Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Georgia by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Georgia 7 *** 17.2 (16.9, 17.6) N/A 1,933 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.4, 2.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 17.1 (17.0, 17.1) N/A 64,622 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Appling County 7 *** 19.7 (12.7, 29.6) 34 (1, 110) 5
*
*
Bacon County 7 *** 24.8 (14.2, 40.7) 7 (1, 110) 3
*
*
Baldwin County 7 *** 15.8 (11.1, 22.0) 83 (9, 110) 8 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.7, 7.6)
Banks County 7 *** 18.7 (11.0, 29.7) 47 (1, 110) 4
*
*
Barrow County 7 *** 19.5 (15.2, 24.6) 37 (6, 104) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.0)
Bartow County 7 *** 19.2 (15.7, 23.2) 41 (7, 97) 22 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.0, 3.5)
Ben Hill County 7 *** 23.8 (14.9, 36.1) 10 (1, 109) 5
*
*
Berrien County 7 *** 14.2 (8.1, 23.3) 103 (6, 110) 3
*
*
Bibb County 7 *** 17.8 (15.1, 21.0) 57 (19, 98) 32 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Brantley County 7 *** 19.7 (12.0, 30.7) 35 (1, 110) 4
*
*
Brooks County 7 *** 17.0 (9.8, 27.9) 69 (2, 110) 4
*
*
Bryan County 7 *** 22.8 (16.0, 31.5) 17 (1, 106) 8 stable stable trend 3.8 (0.0, 7.7)
Bulloch County 7 *** 15.3 (11.3, 20.1) 90 (15, 110) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.8, 2.8)
Burke County 7 *** 16.0 (9.9, 24.8) 82 (4, 110) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.3, 5.1)
Butts County 7 *** 19.8 (13.2, 28.7) 33 (1, 110) 6
*
*
Camden County 7 *** 17.3 (12.4, 23.6) 64 (6, 109) 9 stable stable trend 1.7 (-3.5, 7.1)
Carroll County 7 *** 20.8 (17.2, 24.9) 26 (5, 88) 25 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.1, 4.7)
Catoosa County 7 *** 13.2 (9.9, 17.3) 106 (39, 110) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.2, 3.9)
Charlton County 7 *** 24.1 (14.2, 38.7) 8 (1, 110) 4
*
*
Chatham County 7 *** 15.4 (13.5, 17.5) 89 (46, 105) 49 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
Chattooga County 7 *** 20.0 (13.3, 29.0) 31 (1, 109) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.7, 4.7)
Cherokee County 7 *** 20.6 (18.2, 23.3) 28 (9, 69) 56 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.7, 6.6)
Clarke County 7 *** 14.8 (11.6, 18.6) 94 (29, 109) 15 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.1, 6.3)
Clayton County 7 *** 16.4 (14.1, 19.1) 77 (29, 104) 41 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.2, 3.6)
Cobb County 7 *** 16.8 (15.5, 18.2) 71 (40, 92) 126 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.8, 2.8)
Coffee County 7 *** 13.0 (8.8, 18.6) 107 (26, 110) 6
*
*
Colquitt County 7 *** 17.6 (12.8, 23.7) 61 (6, 109) 9 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.1, 6.2)
Columbia County 7 *** 14.3 (11.7, 17.2) 102 (45, 109) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.4)
Coweta County 7 *** 18.3 (15.4, 21.7) 52 (13, 97) 29 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.3, 4.0)
Crisp County 7 *** 17.1 (10.7, 25.9) 68 (3, 110) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.3, 5.5)
Dade County 7 *** 14.8 (8.6, 24.5) 95 (4, 110) 3 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.9, 5.7)
Dawson County 7 *** 13.3 (7.9, 21.1) 105 (10, 110) 4
*
*
DeKalb County 7 *** 16.7 (15.4, 18.1) 74 (41, 93) 126 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.6, 2.9)
Decatur County 7 *** 18.0 (11.8, 26.3) 55 (3, 110) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.7, 3.6)
Dodge County 7 *** 14.7 (8.7, 23.6) 97 (7, 110) 4 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.3, 6.2)
Dougherty County 7 *** 17.9 (14.3, 22.1) 56 (9, 105) 19 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.7, 3.5)
Douglas County 7 *** 17.3 (14.3, 20.7) 66 (17, 103) 25 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.3)
Effingham County 7 *** 24.9 (19.3, 31.6) 6 (1, 77) 15 rising rising trend 5.5 (1.6, 9.6)
Elbert County 7 *** 14.3 (8.6, 22.9) 101 (7, 110) 4 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.3, 7.4)
Emanuel County 7 *** 14.6 (8.4, 23.5) 99 (6, 110) 4
*
*
Fannin County 7 *** 23.0 (16.5, 31.8) 15 (1, 103) 10 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.7, 7.5)
Fayette County 7 *** 13.5 (10.9, 16.6) 104 (50, 110) 21 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.6)
Floyd County 7 *** 21.3 (17.6, 25.6) 23 (4, 82) 24 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.3, 4.9)
Forsyth County 7 *** 17.6 (15.2, 20.4) 60 (21, 98) 39 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.6, 4.2)
Franklin County 7 *** 18.5 (12.5, 26.9) 49 (2, 110) 6 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.2, 6.8)
Fulton County 7 *** 16.2 (15.1, 17.4) 78 (49, 93) 161 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.3, 2.5)
Gilmer County 7 *** 18.6 (12.8, 26.2) 48 (2, 110) 8 rising rising trend 5.5 (1.5, 9.6)
Glynn County 7 *** 17.2 (13.9, 21.1) 67 (15, 104) 21 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.8, 3.6)
Gordon County 7 *** 22.3 (17.4, 28.2) 20 (1, 93) 15 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.2, 8.0)
Grady County 7 *** 17.4 (11.2, 25.9) 63 (3, 110) 5
*
*
Greene County 7 *** 14.8 (9.4, 23.3) 96 (8, 110) 5
*
*
Gwinnett County 7 *** 15.6 (14.3, 16.9) 86 (53, 100) 125 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.7, 2.0)
Habersham County 7 *** 17.7 (13.0, 23.6) 59 (6, 109) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.1, 4.5)
Hall County 7 *** 15.8 (13.5, 18.4) 84 (33, 104) 34 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.6)
Haralson County 7 *** 25.6 (18.3, 34.8) 5 (1, 99) 9 rising rising trend 6.3 (2.3, 10.4)
Harris County 7 *** 16.5 (11.4, 23.4) 75 (7, 110) 7
*
*
Hart County 7 *** 18.3 (12.1, 26.8) 51 (2, 110) 6 rising rising trend 4.6 (0.3, 9.1)
Henry County 7 *** 18.0 (15.6, 20.8) 54 (19, 94) 41 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.9, 4.1)
Houston County 7 *** 17.3 (14.5, 20.6) 65 (18, 103) 27 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.9)
Jackson County 7 *** 17.7 (13.6, 22.6) 58 (9, 107) 13 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.1, 5.5)
Jasper County 7 *** 19.9 (11.1, 33.2) 32 (1, 110) 3
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7 *** 23.6 (14.0, 37.2) 12 (1, 110) 4
*
*
Jefferson County 7 *** 23.2 (14.7, 35.4) 14 (1, 108) 5
*
*
Jones County 7 *** 26.1 (19.0, 35.2) 4 (1, 94) 9 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.2, 8.6)
Lamar County 7 *** 22.9 (14.7, 34.4) 16 (1, 109) 5
*
*
Laurens County 7 *** 19.2 (14.5, 25.1) 42 (3, 106) 12 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.3, 6.5)
Lee County 7 *** 19.4 (12.9, 28.0) 39 (1, 109) 6
*
*
Liberty County 7 *** 18.2 (12.8, 25.1) 53 (3, 109) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.1, 4.0)
Lowndes County 7 *** 15.5 (12.3, 19.3) 87 (26, 109) 17 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.1, 4.0)
Lumpkin County 7 *** 14.9 (9.9, 21.7) 93 (11, 110) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.1, 2.4)
Madison County 7 *** 18.4 (12.5, 26.2) 50 (3, 110) 7
*
*
McDuffie County 7 *** 28.6 (19.6, 40.4) 1 (1, 93) 7
*
*
Meriwether County 7 *** 12.3 (7.3, 19.9) 109 (20, 110) 4 stable stable trend 36.4 (-5.1, 95.9)
Mitchell County 7 *** 15.5 (9.6, 23.8) 88 (5, 110) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.9, 4.5)
Monroe County 7 *** 15.3 (10.0, 22.6) 91 (8, 110) 6 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.6, -0.1)
Morgan County 7 *** 16.8 (10.0, 26.8) 72 (2, 110) 4
*
*
Murray County 7 *** 16.9 (11.8, 23.6) 70 (7, 110) 7 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.0, 6.0)
Muscogee County 7 *** 14.9 (12.6, 17.6) 92 (40, 107) 31 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.1)
Newton County 7 *** 22.4 (18.6, 26.8) 19 (2, 76) 25 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.3, 5.2)
Oconee County 7 *** 19.5 (13.9, 26.7) 38 (2, 108) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.4, 6.1)
Oglethorpe County 7 *** 16.5 (9.5, 27.3) 76 (2, 110) 3
*
*
Paulding County 7 *** 21.3 (18.0, 25.1) 22 (5, 78) 32 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.6, 7.1)
Peach County 7 *** 20.7 (14.0, 29.6) 27 (1, 108) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.5, 3.8)
Pickens County 7 *** 27.0 (20.2, 35.7) 3 (1, 81) 12 rising rising trend 4.8 (0.9, 8.9)
Pike County 7 *** 16.7 (9.6, 27.4) 73 (2, 110) 3
*
*
Polk County 7 *** 23.6 (17.9, 30.6) 11 (1, 93) 12 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.2, 6.5)
Putnam County 7 *** 19.3 (13.0, 28.1) 40 (2, 110) 7
*
*
Richmond County 7 *** 20.0 (17.4, 23.0) 30 (10, 80) 44 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.6, 4.6)
Rockdale County 7 *** 19.1 (15.3, 23.4) 44 (7, 101) 19 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.8, 4.2)
Screven County 7 *** 24.0 (14.6, 37.6) 9 (1, 110) 4
*
*
Spalding County 7 *** 15.6 (12.0, 20.2) 85 (18, 109) 13 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.1, 6.5)
Stephens County 7 *** 12.0 (7.1, 19.2) 110 (16, 110) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.5, 3.2)
Sumter County 7 *** 20.6 (14.6, 28.5) 29 (1, 108) 8
*
*
Tattnall County 7 *** 16.1 (10.2, 24.3) 81 (5, 110) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.3, 5.0)
Thomas County 7 *** 18.9 (14.1, 24.9) 46 (4, 106) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.8, 4.0)
Tift County 7 *** 19.1 (13.7, 25.8) 45 (3, 108) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.0, 6.7)
Toombs County 7 *** 14.4 (9.2, 21.8) 100 (10, 110) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.2, 6.0)
Towns County 7 *** 17.5 (10.0, 30.8) 62 (1, 110) 4
*
*
Troup County 7 *** 20.9 (16.5, 26.1) 25 (2, 98) 16 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.5, 4.4)
Twiggs County 7 *** 27.7 (15.0, 47.7) 2 (1, 110) 3
*
*
Union County 7 *** 19.7 (13.5, 28.3) 36 (1, 109) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 3.4)
Upson County 7 *** 19.1 (13.0, 27.4) 43 (2, 109) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.1, 5.3)
Walker County 7 *** 16.2 (12.6, 20.6) 80 (19, 108) 15 stable stable trend 29.9 (-11.0, 89.6)
Walton County 7 *** 21.1 (17.3, 25.5) 24 (3, 90) 22 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.4, 6.7)
Ware County 7 *** 12.5 (8.4, 18.3) 108 (28, 110) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.7, 3.4)
Washington County 7 *** 23.4 (15.5, 34.2) 13 (1, 108) 6
*
*
Wayne County 7 *** 22.5 (16.0, 31.0) 18 (1, 106) 8 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.5, 7.9)
White County 7 *** 14.7 (9.8, 21.5) 98 (11, 110) 6
*
*
Whitfield County 7 *** 16.2 (13.0, 20.0) 79 (19, 108) 18 stable stable trend 2.9 (0.0, 5.9)
Worth County 7 *** 22.0 (14.8, 31.9) 21 (1, 109) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.0, 5.1)
Atkinson County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baker County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bleckley County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Candler County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chattahoochee County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinch County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dooly County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Early County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Echols County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Evans County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glascock County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Heard County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irwin County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jenkins County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lanier County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Long County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McIntosh County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Miller County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pierce County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rabun County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schley County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Seminole County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Talbot County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taliaferro County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Telfair County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treutlen County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Turner County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkes County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/09/2022 6:56 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2020 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top