Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Florida by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Florida 6 235.0 (234.1, 236.0) N/A 51,504 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 225.0 (224.8, 225.3) N/A 726,500 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.2, 0.0)
Union County 6 909.7 (844.3, 979.2) 1 (1, 1) 156 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.1, 0.1)
Citrus County 6 294.4 (280.7, 308.7) 2 (2, 9) 469 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.7, 2.5)
Hernando County 6 290.1 (278.7, 301.8) 3 (2, 10) 579 falling falling trend -2.6 (-6.1, -0.6)
Marion County 6 280.1 (271.8, 288.6) 4 (2, 12) 1,008 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Levy County 6 280.0 (256.7, 305.1) 5 (2, 30) 128 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.9)
Nassau County 6 277.9 (262.0, 294.6) 6 (2, 22) 265 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.4)
Dixie County 6 274.9 (240.5, 313.4) 7 (2, 49) 53 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.6)
Pasco County 6 274.5 (268.2, 281.1) 8 (4, 13) 1,536 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Bradford County 6 267.3 (240.3, 296.6) 9 (2, 45) 78 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.7, 4.2)
Highlands County 6 265.7 (249.9, 282.2) 10 (3, 32) 260 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.7)
Taylor County 6 264.1 (233.5, 297.7) 11 (2, 54) 59 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.3, 13.2)
Gilchrist County 6 264.0 (229.3, 302.7) 12 (2, 59) 48 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.3)
Indian River County 6 263.6 (251.3, 276.5) 13 (4, 29) 434 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.5, 4.9)
Brevard County 6 261.1 (255.1, 267.2) 14 (8, 25) 1,753 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Duval County 6 260.7 (256.0, 265.4) 15 (8, 25) 2,520 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.9, 0.1)
Volusia County 6 259.6 (253.4, 266.0) 16 (8, 26) 1,560 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.1, -0.2)
Pinellas County 6 257.8 (253.2, 262.4) 17 (10, 27) 2,858 stable stable trend 0.2 (0.0, 0.4)
Lake County 6 257.3 (249.5, 265.3) 18 (8, 30) 930 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Columbia County 6 257.0 (240.0, 274.9) 19 (4, 44) 190 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.2, 2.2)
Putnam County 6 256.6 (239.9, 274.3) 20 (4, 43) 209 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.0)
Bay County 6 256.2 (245.8, 267.1) 21 (8, 34) 500 falling falling trend -5.0 (-8.4, -1.5)
Escambia County 6 253.6 (245.4, 262.1) 22 (10, 33) 813 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.5)
Gadsden County 6 251.8 (231.7, 273.2) 23 (4, 51) 129 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.5)
Sarasota County 6 250.4 (242.9, 258.0) 24 (11, 35) 1,099 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 1.5)
Flagler County 6 250.2 (236.3, 264.8) 25 (7, 45) 304 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 1.1)
Charlotte County 6 249.4 (237.9, 261.4) 26 (10, 41) 502 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.7)
Polk County 6 248.2 (242.8, 253.8) 27 (17, 34) 1,701 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Wakulla County 6 246.3 (223.4, 271.1) 28 (5, 56) 91 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.9)
Hillsborough County 6 242.4 (238.8, 246.1) 29 (23, 37) 3,534 falling falling trend -1.1 (-3.6, -0.3)
Clay County 6 240.0 (230.8, 249.5) 30 (20, 47) 554 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Okeechobee County 6 239.9 (219.0, 262.4) 31 (8, 59) 104 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Suwannee County 6 238.5 (218.2, 260.2) 32 (9, 59) 116 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Sumter County 6 237.4 (221.3, 254.5) 33 (12, 56) 255 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
St. Johns County 6 237.0 (228.5, 245.7) 34 (23, 48) 655 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Lafayette County 6 235.0 (190.3, 287.7) 35 (2, 67) 20 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.6, 5.8)
Alachua County 6 235.0 (225.8, 244.4) 36 (24, 51) 545 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Santa Rosa County 6 234.1 (224.2, 244.3) 37 (23, 52) 458 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
Hardee County 6 232.8 (206.0, 262.3) 38 (6, 62) 57 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.7)
Seminole County 6 231.6 (225.4, 237.9) 39 (29, 50) 1,126 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 3.5)
Lee County 6 230.9 (225.7, 236.2) 40 (31, 50) 1,753 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
St. Lucie County 6 229.9 (222.2, 237.8) 41 (30, 52) 775 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Martin County 6 229.5 (218.3, 241.2) 42 (26, 56) 396 falling falling trend -4.4 (-8.2, -2.0)
Monroe County 6 229.1 (214.4, 244.7) 43 (21, 59) 213 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Manatee County 6 229.1 (222.0, 236.3) 44 (31, 52) 946 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.5)
Osceola County 6 228.8 (221.7, 236.1) 45 (31, 52) 802 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 1.0)
Leon County 6 227.7 (219.1, 236.6) 46 (29, 55) 575 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Franklin County 6 225.9 (188.3, 269.6) 47 (3, 66) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.7, 2.6)
DeSoto County 6 219.4 (197.6, 243.1) 48 (19, 63) 79 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.1)
Calhoun County 6 219.3 (187.3, 255.7) 49 (8, 66) 36 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.1, 5.1)
Collier County 6 217.8 (210.6, 225.3) 50 (41, 60) 794 stable stable trend 1.1 (0.0, 3.1)
Baker County 6 217.3 (193.7, 243.1) 51 (19, 65) 65 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Gulf County 6 216.9 (185.7, 252.6) 52 (9, 66) 39 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.5)
Orange County 6 216.5 (212.9, 220.1) 53 (46, 59) 2,880 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Palm Beach County 6 215.4 (211.9, 218.9) 54 (46, 59) 3,201 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -1.4)
Liberty County 6 215.3 (174.1, 264.4) 55 (3, 67) 19 stable stable trend 13.0 (-1.2, 26.6)
Broward County 6 213.6 (210.6, 216.5) 56 (48, 60) 4,395 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.8, -0.3)
Okaloosa County 6 212.2 (203.0, 221.7) 57 (45, 62) 447 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Miami-Dade County 6 209.9 (207.4, 212.4) 58 (52, 61) 5,868 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Madison County 6 209.2 (181.5, 240.3) 59 (16, 66) 45 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.0)
Jefferson County 6 206.1 (174.3, 242.8) 60 (14, 67) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.2)
Hamilton County 6 203.7 (171.7, 240.4) 61 (12, 67) 32 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.2, 3.8)
Washington County 6 193.9 (170.5, 219.9) 62 (38, 67) 53 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 2.9)
Hendry County 6 192.0 (172.7, 212.9) 63 (47, 67) 75 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.6)
Walton County 6 184.0 (170.3, 198.6) 64 (57, 67) 153 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.5)
Glades County 6 176.8 (145.7, 213.6) 65 (41, 67) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.5, 2.0)
Jackson County 6 173.9 (157.3, 191.9) 66 (59, 67) 87 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.3)
Holmes County 6 150.5 (126.8, 177.7) 67 (62, 67) 32 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 5.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 1:57 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top