Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Georgia by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Georgia 7 N/A 56.8 (56.2, 57.4) N/A 6,873 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.3, -2.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 53.1 (53.0, 53.2) N/A 216,523 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.9)
Fulton County 7 Urban 47.0 (45.1, 49.0) 148 (132, 151) 482 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Cobb County 7 Urban 45.8 (43.6, 48.1) 149 (134, 152) 354 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.7)
Gwinnett County 7 Urban 42.1 (40.0, 44.2) 152 (142, 155) 343 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
DeKalb County 7 Urban 41.0 (38.9, 43.1) 154 (145, 156) 319 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Chatham County 7 Urban 53.0 (49.6, 56.6) 135 (105, 144) 189 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6)
Cherokee County 7 Urban 53.8 (50.0, 57.7) 134 (99, 144) 161 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.5)
Richmond County 7 Urban 66.4 (61.6, 71.3) 75 (40, 111) 156 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Muscogee County 7 Urban 62.8 (58.2, 67.6) 93 (54, 124) 143 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Hall County 7 Urban 56.0 (51.8, 60.4) 126 (86, 141) 135 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.4)
Clayton County 7 Urban 54.6 (50.2, 59.3) 132 (90, 145) 132 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Bibb County 7 Urban 64.3 (59.3, 69.7) 87 (45, 120) 125 falling falling trend -1.9 (-6.8, -1.0)
Henry County 7 Urban 50.8 (46.6, 55.2) 142 (108, 149) 120 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.3)
Forsyth County 7 Urban 47.9 (44.0, 52.1) 145 (121, 152) 115 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.6)
Paulding County 7 Urban 71.5 (65.4, 78.0) 51 (19, 102) 110 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.3)
Bartow County 7 Urban 76.9 (70.0, 84.2) 30 (9, 84) 98 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
Carroll County 7 Urban 73.6 (67.0, 80.6) 45 (13, 93) 96 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Floyd County 7 Urban 75.5 (68.8, 82.8) 37 (11, 86) 96 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Houston County 7 Urban 52.7 (47.8, 57.8) 137 (97, 149) 92 falling falling trend -10.7 (-18.9, -2.9)
Coweta County 7 Urban 54.7 (49.6, 60.1) 131 (87, 144) 91 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.8)
Columbia County 7 Urban 47.9 (43.3, 52.9) 146 (115, 153) 81 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.6, -1.9)
Douglas County 7 Urban 58.2 (52.4, 64.4) 119 (63, 143) 81 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.3)
Walker County 7 Urban 83.0 (75.0, 91.8) 15 (3, 60) 81 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.1)
Glynn County 7 Urban 60.1 (54.2, 66.6) 111 (54, 139) 80 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Whitfield County 7 Urban 65.0 (58.5, 71.9) 83 (35, 128) 77 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.7)
Walton County 7 Urban 62.0 (55.8, 68.7) 98 (43, 134) 75 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Dougherty County 7 Urban 65.3 (58.6, 72.7) 82 (32, 125) 71 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.3)
Newton County 7 Urban 60.1 (53.8, 66.9) 112 (54, 139) 70 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.8)
Barrow County 7 Urban 80.7 (72.0, 90.1) 21 (3, 78) 67 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 1.1)
Lowndes County 7 Urban 57.4 (51.3, 64.1) 123 (64, 144) 66 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.5)
Catoosa County 7 Urban 63.9 (56.8, 71.8) 89 (35, 135) 60 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.1)
Gordon County 7 Rural 86.4 (76.8, 96.9) 10 (1, 56) 60 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Jackson County 7 Rural 71.5 (63.5, 80.3) 50 (12, 111) 60 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.2)
Fayette County 7 Urban 36.2 (32.1, 40.7) 156 (147, 156) 60 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.4, -3.0)
Clarke County 7 Urban 51.6 (45.8, 58.0) 140 (93, 151) 58 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Spalding County 7 Urban 63.0 (55.7, 71.1) 91 (39, 137) 57 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Troup County 7 Rural 63.1 (55.7, 71.4) 90 (33, 136) 54 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Effingham County 7 Urban 77.3 (67.8, 87.9) 29 (4, 100) 51 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.2)
Laurens County 7 Rural 72.3 (63.3, 82.4) 48 (8, 117) 47 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Bulloch County 7 Rural 61.3 (53.6, 69.9) 103 (35, 140) 47 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.5)
Rockdale County 7 Urban 41.3 (36.0, 47.2) 153 (132, 156) 47 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.4, -2.0)
Polk County 7 Rural 86.4 (75.4, 98.6) 9 (1, 68) 46 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Camden County 7 Rural 76.7 (66.7, 87.7) 31 (3, 107) 46 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.0, 0.2)
Habersham County 7 Rural 67.0 (58.3, 76.8) 74 (15, 131) 43 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 2.0)
Thomas County 7 Rural 67.1 (58.2, 77.1) 73 (20, 134) 43 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.0)
Murray County 7 Urban 87.3 (75.7, 100.3) 7 (1, 68) 42 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Pickens County 7 Urban 75.5 (65.3, 87.1) 38 (4, 107) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.9)
Colquitt County 7 Rural 71.5 (61.8, 82.4) 52 (8, 120) 40 falling falling trend -8.3 (-17.7, -1.3)
Baldwin County 7 Rural 68.9 (59.2, 79.7) 62 (12, 129) 38 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Liberty County 7 Urban 70.7 (60.5, 82.2) 55 (6, 124) 37 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Ware County 7 Rural 78.9 (67.7, 91.4) 26 (3, 104) 37 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Gilmer County 7 Rural 62.8 (53.7, 73.3) 94 (29, 142) 37 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.8)
Coffee County 7 Rural 68.4 (58.3, 79.9) 66 (13, 136) 34 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Tift County 7 Rural 66.0 (56.2, 77.1) 78 (17, 138) 33 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.3)
Madison County 7 Urban 80.0 (68.0, 93.7) 25 (2, 108) 33 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Fannin County 7 Rural 62.8 (52.8, 74.8) 92 (20, 144) 33 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.5)
Lumpkin County 7 Urban 74.7 (63.3, 87.8) 40 (4, 121) 32 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.4)
White County 7 Rural 67.2 (57.0, 79.1) 72 (12, 134) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 1.1)
Wayne County 7 Rural 81.0 (68.7, 95.1) 20 (1, 101) 31 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.8)
Haralson County 7 Urban 80.3 (68.0, 94.3) 24 (1, 107) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Chattooga County 7 Rural 89.3 (75.5, 105.2) 5 (1, 73) 31 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.8)
Union County 7 Rural 52.0 (43.7, 62.4) 138 (72, 154) 30 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.3)
Upson County 7 Rural 71.8 (60.5, 84.9) 49 (6, 129) 29 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Jones County 7 Urban 69.0 (57.9, 81.9) 61 (9, 138) 28 falling falling trend -3.1 (-13.9, -0.3)
Monroe County 7 Urban 67.7 (56.7, 80.4) 69 (9, 140) 28 falling falling trend -10.9 (-26.2, -0.3)
Franklin County 7 Rural 82.5 (69.2, 97.9) 18 (1, 103) 28 stable stable trend -11.2 (-20.0, 0.0)
Hart County 7 Rural 62.4 (52.1, 74.4) 97 (24, 148) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.9)
Stephens County 7 Rural 66.2 (55.2, 79.1) 77 (11, 144) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Decatur County 7 Rural 68.6 (57.1, 81.8) 64 (8, 139) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.8)
Bryan County 7 Urban 67.6 (56.1, 80.8) 70 (8, 139) 26 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 1.0)
Elbert County 7 Rural 84.7 (70.1, 101.8) 13 (1, 100) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.8)
Peach County 7 Urban 68.3 (56.6, 81.9) 67 (8, 141) 25 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.6)
Pierce County 7 Rural 95.9 (79.4, 115.1) 1 (1, 72) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.4)
Putnam County 7 Rural 60.3 (49.7, 73.1) 109 (24, 151) 24
*
*
Worth County 7 Urban 75.8 (62.6, 91.4) 36 (2, 127) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 2.6)
Sumter County 7 Rural 61.3 (50.6, 73.8) 102 (22, 149) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.3)
Harris County 7 Urban 47.6 (39.2, 57.5) 147 (78, 156) 24 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
Dawson County 7 Urban 58.5 (48.0, 71.0) 117 (31, 152) 23 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.9, 0.3)
Lee County 7 Urban 69.5 (57.0, 84.0) 59 (6, 142) 23 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.8)
Emanuel County 7 Rural 76.4 (62.6, 92.6) 32 (2, 125) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.1)
Toombs County 7 Rural 61.9 (50.8, 74.8) 101 (22, 150) 22 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.4)
Brantley County 7 Urban 85.9 (70.1, 104.5) 11 (1, 111) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.8)
Burke County 7 Urban 66.0 (53.4, 80.7) 79 (11, 147) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 1.0)
Banks County 7 Rural 82.6 (66.9, 101.3) 17 (1, 122) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 3.3)
Dodge County 7 Rural 71.0 (57.6, 87.0) 54 (4, 141) 20 stable stable trend -2.0 (-14.5, 0.5)
Meriwether County 7 Urban 61.9 (50.0, 76.2) 100 (18, 151) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.4)
Crisp County 7 Rural 64.8 (52.3, 79.6) 85 (11, 148) 20 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.2)
Tattnall County 7 Rural 68.6 (55.5, 84.0) 65 (5, 142) 20 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.5, -0.1)
Greene County 7 Rural 51.5 (40.9, 64.8) 141 (51, 156) 19
*
*
Rabun County 7 Rural 60.0 (48.1, 74.9) 113 (21, 153) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 1.1)
Mitchell County 7 Rural 64.0 (51.7, 78.6) 88 (11, 149) 19 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Butts County 7 Urban 57.6 (46.4, 71.0) 121 (31, 153) 19 falling falling trend -8.3 (-30.9, -2.7)
Grady County 7 Rural 51.7 (41.5, 63.7) 139 (59, 156) 19 falling falling trend -9.5 (-26.6, -2.9)
Morgan County 7 Urban 60.4 (48.6, 74.5) 108 (20, 152) 19
*
*
McDuffie County 7 Urban 62.6 (50.1, 77.5) 96 (11, 151) 18 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.3)
Oconee County 7 Urban 36.8 (29.6, 45.5) 155 (134, 156) 18 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -0.9)
Jefferson County 7 Rural 80.3 (64.3, 99.6) 23 (1, 127) 18
*
*
Berrien County 7 Rural 67.7 (54.1, 84.2) 68 (5, 148) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.4)
McIntosh County 7 Urban 74.6 (59.3, 94.2) 41 (2, 136) 17 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.2, 15.9)
Brooks County 7 Urban 64.8 (51.1, 81.6) 84 (7, 149) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 1.0)
Washington County 7 Rural 58.4 (46.3, 73.1) 118 (21, 154) 16
*
*
Lamar County 7 Rural 65.7 (51.8, 82.5) 80 (7, 149) 16 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.8)
Cook County 7 Rural 73.4 (58.0, 91.9) 46 (2, 145) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-10.8, 0.8)
Dade County 7 Urban 65.6 (51.6, 82.9) 81 (5, 151) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 2.1)
Crawford County 7 Urban 82.9 (65.1, 104.9) 16 (1, 136) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.3)
Pike County 7 Urban 64.7 (51.0, 81.3) 86 (8, 150) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.2, 3.3)
Towns County 7 Rural 59.0 (44.3, 78.4) 115 (13, 155) 16 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.0, 0.2)
Ben Hill County 7 Rural 62.6 (48.9, 79.4) 95 (9, 153) 15 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.2, -0.8)
Appling County 7 Rural 57.0 (44.3, 72.6) 124 (24, 155) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 2.1)
Heard County 7 Urban 88.3 (68.3, 112.9) 6 (1, 121) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.7)
Jasper County 7 Urban 69.6 (53.8, 89.1) 58 (2, 149) 14
*
*
Oglethorpe County 7 Urban 60.9 (47.0, 78.2) 106 (11, 154) 13 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.3)
Macon County 7 Rural 76.2 (58.1, 98.7) 33 (1, 148) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.9)
Screven County 7 Rural 59.3 (45.4, 76.8) 114 (11, 155) 13 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.3)
Jeff Davis County 7 Rural 60.9 (46.3, 79.1) 105 (11, 155) 12 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.0)
Terrell County 7 Urban 87.2 (65.7, 114.4) 8 (1, 129) 12 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.9, 0.5)
Charlton County 7 Rural 72.6 (54.6, 94.9) 47 (1, 149) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.6, 3.7)
Hancock County 7 Rural 74.1 (55.4, 98.8) 42 (1, 151) 11
*
*
Twiggs County 7 Urban 71.1 (52.7, 95.6) 53 (1, 150) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 0.8)
Evans County 7 Rural 77.4 (57.7, 102.1) 28 (1, 146) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.7)
Marion County 7 Urban 83.9 (62.4, 112.0) 14 (1, 141) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 5.2)
Bleckley County 7 Rural 61.1 (45.5, 81.0) 104 (7, 155) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.0)
Johnson County 7 Rural 73.8 (54.8, 98.3) 43 (1, 151) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 2.9)
Lanier County 7 Urban 81.9 (60.6, 108.7) 19 (1, 147) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.4)
Wilkinson County 7 Rural 74.8 (55.1, 100.3) 39 (1, 151) 10 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.7)
Dooly County 7 Rural 52.9 (39.0, 71.3) 136 (18, 156) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 1.8)
Telfair County 7 Rural 54.9 (40.5, 73.6) 130 (15, 156) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.7)
Bacon County 7 Rural 60.2 (43.9, 81.1) 110 (7, 156) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.5, 2.2)
Long County 7 Urban 69.8 (49.7, 94.8) 57 (1, 154) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.9, 2.9)
Pulaski County 7 Rural 54.5 (39.6, 74.5) 133 (18, 156) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.9, 3.8)
Lincoln County 7 Urban 68.6 (49.1, 94.9) 63 (1, 156) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.5)
Early County 7 Rural 56.3 (40.4, 77.0) 125 (10, 156) 9 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.7, 1.3)
Seminole County 7 Rural 57.8 (41.1, 80.2) 120 (6, 156) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 2.4)
Clinch County 7 Rural 90.3 (64.7, 123.8) 4 (1, 141) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.8)
Taylor County 7 Rural 67.3 (48.2, 92.9) 71 (2, 156) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.8, 3.2)
Wilkes County 7 Rural 49.1 (35.2, 68.0) 144 (35, 156) 8 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.3, -2.1)
Candler County 7 Rural 55.9 (39.6, 77.2) 127 (9, 156) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.5, 3.8)
Montgomery County 7 Rural 66.3 (46.7, 92.2) 76 (1, 156) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.2, 1.0)
Irwin County 7 Rural 55.3 (38.5, 77.6) 129 (11, 156) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 2.5)
Miller County 7 Rural 80.5 (55.6, 114.1) 22 (1, 154) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.2, 3.2)
Warren County 7 Rural 78.4 (53.8, 112.7) 27 (1, 154) 7
*
*
Randolph County 7 Rural 60.5 (41.8, 87.0) 107 (2, 156) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.2, 3.8)
Turner County 7 Rural 55.4 (38.5, 78.1) 128 (7, 156) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.5)
Treutlen County 7 Rural 73.6 (50.5, 105.0) 44 (1, 155) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.4)
Talbot County 7 Urban 58.5 (39.1, 87.3) 116 (4, 156) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.8, 3.4)
Atkinson County 7 Rural 69.4 (46.5, 99.6) 60 (1, 156) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.6, 4.6)
Wilcox County 7 Rural 45.1 (30.1, 66.0) 150 (48, 156) 6 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.2, -0.9)
Jenkins County 7 Rural 44.2 (28.6, 66.0) 151 (32, 156) 5 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.7, -0.4)
Schley County 7 Rural 76.1 (48.7, 115.5) 35 (1, 156) 5 stable stable trend 31.7 (-1.8, 66.5)
Wheeler County 7 Rural 50.0 (31.6, 76.2) 143 (7, 156) 5
*
*
Quitman County 7 Rural 95.1 (58.1, 157.1) 2 (1, 156) 4
*
*
Stewart County 7 Urban 76.2 (46.7, 119.4) 34 (1, 156) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.5, 4.4)
Calhoun County 7 Rural 57.6 (33.8, 92.6) 122 (1, 156) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.4, 0.9)
Clay County 7 Rural 61.9 (34.7, 108.4) 99 (1, 156) 3
*
*
Webster County 7 Rural 84.9 (48.5, 144.6) 12 (1, 156) 3
*
*
Baker County 7 Rural 70.7 (38.1, 123.2) 56 (1, 156) 3 stable stable trend 0.7 (-5.7, 7.9)
Chattahoochee County 7 Urban 90.5 (51.4, 144.6) 3 (1, 156) 3
*
*
Echols County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glascock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taliaferro County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/14/2024 8:14 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top