Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Florida by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Florida 6 97.9 (97.2, 98.6) N/A 14,461 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 109.9 (109.7, 110.2) N/A 211,245 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.8, 4.6)
Union County 6 301.1 (257.9, 350.3) 1 (1, 1) 41 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.4, 4.5)
Miami-Dade County 6 116.9 (114.5, 119.4) 2 (2, 7) 1,779 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.4, -2.2)
Escambia County 6 113.9 (107.1, 121.0) 3 (2, 15) 221 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.4)
Lake County 6 111.9 (106.5, 117.6) 4 (2, 14) 339 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.0, -2.4)
Nassau County 6 110.0 (98.8, 122.2) 5 (2, 37) 76 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.7, -1.8)
St. Johns County 6 109.6 (102.7, 116.9) 6 (2, 22) 195 stable stable trend 4.2 (-4.4, 13.6)
Indian River County 6 108.5 (101.2, 116.4) 7 (2, 24) 176 rising rising trend 12.0 (5.5, 18.9)
Hillsborough County 6 107.4 (104.1, 110.9) 8 (4, 17) 823 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.7, 5.4)
Columbia County 6 107.1 (94.3, 121.4) 9 (2, 42) 52 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.0)
Osceola County 6 106.7 (99.9, 113.9) 10 (2, 29) 189 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.0)
Leon County 6 103.4 (95.8, 111.5) 11 (3, 38) 148 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.9, -2.0)
Polk County 6 103.3 (99.3, 107.6) 12 (6, 25) 498 stable stable trend 3.8 (-3.0, 11.0)
Suwannee County 6 102.5 (87.6, 119.5) 13 (2, 49) 34 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.3)
Gadsden County 6 102.2 (86.5, 120.2) 14 (2, 50) 32 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.4, -2.0)
Santa Rosa County 6 101.4 (92.8, 110.5) 15 (3, 41) 111 stable stable trend 5.7 (-4.5, 17.1)
Marion County 6 101.0 (95.9, 106.3) 16 (7, 35) 326 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.0, -3.9)
Alachua County 6 99.8 (92.3, 107.8) 17 (5, 41) 137 stable stable trend 1.7 (-4.5, 8.3)
Collier County 6 99.8 (95.1, 104.9) 18 (8, 36) 365 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.0, -2.6)
Franklin County 6 99.2 (73.6, 132.8) 19 (2, 61) 11 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.0, 6.8)
Wakulla County 6 98.4 (80.3, 119.7) 20 (2, 55) 22 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.5, 1.8)
Duval County 6 98.1 (94.1, 102.2) 21 (11, 38) 492 falling falling trend -7.6 (-9.9, -5.3)
Flagler County 6 97.9 (89.6, 107.1) 22 (6, 44) 111 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.3, -2.7)
Pinellas County 6 97.9 (94.8, 101.1) 23 (12, 36) 787 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -1.9)
Bay County 6 97.3 (89.4, 105.8) 24 (6, 44) 115 falling falling trend -9.7 (-13.0, -6.3)
Orange County 6 96.7 (93.2, 100.3) 25 (13, 38) 615 stable stable trend 0.2 (-5.3, 6.1)
Sarasota County 6 96.5 (92.4, 100.8) 26 (12, 40) 457 stable stable trend -8.0 (-16.3, 1.2)
Pasco County 6 96.4 (92.1, 100.8) 27 (13, 41) 392 stable stable trend -0.3 (-6.0, 5.7)
St. Lucie County 6 96.3 (90.9, 102.1) 28 (10, 43) 244 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.7)
Brevard County 6 95.4 (91.5, 99.5) 29 (14, 41) 465 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.8, -2.9)
Palm Beach County 6 95.1 (92.5, 97.8) 30 (18, 40) 1,047 falling falling trend -8.4 (-14.6, -1.7)
Martin County 6 95.0 (88.1, 102.6) 31 (10, 45) 148 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.3, 1.2)
Jefferson County 6 95.0 (70.9, 126.1) 32 (2, 61) 11 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.9, 0.7)
Citrus County 6 94.4 (87.3, 102.0) 33 (10, 45) 158 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.3, -3.4)
Broward County 6 93.9 (91.4, 96.4) 34 (21, 41) 1,118 stable stable trend -10.1 (-19.2, 0.0)
Hernando County 6 93.5 (86.9, 100.5) 35 (12, 46) 160 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.1, -3.2)
Manatee County 6 92.1 (87.5, 96.9) 36 (18, 45) 320 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.3, -2.0)
Seminole County 6 91.7 (86.5, 97.2) 37 (16, 46) 243 falling falling trend -5.0 (-5.7, -4.3)
Volusia County 6 90.1 (86.1, 94.3) 38 (25, 46) 405 falling falling trend -8.2 (-15.1, -0.8)
Madison County 6 90.1 (68.5, 117.1) 39 (2, 62) 12 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.2, 0.2)
Gulf County 6 89.6 (67.6, 117.7) 40 (2, 62) 12 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.3, -1.4)
Sumter County 6 88.1 (81.2, 96.0) 41 (19, 50) 192 falling falling trend -7.3 (-9.1, -5.5)
Bradford County 6 87.1 (69.0, 109.0) 42 (2, 61) 16 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.4, -0.6)
Putnam County 6 85.9 (75.5, 97.6) 43 (13, 57) 52 stable stable trend 1.6 (-4.3, 7.9)
Okaloosa County 6 85.5 (78.2, 93.3) 44 (23, 54) 106 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.0, -2.6)
Hamilton County 6 82.2 (58.0, 113.7) 45 (2, 64) 8 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.2, -0.4)
Charlotte County 6 81.1 (75.5, 87.3) 46 (38, 55) 184 falling falling trend -6.4 (-8.9, -3.9)
Lee County 6 80.8 (77.8, 84.0) 47 (41, 54) 565 falling falling trend -6.7 (-8.4, -4.9)
Levy County 6 78.6 (65.7, 94.0) 48 (15, 61) 28 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.5, -1.8)
Monroe County 6 78.5 (69.3, 88.8) 49 (30, 59) 56 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6)
Hardee County 6 78.2 (60.1, 100.2) 50 (5, 63) 13 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.0, -1.0)
Highlands County 6 75.9 (68.0, 84.6) 51 (39, 60) 82 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.5, -2.9)
Hendry County 6 74.8 (59.7, 92.7) 52 (14, 63) 17 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.5, -2.1)
Clay County 6 74.4 (67.6, 81.7) 53 (42, 60) 95 falling falling trend -8.9 (-11.8, -5.9)
Walton County 6 72.7 (62.3, 84.6) 54 (38, 62) 37 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.0)
DeSoto County 6 69.4 (56.5, 84.8) 55 (36, 64) 20 falling falling trend -8.7 (-11.3, -6.1)
Okeechobee County 6 69.4 (56.9, 84.1) 56 (37, 64) 22 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.8, -1.5)
Taylor County 6 65.5 (48.8, 86.6) 57 (29, 65) 11 falling falling trend -5.3 (-7.5, -3.0)
Lafayette County 6 64.4 (37.1, 105.2) 58 (2, 66) 3
*
*
Glades County 6 64.1 (45.5, 90.1) 59 (21, 65) 8 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.9, 1.2)
Baker County 6 60.7 (44.1, 81.6) 60 (37, 65) 10 falling falling trend -5.7 (-8.8, -2.4)
Dixie County 6 57.0 (41.0, 78.6) 61 (41, 65) 9 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.2, -0.6)
Gilchrist County 6 56.1 (39.3, 78.8) 62 (41, 65) 7 falling falling trend -6.0 (-8.9, -3.0)
Washington County 6 54.3 (40.1, 72.7) 63 (47, 65) 10 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.1, -1.3)
Calhoun County 6 54.1 (35.5, 79.9) 64 (39, 66) 5 falling falling trend -14.7 (-22.1, -6.6)
Jackson County 6 41.8 (32.5, 53.2) 65 (60, 66) 14 falling falling trend -5.3 (-7.2, -3.3)
Holmes County 6 22.4 (12.7, 37.5) 66 (64, 66) 3 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.8, -0.4)
Liberty County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/29/2023 7:20 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top