Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Idaho by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Idaho 7 N/A 119.9 (117.0, 122.9) N/A 1,353 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.9, 7.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 113.2 (113.0, 113.4) N/A 224,883 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.7)
Ada County 7 Urban 135.7 (129.5, 142.1) 6 (3, 14) 382 rising rising trend 5.2 (2.9, 8.4)
Adams County 7 Rural 103.8 (70.3, 161.6) 29 (2, 41) 6
*
*
Bannock County 7 Urban 96.8 (84.4, 110.5) 34 (17, 40) 48 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.9, -1.6)
Bear Lake County 7 Rural 101.2 (63.7, 155.7) 31 (2, 41) 5 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.5, -0.2)
Benewah County 7 Rural 83.5 (58.5, 118.7) 41 (11, 41) 8 falling falling trend -5.2 (-7.7, -2.8)
Bingham County 7 Rural 97.3 (81.1, 115.8) 33 (13, 41) 27 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.2, -2.1)
Blaine County 7 Rural 119.1 (97.2, 145.1) 13 (2, 38) 22 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.1, -1.1)
Boise County 7 Urban 133.8 (98.1, 184.1) 7 (1, 39) 11 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.5, 0.7)
Bonner County 7 Rural 111.6 (97.7, 127.6) 22 (7, 37) 51 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.3, -1.6)
Bonneville County 7 Urban 117.9 (106.0, 130.8) 17 (6, 31) 75 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.0)
Boundary County 7 Rural 110.5 (82.6, 146.6) 25 (3, 41) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.6, 2.0)
Canyon County 7 Urban 126.8 (117.8, 136.3) 10 (4, 22) 154 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.8, 2.8)
Caribou County 7 Rural 157.1 (106.3, 224.6) 2 (1, 39) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.8, 2.8)
Cassia County 7 Rural 90.2 (68.3, 117.0) 39 (12, 41) 12 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.8, -1.6)
Clearwater County 7 Rural 114.8 (86.2, 154.0) 19 (2, 41) 11 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.8, 1.1)
Custer County 7 Rural 118.1 (76.9, 184.0) 16 (1, 41) 6 falling falling trend -4.3 (-8.1, -0.7)
Elmore County 7 Rural 107.4 (84.8, 134.1) 26 (4, 41) 17 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.8, -0.4)
Franklin County 7 Urban 114.4 (83.2, 153.8) 20 (2, 41) 9 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.3, -0.9)
Fremont County 7 Rural 105.8 (78.2, 141.0) 28 (3, 41) 10 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.1, 0.6)
Gem County 7 Urban 121.3 (98.0, 149.6) 11 (2, 37) 20 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.4)
Gooding County 7 Rural 92.9 (68.7, 123.8) 37 (7, 41) 10 falling falling trend -7.4 (-19.7, -4.0)
Idaho County 7 Rural 127.6 (104.6, 156.0) 8 (2, 34) 23 stable stable trend 10.9 (-1.5, 36.1)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 111.2 (87.5, 139.3) 23 (3, 41) 17 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.6, 0.0)
Jerome County 7 Urban 102.5 (78.3, 131.9) 30 (5, 41) 13 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.3, -0.5)
Kootenai County 7 Urban 115.1 (106.6, 124.3) 18 (9, 30) 141 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -0.8)
Latah County 7 Rural 139.3 (117.4, 164.2) 5 (1, 27) 31 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.9, -0.4)
Lemhi County 7 Rural 152.6 (119.4, 197.4) 3 (1, 29) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 2.3)
Lewis County 7 Rural 142.3 (87.8, 227.5) 4 (1, 41) 5 stable stable trend 15.1 (-3.0, 58.8)
Lincoln County 7 Rural 119.5 (67.9, 195.1) 12 (1, 41) 3
*
*
Madison County 7 Rural 127.2 (99.3, 160.1) 9 (1, 38) 15 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.9)
Minidoka County 7 Rural 96.3 (73.6, 124.1) 35 (8, 41) 13 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.5, -2.4)
Nez Perce County 7 Urban 118.8 (102.1, 137.7) 14 (4, 34) 37 stable stable trend 10.5 (-4.4, 22.1)
Oneida County 7 Rural 95.8 (55.3, 160.3) 36 (2, 41) 3
*
*
Owyhee County 7 Urban 99.9 (71.7, 136.7) 32 (4, 41) 9 falling falling trend -4.4 (-8.1, -0.9)
Payette County 7 Rural 114.2 (93.0, 139.5) 21 (3, 39) 20 stable stable trend 4.9 (-5.7, 22.5)
Power County 7 Rural 106.1 (69.1, 157.5) 27 (1, 41) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.5, 6.5)
Shoshone County 7 Rural 110.8 (85.0, 143.8) 24 (3, 41) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.8)
Teton County 7 Rural 87.8 (59.9, 125.8) 40 (7, 41) 7 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.6, -1.7)
Twin Falls County 7 Urban 92.7 (81.1, 105.6) 38 (22, 41) 48 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.3, -3.2)
Valley County 7 Rural 171.8 (136.2, 216.1) 1 (1, 17) 19 rising rising trend 14.1 (2.9, 35.2)
Washington County 7 Rural 118.1 (88.4, 157.3) 15 (1, 40) 11 falling falling trend -4.7 (-17.9, -1.6)
Butte County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camas County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2024 10:46 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top