Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Florida by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Florida 6 N/A 21.7 (21.5, 22.0) N/A 6,519 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) N/A 71,542 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.5)
Washington County 6 Urban 13.2 (8.2, 20.3) 61 (22, 63) 5 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.6, 10.1)
Walton County 6 Urban 14.9 (11.6, 18.8) 57 (36, 63) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.5)
Wakulla County 6 Urban 16.1 (10.9, 23.1) 56 (5, 63) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 3.9)
Volusia County 6 Urban 22.7 (21.2, 24.2) 22 (6, 40) 200 falling falling trend -6.3 (-11.2, -0.9)
Union County 6 Rural 42.4 (30.0, 58.4) 1 (1, 18) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.5, 2.9)
Taylor County 6 Rural 16.2 (10.3, 24.6) 55 (3, 63) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.5, 5.5)
Suwannee County 6 Rural 23.9 (18.4, 30.6) 13 (1, 57) 14 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.5, 5.7)
Sumter County 6 Urban 21.4 (18.1, 25.4) 33 (3, 55) 82 falling falling trend -5.9 (-9.6, -3.4)
St. Lucie County 6 Urban 22.4 (20.5, 24.5) 24 (5, 46) 112 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 3.9)
St. Johns County 6 Urban 24.5 (22.2, 26.9) 7 (2, 36) 93 rising rising trend 10.3 (0.1, 18.4)
Seminole County 6 Urban 22.4 (20.6, 24.3) 23 (6, 45) 125 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 3.0)
Sarasota County 6 Urban 25.7 (23.9, 27.5) 4 (2, 19) 240 falling falling trend -6.0 (-11.6, -2.1)
Santa Rosa County 6 Urban 21.9 (19.1, 24.9) 29 (3, 52) 47 falling falling trend -23.4 (-37.0, -13.2)
Putnam County 6 Rural 19.6 (15.5, 24.5) 44 (3, 60) 20 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.9, 5.8)
Polk County 6 Urban 21.3 (20.0, 22.7) 34 (15, 46) 204 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.1)
Pinellas County 6 Urban 21.8 (20.7, 22.9) 30 (14, 43) 346 stable stable trend -4.0 (-8.5, 0.7)
Pasco County 6 Urban 23.1 (21.6, 24.7) 20 (5, 39) 188 stable stable trend -4.8 (-11.3, 1.2)
Palm Beach County 6 Urban 21.9 (21.0, 22.8) 28 (14, 40) 513 falling falling trend -5.2 (-10.7, -2.0)
Osceola County 6 Urban 18.2 (16.3, 20.2) 49 (31, 57) 73 stable stable trend 2.7 (-10.1, 12.1)
Orange County 6 Urban 18.2 (17.2, 19.2) 48 (39, 56) 258 falling falling trend -2.4 (-5.1, -0.7)
Okeechobee County 6 Rural 22.1 (16.7, 28.7) 26 (2, 59) 12 rising rising trend 7.1 (3.1, 20.7)
Okaloosa County 6 Urban 19.8 (17.3, 22.5) 43 (11, 56) 48 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.3)
Nassau County 6 Urban 20.8 (17.3, 24.8) 36 (4, 57) 28 stable stable trend 2.0 (0.0, 4.6)
Monroe County 6 Rural 13.0 (10.2, 16.4) 62 (49, 63) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.2)
Miami-Dade County 6 Urban 20.6 (19.9, 21.4) 37 (27, 47) 682 falling falling trend -4.8 (-8.8, -2.6)
Martin County 6 Urban 23.3 (20.6, 26.4) 17 (2, 47) 70 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.4, 4.6)
Marion County 6 Urban 24.3 (22.4, 26.3) 10 (2, 33) 157 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 3.4)
Manatee County 6 Urban 21.5 (19.8, 23.3) 32 (9, 47) 145 stable stable trend -6.1 (-12.9, 1.2)
Madison County 6 Rural 14.1 (8.2, 23.0) 59 (6, 63) 4 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.1, 16.4)
Levy County 6 Urban 24.1 (18.6, 31.0) 12 (1, 56) 16 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.8, 5.0)
Leon County 6 Urban 18.9 (16.6, 21.3) 46 (21, 57) 54 falling falling trend -2.9 (-8.5, -0.4)
Lee County 6 Urban 23.2 (21.9, 24.5) 19 (6, 35) 309 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.0, -2.4)
Lake County 6 Urban 22.3 (20.6, 24.2) 25 (6, 44) 140 stable stable trend -9.9 (-23.9, 2.5)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 14.3 (8.1, 24.5) 58 (3, 63) 4
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural 11.2 (7.7, 15.8) 63 (50, 63) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 3.5)
Indian River County 6 Urban 24.2 (21.5, 27.3) 11 (2, 43) 77 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.9, 3.8)
Hillsborough County 6 Urban 23.0 (21.9, 24.0) 21 (8, 35) 366 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.2)
Highlands County 6 Urban 23.6 (19.9, 28.0) 15 (2, 50) 43 stable stable trend 1.9 (0.0, 3.9)
Hernando County 6 Urban 24.7 (22.1, 27.4) 6 (2, 37) 82 falling falling trend -5.7 (-13.2, -1.7)
Hendry County 6 Rural 17.3 (12.0, 24.0) 53 (3, 63) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.4, 7.5)
Hardee County 6 Rural 19.8 (13.3, 28.5) 42 (2, 63) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.8, 6.6)
Gulf County 6 Rural 27.0 (17.9, 39.9) 2 (1, 59) 6
*
*
Glades County 6 Rural 24.3 (14.4, 39.4) 9 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Gilchrist County 6 Urban 13.9 (8.1, 22.8) 60 (7, 63) 4 falling falling trend -16.9 (-41.1, -5.6)
Gadsden County 6 Urban 17.8 (13.3, 23.4) 51 (5, 62) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.9, 3.5)
Franklin County 6 Rural 25.4 (15.3, 40.4) 5 (1, 63) 5 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.4, 6.8)
Flagler County 6 Urban 25.8 (22.4, 29.7) 3 (1, 39) 54 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.7)
Escambia County 6 Urban 21.7 (19.6, 24.0) 31 (7, 49) 85 falling falling trend -4.0 (-8.9, -1.3)
Duval County 6 Urban 23.3 (22.0, 24.6) 18 (5, 35) 251 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.5, 3.2)
Dixie County 6 Rural 16.7 (10.0, 26.8) 54 (2, 63) 4 falling falling trend -45.4 (-70.4, -4.3)
DeSoto County 6 Rural 19.1 (13.8, 26.1) 45 (2, 62) 9 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.0, 5.9)
Columbia County 6 Rural 21.9 (17.7, 27.0) 27 (2, 56) 20 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.2, 4.7)
Collier County 6 Urban 24.4 (22.5, 26.4) 8 (2, 33) 171 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.2, 4.0)
Clay County 6 Urban 23.8 (21.1, 26.6) 14 (2, 44) 63 stable stable trend -6.8 (-23.6, 1.6)
Citrus County 6 Urban 20.3 (17.7, 23.2) 38 (8, 55) 67 falling falling trend -8.3 (-23.6, -2.3)
Charlotte County 6 Urban 19.9 (17.7, 22.3) 41 (13, 55) 92 stable stable trend -7.9 (-14.8, 2.6)
Calhoun County 6 Rural 17.4 (10.1, 28.6) 52 (2, 63) 3 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.4, 10.0)
Broward County 6 Urban 20.1 (19.3, 20.9) 40 (30, 49) 483 falling falling trend -4.3 (-9.9, -0.2)
Brevard County 6 Urban 23.4 (22.0, 24.9) 16 (4, 35) 225 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.2)
Bradford County 6 Rural 18.5 (12.6, 26.4) 47 (2, 63) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.4, 8.2)
Bay County 6 Urban 21.0 (18.4, 23.9) 35 (6, 54) 50 stable stable trend -6.3 (-23.6, 1.7)
Baker County 6 Urban 18.1 (11.9, 26.4) 50 (2, 63) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.8, 6.0)
Alachua County 6 Urban 20.2 (17.9, 22.7) 39 (12, 55) 60 falling falling trend -3.1 (-11.4, -0.5)
Hamilton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Liberty County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/13/2024 12:44 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top