Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Georgia by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Georgia 7 N/A 25.0 (24.6, 25.5) N/A 2,901 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.8, 0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 22.7 (22.6, 22.8) N/A 86,630 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.5)
Clayton County 7 Urban 6.5 (5.1, 8.3) 116 (114, 116) 16 falling falling trend -21.3 (-35.5, -2.8)
Dougherty County 7 Urban 11.9 (9.0, 15.4) 115 (94, 116) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.9, 2.4)
Decatur County 7 Rural 12.2 (7.5, 18.8) 114 (69, 116) 4
*
*
Muscogee County 7 Urban 14.2 (12.0, 16.7) 113 (88, 115) 30 falling falling trend -16.1 (-29.9, -4.6)
Richmond County 7 Urban 14.3 (12.1, 16.8) 112 (87, 115) 32 stable stable trend 1.8 (0.0, 3.8)
Rockdale County 7 Urban 14.8 (11.5, 18.6) 111 (74, 115) 15 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.5)
Chattooga County 7 Rural 15.0 (9.4, 23.0) 110 (44, 116) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.5, 7.0)
Mitchell County 7 Rural 15.1 (9.1, 23.7) 109 (37, 116) 4
*
*
Cook County 7 Rural 15.9 (9.0, 26.2) 108 (28, 116) 3
*
*
Clarke County 7 Urban 16.3 (13.1, 20.2) 107 (67, 115) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.2, 1.8)
Polk County 7 Rural 16.5 (11.7, 22.7) 106 (49, 115) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.9, 3.5)
Walker County 7 Urban 16.7 (12.9, 21.3) 105 (60, 115) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.2)
Sumter County 7 Rural 16.8 (11.2, 24.4) 104 (42, 115) 6 rising rising trend 6.2 (2.4, 11.6)
Emanuel County 7 Rural 16.9 (10.3, 26.2) 103 (31, 116) 4
*
*
Murray County 7 Urban 16.9 (12.1, 23.2) 102 (48, 115) 8
*
*
Floyd County 7 Urban 17.1 (13.8, 20.8) 101 (63, 114) 20 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.3)
DeKalb County 7 Urban 17.2 (15.9, 18.6) 100 (78, 107) 131 falling falling trend -9.2 (-16.1, -0.7)
Berrien County 7 Rural 17.3 (10.2, 27.5) 99 (21, 116) 4
*
*
Brooks County 7 Urban 17.5 (10.5, 28.0) 98 (24, 116) 4
*
*
Bulloch County 7 Rural 17.7 (13.5, 22.7) 97 (49, 115) 13 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.1, 6.3)
Hart County 7 Rural 17.8 (12.0, 25.6) 96 (33, 115) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.4, 6.7)
Paulding County 7 Urban 17.8 (14.9, 21.1) 95 (62, 112) 29 falling falling trend -7.0 (-18.8, -4.0)
Douglas County 7 Urban 17.9 (14.8, 21.5) 94 (59, 113) 25 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.1)
Troup County 7 Rural 17.9 (13.9, 22.8) 93 (51, 115) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.9, 4.2)
Grady County 7 Rural 18.1 (11.9, 26.6) 92 (28, 115) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.3, 3.6)
Appling County 7 Rural 18.3 (10.7, 29.2) 91 (20, 116) 4
*
*
Coffee County 7 Rural 18.4 (13.2, 25.0) 90 (38, 115) 9
*
*
Franklin County 7 Rural 18.5 (12.4, 26.9) 89 (29, 115) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.2, 5.8)
Bibb County 7 Urban 18.7 (15.9, 21.8) 88 (61, 109) 35 falling falling trend -6.3 (-16.0, -1.0)
Catoosa County 7 Urban 18.9 (14.9, 23.8) 87 (45, 113) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.5)
Upson County 7 Rural 19.1 (13.1, 27.1) 86 (27, 115) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.1, 7.1)
Lowndes County 7 Urban 19.2 (15.7, 23.4) 85 (49, 111) 21 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 3.1)
Whitfield County 7 Urban 19.4 (15.9, 23.4) 84 (48, 111) 22 stable stable trend -1.5 (-9.1, 1.7)
Greene County 7 Rural 19.5 (12.9, 29.1) 83 (22, 115) 7
*
*
Crisp County 7 Rural 19.9 (13.3, 29.0) 82 (22, 115) 6
*
*
Gordon County 7 Rural 20.0 (15.3, 25.7) 81 (37, 113) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 3.3)
Burke County 7 Urban 20.4 (13.7, 29.5) 80 (18, 115) 6 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.2, 7.6)
Putnam County 7 Rural 20.5 (13.5, 30.2) 79 (18, 115) 7
*
*
Tift County 7 Rural 20.6 (15.0, 27.6) 78 (25, 114) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.7, 5.2)
Liberty County 7 Urban 20.6 (15.0, 27.4) 77 (26, 114) 10
*
*
Laurens County 7 Rural 20.6 (15.7, 26.7) 76 (29, 113) 12 rising rising trend 7.7 (4.9, 12.0)
Ben Hill County 7 Rural 21.1 (12.5, 33.3) 75 (13, 115) 4
*
*
Ware County 7 Rural 21.4 (15.5, 28.8) 74 (23, 114) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.7, 4.4)
Meriwether County 7 Urban 21.4 (14.0, 31.5) 73 (16, 115) 6
*
*
Wilkes County 7 Rural 22.4 (12.7, 37.9) 72 (10, 116) 3
*
*
Dade County 7 Urban 22.6 (14.6, 34.0) 71 (13, 115) 5
*
*
Bartow County 7 Urban 22.6 (18.8, 27.0) 70 (32, 97) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 3.0)
Colquitt County 7 Rural 22.6 (17.2, 29.3) 69 (21, 110) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.5, 2.4)
Lee County 7 Urban 22.9 (16.3, 31.5) 68 (16, 113) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.7, 7.5)
Tattnall County 7 Rural 23.2 (16.0, 32.8) 67 (15, 114) 7
*
*
Jefferson County 7 Rural 23.4 (14.3, 36.2) 66 (10, 115) 5
*
*
Fannin County 7 Rural 23.7 (16.7, 33.0) 65 (15, 112) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.1, 4.1)
Peach County 7 Urban 23.9 (16.8, 33.1) 64 (14, 113) 8 rising rising trend 5.8 (1.1, 13.1)
Wayne County 7 Rural 24.0 (17.3, 32.6) 63 (15, 111) 9 rising rising trend 4.6 (1.7, 8.5)
Baldwin County 7 Rural 24.1 (18.2, 31.4) 62 (17, 106) 12 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.5, 5.6)
Pulaski County 7 Rural 24.2 (14.1, 39.9) 61 (9, 115) 4
*
*
Worth County 7 Urban 24.6 (16.6, 35.5) 60 (10, 114) 7
*
*
Gwinnett County 7 Urban 24.7 (23.2, 26.2) 59 (39, 73) 221 falling falling trend -8.7 (-15.2, -1.1)
Crawford County 7 Urban 24.8 (14.0, 40.8) 58 (5, 115) 4
*
*
Harris County 7 Urban 24.8 (18.4, 33.0) 57 (13, 108) 11 stable stable trend -26.1 (-44.9, 1.8)
Elbert County 7 Rural 25.0 (16.2, 36.9) 56 (9, 114) 6 rising rising trend 4.6 (1.0, 9.2)
Brantley County 7 Urban 25.0 (15.8, 37.5) 55 (9, 115) 5
*
*
Henry County 7 Urban 25.2 (22.3, 28.4) 54 (29, 79) 58 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 4.0)
Coweta County 7 Urban 25.3 (21.8, 29.1) 53 (26, 83) 40 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.1, 3.1)
Cobb County 7 Urban 25.6 (24.0, 27.2) 52 (36, 69) 205 falling falling trend -6.4 (-9.9, -4.0)
Oconee County 7 Urban 25.6 (19.7, 32.9) 51 (15, 102) 13 stable stable trend -8.1 (-23.3, 0.5)
Newton County 7 Urban 25.7 (21.6, 30.3) 50 (21, 88) 29 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.9)
Glynn County 7 Urban 25.9 (21.7, 30.8) 49 (20, 87) 30 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.9, 5.2)
Heard County 7 Urban 26.1 (14.7, 43.1) 48 (3, 115) 3
*
*
Madison County 7 Urban 26.2 (19.3, 35.0) 47 (13, 107) 10 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.0, 7.9)
Camden County 7 Rural 26.4 (20.4, 33.5) 46 (13, 101) 14
*
*
Dodge County 7 Rural 26.4 (17.9, 37.8) 45 (8, 112) 7
*
*
McDuffie County 7 Urban 26.6 (18.7, 36.9) 44 (10, 111) 8 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.4, 7.4)
Bacon County 7 Rural 26.8 (15.1, 44.0) 43 (3, 115) 3
*
*
Jackson County 7 Rural 27.3 (22.4, 33.0) 42 (16, 85) 22 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.4, 4.9)
Toombs County 7 Rural 27.9 (20.0, 37.9) 41 (10, 107) 9
*
*
Banks County 7 Rural 28.0 (18.8, 40.3) 40 (7, 111) 6 falling falling trend -6.5 (-21.7, -0.4)
Thomas County 7 Rural 28.1 (22.0, 35.4) 39 (12, 96) 16 stable stable trend -13.7 (-27.9, 0.0)
Fulton County 7 Urban 28.2 (26.8, 29.7) 38 (26, 53) 303 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.7)
Morgan County 7 Urban 28.4 (19.9, 39.6) 37 (8, 106) 8
*
*
Stephens County 7 Rural 28.9 (21.2, 38.6) 36 (9, 101) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.5, 6.1)
Oglethorpe County 7 Urban 29.0 (18.0, 44.2) 35 (4, 114) 5 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.4, 9.8)
Jones County 7 Urban 29.0 (21.3, 38.9) 34 (9, 102) 10 rising rising trend 5.7 (2.3, 11.3)
Houston County 7 Urban 29.1 (25.5, 33.1) 33 (16, 65) 48 rising rising trend 4.6 (3.0, 7.1)
Barrow County 7 Urban 29.3 (24.3, 35.1) 32 (12, 75) 25 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.3, 5.9)
Union County 7 Rural 29.6 (22.0, 39.5) 31 (8, 96) 15 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 1.2)
Chatham County 7 Urban 29.8 (27.2, 32.7) 30 (17, 53) 100 rising rising trend 5.1 (3.7, 7.0)
Effingham County 7 Urban 29.9 (24.0, 36.8) 29 (11, 80) 19 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.9, 6.2)
Lamar County 7 Rural 30.0 (19.8, 43.6) 28 (4, 108) 6
*
*
Bleckley County 7 Rural 31.0 (19.6, 47.0) 27 (3, 112) 5
*
*
Fayette County 7 Urban 31.2 (27.2, 35.7) 26 (12, 56) 49 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.1, 4.1)
Pierce County 7 Rural 31.3 (21.6, 44.1) 25 (3, 103) 7 rising rising trend 12.4 (5.0, 38.1)
Monroe County 7 Urban 31.6 (23.4, 41.9) 24 (6, 93) 11 rising rising trend 7.2 (4.0, 12.7)
Lincoln County 7 Urban 32.0 (20.0, 50.8) 23 (2, 110) 5
*
*
McIntosh County 7 Urban 32.0 (20.8, 48.4) 22 (2, 109) 6
*
*
Bryan County 7 Urban 32.1 (24.5, 41.3) 21 (6, 88) 13
*
*
Carroll County 7 Urban 32.4 (28.0, 37.4) 20 (10, 59) 40 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.9, 4.1)
Spalding County 7 Urban 32.5 (27.1, 38.7) 19 (8, 67) 27 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.9, 5.3)
Walton County 7 Urban 32.8 (28.0, 38.1) 18 (10, 57) 36 stable stable trend -1.5 (-10.0, 0.7)
Rabun County 7 Rural 34.4 (24.0, 48.2) 17 (3, 88) 9
*
*
Columbia County 7 Urban 34.8 (30.9, 39.1) 16 (9, 41) 60 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.0, 7.1)
Johnson County 7 Rural 34.8 (21.4, 54.3) 15 (1, 110) 4
*
*
Gilmer County 7 Rural 37.6 (29.7, 47.2) 14 (3, 57) 18 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.2, 5.4)
Butts County 7 Urban 38.7 (28.9, 50.9) 13 (1, 67) 11 rising rising trend 6.1 (2.8, 11.3)
Jasper County 7 Urban 39.4 (27.2, 55.7) 12 (1, 82) 7
*
*
Haralson County 7 Urban 40.7 (31.5, 51.8) 11 (1, 48) 14 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.5, 7.3)
Cherokee County 7 Urban 41.9 (38.6, 45.5) 10 (4, 18) 122 stable stable trend -3.8 (-11.3, 0.1)
Pike County 7 Urban 42.7 (30.9, 57.7) 9 (1, 63) 9 rising rising trend 7.1 (3.3, 13.2)
Towns County 7 Rural 44.3 (31.1, 62.6) 8 (1, 63) 10 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.2, 5.4)
Hall County 7 Urban 45.0 (41.1, 49.1) 7 (2, 15) 103 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.7, 4.1)
Habersham County 7 Rural 46.0 (38.2, 55.0) 6 (1, 25) 26 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.7, 6.3)
Lumpkin County 7 Urban 47.4 (37.5, 59.1) 5 (1, 25) 18 stable stable trend -8.3 (-24.5, 2.5)
Forsyth County 7 Urban 48.0 (44.2, 52.0) 4 (1, 12) 123 falling falling trend -6.3 (-12.7, -2.3)
Dawson County 7 Urban 53.2 (42.4, 66.2) 3 (1, 18) 19 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.6, 8.5)
Pickens County 7 Urban 56.1 (46.2, 67.7) 2 (1, 13) 26 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.9, 9.0)
White County 7 Rural 58.6 (47.5, 71.8) 1 (1, 13) 22
*
*
Atkinson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baker County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Candler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chattahoochee County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinch County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dooly County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Early County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Echols County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Evans County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glascock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irwin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jenkins County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lanier County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Long County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Miller County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Screven County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Seminole County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Talbot County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taliaferro County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Telfair County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treutlen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Turner County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Twiggs County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/10/2024 10:40 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Atkinson, Baker, Calhoun, Candler, Charlton, Chattahoochee, Clay, Clinch, Dooly, Early, Echols, Evans, Glascock, Hancock, Irwin, Jeff Davis, Jenkins, Lanier, Long, Macon, Marion, Miller, Montgomery, Quitman, Randolph, Schley, Screven, Seminole, Stewart, Talbot, Taliaferro, Taylor, Telfair, Terrell, Treutlen, Turner, Twiggs, Warren, Washington, Webster, Wheeler, Wilcox, Wilkinson

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top