Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Idaho by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Idaho 7 N/A 212.7 (209.6, 215.9) N/A 3,686 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.2, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 222.9 (222.7, 223.2) N/A 734,330 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 0.0)
Ada County 7 Urban 213.9 (207.9, 219.9) 17 (10, 29) 1,029 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Adams County 7 Rural 199.3 (140.4, 277.8) 34 (1, 42) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.0, 2.9)
Bannock County 7 Urban 207.3 (192.8, 222.6) 23 (9, 38) 163 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 4.6)
Bear Lake County 7 Rural 169.1 (122.9, 227.3) 42 (5, 42) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.9, 4.4)
Benewah County 7 Rural 198.0 (159.3, 244.1) 35 (2, 42) 23 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.4)
Bingham County 7 Rural 229.1 (208.5, 251.1) 8 (2, 30) 98 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.7, 2.3)
Blaine County 7 Rural 199.9 (175.2, 227.4) 33 (5, 42) 54 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.2)
Boise County 7 Urban 222.0 (175.3, 279.5) 12 (1, 42) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 2.8)
Bonner County 7 Rural 222.8 (202.8, 244.3) 10 (2, 34) 114 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Bonneville County 7 Urban 233.8 (220.6, 247.6) 4 (2, 20) 247 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.3, 1.7)
Boundary County 7 Rural 222.1 (183.5, 266.8) 11 (1, 41) 27 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.5)
Butte County 7 Urban 216.0 (132.9, 332.4) 14 (1, 42) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.8, 4.1)
Canyon County 7 Urban 212.6 (203.6, 222.0) 21 (9, 32) 436 falling falling trend -0.8 (-2.4, -0.1)
Caribou County 7 Rural 205.4 (157.2, 264.0) 24 (1, 42) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.7)
Cassia County 7 Rural 190.3 (164.2, 219.2) 38 (9, 42) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6)
Clearwater County 7 Rural 215.2 (173.4, 265.8) 15 (1, 42) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.4)
Custer County 7 Rural 174.8 (124.4, 243.3) 40 (2, 42) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.9, 3.2)
Elmore County 7 Rural 253.3 (225.0, 284.1) 2 (1, 21) 64 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.0)
Franklin County 7 Urban 220.4 (183.5, 262.5) 13 (1, 41) 27 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.0, 3.5)
Fremont County 7 Rural 194.7 (161.4, 233.0) 37 (4, 42) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 1.0)
Gem County 7 Urban 212.9 (183.5, 246.1) 19 (2, 41) 45 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Gooding County 7 Rural 200.9 (169.0, 237.2) 31 (3, 42) 31 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.5)
Idaho County 7 Rural 204.4 (172.6, 240.8) 27 (3, 42) 38 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.3, 3.4)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 211.3 (186.4, 238.4) 22 (3, 40) 55 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Jerome County 7 Urban 213.3 (185.7, 243.7) 18 (3, 40) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Kootenai County 7 Urban 203.7 (193.9, 213.9) 29 (14, 37) 359 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Latah County 7 Rural 194.9 (173.0, 218.9) 36 (9, 42) 63 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Lemhi County 7 Rural 171.5 (130.2, 223.2) 41 (5, 42) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 2.0)
Lewis County 7 Rural 275.1 (200.1, 371.9) 1 (1, 40) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.2, 1.6)
Lincoln County 7 Rural 187.3 (136.3, 251.6) 39 (1, 42) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.7)
Madison County 7 Rural 212.7 (184.4, 243.9) 20 (2, 40) 46 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.6)
Minidoka County 7 Rural 214.4 (185.5, 246.6) 16 (2, 40) 43 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.8)
Nez Perce County 7 Urban 202.9 (183.5, 224.0) 30 (8, 40) 89 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Oneida County 7 Rural 233.3 (169.2, 314.4) 5 (1, 42) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.0, 4.1)
Owyhee County 7 Urban 232.6 (193.7, 277.4) 6 (1, 39) 29 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.2)
Payette County 7 Rural 227.6 (200.4, 257.5) 9 (1, 37) 55 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Power County 7 Rural 200.0 (155.0, 254.3) 32 (1, 42) 15 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.1, 5.8)
Shoshone County 7 Rural 244.8 (206.1, 289.1) 3 (1, 35) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.4)
Teton County 7 Rural 203.8 (169.1, 243.8) 28 (2, 42) 25 stable stable trend 4.4 (-0.7, 19.1)
Twin Falls County 7 Urban 205.3 (191.2, 220.2) 25 (10, 38) 167 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Valley County 7 Rural 204.7 (168.6, 247.2) 26 (2, 42) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.9)
Washington County 7 Rural 232.2 (189.7, 281.9) 7 (1, 40) 25 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.0)
Camas County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2024 7:32 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Camas, Clark

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top