Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Idaho by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Idaho 7 N/A 132.8 (129.6, 136.1) N/A 1,389 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.5, 1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 129.8 (129.5, 130.0) N/A 258,398 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.4, 0.8)
Ada County 7 Urban 147.5 (141.0, 154.2) 4 (1, 13) 411 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.4, 2.8)
Adams County 7 Rural 102.0 (56.4, 178.5) 35 (1, 39) 4
*
*
Bannock County 7 Urban 124.3 (110.1, 139.9) 21 (6, 33) 59 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Bear Lake County 7 Rural 72.3 (39.4, 123.8) 39 (14, 39) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-6.7, 6.6)
Benewah County 7 Rural 127.6 (88.9, 178.9) 18 (1, 39) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.2, 2.6)
Bingham County 7 Rural 109.5 (91.3, 130.2) 31 (10, 38) 27 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.4)
Blaine County 7 Rural 137.8 (112.2, 167.9) 8 (1, 34) 23 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.4)
Boise County 7 Urban 100.7 (64.9, 153.6) 36 (2, 39) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.4, 6.2)
Bonner County 7 Rural 133.7 (115.3, 154.5) 12 (2, 32) 48 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Bonneville County 7 Urban 131.6 (118.7, 145.6) 15 (4, 29) 80 stable stable trend 3.6 (-5.4, 13.8)
Boundary County 7 Rural 132.8 (97.4, 177.8) 13 (1, 38) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.8, 3.0)
Canyon County 7 Urban 141.2 (131.7, 151.2) 6 (2, 20) 173 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.2, 3.2)
Caribou County 7 Rural 119.3 (76.0, 179.4) 25 (1, 39) 5
*
*
Cassia County 7 Rural 127.6 (101.1, 159.1) 17 (1, 37) 17 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.2, 5.5)
Clearwater County 7 Rural 124.1 (83.7, 180.4) 22 (1, 39) 8 stable stable trend 8.0 (-2.8, 28.7)
Custer County 7 Rural 93.5 (49.5, 168.7) 38 (1, 39) 3
*
*
Elmore County 7 Rural 117.4 (92.1, 147.3) 28 (3, 38) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.3)
Franklin County 7 Urban 148.6 (109.2, 197.4) 3 (1, 36) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.4, 3.3)
Fremont County 7 Rural 120.5 (87.9, 161.9) 24 (1, 39) 10 stable stable trend 9.9 (-2.5, 29.5)
Gem County 7 Urban 109.3 (84.3, 140.1) 32 (4, 39) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 2.1)
Gooding County 7 Rural 118.3 (88.2, 155.9) 27 (2, 39) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.2, 2.7)
Idaho County 7 Rural 133.8 (102.6, 172.7) 11 (1, 37) 16 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.1, 4.4)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 116.0 (91.8, 144.5) 29 (3, 38) 17 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.0, 3.8)
Jerome County 7 Urban 105.5 (80.8, 135.4) 34 (6, 39) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Kootenai County 7 Urban 130.1 (120.4, 140.4) 16 (6, 27) 149 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Latah County 7 Rural 136.0 (112.8, 162.6) 10 (1, 33) 27 falling falling trend -8.6 (-17.2, -3.8)
Lemhi County 7 Rural 118.8 (76.2, 178.4) 26 (1, 39) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.6, 5.5)
Lewis County 7 Rural 162.7 (96.5, 263.0) 1 (1, 39) 5
*
*
Madison County 7 Rural 131.9 (103.0, 165.8) 14 (1, 37) 15 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.3, 4.9)
Minidoka County 7 Rural 123.6 (95.8, 157.1) 23 (1, 38) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.0)
Nez Perce County 7 Urban 125.6 (106.9, 146.9) 19 (3, 35) 36 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.0)
Owyhee County 7 Urban 156.2 (115.6, 206.7) 2 (1, 35) 11 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.0, 6.5)
Payette County 7 Rural 140.0 (114.0, 170.5) 7 (1, 34) 22 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 2.9)
Power County 7 Rural 113.9 (70.3, 174.2) 30 (1, 39) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.0, 6.1)
Shoshone County 7 Rural 96.4 (67.4, 134.4) 37 (6, 39) 9 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.9, 0.1)
Teton County 7 Rural 125.5 (88.8, 173.5) 20 (1, 39) 8
*
*
Twin Falls County 7 Urban 109.0 (96.0, 123.1) 33 (16, 38) 56 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Valley County 7 Rural 137.0 (101.2, 183.2) 9 (1, 37) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.7)
Washington County 7 Rural 145.4 (107.4, 194.0) 5 (1, 37) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 3.0)
Butte County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camas County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oneida County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2024 3:57 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top