Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Melanoma of the Skin, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Georgia 3,9 18.4 (17.9, 18.9) 952 stable stable trend 2.5 (-3.0, 8.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 16.2 (16.1, 16.3) 28,423 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Fulton County 7,8 21.5 (19.6, 23.4) 104 rising rising trend 3.8 (2.8, 4.8)
Cobb County 7,8 26.0 (23.7, 28.5) 94 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.9, 3.2)
Gwinnett County 7,8 21.9 (19.8, 24.2) 86 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.2, 2.9)
DeKalb County 7,8 14.0 (12.3, 15.8) 52 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.4, 2.4)
Cherokee County 7,9 30.7 (26.3, 35.7) 36 stable stable trend 6.4 (-6.5, 21.0)
Forsyth County 7,9 38.3 (32.7, 44.7) 35 stable stable trend 11.9 (-8.7, 37.1)
Hall County 7,9 32.1 (27.1, 37.8) 29 stable stable trend 13.5 (-9.1, 41.8)
Chatham County 7,9 15.1 (12.4, 18.2) 23 stable stable trend -3.9 (-36.4, 45.2)
Henry County 7,9 18.9 (15.2, 23.1) 20 stable stable trend 2.9 (-32.1, 56.1)
Fayette County 7,9 29.2 (23.5, 36.1) 19 stable stable trend -5.5 (-18.8, 10.0)
Coweta County 7,9 23.1 (18.2, 28.9) 16 stable stable trend 10.3 (-32.9, 81.2)
Richmond County 7,9 11.9 (9.2, 15.2) 14 stable stable trend -10.9 (-31.5, 15.7)
Muscogee County 7,9 12.5 (9.6, 16.0) 13 stable stable trend -10.9 (-27.2, 9.1)
Walton County 7,9 28.0 (21.4, 36.0) 13 stable stable trend -2.0 (-19.5, 19.3)
Newton County 7,9 23.2 (17.7, 30.0) 12 stable stable trend 6.9 (-9.4, 26.2)
Paulding County 7,9 16.5 (12.5, 21.4) 12 stable stable trend -6.9 (-17.5, 5.0)
Carroll County 7,9 19.2 (14.3, 25.1) 11 stable stable trend 35.0 (-0.4, 83.0)
Columbia County 7,9 15.6 (11.7, 20.5) 11 stable stable trend 18.5 (-26.8, 91.8)
Whitfield County 7,9 19.9 (14.9, 26.2) 10 stable stable trend -15.8 (-31.7, 3.9)
Bartow County 7,9 19.0 (14.1, 25.2) 10 stable stable trend 3.0 (-20.4, 33.4)
Clarke County 7,9 17.7 (12.7, 24.0) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-23.8, 30.0)
Floyd County 7,9 14.3 (10.2, 19.6) 8 stable stable trend -23.1 (-55.1, 31.5)
Douglas County 7,9 12.3 (8.7, 16.9) 8 stable stable trend -12.2 (-28.1, 7.3)
Lowndes County 7,9 14.7 (10.4, 20.3) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-21.4, 23.4)
Barrow County 7,9 22.5 (15.8, 31.0) 8 stable stable trend -11.3 (-50.4, 58.8)
Bibb County 7,9 8.4 (5.9, 11.6) 8 stable stable trend 15.9 (-18.5, 64.8)
Catoosa County 7,9 20.2 (14.1, 28.2) 7 stable stable trend 6.1 (-26.8, 53.8)
Glynn County 7,9 14.5 (10.0, 20.2) 7 stable stable trend -6.7 (-27.3, 19.7)
Houston County 7,9 9.9 (7.0, 13.7) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-31.3, 47.6)
White County 7,9 41.2 (27.9, 58.9) 7 stable stable trend -10.7 (-51.9, 65.7)
Effingham County 7,9 25.1 (17.0, 35.7) 6 stable stable trend -20.3 (-43.2, 11.8)
Clayton County 7,8 5.6 (3.7, 8.1) 6 falling falling trend -5.5 (-6.9, -4.1)
Union County 7,9 31.9 (20.5, 48.8) 6 stable stable trend -4.6 (-45.7, 67.6)
Pickens County 7,9 30.1 (19.8, 44.3) 6 stable stable trend 29.5 (-23.7, 120.1)
Rockdale County 7,9 12.3 (8.2, 17.8) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-34.1, 56.9)
Gordon County 7,9 19.9 (13.2, 28.7) 6 stable stable trend -26.3 (-51.1, 11.0)
Lumpkin County 7,9 39.7 (26.3, 57.5) 6 stable stable trend -6.1 (-27.7, 22.0)
Dougherty County 7,9 10.2 (6.7, 15.0) 5 stable stable trend 20.0 (-9.2, 58.4)
Gilmer County 7,9 27.4 (17.5, 41.4) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-40.8, 69.8)
Habersham County 7,9 20.2 (13.2, 29.8) 5 stable stable trend 6.0 (-24.3, 48.6)
Walker County 7,9 14.1 (9.1, 20.7) 5 stable stable trend -3.6 (-36.6, 46.6)
Jackson County 7,9 15.5 (9.9, 23.0) 5 stable stable trend 8.0 (-10.2, 29.9)
Lee County 7,9 35.0 (22.4, 52.2) 5 stable stable trend 12.9 (-39.2, 109.9)
Spalding County 7,9 13.3 (8.4, 20.0) 5 stable stable trend 34.1 (-46.8, 238.1)
Bulloch County 7,9 14.5 (9.1, 22.0) 5 stable stable trend -19.7 (-43.8, 14.8)
Troup County 7,9 11.2 (7.0, 17.0) 5 stable stable trend -5.9 (-32.1, 30.5)
Fannin County 7,9 23.9 (14.1, 38.8) 4 stable stable trend -7.9 (-26.9, 15.9)
Murray County 7,9 22.9 (14.3, 34.7) 4 stable stable trend 13.7 (-3.7, 34.2)
Tift County 7,9 20.5 (12.7, 31.3) 4 stable stable trend -18.4 (-43.6, 18.1)
Towns County 7,9 50.6 (30.2, 83.0) 4 stable stable trend 10.7 (-40.0, 104.2)
Banks County 7,9 39.9 (24.1, 62.5) 4 stable stable trend 34.8 (-16.9, 118.7)
Harris County 7,9 21.4 (12.7, 34.1) 4 stable stable trend -14.0 (-56.3, 69.5)
Madison County 7,9 24.6 (14.8, 38.6) 4
*
*
Oconee County 7,9 21.3 (12.8, 33.6) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-36.7, 54.1)
Bryan County 7,9 27.2 (16.1, 42.6) 4 stable stable trend 3.2 (-58.2, 154.5)
Camden County 7,9 15.9 (9.4, 25.2) 4 stable stable trend -11.8 (-39.9, 29.3)
Franklin County 7,9 28.3 (16.5, 45.4) 4 stable stable trend 26.4 (-48.8, 212.1)
Haralson County 7,9 25.3 (15.0, 39.9) 4 stable stable trend -28.5 (-53.5, 10.2)
Polk County 7,9 15.4 (8.9, 24.9) 3
*
*
Colquitt County 7,9 13.0 (7.3, 21.2) 3
*
*
Dawson County 7,9 28.0 (15.5, 46.5) 3
*
*
Hart County 7,9 18.8 (10.4, 31.8) 3
*
*
Stephens County 7,9 21.7 (12.1, 36.1) 3
*
*
Appling County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atkinson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bacon County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baker County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baldwin County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ben Hill County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Berrien County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bleckley County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brantley County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burke County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butts County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Candler County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlton County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chattahoochee County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chattooga County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinch County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coffee County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crisp County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dade County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dodge County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dooly County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Early County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Echols County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Elbert County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emanuel County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Evans County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glascock County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grady County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Heard County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irwin County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jenkins County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lanier County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Laurens County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Liberty County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Long County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDuffie County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McIntosh County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meriwether County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Miller County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oglethorpe County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Peach County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pierce County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rabun County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schley County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Screven County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Seminole County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Talbot County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taliaferro County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tattnall County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Telfair County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Toombs County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treutlen County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Turner County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Twiggs County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ware County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkes County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/25/2016 12:44 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2015 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2015 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top