Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Idaho by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Idaho 7 N/A 445.7 (441.6, 449.9) N/A 9,467 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.5, -0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 444.4 (444.1, 444.7) N/A 1,744,459 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.3)
Clark County 7 Rural 336.3 (189.3, 556.0) 44 (1, 44) 3
*
*
Camas County 7 Rural 342.9 (218.9, 522.5) 43 (1, 44) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.3)
Fremont County 7 Rural 378.2 (336.5, 423.9) 42 (17, 44) 64 stable stable trend -9.1 (-20.2, 0.5)
Custer County 7 Rural 381.8 (319.1, 456.4) 41 (4, 44) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Bear Lake County 7 Rural 383.3 (324.9, 450.0) 40 (5, 44) 34 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 2.9)
Power County 7 Rural 384.7 (328.5, 448.2) 39 (6, 44) 36 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 3.4)
Adams County 7 Rural 396.4 (328.5, 477.2) 38 (2, 44) 32 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
Lincoln County 7 Rural 405.2 (332.9, 489.0) 37 (1, 44) 23 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 2.0)
Cassia County 7 Rural 409.2 (374.3, 446.4) 36 (10, 43) 105 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.1, 9.3)
Boise County 7 Urban 410.5 (356.8, 471.5) 35 (3, 44) 56 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.4)
Franklin County 7 Urban 411.4 (365.5, 461.6) 34 (4, 44) 61 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.0)
Madison County 7 Rural 413.8 (376.4, 453.6) 33 (6, 43) 97 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 2.0)
Gooding County 7 Rural 416.6 (376.0, 460.6) 32 (5, 43) 82 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.2)
Lemhi County 7 Rural 417.1 (367.5, 473.0) 31 (3, 43) 66 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Minidoka County 7 Rural 420.4 (384.2, 459.2) 30 (6, 42) 105 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Benewah County 7 Rural 421.0 (371.9, 475.4) 29 (3, 44) 62 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Teton County 7 Rural 421.1 (368.0, 479.9) 28 (2, 44) 52 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.7)
Latah County 7 Rural 422.6 (393.8, 453.1) 27 (8, 41) 171 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Blaine County 7 Rural 423.1 (391.1, 457.2) 26 (6, 41) 142 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Bannock County 7 Urban 425.6 (406.5, 445.5) 25 (12, 38) 393 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Nez Perce County 7 Urban 426.0 (401.8, 451.3) 24 (9, 39) 252 falling falling trend -1.6 (-4.1, -1.0)
Twin Falls County 7 Urban 427.8 (409.7, 446.6) 23 (12, 37) 438 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Oneida County 7 Rural 428.0 (353.2, 514.9) 22 (1, 44) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 2.0)
Valley County 7 Rural 429.1 (384.4, 478.3) 21 (2, 43) 82 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Jerome County 7 Urban 430.8 (393.8, 470.3) 20 (4, 41) 104 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Owyhee County 7 Urban 431.4 (384.4, 483.0) 19 (2, 43) 67 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 0.0)
Bingham County 7 Rural 431.7 (405.8, 458.8) 18 (7, 38) 219 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 433.6 (398.9, 470.4) 17 (3, 40) 122 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Idaho County 7 Rural 440.1 (403.2, 480.0) 16 (3, 40) 130 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 1.6)
Gem County 7 Urban 447.5 (411.6, 486.1) 15 (2, 38) 129 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.7, 2.2)
Bonneville County 7 Urban 450.1 (433.2, 467.6) 14 (4, 28) 554 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.7)
Clearwater County 7 Rural 452.5 (403.2, 507.5) 13 (1, 40) 73 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.2)
Ada County 7 Urban 453.1 (445.0, 461.3) 12 (6, 22) 2,490 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.5)
Kootenai County 7 Urban 457.8 (445.0, 470.9) 11 (4, 22) 1,040 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Bonner County 7 Rural 458.2 (434.7, 482.7) 10 (2, 28) 346 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Canyon County 7 Urban 463.7 (451.4, 476.3) 9 (3, 19) 1,114 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 0.1)
Caribou County 7 Rural 465.5 (401.4, 537.3) 8 (1, 42) 40 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.4)
Butte County 7 Urban 471.5 (370.8, 593.6) 7 (1, 44) 18 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.1, 8.5)
Payette County 7 Rural 477.4 (443.4, 513.4) 6 (1, 25) 157 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Boundary County 7 Rural 485.3 (437.6, 537.2) 5 (1, 31) 87 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.8)
Washington County 7 Rural 486.7 (437.0, 541.1) 4 (1, 31) 83 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Lewis County 7 Rural 487.7 (404.9, 585.1) 3 (1, 41) 31 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.2)
Shoshone County 7 Rural 488.1 (442.6, 537.4) 2 (1, 28) 99 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Elmore County 7 Rural 491.9 (455.5, 530.4) 1 (1, 20) 144 falling falling trend -1.6 (-9.1, -0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:01 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top