Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Georgia by County

Colon & Rectum, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Georgia 3,9 36.2 (35.5, 37.0) 1,896 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.0, 1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 35.5 (35.4, 35.7) 66,990 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.4)
Jones County 7,9 20.0 (11.7, 32.2) 4 stable stable trend -15.5 (-41.8, 22.6)
Bulloch County 7,9 22.6 (15.7, 31.6) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-33.5, 48.8)
Toombs County 7,9 23.7 (14.3, 37.0) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-35.6, 55.2)
Walker County 7,9 24.0 (18.0, 31.5) 11 stable stable trend -2.1 (-31.8, 40.5)
Barrow County 7,9 24.9 (18.0, 33.6) 9 stable stable trend 16.5 (-34.1, 106.3)
Monroe County 7,9 25.6 (16.1, 39.2) 5 stable stable trend -8.9 (-39.6, 37.3)
Ware County 7,9 26.2 (18.3, 36.9) 7 stable stable trend 18.4 (-16.8, 68.6)
McDuffie County 7,9 26.3 (15.9, 41.5) 4 stable stable trend -32.8 (-61.6, 17.6)
Murray County 7,9 26.4 (17.5, 38.4) 6 stable stable trend -8.9 (-46.0, 53.8)
Butts County 7,9 27.0 (15.8, 43.4) 4 stable stable trend -7.4 (-36.5, 35.0)
Catoosa County 7,9 27.1 (20.3, 35.5) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-28.2, 40.2)
Union County 7,9 27.2 (18.0, 41.4) 6
*
*
Whitfield County 7,9 27.5 (21.5, 34.6) 15 falling falling trend -17.4 (-29.5, -3.3)
Dawson County 7,9 27.8 (16.5, 44.6) 4 stable stable trend -30.2 (-69.9, 61.6)
Pierce County 7,9 27.9 (16.1, 45.7) 3
*
*
Richmond County 7,9 29.0 (24.6, 33.9) 33 stable stable trend -0.4 (-12.0, 12.8)
Fannin County 7,9 29.4 (19.0, 44.7) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-41.0, 66.7)
Fayette County 7,9 29.6 (24.0, 36.1) 21 stable stable trend -8.9 (-28.0, 15.3)
Walton County 7,9 30.4 (23.7, 38.4) 15 stable stable trend -10.1 (-40.5, 35.8)
Lowndes County 7,9 30.4 (24.0, 37.9) 16 stable stable trend -2.2 (-16.0, 13.8)
McIntosh County 7,9 30.6 (17.2, 51.7) 3
*
*
Brantley County 7,9 31.1 (17.9, 50.8) 3
*
*
Coweta County 7,9 31.2 (25.4, 38.0) 20 stable stable trend -4.7 (-23.0, 18.1)
Brooks County 7,9 31.3 (18.8, 50.4) 4 stable stable trend 4.3 (-27.0, 49.0)
Columbia County 7,9 31.6 (25.7, 38.5) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-24.5, 32.9)
Thomas County 7,9 32.1 (23.4, 43.0) 10 stable stable trend -11.1 (-29.0, 11.2)
Cobb County 7,8 32.1 (29.3, 35.0) 108 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.4, -1.9)
Colquitt County 7,9 32.5 (23.4, 44.1) 9 stable stable trend 3.4 (-20.0, 33.5)
Greene County 7 32.8 (19.4, 53.1) 4
*
*
Hall County 7,9 32.9 (27.9, 38.6) 31 stable stable trend -1.3 (-19.6, 21.1)
Rockdale County 7,9 33.2 (26.0, 41.7) 15 stable stable trend -12.7 (-37.2, 21.3)
Harris County 7,9 33.4 (22.8, 47.6) 7 stable stable trend -1.9 (-36.2, 50.9)
Lumpkin County 7,9 33.5 (22.2, 48.8) 6 stable stable trend 8.7 (-32.7, 75.6)
Gilmer County 7,9 33.7 (23.1, 48.1) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-45.7, 82.7)
Forsyth County 7,9 34.0 (28.4, 40.3) 28 stable stable trend -9.0 (-32.1, 22.0)
Floyd County 7,9 34.0 (27.7, 41.4) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-22.2, 27.2)
Gwinnett County 7,8 34.2 (31.3, 37.2) 117 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Cherokee County 7,9 34.4 (29.5, 40.0) 37 stable stable trend -2.7 (-19.8, 18.0)
Glynn County 7,9 34.6 (27.8, 42.7) 18 stable stable trend -0.1 (-9.9, 10.8)
Ben Hill County 7,9 34.7 (21.0, 54.4) 4 stable stable trend 4.4 (-46.8, 104.6)
Fulton County 7,8 35.0 (32.6, 37.6) 162 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.4, -2.1)
Oconee County 7,9 35.6 (23.8, 51.2) 6 stable stable trend 6.9 (-31.2, 65.9)
Emanuel County 7,9 36.0 (23.0, 53.9) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-41.1, 69.7)
Troup County 7,9 36.2 (28.2, 45.9) 14 stable stable trend -16.2 (-34.9, 7.9)
Chatham County 7,9 36.8 (32.6, 41.4) 58 stable stable trend 5.9 (-3.6, 16.3)
Towns County 7,9 36.8 (21.4, 63.7) 4 stable stable trend 5.5 (-50.4, 124.8)
DeKalb County 7,8 36.9 (34.0, 39.9) 130 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Pulaski County 7,9 37.0 (20.9, 61.9) 3
*
*
Hart County 7,9 37.1 (26.0, 52.1) 8 stable stable trend -19.8 (-44.4, 15.7)
Chattooga County 7,9 37.2 (25.4, 53.4) 6 stable stable trend 11.6 (-10.5, 39.3)
Wilkes County 7,9 37.4 (21.2, 63.7) 3
*
*
Appling County 7,9 37.7 (23.5, 58.0) 4 stable stable trend 10.1 (-28.4, 69.3)
Tift County 7,9 37.8 (27.4, 51.0) 9 stable stable trend 6.5 (-23.8, 49.0)
Coffee County 7,9 38.1 (27.4, 51.6) 9 stable stable trend -14.1 (-44.7, 33.5)
Clayton County 7,8 38.2 (33.0, 44.0) 43 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Decatur County 7,9 38.4 (26.7, 53.9) 7 rising rising trend 24.6 (2.7, 51.2)
Putnam County 7 38.7 (25.5, 57.0) 6
*
*
White County 7,9 38.8 (27.2, 54.1) 8 stable stable trend 5.8 (-32.0, 64.6)
Paulding County 7,9 38.8 (31.9, 46.6) 24 stable stable trend 7.0 (-8.6, 25.2)
Clarke County 7,9 38.8 (31.3, 47.4) 20 stable stable trend 2.3 (-20.4, 31.4)
Henry County 7,9 39.5 (33.8, 45.8) 37 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.4)
Habersham County 7,9 39.6 (29.8, 51.8) 11 stable stable trend -6.9 (-29.3, 22.7)
Laurens County 7,9 39.6 (30.0, 51.4) 12 stable stable trend -2.7 (-20.7, 19.3)
Dougherty County 7,9 39.7 (32.5, 47.9) 22 rising rising trend 17.1 (2.4, 33.9)
Newton County 7,9 39.7 (32.3, 48.2) 21 stable stable trend 2.6 (-18.9, 29.9)
Gordon County 7,9 39.7 (30.3, 51.2) 12 stable stable trend -10.7 (-46.9, 50.3)
Worth County 7,9 39.8 (26.1, 58.6) 6 stable stable trend 35.1 (-24.5, 141.6)
Jefferson County 7 39.9 (24.8, 61.5) 4
*
*
Elbert County 7,9 40.4 (26.6, 59.3) 6 stable stable trend 7.0 (-14.9, 34.6)
Wayne County 7,9 40.5 (27.7, 57.4) 7 stable stable trend -23.4 (-61.5, 52.7)
Crisp County 7,9 40.9 (27.6, 58.6) 6 stable stable trend -22.9 (-42.7, 3.7)
Pickens County 7,9 41.0 (29.1, 56.7) 8 stable stable trend 4.9 (-23.1, 43.1)
Sumter County 7,9 41.1 (28.8, 57.0) 8 stable stable trend 17.3 (-17.5, 66.6)
Jackson County 7,9 41.3 (31.8, 52.8) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-32.6, 49.1)
Camden County 7,9 41.5 (30.2, 55.5) 10 stable stable trend -10.1 (-26.1, 9.3)
Effingham County 7,9 42.1 (31.2, 55.5) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-20.8, 23.5)
Bibb County 7,9 42.4 (36.6, 48.9) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-12.1, 13.0)
Berrien County 7,9 42.9 (27.8, 63.8) 5
*
*
Bartow County 7,9 43.0 (35.4, 51.8) 23 stable stable trend -4.7 (-17.2, 9.7)
Bryan County 7,9 43.5 (28.8, 62.7) 6 stable stable trend 3.8 (-40.2, 80.1)
Carroll County 7,9 44.0 (36.6, 52.5) 26 falling falling trend -8.3 (-10.9, -5.6)
Lee County 7,9 44.2 (29.8, 63.1) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-28.1, 44.6)
Pike County 7,9 44.2 (27.4, 67.8) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-24.8, 33.8)
Rabun County 7,9 44.2 (29.3, 65.7) 6 stable stable trend -3.9 (-35.3, 42.8)
Houston County 7,9 44.3 (37.6, 51.7) 32 stable stable trend 6.2 (-16.7, 35.5)
Oglethorpe County 7,9 44.5 (28.0, 68.2) 5 stable stable trend 4.8 (-32.4, 62.6)
Douglas County 7,9 44.5 (37.2, 52.8) 28 stable stable trend -2.8 (-20.5, 18.7)
Muscogee County 7,9 44.6 (39.1, 50.6) 49 stable stable trend -10.0 (-24.5, 7.2)
Lamar County 7,9 44.6 (28.8, 66.7) 5 stable stable trend -8.7 (-46.9, 56.7)
Spalding County 7,9 45.3 (36.3, 56.1) 18 stable stable trend -15.8 (-33.7, 6.9)
Jasper County 7 45.7 (27.2, 72.5) 4
*
*
Franklin County 7,9 46.1 (31.6, 65.5) 7 stable stable trend 5.0 (-35.4, 70.7)
Madison County 7,9 46.2 (32.8, 63.5) 8 stable stable trend 7.9 (-34.8, 78.4)
Washington County 7 46.7 (31.4, 67.4) 6
*
*
Haralson County 7,9 46.7 (33.4, 63.9) 8 stable stable trend 3.4 (-16.1, 27.6)
Banks County 7,9 47.3 (29.5, 71.9) 5 stable stable trend -14.0 (-55.6, 66.5)
Jeff Davis County 7,9 47.4 (29.0, 73.4) 4 stable stable trend 5.3 (-24.5, 47.0)
Baldwin County 7,9 48.6 (36.7, 63.1) 12 stable stable trend 3.1 (-19.3, 31.6)
Wilkinson County 7,9 48.6 (28.1, 80.1) 3
*
*
Peach County 7,9 48.7 (34.1, 67.6) 7 stable stable trend 7.2 (-26.1, 55.5)
Polk County 7,9 49.1 (37.3, 63.7) 12 stable stable trend 10.0 (-23.8, 59.0)
Upson County 7,9 49.8 (36.6, 66.8) 10 stable stable trend 18.5 (-16.1, 67.4)
Meriwether County 7,9 50.0 (34.8, 70.2) 7 stable stable trend 7.2 (-16.2, 37.1)
Stephens County 7,9 50.1 (36.3, 67.8) 9 stable stable trend 5.1 (-29.1, 55.8)
Tattnall County 7,9 50.2 (34.2, 71.3) 6 stable stable trend -7.2 (-16.2, 2.7)
Grady County 7,9 50.9 (36.2, 69.8) 8 stable stable trend -4.0 (-32.0, 35.5)
Macon County 7,9 51.1 (31.8, 78.8) 5 stable stable trend 4.0 (-31.7, 58.3)
Dodge County 7,9 51.7 (35.1, 73.8) 6 stable stable trend -8.7 (-36.2, 30.7)
Mitchell County 7,9 51.8 (36.5, 71.9) 8 rising rising trend 27.8 (7.3, 52.4)
Screven County 7,9 51.8 (32.2, 79.5) 5 stable stable trend 25.6 (-6.1, 68.2)
Liberty County 7,9 52.1 (38.6, 68.5) 11 stable stable trend 18.5 (-13.1, 61.6)
Morgan County 7 52.4 (35.6, 75.2) 6
*
*
Taylor County 7,9 52.7 (29.8, 88.0) 3
*
*
Cook County 7,9 54.8 (35.6, 80.7) 5 stable stable trend 20.8 (-0.7, 47.1)
Wilcox County 7,9 60.7 (35.1, 100.5) 3
*
*
Burke County 7,9 61.8 (44.4, 84.0) 9 stable stable trend -21.5 (-49.7, 22.8)
Talbot County 7,9 63.3 (35.2, 108.5) 3
*
*
Evans County 7,9 65.0 (40.6, 99.5) 4 stable stable trend 22.7 (-18.9, 85.7)
Terrell County 7,9 65.6 (39.5, 103.6) 4 stable stable trend -6.0 (-23.4, 15.5)
Hancock County 7 77.4 (45.9, 123.9) 4
*
*
Atkinson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bacon County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baker County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bleckley County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Candler County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlton County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chattahoochee County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinch County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dade County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dooly County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Early County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Echols County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glascock County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Heard County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irwin County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jenkins County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lanier County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Long County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Miller County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schley County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Seminole County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taliaferro County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Telfair County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treutlen County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Turner County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Twiggs County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/09/2016 2:39 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2015 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2015 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top