Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Florida by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Florida 6 N/A 103.1 (102.4, 103.8) N/A 15,950 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 113.2 (113.0, 113.4) N/A 224,883 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.7)
Miami-Dade County 6 Urban 112.6 (110.3, 115.0) 15 (8, 21) 1,766 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.6)
Palm Beach County 6 Urban 105.6 (102.9, 108.4) 21 (16, 32) 1,216 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Broward County 6 Urban 95.0 (92.5, 97.5) 38 (32, 44) 1,177 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.3)
Hillsborough County 6 Urban 120.0 (116.5, 123.6) 5 (2, 14) 953 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.1, 8.4)
Pinellas County 6 Urban 104.5 (101.4, 107.8) 25 (17, 34) 865 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.5, 8.0)
Orange County 6 Urban 100.5 (97.0, 104.0) 32 (22, 40) 688 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 4.6)
Polk County 6 Urban 115.2 (111.0, 119.6) 11 (4, 21) 579 rising rising trend 6.1 (0.6, 12.0)
Lee County 6 Urban 77.6 (74.6, 80.7) 53 (46, 60) 557 falling falling trend -5.5 (-11.8, -4.4)
Sarasota County 6 Urban 108.9 (104.6, 113.4) 20 (10, 30) 542 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
Duval County 6 Urban 99.6 (95.7, 103.6) 33 (22, 41) 533 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.9, 4.4)
Brevard County 6 Urban 103.1 (99.1, 107.2) 27 (17, 38) 529 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.1, 6.4)
Volusia County 6 Urban 98.9 (94.9, 103.2) 34 (22, 42) 466 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.8, 7.1)
Pasco County 6 Urban 100.9 (96.6, 105.4) 31 (20, 41) 427 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.4, -2.6)
Collier County 6 Urban 102.8 (98.1, 107.8) 28 (17, 39) 391 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.3)
Marion County 6 Urban 110.6 (105.5, 116.0) 18 (6, 29) 381 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.8, -2.9)
Lake County 6 Urban 109.6 (104.5, 115.0) 19 (8, 30) 365 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.9, -2.0)
Manatee County 6 Urban 98.8 (94.2, 103.6) 35 (22, 43) 364 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
St. Lucie County 6 Urban 105.4 (99.9, 111.3) 23 (12, 38) 285 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Seminole County 6 Urban 93.5 (88.4, 98.9) 39 (28, 47) 257 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.7, 4.5)
St. Johns County 6 Urban 122.8 (115.9, 130.1) 4 (2, 16) 246 stable stable trend 4.9 (-1.5, 13.3)
Escambia County 6 Urban 118.9 (112.1, 126.1) 7 (2, 21) 239 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 6.6)
Sumter County 6 Urban 101.3 (93.9, 109.7) 30 (12, 43) 223 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.8, 9.4)
Indian River County 6 Urban 120.0 (112.5, 128.1) 6 (2, 21) 208 stable stable trend 4.9 (-1.5, 16.4)
Osceola County 6 Urban 105.6 (99.1, 112.5) 22 (10, 38) 205 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Citrus County 6 Urban 112.6 (105.1, 120.8) 14 (3, 31) 199 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.1, 10.8)
Charlotte County 6 Urban 79.2 (73.7, 85.1) 50 (42, 60) 188 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.8, -2.1)
Martin County 6 Urban 113.6 (106.1, 121.6) 12 (3, 29) 184 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.8, 8.4)
Leon County 6 Urban 117.8 (109.9, 126.2) 8 (2, 25) 176 stable stable trend 7.3 (-2.2, 13.8)
Hernando County 6 Urban 95.5 (88.9, 102.5) 37 (22, 48) 167 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.5, -2.7)
Alachua County 6 Urban 102.7 (95.3, 110.6) 29 (11, 42) 148 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.4, 8.6)
Santa Rosa County 6 Urban 117.8 (109.0, 127.3) 9 (2, 27) 140 rising rising trend 7.0 (0.2, 14.0)
Flagler County 6 Urban 113.3 (104.7, 122.6) 13 (3, 33) 137 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.5, 10.0)
Bay County 6 Urban 89.0 (81.6, 96.9) 41 (30, 54) 113 falling falling trend -7.6 (-15.4, -4.7)
Okaloosa County 6 Urban 87.7 (80.4, 95.6) 43 (32, 57) 112 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.5, -2.0)
Clay County 6 Urban 79.1 (72.2, 86.4) 51 (40, 61) 106 falling falling trend -6.8 (-11.8, -5.0)
Highlands County 6 Urban 85.8 (77.5, 95.0) 46 (33, 58) 93 stable stable trend 3.9 (-3.0, 16.6)
Nassau County 6 Urban 112.6 (101.8, 124.5) 16 (2, 38) 84 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -0.7)
Columbia County 6 Rural 116.6 (103.3, 131.2) 10 (2, 38) 58 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.6)
Monroe County 6 Rural 74.6 (66.0, 84.3) 57 (42, 63) 58 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Putnam County 6 Rural 89.3 (78.8, 101.1) 40 (21, 58) 56 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.2, 8.2)
Union County 6 Rural 341.3 (295.9, 392.4) 1 (1, 1) 45 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.1, 6.1)
Walton County 6 Urban 76.2 (66.1, 87.7) 55 (39, 63) 44 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.4, 1.0)
Gadsden County 6 Urban 128.4 (110.5, 148.5) 2 (2, 33) 40 rising rising trend 13.0 (0.1, 21.2)
Suwannee County 6 Rural 104.6 (89.6, 121.6) 24 (2, 49) 36 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6)
Levy County 6 Urban 78.6 (66.2, 93.1) 52 (33, 63) 30 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.5, -1.4)
Wakulla County 6 Urban 123.8 (103.1, 147.8) 3 (2, 43) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.6, 3.3)
Okeechobee County 6 Rural 80.5 (66.7, 96.6) 49 (25, 63) 24 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -0.8)
DeSoto County 6 Rural 76.5 (62.4, 93.3) 54 (31, 64) 21 falling falling trend -6.1 (-16.9, -3.8)
Hendry County 6 Rural 83.1 (66.7, 102.2) 48 (16, 63) 18 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.4, 0.3)
Jackson County 6 Rural 49.9 (39.8, 62.1) 65 (59, 66) 17 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.0, -2.5)
Bradford County 6 Rural 84.4 (66.8, 105.6) 47 (11, 64) 16 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.5, 0.9)
Gulf County 6 Rural 111.6 (86.9, 142.5) 17 (2, 58) 15 stable stable trend 17.6 (-2.6, 32.5)
Hardee County 6 Rural 86.8 (67.4, 110.3) 44 (5, 63) 14 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.1, 0.6)
Madison County 6 Rural 88.0 (66.8, 114.8) 42 (3, 64) 12 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.2)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 104.3 (78.8, 136.9) 26 (2, 61) 12 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.2, 2.5)
Baker County 6 Urban 72.9 (54.5, 95.5) 58 (20, 65) 11 falling falling trend -4.3 (-8.0, -0.8)
Washington County 6 Urban 61.1 (45.7, 80.6) 62 (43, 66) 11 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.0, 0.0)
Dixie County 6 Rural 70.6 (52.6, 94.0) 61 (27, 65) 11 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.6, 0.7)
Franklin County 6 Rural 86.0 (63.0, 116.8) 45 (2, 65) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.6, 5.9)
Taylor County 6 Rural 59.7 (44.1, 79.8) 63 (42, 66) 10 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.4, -2.4)
Gilchrist County 6 Urban 71.6 (52.4, 96.5) 60 (23, 65) 10 stable stable trend 15.6 (-6.3, 42.5)
Hamilton County 6 Rural 97.1 (70.5, 131.0) 36 (2, 63) 9 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.4)
Glades County 6 Rural 75.7 (54.1, 105.7) 56 (11, 65) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.7, 3.8)
Calhoun County 6 Rural 55.5 (36.7, 81.6) 64 (42, 66) 6 falling falling trend -9.9 (-23.4, -5.4)
Holmes County 6 Rural 32.9 (21.0, 50.1) 66 (62, 66) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.9, 1.9)
Liberty County 6 Rural 72.8 (44.1, 115.3) 59 (2, 66) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.8, 4.5)
Lafayette County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2024 10:44 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Lafayette

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top