Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Florida by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Florida 6 *** 95.2 (94.4, 95.9) N/A 13,622 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.0, 1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 106.2 (106.0, 106.4) N/A 200,677 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.6, 6.3)
Franklin County 6 *** 100.9 (74.6, 135.3) 12 (2, 58) 10 stable stable trend 22.1 (-3.7, 54.8)
Indian River County 6 *** 92.0 (85.0, 99.5) 29 (8, 43) 140 rising rising trend 11.7 (1.0, 23.5)
Citrus County 6 *** 92.9 (85.8, 100.6) 26 (7, 44) 150 stable stable trend 3.5 (-1.8, 9.0)
Putnam County 6 *** 86.9 (76.4, 98.7) 37 (6, 52) 52 stable stable trend 2.7 (-5.1, 11.0)
Alachua County 6 *** 93.7 (86.3, 101.6) 23 (5, 43) 125 stable stable trend 1.3 (-8.0, 11.6)
Union County 6 *** 256.2 (217.5, 301.0) 1 (1, 1) 36 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.2, 4.3)
Polk County 6 *** 102.0 (97.9, 106.3) 8 (4, 21) 476 stable stable trend 0.4 (-7.1, 8.6)
Hillsborough County 6 *** 102.2 (98.9, 105.6) 7 (4, 18) 762 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.8, 6.0)
Pasco County 6 *** 95.2 (90.9, 99.7) 20 (9, 36) 376 stable stable trend -0.6 (-8.9, 8.5)
Columbia County 6 *** 101.4 (88.7, 115.5) 10 (2, 44) 48 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.9, 1.1)
Monroe County 6 *** 74.0 (65.1, 84.1) 50 (34, 59) 52 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.0, 1.0)
Jefferson County 6 *** 91.0 (67.0, 122.2) 30 (2, 60) 10 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.5, 1.7)
Charlotte County 6 *** 83.0 (77.3, 89.4) 41 (25, 51) 182 stable stable trend -2.0 (-8.3, 4.8)
Wakulla County 6 *** 84.2 (67.1, 104.7) 39 (2, 59) 18 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.6, 1.7)
Suwannee County 6 *** 92.9 (78.6, 109.3) 25 (2, 52) 31 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.1, 0.0)
Osceola County 6 *** 105.7 (98.7, 113.1) 5 (2, 23) 179 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.1)
Madison County 6 *** 79.1 (58.6, 105.1) 45 (2, 63) 11 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.7, 0.5)
Palm Beach County 6 *** 94.7 (92.1, 97.4) 21 (12, 33) 1,013 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.6)
Martin County 6 *** 90.4 (83.5, 97.9) 32 (9, 46) 137 stable stable trend -2.9 (-5.9, 0.1)
Pinellas County 6 *** 93.8 (90.7, 96.9) 22 (12, 36) 736 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.2, -2.2)
Hamilton County 6 *** 79.3 (55.1, 111.0) 44 (2, 64) 7 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.0, -0.6)
Nassau County 6 *** 110.2 (98.8, 122.7) 3 (2, 27) 73 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.0, -1.7)
Escambia County 6 *** 101.1 (94.7, 107.9) 11 (3, 30) 192 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.5, -2.4)
Manatee County 6 *** 90.9 (86.3, 95.8) 31 (14, 42) 304 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.9, -2.2)
Santa Rosa County 6 *** 92.2 (83.9, 101.2) 28 (5, 46) 96 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.7, -2.4)
Bradford County 6 *** 80.8 (63.2, 102.1) 43 (4, 61) 15 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.4, -0.9)
Gadsden County 6 *** 103.0 (86.9, 121.4) 6 (2, 48) 31 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.7, -1.8)
Hardee County 6 *** 75.1 (57.2, 96.9) 48 (5, 63) 12 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.8, -0.6)
St. Lucie County 6 *** 85.6 (80.4, 91.2) 38 (22, 48) 208 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.8, -2.7)
Dixie County 6 *** 53.2 (37.7, 74.2) 60 (42, 65) 8 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.1, -0.6)
Glades County 6 *** 49.7 (33.7, 73.3) 62 (43, 65) 6 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.1, 0.5)
Orange County 6 *** 95.3 (91.8, 98.9) 19 (10, 34) 586 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.0, -0.7)
Leon County 6 *** 95.5 (88.1, 103.4) 17 (4, 42) 132 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.8, -2.3)
Miami-Dade County 6 *** 114.0 (111.6, 116.5) 2 (2, 6) 1,700 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.0, -3.0)
St. Johns County 6 *** 98.8 (92.1, 106.0) 14 (4, 35) 166 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.1, -2.9)
Walton County 6 *** 64.2 (54.2, 75.8) 57 (43, 63) 31 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.9, -2.0)
Hernando County 6 *** 92.4 (85.9, 99.5) 27 (7, 44) 155 falling falling trend -4.5 (-5.6, -3.4)
Brevard County 6 *** 90.1 (86.3, 94.1) 33 (17, 42) 427 falling falling trend -4.6 (-5.7, -3.6)
Okeechobee County 6 *** 63.7 (51.6, 78.1) 58 (38, 64) 19 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.3, -2.0)
Gulf County 6 *** 71.8 (52.2, 97.6) 53 (5, 64) 9 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.6, -2.3)
Marion County 6 *** 101.5 (96.4, 106.9) 9 (3, 26) 319 falling falling trend -5.0 (-6.3, -3.8)
Flagler County 6 *** 88.3 (80.3, 97.2) 35 (10, 49) 96 falling falling trend -5.1 (-6.5, -3.6)
Okaloosa County 6 *** 74.9 (67.9, 82.4) 49 (36, 57) 90 falling falling trend -5.1 (-6.6, -3.7)
Washington County 6 *** 48.6 (34.8, 66.5) 64 (48, 65) 8 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.9, -2.3)
Levy County 6 *** 75.4 (62.7, 90.5) 47 (17, 60) 27 falling falling trend -5.3 (-7.8, -2.7)
Jackson County 6 *** 41.8 (32.4, 53.3) 65 (58, 65) 14 falling falling trend -5.4 (-7.8, -2.9)
Volusia County 6 *** 84.0 (80.1, 88.1) 40 (30, 48) 366 stable stable trend -5.4 (-15.6, 6.1)
Hendry County 6 *** 65.7 (51.3, 82.9) 55 (29, 64) 14 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.0, -3.0)
Seminole County 6 *** 88.2 (83.1, 93.7) 36 (17, 45) 228 falling falling trend -5.5 (-6.2, -4.9)
Taylor County 6 *** 64.4 (47.9, 85.5) 56 (17, 65) 10 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.2, -2.6)
Highlands County 6 *** 68.9 (61.4, 77.3) 54 (42, 60) 72 falling falling trend -5.6 (-7.6, -3.6)
Lake County 6 *** 109.0 (103.6, 114.7) 4 (2, 13) 317 falling falling trend -5.9 (-8.3, -3.5)
Baker County 6 *** 53.4 (37.5, 73.8) 59 (39, 65) 8 falling falling trend -6.0 (-9.7, -2.2)
Broward County 6 *** 95.4 (92.8, 98.0) 18 (12, 32) 1,104 falling falling trend -6.0 (-8.1, -3.9)
Sarasota County 6 *** 93.5 (89.4, 97.9) 24 (11, 38) 427 stable stable trend -6.5 (-17.8, 6.4)
Collier County 6 *** 98.7 (93.9, 103.8) 15 (5, 31) 346 stable stable trend -7.1 (-19.3, 6.9)
Lee County 6 *** 81.6 (78.4, 84.9) 42 (35, 50) 544 falling falling trend -7.4 (-9.2, -5.5)
Gilchrist County 6 *** 48.9 (33.2, 70.5) 63 (44, 65) 6 falling falling trend -7.7 (-10.5, -4.7)
Duval County 6 *** 99.2 (95.1, 103.4) 13 (5, 27) 481 falling falling trend -8.1 (-10.9, -5.2)
Sumter County 6 *** 89.8 (82.6, 98.0) 34 (10, 46) 184 falling falling trend -8.6 (-11.1, -6.1)
DeSoto County 6 *** 72.8 (59.3, 88.8) 52 (17, 62) 21 falling falling trend -9.3 (-13.7, -4.7)
Clay County 6 *** 75.6 (68.7, 83.1) 46 (36, 57) 95 falling falling trend -10.4 (-14.7, -5.8)
Bay County 6 *** 95.6 (87.7, 104.1) 16 (5, 42) 111 falling falling trend -11.1 (-15.3, -6.8)
Calhoun County 6 *** 50.2 (32.3, 75.2) 61 (38, 65) 5 falling falling trend -18.2 (-26.9, -8.4)
Lafayette County 6 *** 73.9 (44.8, 116.1) 51 (2, 65) 4
*
*
Holmes County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Liberty County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2021 2:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top