Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Georgia by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Georgia 7 *** 126.6 (125.2, 128.0) N/A 6,829 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.6, 9.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 106.2 (106.0, 106.4) N/A 200,677 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.6, 6.3)
Clayton County 7 *** 167.0 (155.1, 179.5) 1 (1, 22) 179 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Terrell County 7 *** 163.9 (118.5, 222.5) 2 (1, 127) 9 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.8, -1.3)
Douglas County 7 *** 158.7 (144.4, 174.0) 3 (1, 40) 103 stable stable trend 9.2 (-1.0, 20.4)
Sumter County 7 *** 154.9 (129.3, 184.3) 4 (1, 86) 27 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.5, 0.0)
Twiggs County 7 *** 154.3 (112.6, 209.1) 5 (1, 131) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.1, 3.1)
Ben Hill County 7 *** 154.2 (119.6, 195.9) 6 (1, 121) 15 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.2, 0.1)
Henry County 7 *** 153.5 (142.6, 165.1) 7 (2, 43) 164 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.1)
Bibb County 7 *** 153.4 (141.3, 166.4) 8 (2, 46) 126 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.5)
Stewart County 7 *** 153.1 (98.1, 229.4) 9 (1, 147) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.0, 2.7)
Quitman County 7 *** 152.3 (84.7, 272.2) 10 (1, 152) 3 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.1, 6.5)
Rockdale County 7 *** 151.0 (135.3, 168.2) 11 (1, 67) 74 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Crawford County 7 *** 150.6 (115.2, 194.8) 12 (1, 125) 14 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.1, 4.5)
Stephens County 7 *** 150.5 (124.8, 180.4) 13 (1, 96) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 1.1)
Clay County 7 *** 150.1 (81.0, 261.8) 14 (1, 152) 3
*
*
Liberty County 7 *** 149.7 (126.5, 175.7) 15 (1, 90) 34 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.1)
Dougherty County 7 *** 149.2 (134.1, 165.7) 16 (1, 62) 75 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.6)
DeKalb County 7 *** 147.3 (141.3, 153.5) 17 (7, 39) 500 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.3, 6.9)
Butts County 7 *** 145.6 (118.1, 177.8) 18 (1, 105) 21 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.4)
Fulton County 7 *** 144.8 (139.6, 150.0) 19 (9, 41) 662 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.1, 6.5)
Taylor County 7 *** 144.7 (103.1, 199.8) 20 (1, 141) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.0, 2.3)
Towns County 7 *** 144.2 (115.2, 182.5) 21 (1, 117) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.7, 2.0)
Lamar County 7 *** 143.1 (114.5, 177.6) 22 (1, 114) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.2)
Cobb County 7 *** 142.2 (136.4, 148.1) 23 (10, 48) 515 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.3, 7.3)
Richmond County 7 *** 141.8 (131.4, 152.8) 24 (6, 62) 148 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
Jefferson County 7 *** 140.7 (109.1, 179.4) 25 (1, 128) 14
*
*
Upson County 7 *** 140.3 (116.2, 168.4) 26 (1, 107) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.5)
Peach County 7 *** 139.8 (114.1, 169.9) 27 (1, 113) 22 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.9, 0.1)
McDuffie County 7 *** 139.6 (112.7, 171.7) 28 (1, 116) 20 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.8)
Houston County 7 *** 139.5 (127.1, 152.8) 29 (6, 75) 101 stable stable trend 13.9 (-0.9, 30.8)
Spalding County 7 *** 137.8 (121.9, 155.4) 30 (3, 88) 57 stable stable trend 5.3 (-6.5, 18.7)
Fayette County 7 *** 137.2 (125.5, 149.9) 31 (8, 78) 107 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.6)
Pickens County 7 *** 137.1 (116.7, 160.7) 32 (2, 105) 35 rising rising trend 12.7 (2.7, 23.7)
Morgan County 7 *** 136.2 (108.1, 170.1) 33 (1, 126) 17
*
*
Wilcox County 7 *** 135.3 (97.1, 184.6) 34 (1, 143) 8 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.4, 5.4)
Greene County 7 *** 135.0 (109.8, 166.0) 35 (1, 118) 23
*
*
Calhoun County 7 *** 134.9 (84.6, 205.1) 36 (1, 150) 5 falling falling trend -5.9 (-8.8, -2.8)
Washington County 7 *** 134.1 (106.7, 167.0) 37 (1, 129) 18
*
*
Jones County 7 *** 134.0 (110.2, 161.9) 38 (1, 120) 24 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.2, 0.0)
Early County 7 *** 133.3 (95.6, 182.2) 39 (1, 145) 9 stable stable trend -4.2 (-8.6, 0.5)
Cherokee County 7 *** 132.9 (123.6, 142.8) 40 (15, 79) 169 stable stable trend 4.0 (-1.1, 9.3)
Paulding County 7 *** 132.8 (120.1, 146.3) 41 (11, 85) 93 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Lee County 7 *** 132.3 (107.9, 161.1) 42 (2, 122) 22 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.9)
Gwinnett County 7 *** 131.9 (126.4, 137.5) 43 (25, 68) 513 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Union County 7 *** 131.1 (110.8, 155.8) 44 (3, 111) 33 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.7)
Monroe County 7 *** 130.8 (107.9, 157.7) 45 (2, 124) 25 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.5, -1.5)
Muscogee County 7 *** 130.5 (120.2, 141.6) 46 (17, 86) 125 stable stable trend 1.8 (-4.8, 8.8)
Bryan County 7 *** 130.2 (105.8, 158.5) 47 (2, 127) 21 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.1, 3.7)
Newton County 7 *** 130.0 (116.0, 145.2) 48 (12, 95) 68 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.3)
Meriwether County 7 *** 129.9 (104.9, 159.9) 49 (2, 127) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.5)
Wheeler County 7 *** 128.5 (84.6, 187.5) 50 (1, 150) 6
*
*
Lumpkin County 7 *** 128.3 (106.7, 153.4) 51 (4, 121) 27 rising rising trend 13.2 (3.9, 23.2)
Chatham County 7 *** 128.3 (120.2, 136.7) 52 (26, 83) 198 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Tift County 7 *** 128.1 (107.4, 151.7) 53 (4, 119) 28 stable stable trend 11.2 (0.0, 23.6)
Forsyth County 7 *** 128.1 (117.9, 138.8) 54 (20, 88) 131 stable stable trend 5.6 (-4.2, 16.3)
Warren County 7 *** 127.5 (81.3, 195.1) 55 (1, 152) 5
*
*
Screven County 7 *** 126.0 (94.8, 165.0) 56 (1, 139) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.9)
Jasper County 7 *** 125.9 (93.5, 166.7) 57 (1, 142) 11
*
*
Irwin County 7 *** 125.5 (88.1, 174.7) 58 (1, 148) 7 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.6, 1.3)
Hall County 7 *** 124.8 (115.2, 135.0) 59 (27, 95) 130 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.8, 8.6)
Macon County 7 *** 123.3 (92.1, 162.6) 60 (1, 143) 11 stable stable trend 15.3 (-7.1, 42.9)
Oglethorpe County 7 *** 123.1 (92.8, 160.9) 61 (2, 146) 12 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.2)
Clarke County 7 *** 122.7 (108.6, 138.2) 62 (19, 109) 58 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -1.0)
Lowndes County 7 *** 122.5 (108.7, 137.5) 63 (16, 108) 61 falling falling trend -9.3 (-13.6, -4.8)
Walton County 7 *** 122.4 (108.9, 137.2) 64 (18, 110) 64 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.0)
Putnam County 7 *** 122.3 (99.9, 149.3) 65 (4, 131) 22
*
*
Fannin County 7 *** 121.9 (102.3, 145.3) 66 (7, 126) 30 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Miller County 7 *** 121.4 (79.1, 182.0) 67 (1, 151) 5 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.0, 1.4)
Harris County 7 *** 120.7 (101.2, 143.3) 68 (9, 127) 30 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.1, 0.9)
Banks County 7 *** 120.4 (93.0, 153.8) 69 (3, 141) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.2, 3.5)
Toombs County 7 *** 120.0 (96.1, 148.3) 70 (4, 137) 18 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.9, 0.8)
Bleckley County 7 *** 119.6 (86.6, 162.1) 71 (2, 147) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.2, 2.4)
Wilkinson County 7 *** 118.5 (80.7, 169.4) 72 (1, 151) 7 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.2, -0.2)
Troup County 7 *** 118.1 (102.9, 135.0) 73 (19, 120) 46 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.9, -0.6)
Baldwin County 7 *** 117.8 (100.0, 138.1) 74 (16, 130) 33 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.6, -0.7)
Brooks County 7 *** 117.5 (89.8, 152.2) 75 (3, 144) 13 stable stable trend -2.5 (-4.9, 0.0)
Effingham County 7 *** 115.9 (97.7, 136.4) 76 (17, 129) 33 stable stable trend 19.7 (-4.2, 49.7)
Wilkes County 7 *** 115.0 (82.8, 157.9) 77 (2, 148) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.5, 1.3)
Glynn County 7 *** 114.6 (102.2, 128.3) 78 (34, 118) 65 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.2)
Lincoln County 7 *** 114.3 (81.1, 160.8) 79 (1, 150) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.2, 3.6)
Schley County 7 *** 113.8 (68.4, 182.7) 80 (1, 152) 4
*
*
Camden County 7 *** 113.6 (95.9, 133.6) 81 (23, 131) 31 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.6, -3.2)
Madison County 7 *** 113.5 (92.5, 138.4) 82 (11, 138) 22 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.2)
Turner County 7 *** 113.4 (75.4, 165.5) 83 (1, 151) 6 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.1, -0.1)
Barrow County 7 *** 113.3 (97.4, 130.9) 84 (21, 129) 41 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.5)
Habersham County 7 *** 113.3 (96.1, 132.8) 85 (24, 131) 32 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.8)
Clinch County 7 *** 113.1 (68.8, 176.5) 86 (1, 152) 4 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.0, 1.6)
Pike County 7 *** 113.0 (86.6, 145.8) 87 (5, 145) 13 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.6, 1.0)
Gilmer County 7 *** 112.5 (94.4, 133.7) 88 (21, 134) 30 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.1)
Oconee County 7 *** 112.4 (93.1, 134.9) 89 (16, 138) 26 falling falling trend -7.2 (-12.3, -1.9)
Bacon County 7 *** 112.0 (75.0, 160.9) 90 (2, 152) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.8, 1.5)
Coweta County 7 *** 111.1 (100.4, 122.6) 91 (45, 121) 87 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.4)
Worth County 7 *** 111.0 (88.0, 139.1) 92 (11, 142) 17 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.7, 0.2)
Talbot County 7 *** 110.8 (72.8, 166.9) 93 (1, 152) 6 stable stable trend -3.8 (-7.6, 0.2)
Emanuel County 7 *** 110.5 (85.8, 140.4) 94 (8, 145) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.4, 1.9)
Columbia County 7 *** 109.7 (99.1, 121.2) 95 (49, 122) 85 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Pierce County 7 *** 109.4 (83.1, 141.8) 96 (9, 148) 12 falling falling trend -13.8 (-22.9, -3.5)
Mitchell County 7 *** 109.1 (85.1, 138.1) 97 (12, 146) 15 stable stable trend 10.1 (-10.8, 35.8)
Pulaski County 7 *** 108.6 (79.0, 148.5) 98 (6, 150) 9 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.1, -1.4)
Thomas County 7 *** 108.5 (91.6, 127.9) 99 (34, 137) 30 falling falling trend -6.0 (-7.5, -4.4)
Laurens County 7 *** 107.8 (90.8, 127.3) 100 (31, 138) 30 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.1)
White County 7 *** 107.7 (89.1, 129.7) 101 (23, 140) 25 rising rising trend 11.6 (0.2, 24.4)
Atkinson County 7 *** 107.4 (67.8, 162.0) 102 (1, 152) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.0, 4.6)
Ware County 7 *** 106.8 (87.4, 129.3) 103 (26, 143) 22 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.5)
Montgomery County 7 *** 106.7 (71.0, 155.5) 104 (2, 152) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.5)
Rabun County 7 *** 106.0 (84.1, 133.8) 105 (16, 144) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 2.3)
Grady County 7 *** 104.5 (82.8, 130.6) 106 (23, 146) 17 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.5, -2.5)
Dooly County 7 *** 103.6 (76.3, 138.5) 107 (10, 151) 10 falling falling trend -5.7 (-8.6, -2.6)
Crisp County 7 *** 103.2 (80.3, 131.0) 108 (21, 147) 15 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.9, 1.2)
McIntosh County 7 *** 102.6 (78.4, 134.0) 109 (18, 149) 13 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.7, -0.8)
Elbert County 7 *** 101.7 (78.6, 130.4) 110 (22, 149) 14 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.1, -0.8)
Franklin County 7 *** 98.8 (76.9, 125.5) 111 (28, 149) 15 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.0, 1.2)
Jeff Davis County 7 *** 96.8 (69.8, 131.5) 112 (19, 151) 9 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.1, -1.3)
Colquitt County 7 *** 96.8 (79.8, 116.4) 113 (53, 146) 24 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.3, -1.5)
Evans County 7 *** 96.6 (64.8, 139.2) 114 (4, 152) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.8, 1.9)
Coffee County 7 *** 96.4 (79.1, 116.5) 115 (49, 147) 23 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.6, 5.7)
Carroll County 7 *** 95.7 (84.3, 108.3) 116 (73, 141) 55 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.7, -1.7)
Decatur County 7 *** 95.5 (75.0, 120.3) 117 (35, 149) 15 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.4, -1.3)
Burke County 7 *** 95.0 (71.1, 124.5) 118 (28, 151) 12 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.2, -0.6)
Berrien County 7 *** 94.4 (71.6, 122.9) 119 (30, 151) 12 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.5, 0.1)
Murray County 7 *** 94.4 (76.8, 115.1) 120 (51, 149) 22 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.7, 0.0)
Dawson County 7 *** 93.3 (73.8, 117.2) 121 (47, 149) 17 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.4, -1.7)
Seminole County 7 *** 93.3 (62.6, 136.8) 122 (14, 152) 6 falling falling trend -4.7 (-8.1, -1.1)
Jenkins County 7 *** 93.2 (57.6, 142.7) 123 (4, 152) 5 falling falling trend -5.6 (-8.6, -2.4)
Hancock County 7 *** 92.9 (63.3, 134.7) 124 (14, 152) 7
*
*
Jackson County 7 *** 91.8 (78.4, 107.1) 125 (74, 147) 35 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.9, -1.5)
Bartow County 7 *** 91.6 (80.4, 104.0) 126 (80, 144) 53 falling falling trend -5.1 (-6.5, -3.8)
Lanier County 7 *** 91.5 (57.3, 138.6) 127 (6, 152) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.9, 4.0)
Bulloch County 7 *** 91.1 (76.6, 107.6) 128 (71, 148) 30 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.2, -2.1)
Wayne County 7 *** 91.0 (71.8, 113.9) 129 (53, 150) 16 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.8, -1.7)
Hart County 7 *** 90.9 (72.6, 113.1) 130 (59, 150) 18 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.6, -2.3)
Polk County 7 *** 90.7 (74.4, 109.7) 131 (63, 149) 23 stable stable trend 4.6 (-7.8, 18.6)
Charlton County 7 *** 90.3 (62.7, 126.7) 132 (19, 152) 7 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.5, -1.3)
Floyd County 7 *** 87.9 (77.3, 99.6) 133 (94, 146) 52 falling falling trend -9.0 (-12.6, -5.3)
Tattnall County 7 *** 86.6 (66.2, 111.6) 134 (58, 152) 13 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.7, -1.7)
Cook County 7 *** 86.3 (62.0, 117.5) 135 (37, 152) 9 stable stable trend -3.5 (-7.0, 0.0)
Randolph County 7 *** 85.8 (53.8, 134.0) 136 (14, 152) 5 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.4, 0.0)
Haralson County 7 *** 84.0 (65.4, 106.6) 137 (65, 152) 15 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.1, -1.7)
Whitfield County 7 *** 81.2 (70.6, 93.0) 138 (104, 150) 44 falling falling trend -5.3 (-6.8, -3.7)
Chattooga County 7 *** 79.5 (60.8, 102.4) 139 (74, 152) 13 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.2, -2.1)
Dodge County 7 *** 79.0 (59.0, 104.0) 140 (72, 152) 11 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.5, -1.2)
Johnson County 7 *** 78.7 (52.4, 115.5) 141 (45, 152) 6 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.4, -0.7)
Catoosa County 7 *** 77.9 (66.2, 91.3) 142 (107, 151) 32 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.4, -0.8)
Candler County 7 *** 75.8 (48.6, 113.9) 143 (43, 152) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.9, 2.6)
Appling County 7 *** 75.6 (54.4, 102.8) 144 (75, 152) 9 falling falling trend -5.7 (-9.7, -1.5)
Heard County 7 *** 74.5 (49.6, 109.0) 145 (58, 152) 6 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.4, -0.3)
Gordon County 7 *** 72.1 (59.4, 86.8) 146 (111, 152) 24 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.3, -1.3)
Marion County 7 *** 71.4 (45.1, 110.8) 147 (44, 152) 5
*
*
Telfair County 7 *** 67.7 (47.1, 95.0) 148 (88, 152) 7 falling falling trend -6.1 (-8.8, -3.2)
Brantley County 7 *** 65.2 (45.5, 91.1) 149 (95, 152) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.7, 2.7)
Walker County 7 *** 63.0 (52.9, 74.7) 150 (133, 152) 29 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.6, -0.7)
Dade County 7 *** 60.1 (41.5, 85.5) 151 (113, 152) 7 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.7, 0.7)
Long County 7 *** 58.6 (36.0, 89.9) 152 (101, 152) 5 falling falling trend -5.6 (-9.9, -1.0)
Baker County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chattahoochee County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Echols County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glascock County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taliaferro County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treutlen County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2021 5:55 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2020 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top