Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Georgia by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Georgia 7 N/A 17.9 (17.5, 18.2) N/A 2,146 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.5, 2.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.3 (17.2, 17.4) N/A 67,373 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Appling County 7 Rural 31.1 (21.4, 43.9) 1 (1, 95) 7
*
*
Oglethorpe County 7 Urban 29.8 (20.3, 42.8) 2 (1, 101) 7
*
*
Elbert County 7 Rural 27.0 (18.2, 38.8) 3 (1, 105) 7 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.5, 8.3)
Sumter County 7 Rural 26.8 (19.5, 36.0) 4 (1, 94) 10
*
*
Worth County 7 Urban 26.4 (18.5, 36.8) 5 (1, 105) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.1, 5.0)
Effingham County 7 Urban 24.9 (19.6, 31.3) 6 (1, 81) 16 rising rising trend 5.2 (2.2, 9.6)
Polk County 7 Rural 24.6 (18.8, 31.8) 7 (1, 93) 13 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.5, 6.2)
Ben Hill County 7 Rural 24.6 (15.7, 37.0) 8 (1, 110) 5
*
*
Meriwether County 7 Urban 23.7 (16.2, 33.9) 9 (1, 109) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.9, 4.8)
Pike County 7 Urban 23.4 (15.0, 34.9) 10 (1, 110) 5
*
*
Dade County 7 Urban 23.3 (14.6, 35.7) 11 (1, 111) 5 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.1, 8.4)
Franklin County 7 Rural 23.3 (15.7, 33.3) 12 (1, 109) 7 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.8, 7.3)
Walker County 7 Urban 23.2 (18.7, 28.4) 13 (2, 87) 21 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.3, 7.3)
Peach County 7 Urban 23.1 (16.2, 32.2) 14 (1, 109) 8 rising rising trend 9.6 (3.1, 33.4)
Screven County 7 Rural 23.0 (14.3, 35.5) 15 (1, 111) 5
*
*
Pickens County 7 Urban 22.8 (16.8, 30.6) 16 (1, 104) 11 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.9, 7.9)
Lee County 7 Urban 22.8 (15.9, 31.6) 17 (1, 108) 8
*
*
Stephens County 7 Rural 22.6 (15.5, 32.1) 18 (1, 110) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.1, 4.6)
Laurens County 7 Rural 22.6 (17.4, 28.8) 19 (1, 101) 14 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.7, 6.6)
Jasper County 7 Urban 22.5 (13.7, 35.3) 20 (1, 111) 4
*
*
Bleckley County 7 Rural 22.4 (12.7, 36.9) 21 (1, 111) 3
*
*
Bartow County 7 Urban 22.3 (18.6, 26.5) 22 (3, 84) 28 stable stable trend 2.1 (0.0, 4.8)
Upson County 7 Rural 22.2 (15.8, 30.5) 23 (1, 108) 8 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.8, 4.9)
Walton County 7 Urban 22.2 (18.4, 26.5) 24 (4, 83) 26 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.1, 7.0)
Murray County 7 Urban 22.2 (16.4, 29.3) 25 (1, 107) 10 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.2, 7.3)
Newton County 7 Urban 22.1 (18.4, 26.4) 26 (4, 86) 27 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.7, 4.5)
Catoosa County 7 Urban 21.9 (17.6, 27.0) 27 (2, 98) 19 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.9, 6.4)
Paulding County 7 Urban 21.8 (18.6, 25.4) 28 (5, 78) 36 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.8, 6.2)
Towns County 7 Rural 21.7 (13.7, 34.7) 29 (1, 111) 6
*
*
Baldwin County 7 Rural 21.6 (16.0, 28.6) 30 (1, 107) 11 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.2, 7.2)
Lamar County 7 Rural 21.2 (13.3, 32.4) 31 (1, 111) 5
*
*
Brantley County 7 Urban 21.1 (12.9, 32.7) 32 (1, 111) 4
*
*
Crawford County 7 Urban 21.1 (12.5, 34.3) 33 (1, 111) 4
*
*
Habersham County 7 Rural 21.1 (16.0, 27.4) 34 (2, 106) 12 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.5, 8.0)
Banks County 7 Rural 21.0 (13.1, 32.2) 35 (1, 111) 5
*
*
Jackson County 7 Rural 20.9 (16.8, 25.8) 36 (4, 101) 18 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.1, 5.5)
Jones County 7 Urban 20.9 (14.7, 29.1) 37 (1, 110) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.6, 7.6)
Ware County 7 Rural 20.8 (15.0, 28.2) 38 (2, 109) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.8, 4.1)
Henry County 7 Urban 20.7 (18.2, 23.5) 39 (11, 82) 52 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.1, 4.7)
Douglas County 7 Urban 20.6 (17.3, 24.4) 40 (8, 93) 30 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 3.8)
McDuffie County 7 Urban 20.5 (13.2, 30.6) 41 (1, 111) 6
*
*
Troup County 7 Rural 20.4 (16.2, 25.6) 42 (5, 105) 16 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.8, 4.6)
Coweta County 7 Urban 20.4 (17.4, 23.7) 43 (9, 92) 35 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 4.2)
Lumpkin County 7 Urban 20.4 (14.4, 28.2) 44 (2, 110) 8 rising rising trend 27.5 (3.1, 47.1)
Telfair County 7 Rural 20.3 (11.7, 33.6) 45 (1, 111) 3
*
*
Haralson County 7 Urban 20.3 (14.1, 28.3) 46 (2, 110) 7 rising rising trend 4.8 (1.1, 10.0)
Fannin County 7 Rural 20.3 (14.2, 28.7) 47 (2, 110) 9 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.3, 8.2)
Morgan County 7 Urban 20.2 (12.9, 30.3) 48 (1, 111) 5
*
*
Washington County 7 Rural 20.0 (12.8, 30.2) 49 (1, 111) 5
*
*
Hall County 7 Urban 20.0 (17.5, 22.8) 50 (13, 89) 46 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.5, 3.0)
Cook County 7 Rural 20.0 (12.0, 31.4) 51 (1, 111) 4 stable stable trend -3.5 (-8.2, 0.8)
Barrow County 7 Urban 20.0 (16.0, 24.7) 52 (6, 104) 18 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.2, 17.0)
Colquitt County 7 Rural 19.9 (14.8, 26.1) 53 (3, 108) 11 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.2, 5.9)
Wayne County 7 Rural 19.8 (13.7, 27.9) 54 (2, 111) 7 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.0, 7.0)
Emanuel County 7 Rural 19.6 (12.5, 29.2) 55 (1, 111) 5
*
*
Whitfield County 7 Urban 19.5 (16.0, 23.6) 56 (8, 103) 22 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.8, 7.8)
Decatur County 7 Rural 19.4 (13.2, 27.4) 57 (2, 111) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.7, 5.0)
Floyd County 7 Urban 18.8 (15.3, 22.8) 58 (11, 105) 22 falling falling trend -6.7 (-20.0, -1.4)
Cherokee County 7 Urban 18.7 (16.6, 21.1) 59 (24, 95) 58 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.3, 5.9)
Chattooga County 7 Rural 18.5 (12.3, 26.9) 60 (3, 111) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.3, 5.9)
Thomas County 7 Rural 18.3 (13.5, 24.5) 61 (4, 110) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.9, 3.9)
Harris County 7 Urban 18.2 (12.9, 25.3) 62 (4, 111) 8
*
*
Dougherty County 7 Urban 18.2 (14.6, 22.4) 63 (14, 108) 19 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.8, 3.1)
Putnam County 7 Rural 18.2 (11.9, 27.0) 64 (1, 111) 7
*
*
Bryan County 7 Urban 18.2 (12.7, 25.2) 65 (4, 111) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.8, 6.6)
Forsyth County 7 Urban 18.1 (15.8, 20.6) 66 (25, 102) 47 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 5.1)
Pierce County 7 Rural 18.1 (11.0, 28.1) 67 (1, 111) 4
*
*
Liberty County 7 Urban 17.7 (12.8, 23.9) 68 (7, 111) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.5, 4.8)
Dodge County 7 Rural 17.6 (11.2, 26.9) 69 (3, 111) 5 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.1, 7.7)
Glynn County 7 Urban 17.6 (14.3, 21.6) 70 (17, 108) 21 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.9, 4.8)
Bibb County 7 Urban 17.6 (14.9, 20.7) 71 (26, 105) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Gordon County 7 Rural 17.6 (13.4, 22.8) 72 (10, 110) 12 stable stable trend -11.6 (-36.1, 1.8)
Richmond County 7 Urban 17.5 (15.1, 20.3) 73 (29, 104) 40 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.1, 3.7)
Carroll County 7 Urban 17.5 (14.4, 21.1) 74 (21, 107) 23 stable stable trend -8.4 (-21.2, 0.5)
Crisp County 7 Rural 17.5 (10.6, 27.3) 75 (2, 111) 4 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.8, 7.5)
McIntosh County 7 Urban 17.4 (9.2, 31.2) 76 (1, 111) 3
*
*
Camden County 7 Rural 17.2 (12.7, 22.8) 77 (8, 111) 11 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.3, 8.4)
Cobb County 7 Urban 17.2 (15.9, 18.6) 78 (47, 98) 140 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.6, 2.8)
Mitchell County 7 Rural 17.2 (10.7, 26.3) 79 (3, 111) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.9, 7.6)
Union County 7 Rural 17.2 (11.5, 25.3) 80 (4, 111) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 2.9)
Rockdale County 7 Urban 17.0 (13.6, 21.1) 81 (20, 109) 18 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.2, 4.4)
Fulton County 7 Urban 16.9 (15.8, 18.1) 82 (52, 96) 181 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.4, 2.9)
Greene County 7 Rural 16.8 (10.4, 26.3) 83 (3, 111) 6
*
*
Chatham County 7 Urban 16.7 (14.8, 18.8) 84 (41, 105) 58 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.4)
Bulloch County 7 Rural 16.7 (12.7, 21.5) 85 (18, 111) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.6, 3.6)
Madison County 7 Urban 16.6 (11.5, 23.5) 86 (7, 111) 7
*
*
Monroe County 7 Urban 16.6 (11.1, 24.2) 87 (7, 111) 6 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.6, 0.4)
Toombs County 7 Rural 16.5 (10.7, 24.4) 88 (6, 111) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.1, 6.7)
Burke County 7 Urban 16.4 (10.3, 25.1) 89 (4, 111) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.5, 5.1)
Gilmer County 7 Rural 16.3 (11.4, 23.0) 90 (11, 111) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.5, 7.1)
Rabun County 7 Rural 16.3 (9.0, 27.5) 91 (2, 111) 4
*
*
Oconee County 7 Urban 16.2 (11.5, 22.3) 92 (10, 111) 8 falling falling trend -11.1 (-30.6, -0.7)
DeKalb County 7 Urban 16.2 (14.9, 17.5) 93 (59, 104) 129 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.5, 2.8)
Coffee County 7 Rural 16.0 (11.3, 22.2) 94 (12, 111) 8
*
*
Clayton County 7 Urban 16.0 (13.7, 18.5) 95 (47, 108) 41 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.3, 3.9)
Gwinnett County 7 Urban 15.9 (14.7, 17.2) 96 (62, 104) 143 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.9, 2.3)
Tift County 7 Rural 15.9 (11.1, 22.1) 97 (12, 111) 8 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.9, 6.8)
White County 7 Rural 15.9 (10.4, 23.4) 98 (7, 111) 6
*
*
Houston County 7 Urban 15.7 (13.1, 18.7) 99 (40, 110) 27 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 10.6)
Muscogee County 7 Urban 15.5 (13.2, 18.0) 100 (44, 109) 36 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.8)
Fayette County 7 Urban 15.4 (12.7, 18.5) 101 (40, 110) 25 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.6)
Columbia County 7 Urban 15.3 (12.8, 18.3) 102 (45, 110) 26 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.5)
Hart County 7 Rural 15.3 (10.1, 22.5) 103 (9, 111) 6 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.2, 7.8)
Berrien County 7 Rural 15.2 (8.8, 24.7) 104 (4, 111) 4
*
*
Lowndes County 7 Urban 15.1 (12.0, 18.8) 105 (39, 111) 17 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 4.0)
Grady County 7 Rural 14.8 (9.2, 22.8) 106 (8, 111) 5
*
*
Spalding County 7 Urban 14.8 (11.4, 18.9) 107 (31, 111) 14 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.5, 6.0)
Butts County 7 Urban 14.5 (9.2, 22.0) 108 (11, 111) 5
*
*
Clarke County 7 Urban 13.8 (10.8, 17.3) 109 (50, 111) 15 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.5, 6.0)
Tattnall County 7 Rural 13.2 (8.0, 20.7) 110 (17, 111) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.5, 4.4)
Dawson County 7 Urban 10.4 (6.4, 16.4) 111 (56, 111) 4
*
*
Atkinson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bacon County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baker County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Candler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chattahoochee County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinch County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dooly County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Early County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Echols County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Evans County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glascock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Heard County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irwin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jenkins County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lanier County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Long County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Miller County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Seminole County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Talbot County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taliaferro County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treutlen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Turner County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Twiggs County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkes County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/12/2024 6:27 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Atkinson, Bacon, Baker, Brooks, Calhoun, Candler, Charlton, Chattahoochee, Clay, Clinch, Dooly, Early, Echols, Evans, Glascock, Hancock, Heard, Irwin, Jeff Davis, Jefferson, Jenkins, Johnson, Lanier, Lincoln, Long, Macon, Marion, Miller, Montgomery, Pulaski, Quitman, Randolph, Schley, Seminole, Stewart, Talbot, Taliaferro, Taylor, Terrell, Treutlen, Turner, Twiggs, Warren, Webster, Wheeler, Wilcox, Wilkes, Wilkinson

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top