Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Idaho by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Idaho 7 N/A 485.8 (479.7, 492.1) N/A 5,054 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 481.1 (480.6, 481.5) N/A 888,315 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.0, 0.0)
Fremont County 7 Rural 387.0 (329.5, 452.1) 42 (19, 43) 34 falling falling trend -12.3 (-21.8, -1.4)
Elmore County 7 Rural 512.9 (460.4, 569.7) 6 (2, 33) 75 falling falling trend -2.7 (-17.5, -0.7)
Lewis County 7 Rural 551.3 (433.2, 698.1) 3 (1, 41) 18 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.8)
Benewah County 7 Rural 448.1 (381.0, 525.5) 30 (3, 43) 35 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.9)
Boise County 7 Urban 439.9 (368.0, 526.1) 32 (3, 43) 34 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.8, 0.8)
Adams County 7 Rural 401.0 (314.1, 511.8) 40 (4, 43) 19 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.4)
Jerome County 7 Urban 429.1 (377.1, 486.3) 34 (8, 43) 52 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Nez Perce County 7 Urban 459.3 (424.2, 496.7) 27 (8, 39) 134 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Bonner County 7 Rural 486.7 (453.8, 521.8) 14 (4, 33) 193 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Cassia County 7 Rural 412.9 (362.9, 467.8) 39 (15, 43) 51 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Gooding County 7 Rural 424.3 (367.7, 487.6) 36 (7, 43) 42 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.1)
Twin Falls County 7 Urban 480.0 (452.2, 509.1) 16 (5, 33) 232 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Custer County 7 Rural 462.3 (368.9, 579.1) 26 (1, 43) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.3, 2.2)
Latah County 7 Rural 458.0 (415.6, 503.7) 28 (6, 41) 92 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Owyhee County 7 Urban 431.4 (367.7, 503.9) 33 (5, 43) 35 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Valley County 7 Rural 478.4 (414.9, 550.7) 17 (2, 41) 50 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 1.1)
Blaine County 7 Rural 443.6 (397.8, 493.7) 31 (6, 42) 75 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.6)
Gem County 7 Urban 475.1 (424.5, 530.9) 18 (3, 39) 71 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Canyon County 7 Urban 509.7 (490.8, 529.1) 7 (3, 20) 583 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Kootenai County 7 Urban 507.1 (487.6, 527.1) 8 (3, 21) 551 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Payette County 7 Rural 497.5 (449.3, 549.8) 11 (2, 35) 82 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Washington County 7 Rural 502.2 (433.4, 580.4) 9 (1, 39) 44 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.8)
Bingham County 7 Rural 464.1 (426.4, 504.4) 25 (6, 39) 118 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Butte County 7 Urban 495.0 (355.7, 676.9) 12 (1, 43) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.1, 2.9)
Minidoka County 7 Rural 474.5 (420.2, 534.0) 20 (3, 41) 58 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Bonneville County 7 Urban 488.8 (463.2, 515.4) 13 (5, 30) 288 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Shoshone County 7 Rural 615.6 (543.1, 696.0) 1 (1, 11) 62 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Boundary County 7 Rural 535.9 (465.6, 614.8) 4 (1, 34) 48 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 474.4 (422.2, 531.2) 21 (3, 40) 66 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 1.0)
Lemhi County 7 Rural 472.8 (403.0, 554.6) 22 (2, 42) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Clearwater County 7 Rural 465.2 (400.2, 540.4) 24 (3, 42) 41 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Franklin County 7 Urban 415.1 (351.5, 487.0) 38 (7, 43) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.9)
Teton County 7 Rural 457.4 (380.9, 544.9) 29 (2, 43) 30 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 2.3)
Lincoln County 7 Rural 415.3 (315.0, 538.1) 37 (2, 43) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Oneida County 7 Rural 528.8 (416.1, 665.2) 5 (1, 42) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 3.1)
Ada County 7 Urban 498.4 (486.1, 511.1) 10 (5, 22) 1,307 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.6)
Madison County 7 Rural 428.8 (374.2, 488.7) 35 (7, 43) 48 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.8)
Idaho County 7 Rural 474.6 (424.3, 530.6) 19 (3, 40) 77 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 2.0)
Bear Lake County 7 Rural 486.2 (394.5, 594.7) 15 (1, 43) 21 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 3.1)
Caribou County 7 Rural 582.7 (480.1, 701.6) 2 (1, 33) 24 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 2.9)
Power County 7 Rural 392.2 (315.8, 482.6) 41 (6, 43) 19 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 4.1)
Bannock County 7 Urban 466.6 (437.4, 497.1) 23 (7, 36) 207 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.3, 7.8)
Camas County 7 Rural 381.2 (202.2, 676.9) 43 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Clark County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/13/2024 1:41 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Clark

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top