Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Florida by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Florida 6 22.5 (22.3, 22.8) N/A 6,497 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.4, -1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 19.0 (18.9, 19.0) N/A 71,841 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Union County 6 53.0 (38.6, 71.3) 1 (1, 2) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.1)
Hernando County 6 29.1 (26.2, 32.2) 2 (2, 15) 91 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.5, 5.7)
Sarasota County 6 27.3 (25.5, 29.3) 3 (2, 15) 244 falling falling trend -7.0 (-10.1, -3.9)
Marion County 6 27.0 (25.0, 29.1) 4 (2, 19) 166 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.4, 3.4)
Gulf County 6 25.9 (17.1, 38.4) 5 (1, 60) 6
*
*
Citrus County 6 25.9 (22.9, 29.2) 6 (2, 36) 79 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.0, 5.5)
Lake County 6 25.7 (23.7, 27.8) 7 (2, 27) 149 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.4)
Indian River County 6 25.4 (22.4, 28.7) 8 (2, 36) 73 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.4, 3.8)
Santa Rosa County 6 25.1 (22.1, 28.5) 9 (2, 41) 53 stable stable trend -10.7 (-27.2, 9.5)
Bay County 6 24.5 (21.7, 27.7) 10 (2, 41) 57 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.1, 5.5)
Volusia County 6 24.3 (22.7, 26.0) 11 (5, 33) 205 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.4, 2.7)
Pasco County 6 24.3 (22.7, 26.0) 12 (4, 33) 187 stable stable trend -9.9 (-19.0, 0.3)
Levy County 6 24.3 (18.6, 31.5) 13 (2, 54) 15 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.3, 5.3)
Duval County 6 24.3 (22.9, 25.7) 14 (5, 32) 245 falling falling trend -8.7 (-13.7, -3.4)
Sumter County 6 24.1 (20.6, 28.3) 15 (2, 46) 84 falling falling trend -10.5 (-16.1, -4.4)
Escambia County 6 23.9 (21.7, 26.3) 16 (4, 39) 90 stable stable trend -5.8 (-13.9, 3.1)
Flagler County 6 23.9 (20.4, 27.9) 17 (2, 47) 45 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.8, 3.0)
Collier County 6 23.7 (21.9, 25.7) 18 (5, 38) 163 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.0, 4.0)
Lee County 6 23.7 (22.4, 25.1) 19 (7, 35) 297 falling falling trend -5.8 (-8.7, -2.9)
Brevard County 6 23.7 (22.2, 25.2) 20 (6, 36) 222 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.2)
Charlotte County 6 23.5 (20.9, 26.4) 21 (4, 42) 95 falling falling trend -14.6 (-26.9, -0.2)
Clay County 6 23.4 (20.7, 26.4) 22 (3, 45) 58 falling falling trend -15.8 (-27.1, -2.8)
Suwannee County 6 23.3 (17.9, 29.9) 23 (2, 54) 14 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.6, 4.9)
Pinellas County 6 22.6 (21.5, 23.8) 24 (13, 39) 349 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.1, 3.9)
Miami-Dade County 6 22.6 (21.9, 23.4) 25 (16, 36) 732 falling falling trend -9.2 (-16.5, -1.2)
Palm Beach County 6 22.6 (21.7, 23.6) 26 (15, 38) 512 falling falling trend -10.2 (-14.4, -5.7)
Calhoun County 6 22.6 (14.0, 34.9) 27 (2, 61) 4 rising rising trend 5.0 (0.2, 9.9)
Nassau County 6 22.5 (18.7, 27.0) 28 (2, 52) 27 stable stable trend 2.2 (0.0, 4.4)
Martin County 6 22.2 (19.5, 25.3) 29 (5, 48) 65 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.4, 4.5)
Hillsborough County 6 22.2 (21.1, 23.3) 30 (16, 41) 344 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.0)
Franklin County 6 22.1 (11.8, 38.0) 31 (2, 61) 3 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.9, 6.2)
Seminole County 6 22.0 (20.2, 23.8) 32 (11, 44) 119 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.7)
Manatee County 6 21.8 (20.1, 23.7) 33 (12, 45) 146 falling falling trend -6.7 (-11.0, -2.0)
St. Johns County 6 21.6 (19.3, 24.0) 34 (9, 49) 72 stable stable trend -5.1 (-18.0, 9.9)
Okaloosa County 6 21.5 (18.8, 24.4) 35 (7, 50) 50 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.0)
Broward County 6 21.4 (20.6, 22.3) 36 (24, 43) 502 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.1)
Alachua County 6 21.3 (18.8, 23.9) 37 (9, 50) 59 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.3)
Highlands County 6 20.9 (17.5, 24.8) 38 (6, 54) 41 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.8, 3.6)
Polk County 6 20.5 (19.1, 21.9) 39 (24, 48) 190 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Putnam County 6 19.6 (15.7, 24.3) 40 (7, 58) 20 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.1, 5.2)
Columbia County 6 19.6 (15.6, 24.4) 41 (6, 58) 18 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.4, 4.5)
Orange County 6 19.3 (18.2, 20.4) 42 (35, 51) 256 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Osceola County 6 19.1 (17.1, 21.2) 43 (26, 54) 70 stable stable trend -7.2 (-19.2, 6.7)
Washington County 6 19.1 (12.7, 27.7) 44 (2, 61) 6 rising rising trend 5.3 (0.5, 10.2)
Baker County 6 18.9 (12.4, 27.5) 45 (2, 61) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.9, 5.1)
Hendry County 6 18.6 (13.3, 25.4) 46 (3, 61) 8 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.7, 7.8)
St. Lucie County 6 18.3 (16.5, 20.2) 47 (35, 55) 88 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 2.9)
DeSoto County 6 18.1 (13.1, 24.6) 48 (5, 61) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.4, 4.9)
Dixie County 6 18.1 (10.9, 28.7) 49 (2, 61) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.4, 6.0)
Leon County 6 17.9 (15.6, 20.3) 50 (33, 57) 50 stable stable trend -1.1 (-20.2, 22.6)
Taylor County 6 17.5 (11.0, 26.7) 51 (2, 61) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.5, 4.4)
Wakulla County 6 16.5 (11.2, 23.6) 52 (5, 61) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.4, 2.8)
Okeechobee County 6 16.2 (11.8, 21.9) 53 (14, 61) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.9, 3.3)
Walton County 6 15.7 (12.3, 19.9) 54 (31, 61) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.4)
Bradford County 6 15.1 (10.0, 22.2) 55 (13, 61) 6 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.8, 7.8)
Monroe County 6 15.0 (11.8, 19.0) 56 (38, 61) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.8)
Holmes County 6 13.9 (8.1, 22.7) 57 (9, 61) 4 stable stable trend 4.7 (-1.7, 11.5)
Hardee County 6 13.9 (8.8, 21.1) 58 (19, 61) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.7, 2.9)
Gadsden County 6 12.9 (9.1, 17.8) 59 (42, 61) 8 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.6, 2.4)
Jackson County 6 12.8 (9.1, 17.7) 60 (42, 61) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 3.9)
Jefferson County 6 12.0 (6.8, 21.0) 61 (25, 61) 3
*
*
Gilchrist County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glades County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Liberty County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2022 4:18 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Gilchrist, Glades, Hamilton, Lafayette, Liberty, Madison

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top