Carson County 6,10 *** 101.3 (61.7, 157.5) 5 stable stable trend 4.5 (-41.3, 86.1)
La Plata County 6,10 *** 114.2 (97.3, 133.3) 36 stable stable trend -1.9 (-25.0, 28.2)
Lake County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Larimer County 6,10 *** 126.7 (119.2, 134.6) 226 stable stable trend 1.2 (-12.1, 16.5)
Las Animas County 6,10 *** 106.3 (78.2, 142.2) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.5, 4.3)
Lincoln County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County 6,10 *** 113.8 (86.5, 147.2) 13 stable stable trend 6.7 (-18.8, 40.1)
Mesa County 6,10 *** 115.9 (105.9, 126.7) 108 rising rising trend 7.4 (1.3, 13.8)
Mineral County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moffat County 6,10 *** 117.7 (82.3, 163.1) 8 stable stable trend -11.5 (-56.4, 79.7)
Montezuma County 6,10 *** 108.4 (87.0, 133.9) 20 stable stable trend 2.7 (-17.9, 28.4)
Montrose County 6,10 *** 102.9 (86.6, 121.7) 31 stable stable trend 9.1 (-6.8, 27.8)
Morgan County 6,10 *** 104.2 (82.2, 130.3) 16 stable stable trend -10.0 (-28.9, 13.9)
Otero County 6,10 *** 104.6 (80.7, 133.9) 14 stable stable trend -8.3 (-34.6, 28.3)
Ouray County 6,10 *** 107.1 (59.5, 185.4) 4 rising rising trend 60.2 (16.4, 120.5)
Park County 6,10 *** 99.1 (70.3, 137.0) 11 stable stable trend -6.5 (-28.8, 22.8)
Phillips County 6,10 *** 105.0 (58.4, 177.6) 3
*
*
Pitkin County 6,10 *** 136.8 (106.6, 174.0) 16 stable stable trend 12.8 (-11.9, 44.5)
Prowers County 6,10 *** 99.9 (70.1, 138.8) 8 stable stable trend -11.0 (-43.3, 39.8)
Pueblo County 6,10 *** 123.2 (113.3, 133.8) 124 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.0, 1.9)
Rio Blanco County 6,10 *** 119.5 (73.5, 184.2) 4
*
*
Rio Grande County 6,10 *** 98.0 (67.7, 137.9) 7 stable stable trend -4.1 (-44.0, 64.3)
Routt County 6,10 *** 143.8 (113.5, 179.9) 19 stable stable trend 9.3 (-5.0, 25.8)
Saguache County 6,10 *** 70.1 (39.7, 119.1) 3
*
*
San Juan County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Miguel County 6,10 *** 101.2 (60.6, 162.2) 4 stable stable trend -9.5 (-22.1, 5.1)
Sedgwick County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Summit County 6,10 *** 79.7 (57.9, 107.4) 11 stable stable trend -5.1 (-11.6, 1.8)
Teller County 6,10 *** 138.0 (109.1, 172.7) 19 stable stable trend -5.0 (-47.1, 70.5)
Washington County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Weld County 6,10 *** 114.1 (106.1, 122.6) 155 stable stable trend -3.0 (-9.3, 3.7)
Yuma County 6,10 *** 119.8 (83.3, 167.3) 8 stable stable trend -6.5 (-49.2, 72.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/18/2019 3:38 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top