Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Florida by County

Bladder (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Florida 6 N/A 18.8 (18.6, 19.0) N/A 6,186 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.8 (18.7, 18.9) N/A 75,136 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.7)
Gadsden County 6 Urban 9.9 (6.7, 14.3) 62 (48, 62) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 2.2)
Jackson County 6 Rural 10.6 (7.3, 15.0) 61 (45, 62) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.6, 3.6)
Washington County 6 Urban 10.9 (6.6, 17.4) 60 (34, 62) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.8, 3.9)
Taylor County 6 Rural 11.3 (6.8, 18.3) 59 (21, 62) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.3, 4.6)
Gilchrist County 6 Urban 12.9 (7.4, 21.5) 58 (7, 62) 3 falling falling trend -8.0 (-51.5, -3.9)
Leon County 6 Urban 12.9 (11.1, 15.0) 57 (48, 62) 38 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.8, 5.5)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 13.9 (7.7, 24.1) 56 (3, 62) 3 stable stable trend 4.6 (-1.8, 27.3)
Hendry County 6 Rural 13.9 (9.3, 19.9) 55 (10, 62) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.6, 2.5)
Orange County 6 Urban 14.5 (13.6, 15.5) 54 (46, 59) 197 falling falling trend -4.6 (-9.4, -2.6)
Alachua County 6 Urban 15.4 (13.4, 17.6) 53 (36, 59) 46 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.6)
Miami-Dade County 6 Urban 15.5 (14.9, 16.1) 52 (44, 56) 536 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Calhoun County 6 Rural 15.7 (8.9, 26.3) 51 (2, 62) 3
*
*
Lee County 6 Urban 16.0 (15.1, 17.0) 50 (40, 55) 247 falling falling trend -8.8 (-23.3, -3.0)
Broward County 6 Urban 16.3 (15.5, 17.0) 49 (40, 54) 412 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.9, 3.7)
Osceola County 6 Urban 16.7 (14.9, 18.6) 48 (30, 56) 65 stable stable trend -1.6 (-2.9, 0.0)
Wakulla County 6 Urban 16.9 (11.5, 24.2) 47 (3, 62) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.5, 5.5)
Monroe County 6 Rural 17.0 (14.0, 20.7) 46 (11, 59) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.9)
Seminole County 6 Urban 17.2 (15.7, 18.9) 45 (29, 54) 97 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Walton County 6 Urban 17.5 (14.1, 21.6) 44 (9, 59) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 2.8)
Okeechobee County 6 Rural 17.5 (13.1, 23.3) 43 (4, 61) 10 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.0, 1.1)
Collier County 6 Urban 18.1 (16.7, 19.5) 42 (25, 50) 159 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
DeSoto County 6 Rural 18.1 (13.5, 24.1) 41 (3, 60) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.2, 5.3)
Polk County 6 Urban 18.3 (17.2, 19.5) 40 (25, 48) 192 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Volusia County 6 Urban 18.4 (17.2, 19.7) 39 (24, 48) 182 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Gulf County 6 Rural 18.7 (11.6, 29.5) 38 (2, 62) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-5.0, 6.5)
Levy County 6 Urban 18.8 (14.5, 24.2) 37 (3, 58) 14 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.3, 0.4)
Duval County 6 Urban 18.9 (17.7, 20.1) 36 (21, 46) 208 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.5, 5.2)
Baker County 6 Urban 18.9 (12.5, 27.6) 35 (2, 61) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.6, 3.5)
Palm Beach County 6 Urban 19.2 (18.5, 20.0) 34 (22, 42) 526 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Hardee County 6 Rural 19.4 (13.0, 28.0) 33 (2, 61) 6 rising rising trend 5.2 (2.3, 12.9)
Suwannee County 6 Rural 19.6 (15.1, 25.2) 32 (2, 58) 13 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.7, 18.5)
Columbia County 6 Rural 19.7 (15.9, 24.3) 31 (3, 56) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.4)
Manatee County 6 Urban 19.7 (18.3, 21.3) 30 (13, 44) 155 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Sarasota County 6 Urban 20.1 (18.9, 21.5) 29 (12, 41) 231 falling falling trend -5.5 (-10.4, -2.8)
Hillsborough County 6 Urban 20.2 (19.2, 21.2) 28 (14, 39) 325 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Clay County 6 Urban 20.3 (17.9, 23.0) 27 (5, 47) 53 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 1.0)
Bay County 6 Urban 20.4 (17.9, 23.2) 26 (4, 47) 50 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.3)
Okaloosa County 6 Urban 20.6 (18.2, 23.4) 25 (4, 46) 53 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.3)
Citrus County 6 Urban 20.7 (18.6, 23.1) 24 (5, 44) 79 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 1.0)
Indian River County 6 Urban 20.7 (18.6, 23.1) 23 (6, 43) 80 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.2)
Sumter County 6 Urban 20.7 (18.4, 23.6) 22 (4, 44) 99 falling falling trend -2.4 (-9.1, -1.1)
St. Lucie County 6 Urban 20.7 (19.0, 22.6) 21 (7, 41) 117 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.2)
Marion County 6 Urban 20.8 (19.3, 22.4) 20 (8, 39) 157 falling falling trend -6.5 (-14.9, -1.5)
Brevard County 6 Urban 21.1 (19.8, 22.4) 19 (8, 36) 225 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Putnam County 6 Rural 21.1 (17.5, 25.4) 18 (2, 51) 26 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.2)
Charlotte County 6 Urban 21.2 (19.3, 23.4) 17 (5, 40) 109 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Pinellas County 6 Urban 21.4 (20.4, 22.5) 16 (7, 32) 380 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Bradford County 6 Rural 21.5 (15.3, 29.5) 15 (1, 58) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.9, 3.1)
Lake County 6 Urban 21.5 (20.0, 23.1) 14 (6, 35) 157 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.1)
Martin County 6 Urban 21.8 (19.5, 24.4) 13 (3, 39) 80 falling falling trend -1.6 (-4.3, -0.6)
St. Johns County 6 Urban 22.1 (20.1, 24.4) 12 (3, 36) 87 falling falling trend -6.9 (-13.3, -2.9)
Hamilton County 6 Rural 22.2 (13.4, 35.1) 11 (1, 62) 4
*
*
Nassau County 6 Urban 22.5 (19.0, 26.5) 10 (2, 44) 32 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 2.4)
Highlands County 6 Urban 22.7 (19.9, 25.9) 9 (2, 40) 59 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.4, 4.1)
Dixie County 6 Rural 22.8 (15.1, 33.9) 8 (1, 59) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.2, 3.7)
Pasco County 6 Urban 23.4 (22.0, 24.9) 7 (2, 21) 210 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Escambia County 6 Urban 23.6 (21.5, 25.8) 6 (2, 28) 99 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.5, 2.8)
Hernando County 6 Urban 23.6 (21.3, 26.0) 5 (2, 29) 88 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4)
Flagler County 6 Urban 24.8 (21.9, 28.0) 4 (2, 26) 61 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.9)
Santa Rosa County 6 Urban 25.4 (22.5, 28.6) 3 (1, 22) 57 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.6)
Glades County 6 Rural 27.6 (18.6, 41.1) 2 (1, 56) 6 stable stable trend 5.3 (0.0, 20.9)
Union County 6 Rural 40.1 (28.2, 55.6) 1 (1, 15) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.6, 3.3)
Franklin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Liberty County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/11/2024 9:12 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top