Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Idaho by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Idaho 7 N/A 2,056.2 (2,032.2, 2,080.5) N/A 5,780 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 1,975.2 (1,973.5, 1,977.0) N/A 1,010,129 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Camas County 7 Rural 1,622.6 (934.4, 2,623.5) 43 (1, 43) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.6, 3.3)
Butte County 7 Urban 2,237.5 (1,725.9, 2,853.1) 4 (1, 43) 13 rising rising trend 5.3 (2.1, 11.5)
Lincoln County 7 Rural 1,911.8 (1,475.4, 2,437.7) 29 (1, 43) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.7)
Oneida County 7 Rural 1,773.7 (1,401.8, 2,214.3) 37 (2, 43) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.2)
Lewis County 7 Rural 1,957.4 (1,581.9, 2,396.2) 23 (1, 43) 19 stable stable trend 5.6 (-4.2, 16.6)
Power County 7 Rural 1,661.4 (1,354.3, 2,017.8) 41 (8, 43) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 3.0)
Adams County 7 Rural 1,759.0 (1,429.3, 2,143.3) 38 (3, 43) 21 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.8, 1.1)
Custer County 7 Rural 1,812.3 (1,476.1, 2,202.6) 34 (2, 43) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.8)
Bear Lake County 7 Rural 1,864.2 (1,543.5, 2,232.0) 31 (2, 43) 24 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.6)
Caribou County 7 Rural 2,263.1 (1,892.7, 2,684.8) 2 (1, 38) 27 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.9)
Teton County 7 Rural 1,923.7 (1,584.9, 2,315.9) 27 (1, 43) 27 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 3.3)
Franklin County 7 Urban 1,731.9 (1,479.4, 2,015.1) 39 (10, 43) 34 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.1)
Boise County 7 Urban 1,713.0 (1,448.7, 2,013.5) 40 (9, 43) 34 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.3, 0.6)
Fremont County 7 Rural 1,646.8 (1,416.2, 1,904.6) 42 (17, 43) 37 falling falling trend -12.9 (-21.9, -4.3)
Owyhee County 7 Urban 1,805.4 (1,554.8, 2,085.4) 35 (6, 43) 38 stable stable trend 3.8 (-1.0, 15.2)
Benewah County 7 Rural 1,962.3 (1,688.6, 2,267.9) 22 (1, 42) 39 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.8)
Lemhi County 7 Rural 2,114.5 (1,857.8, 2,397.3) 10 (1, 38) 50 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.5)
Clearwater County 7 Rural 2,092.1 (1,839.9, 2,369.5) 12 (1, 39) 50 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.9)
Madison County 7 Rural 1,803.5 (1,586.4, 2,042.0) 36 (9, 43) 51 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.6)
Gooding County 7 Rural 1,908.1 (1,679.6, 2,159.0) 30 (3, 42) 51 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.8)
Valley County 7 Rural 1,979.7 (1,735.9, 2,248.6) 17 (2, 42) 54 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.3, 0.1)
Washington County 7 Rural 2,245.9 (1,993.5, 2,521.6) 3 (1, 30) 58 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Jerome County 7 Urban 1,934.5 (1,716.2, 2,173.1) 26 (3, 42) 59 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.4)
Boundary County 7 Rural 2,304.5 (2,045.0, 2,587.7) 1 (1, 27) 60 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.6)
Minidoka County 7 Rural 1,844.2 (1,642.7, 2,063.6) 32 (9, 43) 62 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Cassia County 7 Rural 1,922.3 (1,717.1, 2,145.3) 28 (4, 42) 65 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7)
Shoshone County 7 Rural 2,169.6 (1,935.9, 2,423.8) 8 (1, 34) 65 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 1,970.3 (1,759.2, 2,200.0) 18 (2, 40) 67 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.8)
Elmore County 7 Rural 2,141.4 (1,933.7, 2,365.4) 9 (1, 33) 80 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Gem County 7 Urban 2,069.2 (1,875.2, 2,277.9) 15 (1, 36) 85 falling falling trend -6.7 (-17.2, -0.8)
Blaine County 7 Rural 1,965.4 (1,781.3, 2,163.5) 21 (4, 40) 88 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.9)
Idaho County 7 Rural 2,069.8 (1,882.8, 2,270.4) 14 (1, 36) 92 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Payette County 7 Rural 2,204.2 (2,015.4, 2,406.0) 6 (1, 28) 101 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Latah County 7 Rural 1,996.7 (1,828.1, 2,176.7) 16 (3, 37) 108 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Bingham County 7 Rural 1,832.3 (1,686.8, 1,987.0) 33 (15, 42) 121 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6)
Nez Perce County 7 Urban 1,967.5 (1,833.8, 2,108.4) 19 (7, 38) 163 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -1.5)
Bannock County 7 Urban 1,934.7 (1,821.7, 2,052.8) 25 (11, 37) 230 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Bonner County 7 Rural 2,085.4 (1,963.6, 2,212.9) 13 (3, 29) 232 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Twin Falls County 7 Urban 1,966.0 (1,862.1, 2,074.2) 20 (10, 35) 271 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Bonneville County 7 Urban 1,945.4 (1,848.0, 2,046.6) 24 (11, 36) 307 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Canyon County 7 Urban 2,199.2 (2,124.4, 2,276.0) 7 (1, 15) 678 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Kootenai County 7 Urban 2,214.3 (2,139.3, 2,291.3) 5 (1, 15) 681 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Ada County 7 Urban 2,106.7 (2,057.7, 2,156.6) 11 (6, 20) 1,461 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Clark County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/14/2024 7:11 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Clark

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top