Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Idaho by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Idaho 7 N/A 35.3 (34.1, 36.5) N/A 726 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.5, 3.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 36.4 (36.3, 36.4) N/A 140,088 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Latah County 7 Rural 24.7 (18.0, 33.0) 33 (20, 33) 10 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.6, 0.3)
Fremont County 7 Rural 28.0 (17.5, 42.9) 32 (7, 33) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.2, 3.0)
Owyhee County 7 Urban 28.0 (17.4, 43.4) 31 (7, 33) 5
*
*
Blaine County 7 Rural 29.0 (20.7, 39.7) 30 (10, 33) 9 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.4, 1.9)
Benewah County 7 Rural 29.5 (18.4, 46.2) 29 (5, 33) 5 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.1, -0.8)
Ada County 7 Urban 30.3 (28.3, 32.6) 28 (22, 32) 163 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.5)
Lemhi County 7 Rural 31.3 (17.6, 52.9) 27 (2, 33) 4
*
*
Valley County 7 Rural 31.7 (20.0, 48.5) 26 (4, 33) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.6, 4.8)
Custer County 7 Rural 32.7 (18.4, 60.7) 25 (2, 33) 3
*
*
Twin Falls County 7 Urban 33.6 (28.6, 39.2) 24 (11, 32) 34 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Nez Perce County 7 Urban 34.6 (27.7, 42.8) 23 (7, 32) 19 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.9)
Bannock County 7 Urban 35.4 (29.8, 41.6) 22 (8, 31) 31 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.1)
Canyon County 7 Urban 36.0 (32.6, 39.7) 21 (10, 28) 84 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Madison County 7 Rural 36.1 (25.4, 49.6) 20 (3, 33) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.5, 3.4)
Kootenai County 7 Urban 36.5 (32.9, 40.4) 19 (10, 27) 80 stable stable trend 4.1 (-1.8, 8.1)
Bonneville County 7 Urban 37.0 (32.2, 42.2) 18 (8, 29) 46 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 38.3 (28.5, 50.3) 17 (3, 32) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 3.2)
Cassia County 7 Rural 39.9 (29.2, 53.1) 16 (2, 32) 10 stable stable trend 9.6 (-0.2, 35.4)
Gooding County 7 Rural 40.5 (28.3, 56.3) 15 (2, 32) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.5)
Payette County 7 Rural 40.7 (31.1, 52.4) 14 (2, 31) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.9, 2.8)
Jerome County 7 Urban 41.2 (30.1, 54.9) 13 (2, 31) 10 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.1, 0.3)
Bonner County 7 Rural 41.5 (34.6, 49.5) 12 (3, 26) 30 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Minidoka County 7 Rural 42.3 (31.3, 55.9) 11 (2, 31) 10 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.3, 0.1)
Idaho County 7 Rural 42.9 (31.5, 57.8) 10 (1, 31) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.7, 3.2)
Bingham County 7 Rural 43.4 (35.2, 52.9) 9 (2, 26) 21 stable stable trend 2.0 (0.0, 4.4)
Franklin County 7 Urban 43.4 (29.6, 61.6) 8 (1, 32) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.9, 6.3)
Clearwater County 7 Rural 44.8 (30.5, 65.6) 7 (1, 32) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.0, 3.3)
Gem County 7 Urban 47.5 (36.3, 61.4) 6 (1, 27) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 2.9)
Power County 7 Rural 47.7 (29.2, 73.9) 5 (1, 33) 4
*
*
Elmore County 7 Rural 49.4 (38.0, 63.0) 4 (1, 25) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.8, 2.0)
Washington County 7 Rural 54.8 (39.4, 75.4) 3 (1, 25) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.6, 1.6)
Boundary County 7 Rural 56.5 (40.2, 77.6) 2 (1, 23) 9
*
*
Shoshone County 7 Rural 63.4 (46.8, 84.5) 1 (1, 14) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 1.9)
Adams County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bear Lake County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boise County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butte County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camas County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caribou County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oneida County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Teton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/11/2024 9:47 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Adams, Bear Lake, Boise, Butte, Camas, Caribou, Clark, Lewis, Lincoln, Oneida, Teton

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top