Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Georgia by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Georgia 7 *** 236.3 (235.0, 237.7) N/A 24,516 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.2, 0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 227.6 (227.4, 227.9) N/A 750,329 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Turner County 7 *** 323.3 (268.1, 387.1) 1 (1, 104) 26 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.5)
Lee County 7 *** 307.5 (279.6, 337.4) 2 (1, 43) 93 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.9, 3.0)
Towns County 7 *** 299.9 (249.1, 358.8) 3 (1, 131) 32 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.5, 3.9)
Pickens County 7 *** 297.5 (270.3, 326.9) 4 (1, 63) 101 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.3, 3.6)
Chattooga County 7 *** 297.0 (267.4, 329.1) 5 (1, 75) 79 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.9, 3.8)
Terrell County 7 *** 296.2 (246.7, 353.4) 6 (1, 142) 29 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 2.8)
Bryan County 7 *** 295.3 (269.6, 322.7) 7 (1, 60) 99 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.1, 7.4)
Warren County 7 *** 293.8 (230.9, 370.0) 8 (1, 151) 18
*
*
Lumpkin County 7 *** 288.4 (260.7, 318.3) 9 (1, 83) 90 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
McDuffie County 7 *** 284.7 (252.3, 320.2) 10 (1, 108) 63 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.1)
Haralson County 7 *** 284.0 (256.8, 313.4) 11 (1, 96) 85 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.2, 2.2)
Elbert County 7 *** 283.8 (250.2, 321.0) 12 (1, 124) 58 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.1, 3.5)
Barrow County 7 *** 283.7 (266.7, 301.5) 13 (2, 55) 213 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.9)
Chattahoochee County 7 *** 282.6 (214.7, 363.1) 14 (1, 155) 14 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.2, 7.0)
Irwin County 7 *** 278.9 (232.2, 332.7) 15 (1, 143) 26 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Madison County 7 *** 276.9 (250.6, 305.5) 16 (1, 100) 89 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Oglethorpe County 7 *** 276.9 (239.7, 318.7) 17 (1, 132) 44 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.0)
Twiggs County 7 *** 276.0 (228.2, 332.1) 18 (1, 147) 28 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.5)
Crawford County 7 *** 275.2 (236.1, 319.6) 19 (1, 143) 41 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.6)
Spalding County 7 *** 272.1 (253.8, 291.3) 20 (4, 84) 178 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 1.5)
White County 7 *** 271.3 (244.5, 300.4) 21 (2, 116) 85 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.4)
Worth County 7 *** 271.1 (239.8, 305.6) 22 (1, 129) 61 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.1, 2.8)
Heard County 7 *** 271.0 (229.8, 317.8) 23 (1, 142) 34 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.4)
Clinch County 7 *** 270.5 (215.5, 335.6) 24 (1, 155) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.2)
Tift County 7 *** 270.4 (247.3, 295.2) 25 (2, 106) 107 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.1, 2.1)
Gilmer County 7 *** 270.4 (243.8, 299.3) 26 (2, 119) 90 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.5)
Greene County 7 *** 268.5 (233.3, 308.1) 27 (1, 135) 52
*
*
Ben Hill County 7 *** 267.9 (233.2, 306.4) 28 (1, 137) 47 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.2)
Randolph County 7 *** 267.0 (210.6, 334.4) 29 (1, 156) 19 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 3.6)
Butts County 7 *** 266.0 (237.5, 297.2) 30 (2, 130) 67 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Union County 7 *** 265.9 (234.4, 301.0) 31 (2, 134) 67 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.3)
Morgan County 7 *** 265.5 (233.0, 301.6) 32 (1, 136) 53
*
*
Richmond County 7 *** 264.6 (254.2, 275.4) 33 (14, 70) 530 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.5)
Jones County 7 *** 263.9 (237.6, 292.4) 34 (3, 123) 80 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.1, 2.9)
Habersham County 7 *** 263.0 (241.4, 286.1) 35 (7, 112) 117 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.8)
Berrien County 7 *** 262.2 (230.3, 297.4) 36 (2, 140) 53 stable stable trend 1.4 (0.0, 2.8)
Jackson County 7 *** 262.2 (244.7, 280.6) 37 (8, 98) 173 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.4)
Newton County 7 *** 261.1 (247.2, 275.5) 38 (13, 92) 274 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.4)
Burke County 7 *** 261.0 (231.5, 293.4) 39 (3, 134) 63 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.2)
Stephens County 7 *** 260.1 (232.0, 290.9) 40 (4, 135) 70 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Thomas County 7 *** 259.4 (238.4, 281.8) 41 (9, 118) 123 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.6)
Upson County 7 *** 259.3 (232.4, 288.8) 42 (3, 133) 75 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Sumter County 7 *** 258.5 (232.4, 286.8) 43 (5, 130) 78 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8)
Cook County 7 *** 258.3 (224.8, 295.7) 44 (3, 145) 45 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.3)
Polk County 7 *** 258.3 (236.4, 281.7) 45 (7, 122) 109 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Miller County 7 *** 258.1 (200.5, 327.9) 46 (1, 157) 15 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 3.6)
Walton County 7 *** 257.8 (243.0, 273.3) 47 (14, 101) 237 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Wayne County 7 *** 257.3 (231.8, 284.9) 48 (4, 132) 78 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.6)
Brantley County 7 *** 257.1 (225.1, 292.5) 49 (3, 141) 51 rising rising trend 3.6 (2.1, 5.3)
Lamar County 7 *** 256.2 (223.3, 292.8) 50 (2, 146) 48 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.7)
Lincoln County 7 *** 256.2 (207.2, 314.4) 51 (1, 154) 24 rising rising trend 6.2 (1.6, 11.1)
Franklin County 7 *** 256.1 (226.4, 288.8) 52 (3, 139) 60 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.5, 2.8)
Bibb County 7 *** 254.6 (242.9, 266.6) 53 (20, 97) 390 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.5)
Monroe County 7 *** 253.7 (227.7, 282.1) 54 (7, 138) 79 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.7)
Early County 7 *** 252.3 (210.1, 301.0) 55 (1, 151) 27 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.3)
Emanuel County 7 *** 252.0 (222.8, 284.1) 56 (6, 141) 58 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Stewart County 7 *** 250.2 (194.2, 318.9) 57 (1, 157) 14 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.4, 4.4)
Muscogee County 7 *** 250.0 (239.8, 260.6) 58 (30, 101) 473 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Dougherty County 7 *** 248.1 (233.2, 263.7) 59 (24, 124) 226 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Carroll County 7 *** 248.1 (234.9, 261.8) 60 (26, 115) 277 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.3)
Henry County 7 *** 247.1 (237.9, 256.6) 61 (34, 104) 558 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Hall County 7 *** 246.8 (236.7, 257.2) 62 (34, 108) 466 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Camden County 7 *** 246.4 (226.5, 267.6) 63 (16, 134) 120 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.0)
Bleckley County 7 *** 245.8 (206.6, 290.5) 64 (2, 153) 30 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.2, 2.9)
Cherokee County 7 *** 245.5 (236.8, 254.5) 65 (36, 106) 621 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Mitchell County 7 *** 245.2 (217.4, 275.9) 66 (10, 145) 60 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Jefferson County 7 *** 244.8 (211.2, 282.5) 67 (4, 151) 42
*
*
Hart County 7 *** 244.5 (217.7, 274.0) 68 (10, 145) 68 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.5)
Jasper County 7 *** 244.5 (208.7, 285.0) 69 (3, 151) 37
*
*
Rabun County 7 *** 244.4 (209.8, 283.5) 70 (4, 151) 43 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.6)
Putnam County 7 *** 244.3 (215.4, 276.5) 71 (8, 146) 62
*
*
Peach County 7 *** 244.0 (217.7, 272.7) 72 (9, 145) 69 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Effingham County 7 *** 243.9 (226.3, 262.6) 73 (22, 135) 146 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.1)
Brooks County 7 *** 243.2 (209.0, 281.8) 74 (5, 152) 41 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.8)
Decatur County 7 *** 242.9 (216.8, 271.4) 75 (10, 144) 68 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.1)
Banks County 7 *** 242.8 (211.8, 277.4) 76 (4, 150) 47 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.0)
Washington County 7 *** 242.4 (214.0, 273.7) 77 (8, 147) 57
*
*
Ware County 7 *** 242.2 (219.4, 266.9) 78 (17, 141) 89 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.1)
Pike County 7 *** 241.9 (210.9, 276.4) 79 (7, 150) 47 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.1, 2.9)
Glascock County 7 *** 241.6 (169.2, 336.9) 80 (1, 159) 8
*
*
Lanier County 7 *** 241.5 (200.3, 289.1) 81 (2, 155) 25 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Fannin County 7 *** 240.5 (213.1, 270.9) 82 (8, 146) 72 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.5)
Coweta County 7 *** 240.4 (229.2, 252.1) 83 (42, 124) 356 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Grady County 7 *** 240.3 (212.9, 270.3) 84 (11, 148) 61 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.6)
Laurens County 7 *** 239.8 (219.9, 261.0) 85 (18, 141) 116 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Floyd County 7 *** 239.5 (225.5, 254.1) 86 (35, 131) 236 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Murray County 7 *** 239.4 (218.2, 262.1) 87 (18, 143) 98 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.1)
Wilkinson County 7 *** 239.0 (196.1, 289.2) 88 (2, 156) 25 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.1)
Dawson County 7 *** 238.8 (211.5, 268.9) 89 (14, 147) 62 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.4)
Wilkes County 7 *** 238.5 (196.2, 288.0) 90 (2, 155) 26 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.4)
Gordon County 7 *** 238.5 (220.7, 257.4) 91 (28, 138) 139 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
Screven County 7 *** 237.9 (203.5, 277.0) 92 (6, 154) 39 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.5)
Wilcox County 7 *** 237.6 (194.9, 287.6) 93 (3, 156) 23 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.1)
Clayton County 7 *** 237.5 (229.2, 246.1) 94 (52, 125) 630 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.2, 0.4)
Houston County 7 *** 237.5 (226.4, 249.0) 95 (47, 128) 357 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Taliaferro County 7 *** 236.9 (153.4, 363.3) 96 (1, 159) 6
*
*
Toombs County 7 *** 236.5 (210.3, 265.1) 97 (17, 147) 63 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Appling County 7 *** 236.1 (205.3, 270.5) 98 (9, 152) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.1)
Oconee County 7 *** 236.0 (214.0, 259.9) 99 (22, 144) 90 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Forsyth County 7 *** 235.8 (226.7, 245.3) 100 (58, 124) 512 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Paulding County 7 *** 235.8 (225.1, 247.0) 101 (51, 127) 367 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Meriwether County 7 *** 234.4 (206.4, 265.5) 102 (13, 151) 57 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.6)
Bacon County 7 *** 233.4 (194.4, 278.4) 103 (5, 155) 27 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.6)
Glynn County 7 *** 233.1 (218.4, 248.5) 104 (42, 139) 209 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Troup County 7 *** 233.1 (217.0, 250.1) 105 (38, 140) 166 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Fayette County 7 *** 231.4 (218.7, 244.6) 106 (54, 140) 291 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Talbot County 7 *** 231.2 (182.0, 291.7) 107 (2, 157) 19 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.1)
Coffee County 7 *** 231.0 (210.6, 252.8) 108 (30, 147) 98 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Bartow County 7 *** 231.0 (218.1, 244.4) 109 (51, 138) 252 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Lowndes County 7 *** 231.0 (217.3, 245.2) 110 (50, 138) 225 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Macon County 7 *** 230.6 (196.2, 269.8) 111 (9, 155) 35 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
DeKalb County 7 *** 229.7 (224.8, 234.7) 112 (84, 127) 1,705 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.5, 3.4)
Fulton County 7 *** 229.3 (225.1, 233.6) 113 (86, 126) 2,305 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Charlton County 7 *** 229.0 (193.3, 269.9) 114 (7, 156) 30 rising rising trend 6.3 (1.6, 11.3)
Chatham County 7 *** 228.6 (220.4, 236.9) 115 (75, 133) 637 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Quitman County 7 *** 228.3 (147.0, 344.9) 116 (1, 159) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.3, 3.8)
Harris County 7 *** 228.1 (205.8, 252.3) 117 (32, 150) 88 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.2)
Rockdale County 7 *** 227.8 (214.1, 242.1) 118 (54, 141) 222 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Douglas County 7 *** 227.6 (216.6, 239.0) 119 (67, 137) 330 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
Colquitt County 7 *** 227.2 (207.5, 248.4) 120 (39, 148) 102 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Liberty County 7 *** 226.3 (207.5, 246.4) 121 (38, 148) 112 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Baldwin County 7 *** 225.4 (205.1, 247.4) 122 (35, 150) 99 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Cobb County 7 *** 224.7 (219.9, 229.6) 123 (94, 132) 1,714 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.6, -0.1)
Calhoun County 7 *** 223.8 (176.8, 281.0) 124 (2, 158) 16 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.6, 0.1)
Clarke County 7 *** 219.9 (206.4, 234.2) 125 (73, 147) 209 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Taylor County 7 *** 219.8 (177.5, 270.1) 126 (4, 158) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Gwinnett County 7 *** 218.6 (214.2, 223.0) 127 (110, 140) 1,964 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Schley County 7 *** 216.8 (162.9, 283.9) 128 (2, 159) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.3)
Candler County 7 *** 216.7 (178.7, 260.8) 129 (13, 157) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.2)
Atkinson County 7 *** 216.4 (172.2, 268.6) 130 (8, 158) 17 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.7)
Treutlen County 7 *** 215.9 (168.5, 273.2) 131 (4, 158) 15 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.8, 4.0)
Walker County 7 *** 215.5 (200.1, 231.8) 132 (66, 150) 158 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Hancock County 7 *** 214.9 (174.1, 263.8) 133 (6, 158) 22
*
*
Jenkins County 7 *** 214.4 (172.8, 263.4) 134 (10, 158) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.2)
Pulaski County 7 *** 213.4 (176.0, 257.0) 135 (16, 158) 25 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)
McIntosh County 7 *** 213.2 (179.5, 252.2) 136 (21, 158) 36 stable stable trend -7.9 (-22.4, 9.3)
Bulloch County 7 *** 212.7 (196.3, 230.1) 137 (79, 151) 132 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Crisp County 7 *** 212.5 (185.7, 242.2) 138 (44, 156) 51 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Columbia County 7 *** 209.8 (199.3, 220.7) 139 (104, 150) 312 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Pierce County 7 *** 208.1 (179.6, 240.0) 140 (48, 157) 40 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Whitfield County 7 *** 206.0 (193.4, 219.2) 141 (107, 152) 207 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.0)
Tattnall County 7 *** 205.9 (181.5, 232.7) 142 (60, 157) 54 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Baker County 7 *** 204.9 (144.6, 286.3) 143 (2, 159) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.6, 4.1)
Seminole County 7 *** 204.8 (162.7, 255.3) 144 (13, 159) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.6)
Johnson County 7 *** 204.2 (166.7, 248.5) 145 (23, 158) 22 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.0, 4.2)
Clay County 7 *** 203.4 (134.5, 298.4) 146 (1, 159) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.7, 5.2)
Dodge County 7 *** 199.4 (173.8, 228.1) 147 (66, 158) 46 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Montgomery County 7 *** 197.2 (157.3, 244.7) 148 (22, 158) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.8)
Dooly County 7 *** 196.5 (165.0, 232.9) 149 (48, 158) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Catoosa County 7 *** 196.1 (181.3, 212.0) 150 (120, 156) 136 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.3)
Echols County 7 *** 193.6 (136.4, 267.4) 151 (5, 159) 8 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.8, 2.0)
Evans County 7 *** 191.5 (154.9, 234.3) 152 (39, 159) 20 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.5)
Jeff Davis County 7 *** 187.3 (156.5, 222.5) 153 (81, 159) 28 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
Marion County 7 *** 186.2 (148.7, 231.4) 154 (30, 159) 19 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.5)
Long County 7 *** 177.4 (149.7, 208.7) 155 (103, 159) 30 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.4)
Dade County 7 *** 175.0 (147.3, 206.8) 156 (112, 159) 32 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.2)
Webster County 7 *** 163.2 (107.1, 245.6) 157 (13, 159) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.4, 7.3)
Telfair County 7 *** 157.6 (132.0, 187.1) 158 (138, 159) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Wheeler County 7 *** 115.6 (84.6, 155.3) 159 (153, 159) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.4, 4.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2021 1:15 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2020 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top