Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Georgia by County

Breast, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Georgia 3,8 *** 125.2 (123.8, 126.5) 6,974 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 124.7 (124.4, 124.9) 234,445 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
Fulton County 7,8 *** 132.1 (127.6, 136.7) 677 stable stable trend -0.0 (-0.3, 0.2)
Gwinnett County 7,8 *** 128.8 (123.8, 133.9) 541 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.1, 0.6)
Cobb County 7,8 *** 135.2 (130.0, 140.7) 522 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.8)
DeKalb County 7,8 *** 136.0 (130.7, 141.5) 521 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.3)
Chatham County 7,8 *** 132.5 (124.4, 141.0) 210 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.1)
Clayton County 7,8 *** 134.2 (125.0, 143.8) 174 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.3, 1.5)
Cherokee County 7,8 *** 123.2 (114.4, 132.5) 154 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Henry County 7,8 *** 133.3 (123.7, 143.5) 150 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Muscogee County 7,8 *** 134.9 (125.2, 145.1) 150 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.5)
Richmond County 7,8 *** 132.4 (122.8, 142.6) 149 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Forsyth County 7,8 *** 127.4 (117.8, 137.6) 135 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Hall County 7,8 *** 118.5 (109.3, 128.4) 124 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Bibb County 7,8 *** 130.3 (119.8, 141.5) 120 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Fayette County 7,8 *** 143.6 (130.7, 157.4) 101 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.8)
Columbia County 7,8 *** 132.8 (121.1, 145.3) 100 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 1.9)
Houston County 7,8 *** 121.5 (110.7, 133.0) 96 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
Douglas County 7,8 *** 130.8 (119.1, 143.4) 96 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.2)
Paulding County 7,8 *** 122.0 (110.7, 134.0) 91 stable stable trend -0.0 (-1.8, 1.8)
Coweta County 7,8 *** 117.7 (106.8, 129.4) 89 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Newton County 7,8 *** 132.8 (119.4, 147.2) 75 stable stable trend 6.4 (-5.2, 19.5)
Floyd County 7,8 *** 119.6 (107.4, 133.0) 72 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.6)
Carroll County 7,8 *** 120.2 (107.9, 133.5) 72 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.7)
Dougherty County 7,8 *** 129.3 (115.6, 144.1) 69 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.1)
Clarke County 7,8 *** 133.9 (119.8, 149.3) 68 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.2)
Rockdale County 7,8 *** 131.3 (117.4, 146.4) 68 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 0.9)
Bartow County 7,8 *** 118.7 (106.1, 132.3) 67 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Glynn County 7,8 *** 121.1 (107.9, 135.5) 66 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Lowndes County 7,8 *** 119.9 (107.0, 133.9) 65 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.0)
Walton County 7,8 *** 119.9 (106.6, 134.5) 61 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.0)
Whitfield County 7,8 *** 100.4 (88.8, 113.1) 55 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Spalding County 7,8 *** 131.3 (115.3, 148.9) 52 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Troup County 7,8 *** 128.1 (112.6, 145.0) 52 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Jackson County 7,8 *** 128.9 (112.3, 147.3) 45 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 3.1)
Walker County 7,8 *** 100.6 (87.3, 115.4) 44 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.1)
Barrow County 7,8 *** 113.4 (98.6, 129.8) 43 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Bulloch County 7,8 *** 113.1 (97.1, 131.0) 37 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.6)
Effingham County 7,8 *** 132.1 (113.2, 153.2) 37 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.0)
Laurens County 7,8 *** 113.6 (97.0, 132.3) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Catoosa County 7,8 *** 83.8 (71.6, 97.5) 35 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.2, 2.6)
Thomas County 7,8 *** 114.7 (97.7, 133.9) 35 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.5)
Gordon County 7,8 *** 105.4 (89.9, 123.0) 34 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.3)
Habersham County 7,8 *** 115.8 (98.3, 135.7) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Camden County 7,8 *** 133.2 (112.7, 156.4) 32 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.5, 4.4)
Polk County 7,8 *** 130.1 (110.3, 152.6) 32 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.9, 3.7)
Tift County 7,8 *** 131.6 (111.4, 154.5) 32 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.4, 5.4)
Colquitt County 7,8 *** 115.2 (97.3, 135.5) 30 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.0, 3.4)
Oconee County 7,8 *** 142.2 (119.7, 167.9) 30 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.6, 2.7)
Harris County 7,8 *** 133.6 (112.1, 158.5) 29 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.7, 3.2)
Liberty County 7,8 *** 111.4 (93.0, 132.3) 28 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.2)
Ware County 7,8 *** 123.2 (102.9, 146.5) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.0, 3.0)
Baldwin County 7,8 *** 107.5 (89.7, 127.9) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.4)
Union County 7,8 *** 126.6 (103.4, 154.9) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.5, 3.6)
Pickens County 7,8 *** 126.3 (104.3, 151.9) 26 rising rising trend 6.6 (3.6, 9.7)
Coffee County 7,8 *** 105.9 (87.8, 126.8) 25 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.8, 1.2)
White County 7,8 *** 119.9 (98.6, 144.9) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.1)
Upson County 7,8 *** 131.2 (107.6, 158.7) 23 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.9, 4.8)
Fannin County 7,8 *** 119.5 (96.6, 146.9) 23 stable stable trend -8.1 (-23.5, 10.4)
Jones County 7,8 *** 124.7 (102.3, 150.9) 23 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.4, 4.7)
Wayne County 7,8 *** 126.8 (103.9, 153.4) 22 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.1)
Madison County 7,8 *** 121.7 (99.5, 147.6) 22 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.3)
Sumter County 7,8 *** 119.1 (97.1, 144.6) 22 stable stable trend -10.6 (-21.9, 2.4)
Lumpkin County 7,8 *** 120.0 (97.5, 146.4) 22 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.7)
Monroe County 7,8 *** 114.0 (92.9, 139.0) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.7, 2.6)
Gilmer County 7,8 *** 103.6 (83.5, 127.5) 21 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.2, 8.4)
Hart County 7,8 *** 110.7 (89.2, 136.3) 20 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.1)
Franklin County 7,8 *** 133.2 (107.3, 163.9) 20 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.4, 6.0)
Greene County 7 *** 151.6 (119.6, 190.3) 20
*
*
Stephens County 7,8 *** 111.3 (89.6, 137.0) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.2, 3.7)
Murray County 7,8 *** 85.9 (69.2, 105.4) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.7, 3.4)
Meriwether County 7,8 *** 131.7 (105.0, 163.4) 19 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.1, 4.0)
Toombs County 7,8 *** 117.1 (94.3, 144.0) 19 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.5, 3.7)
Bryan County 7,8 *** 113.5 (91.3, 139.6) 19 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.6)
Peach County 7,8 *** 119.6 (96.0, 147.5) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.6, 3.1)
Crisp County 7,8 *** 123.4 (98.8, 152.5) 19 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.8, 4.6)
Mitchell County 7,8 *** 133.3 (106.5, 165.2) 18 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.4, 3.5)
Putnam County 7 *** 109.1 (86.4, 136.6) 18
*
*
Burke County 7,8 *** 120.8 (96.5, 149.7) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.5)
Washington County 7 *** 136.3 (108.5, 169.4) 18
*
*
Haralson County 7,8 *** 97.8 (78.0, 121.3) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.7, 3.2)
Tattnall County 7,8 *** 142.3 (113.4, 176.5) 18 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.3, 3.3)
Decatur County 7,8 *** 101.7 (80.8, 126.6) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.9, 2.5)
Lee County 7,8 *** 110.1 (87.4, 137.1) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.0, 2.6)
Elbert County 7,8 *** 122.8 (96.7, 154.1) 17 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.7, 4.2)
Chattooga County 7,8 *** 103.3 (81.0, 130.2) 16 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.3, 4.2)
McDuffie County 7,8 *** 110.8 (87.1, 139.2) 16 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 1.2)
Emanuel County 7,8 *** 107.5 (84.6, 135.1) 16 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.8, 3.8)
Rabun County 7,8 *** 118.4 (92.1, 151.2) 16 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.4)
Butts County 7,8 *** 112.0 (88.0, 140.9) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 2.3)
Grady County 7,8 *** 98.1 (76.8, 123.7) 16 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.9, 1.2)
Worth County 7,8 *** 113.1 (88.5, 142.9) 15 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 3.7)
Morgan County 7 *** 126.2 (98.2, 160.2) 15
*
*
Dawson County 7,8 *** 97.7 (75.2, 125.1) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.4)
Dodge County 7,8 *** 114.1 (88.5, 145.2) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.4, 2.8)
Pierce County 7,8 *** 115.4 (89.1, 147.4) 14 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.4, 4.6)
Towns County 7,8 *** 121.8 (91.4, 162.6) 13 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.5, 6.4)
Lamar County 7,8 *** 121.1 (92.3, 156.3) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.7, 2.8)
Screven County 7,8 *** 138.1 (105.6, 178.3) 13 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.9, 4.6)
Wilkes County 7,8 *** 169.9 (128.4, 221.8) 13 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.2, 8.4)
Berrien County 7,8 *** 103.2 (78.6, 133.4) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.9, 3.9)
Cook County 7,8 *** 124.7 (95.1, 160.7) 12 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.1, 5.2)
Appling County 7,8 *** 109.4 (82.6, 142.5) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 3.5)
Ben Hill County 7,8 *** 106.6 (80.5, 138.9) 12 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.9, -1.1)
Dade County 7,8 *** 113.5 (84.7, 149.2) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.8, 3.5)
Crawford County 7,8 *** 144.8 (107.9, 191.0) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.8, 3.9)
Pike County 7,8 *** 106.5 (80.2, 139.2) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.3, 3.1)
Jasper County 7 *** 131.0 (97.1, 173.3) 11
*
*
Brooks County 7,8 *** 95.6 (70.3, 127.8) 10 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.1, 5.4)
Oglethorpe County 7,8 *** 104.8 (77.3, 139.6) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.8, 2.6)
Jefferson County 7 *** 88.6 (64.6, 119.0) 10
*
*
Macon County 7,8 *** 122.1 (88.5, 164.7) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.2, 2.2)
Brantley County 7 *** 86.0 (62.9, 115.4) 10
*
*
Bleckley County 7,8 *** 121.8 (88.4, 164.0) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-5.1, 7.0)
Banks County 7,8 *** 85.2 (61.4, 115.5) 9 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.0, 1.6)
Jeff Davis County 7,8 *** 101.4 (73.4, 137.1) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.1, 2.9)
Bacon County 7,8 *** 136.8 (98.4, 185.6) 9 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.9, 8.5)
Evans County 7,8 *** 134.3 (95.6, 183.4) 8 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.4, 6.5)
Turner County 7,8 *** 148.0 (104.9, 204.2) 8 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.6, 8.1)
McIntosh County 7,8 *** 70.0 (49.2, 98.5) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.1, 3.1)
Terrell County 7,8 *** 126.8 (87.9, 177.8) 8 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.5, 7.9)
Warren County 7 *** 185.2 (126.7, 263.4) 8
*
*
Heard County 7,8 *** 101.1 (70.5, 141.3) 7 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.0, 1.0)
Lincoln County 7,8 *** 135.2 (91.7, 193.9) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.3, 4.4)
Early County 7,8 *** 106.3 (73.1, 149.8) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.1, 5.8)
Seminole County 7,8 *** 116.9 (79.4, 166.9) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-8.0, 6.8)
Taylor County 7,8 *** 131.3 (90.4, 185.5) 7 stable stable trend 5.0 (-0.2, 10.5)
Telfair County 7,8 *** 76.5 (52.7, 108.4) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.5, 5.1)
Irwin County 7,8 *** 120.4 (82.2, 171.0) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.3, 6.3)
Jenkins County 7,8 *** 123.9 (84.8, 176.1) 7 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.4, 7.2)
Wilkinson County 7,8 *** 109.8 (74.8, 156.3) 7 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.2, 7.9)
Hancock County 7 *** 117.3 (78.3, 171.0) 7
*
*
Charlton County 7,8 *** 100.3 (68.4, 143.0) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.8, 5.5)
Montgomery County 7,8 *** 118.8 (79.3, 171.7) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-5.8, 6.7)
Long County 7,8 *** 84.0 (55.6, 121.3) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.3, 5.1)
Atkinson County 7,8 *** 136.0 (90.3, 197.0) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.3, 3.3)
Lanier County 7,8 *** 105.4 (70.0, 152.7) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.2, 6.4)
Candler County 7,8 *** 83.2 (54.2, 122.7) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-7.3, 3.3)
Randolph County 7,8 *** 98.9 (63.7, 148.5) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.2, 3.5)
Talbot County 7,8 *** 115.9 (74.8, 174.4) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.7, 3.2)
Dooly County 7,8 *** 60.9 (39.5, 90.8) 5 falling falling trend -5.7 (-9.7, -1.4)
Miller County 7,8 *** 129.2 (83.4, 193.0) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.8, 6.0)
Pulaski County 7,8 *** 58.8 (38.4, 87.7) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-9.2, 3.7)
Johnson County 7,8 *** 77.4 (49.2, 118.1) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-7.0, 5.3)
Calhoun County 7,8 *** 149.8 (93.1, 229.7) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-7.7, 3.7)
Twiggs County 7 *** 74.3 (45.9, 116.1) 5
*
*
Wilcox County 7,8 *** 96.9 (59.5, 150.2) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.1, 3.3)
Marion County 7,8 *** 77.7 (47.3, 121.6) 4 stable stable trend -2.6 (-8.1, 3.3)
Stewart County 7,8 *** 128.4 (79.0, 202.2) 4 stable stable trend 3.7 (-2.2, 9.9)
Treutlen County 7,8 *** 109.7 (67.1, 170.0) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.2, 2.3)
Clinch County 7,8 *** 87.9 (50.7, 142.5) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-7.4, 3.4)
Quitman County 7 *** 190.8 (108.9, 321.8) 4
*
*
Baker County 7,8 *** 142.2 (80.8, 237.4) 3 stable stable trend 6.1 (0.0, 12.6)
Schley County 7 *** 115.9 (66.4, 189.0) 3
*
*
Chattahoochee County 7 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 7 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Echols County 7 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glascock County 7 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taliaferro County 7 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 7 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/27/2019 1:05 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2017 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2017 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2017 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top