Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Georgia by County

Leukemia (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Georgia 7 N/A 14.4 (14.1, 14.8) N/A 1,634 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.9, -0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 14.1 (14.0, 14.1) N/A 53,074 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.2)
Pickens County 7 Urban 27.0 (20.0, 35.7) 1 (1, 37) 12 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.9, 6.6)
Wayne County 7 Rural 23.3 (16.6, 32.0) 2 (1, 75) 8
*
*
Mitchell County 7 Rural 22.9 (15.3, 33.3) 3 (1, 84) 6
*
*
Pike County 7 Urban 22.1 (14.0, 33.3) 4 (1, 93) 5
*
*
Dawson County 7 Urban 21.5 (14.8, 30.5) 5 (1, 86) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 4.2)
Coffee County 7 Rural 21.1 (15.4, 28.3) 6 (1, 77) 9 stable stable trend 3.0 (0.0, 6.8)
Colquitt County 7 Rural 19.8 (14.8, 26.1) 7 (1, 81) 11 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.5, 4.9)
Cook County 7 Rural 19.6 (11.8, 30.8) 8 (1, 95) 4
*
*
Camden County 7 Rural 19.4 (14.4, 25.6) 9 (1, 82) 11 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.5, 7.2)
McIntosh County 7 Urban 19.2 (10.2, 33.9) 10 (1, 95) 3
*
*
Muscogee County 7 Urban 19.2 (16.7, 22.1) 11 (3, 45) 42 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.2, 5.1)
Ben Hill County 7 Rural 19.1 (11.3, 30.2) 12 (1, 95) 4
*
*
Cherokee County 7 Urban 18.8 (16.6, 21.3) 13 (4, 44) 53 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 3.0)
Murray County 7 Urban 18.7 (13.4, 25.4) 14 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.7, 5.4)
Spalding County 7 Urban 18.6 (14.5, 23.5) 15 (2, 77) 15 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.7, 4.1)
Elbert County 7 Rural 18.6 (11.3, 28.9) 16 (1, 95) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.4, 3.8)
Monroe County 7 Urban 18.3 (12.7, 25.9) 17 (1, 91) 7
*
*
Baldwin County 7 Rural 18.2 (13.2, 24.4) 18 (1, 87) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 3.2)
Union County 7 Rural 18.0 (12.2, 26.4) 19 (1, 91) 9 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.2, 5.2)
Coweta County 7 Urban 17.6 (14.7, 20.9) 20 (4, 69) 27 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.9)
Gordon County 7 Rural 17.4 (13.1, 22.7) 21 (2, 86) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.5, 2.9)
Emanuel County 7 Rural 17.4 (10.9, 26.4) 22 (1, 95) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.6, 5.3)
Harris County 7 Urban 17.2 (11.9, 24.3) 23 (1, 92) 7
*
*
Gilmer County 7 Rural 17.1 (11.9, 24.2) 24 (1, 93) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.2, 6.0)
Fannin County 7 Rural 17.1 (11.9, 24.5) 25 (1, 92) 8
*
*
Morgan County 7 Urban 16.8 (10.2, 26.5) 26 (1, 95) 4
*
*
Lumpkin County 7 Urban 16.6 (11.0, 24.1) 27 (2, 94) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.9, 2.9)
Franklin County 7 Rural 16.6 (10.0, 25.8) 28 (1, 95) 4
*
*
Toombs County 7 Rural 16.5 (10.6, 24.6) 29 (1, 95) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.1, 5.4)
Houston County 7 Urban 16.5 (13.7, 19.6) 30 (7, 76) 27 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.5)
Newton County 7 Urban 16.3 (13.1, 20.0) 31 (6, 84) 19 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.6, 6.1)
Henry County 7 Urban 16.2 (13.8, 18.8) 32 (9, 73) 36 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.0, 4.3)
Grady County 7 Rural 15.9 (10.3, 23.6) 33 (1, 95) 5
*
*
Effingham County 7 Urban 15.9 (11.8, 21.0) 34 (4, 90) 11 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.6, 9.1)
Pierce County 7 Rural 15.7 (9.4, 25.1) 35 (1, 95) 4
*
*
Forsyth County 7 Urban 15.7 (13.5, 18.2) 36 (11, 75) 38 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 3.3)
Tift County 7 Rural 15.7 (11.0, 21.9) 37 (2, 93) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-12.9, 2.1)
Habersham County 7 Rural 15.6 (11.2, 21.1) 38 (3, 92) 9 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.4, 7.3)
Hall County 7 Urban 15.6 (13.3, 18.1) 39 (12, 76) 35 stable stable trend -2.5 (-11.4, 1.1)
Worth County 7 Urban 15.5 (9.2, 24.7) 40 (1, 95) 4
*
*
Walton County 7 Urban 15.4 (12.2, 19.1) 41 (7, 88) 17 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.3, 5.3)
Whitfield County 7 Urban 15.3 (12.2, 19.0) 42 (7, 87) 17 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.8)
Fulton County 7 Urban 15.1 (14.0, 16.2) 43 (24, 66) 152 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.6, 2.2)
Lowndes County 7 Urban 15.0 (11.9, 18.6) 44 (10, 88) 16 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.6)
Clayton County 7 Urban 14.9 (12.6, 17.4) 45 (15, 81) 35 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.4)
Carroll County 7 Urban 14.8 (11.9, 18.3) 46 (11, 89) 18 stable stable trend 2.0 (0.0, 4.3)
Putnam County 7 Rural 14.7 (9.2, 22.8) 47 (2, 95) 5
*
*
Columbia County 7 Urban 14.7 (12.1, 17.7) 48 (15, 87) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.5)
Hart County 7 Rural 14.7 (9.1, 22.6) 49 (2, 95) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 3.7)
Appling County 7 Rural 14.6 (8.2, 24.2) 50 (2, 95) 3 stable stable trend 6.7 (-4.9, 37.0)
Troup County 7 Rural 14.5 (10.9, 19.0) 51 (9, 93) 11 stable stable trend -5.6 (-31.2, 2.0)
Butts County 7 Urban 14.5 (8.8, 22.5) 52 (2, 95) 4 stable stable trend 2.1 (-3.2, 9.0)
Fayette County 7 Urban 14.4 (11.8, 17.5) 53 (15, 88) 23 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.6)
Haralson County 7 Urban 14.4 (9.3, 21.4) 54 (3, 95) 5 stable stable trend -37.4 (-63.9, 2.4)
Floyd County 7 Urban 14.3 (11.3, 17.9) 55 (10, 90) 16 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.7, 5.5)
Upson County 7 Rural 14.3 (9.1, 21.5) 56 (3, 95) 5
*
*
Towns County 7 Rural 14.2 (7.4, 26.7) 57 (1, 95) 4
*
*
Gwinnett County 7 Urban 14.0 (12.9, 15.3) 58 (33, 77) 119 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 2.0)
Barrow County 7 Urban 14.0 (10.5, 18.2) 59 (10, 94) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.2, 4.8)
Meriwether County 7 Urban 13.9 (8.2, 22.3) 60 (3, 95) 4 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.2, 7.6)
Washington County 7 Rural 13.8 (8.4, 21.9) 61 (3, 95) 4
*
*
Douglas County 7 Urban 13.7 (11.0, 16.9) 62 (15, 91) 19 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 3.3)
Jackson County 7 Rural 13.6 (10.2, 17.8) 63 (10, 94) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.1, 4.0)
Glynn County 7 Urban 13.5 (10.6, 17.0) 64 (16, 92) 16 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.2, 5.0)
Dodge County 7 Rural 13.4 (8.0, 21.5) 65 (4, 95) 4
*
*
DeKalb County 7 Urban 13.4 (12.2, 14.6) 66 (38, 81) 101 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.5, 2.1)
Bibb County 7 Urban 13.4 (11.1, 16.0) 67 (23, 90) 25 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.6)
Rockdale County 7 Urban 13.2 (10.2, 16.9) 68 (17, 93) 14 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.7, 5.2)
Cobb County 7 Urban 13.2 (12.0, 14.4) 69 (40, 84) 99 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 2.5)
White County 7 Rural 13.1 (8.3, 19.9) 70 (6, 95) 5
*
*
Greene County 7 Rural 13.0 (8.3, 20.6) 71 (5, 95) 5
*
*
Peach County 7 Urban 13.0 (7.9, 20.2) 72 (5, 95) 4
*
*
Richmond County 7 Urban 12.9 (10.8, 15.3) 73 (28, 90) 28 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.4)
McDuffie County 7 Urban 12.9 (7.3, 21.3) 74 (3, 95) 3
*
*
Bartow County 7 Urban 12.8 (9.9, 16.2) 75 (19, 94) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.9, 3.0)
Bulloch County 7 Rural 12.6 (9.0, 17.1) 76 (11, 95) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.2, 4.9)
Paulding County 7 Urban 12.4 (10.0, 15.1) 77 (28, 93) 20 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 1.5)
Sumter County 7 Rural 12.3 (7.5, 19.1) 78 (6, 95) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 4.5)
Dougherty County 7 Urban 12.3 (9.3, 15.9) 79 (24, 94) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Chatham County 7 Urban 12.1 (10.5, 14.0) 80 (44, 92) 40 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.5, 3.5)
Laurens County 7 Rural 12.1 (8.3, 17.1) 81 (13, 95) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.8, 2.2)
Polk County 7 Rural 12.1 (8.0, 17.5) 82 (11, 95) 6 falling falling trend -19.9 (-60.6, -0.3)
Madison County 7 Urban 12.0 (7.4, 18.5) 83 (6, 95) 4 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.2, 9.0)
Liberty County 7 Urban 11.9 (7.7, 17.4) 84 (9, 95) 6 stable stable trend 3.1 (-2.1, 10.0)
Thomas County 7 Rural 11.7 (8.0, 16.7) 85 (16, 95) 7 falling falling trend -20.3 (-41.8, -5.9)
Stephens County 7 Rural 11.5 (6.8, 18.4) 86 (7, 95) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.3, 3.8)
Burke County 7 Urban 11.4 (6.5, 18.7) 87 (9, 95) 3 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.3, 4.5)
Lee County 7 Urban 11.0 (6.4, 17.6) 88 (9, 95) 4
*
*
Bryan County 7 Urban 10.9 (6.8, 16.7) 89 (11, 95) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.5, 6.9)
Oconee County 7 Urban 10.9 (7.1, 16.1) 90 (19, 95) 5
*
*
Walker County 7 Urban 10.7 (7.8, 14.4) 91 (31, 95) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.1, 2.0)
Clarke County 7 Urban 10.4 (7.8, 13.5) 92 (42, 95) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.0, 3.2)
Jones County 7 Urban 10.0 (5.9, 16.0) 93 (19, 95) 4
*
*
Ware County 7 Rural 9.8 (6.0, 15.2) 94 (24, 95) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.9, 3.6)
Catoosa County 7 Urban 8.6 (6.0, 12.1) 95 (57, 95) 7 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.0, 1.0)
Atkinson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bacon County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baker County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banks County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Berrien County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bleckley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brantley County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Candler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chattahoochee County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chattooga County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinch County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crisp County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dade County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dooly County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Early County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Echols County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Evans County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glascock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Heard County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irwin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jenkins County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lanier County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Long County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Miller County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oglethorpe County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rabun County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Screven County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Seminole County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Talbot County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taliaferro County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tattnall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Telfair County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treutlen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Turner County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Twiggs County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkes County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/05/2024 11:11 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top