Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Idaho by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Idaho 7 118.8 (115.9, 121.8) N/A 1,283 rising rising trend 5.9 (2.1, 10.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 110.5 (110.2, 110.7) N/A 212,734 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.1)
Lemhi County 7 153.1 (117.3, 201.3) 1 (1, 30) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.0, 2.0)
Caribou County 7 150.0 (101.5, 214.8) 2 (1, 38) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.8, 2.1)
Boise County 7 146.9 (109.4, 199.1) 3 (1, 35) 12 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.2, 2.0)
Valley County 7 141.0 (108.1, 183.1) 4 (1, 33) 15 stable stable trend 15.5 (-1.4, 40.9)
Latah County 7 135.2 (113.8, 159.7) 5 (1, 28) 30 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.9, -1.0)
Washington County 7 132.6 (100.6, 174.2) 6 (1, 35) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.6)
Lincoln County 7 132.5 (79.5, 208.0) 7 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Ada County 7 131.4 (125.1, 137.9) 8 (3, 18) 349 rising rising trend 7.2 (3.6, 12.2)
Fremont County 7 131.2 (99.6, 170.6) 9 (1, 36) 12 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.2, 1.4)
Custer County 7 128.9 (80.7, 204.1) 10 (1, 40) 6 falling falling trend -4.3 (-8.5, -0.1)
Gem County 7 127.1 (102.5, 157.0) 11 (1, 34) 19 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.5, 0.4)
Blaine County 7 126.5 (103.2, 154.3) 12 (1, 34) 22 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.9, -0.4)
Bonneville County 7 125.4 (112.8, 139.1) 13 (3, 27) 75 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.6)
Madison County 7 123.4 (95.6, 156.4) 14 (1, 37) 14 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.5, 1.0)
Canyon County 7 122.9 (113.9, 132.5) 15 (6, 26) 144 stable stable trend 7.9 (-1.5, 15.4)
Shoshone County 7 122.8 (94.7, 158.5) 16 (1, 38) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.6)
Kootenai County 7 122.3 (113.2, 132.0) 17 (5, 26) 141 rising rising trend 6.7 (1.3, 10.6)
Elmore County 7 121.9 (97.1, 151.3) 18 (1, 37) 18 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.2, 0.3)
Lewis County 7 120.4 (71.6, 198.6) 19 (1, 40) 4 rising rising trend 36.5 (8.2, 68.3)
Bonner County 7 117.0 (102.4, 133.6) 20 (5, 32) 51 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.2)
Jefferson County 7 116.7 (92.0, 145.9) 21 (2, 38) 17 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.9, 0.4)
Clearwater County 7 114.8 (86.5, 153.4) 22 (1, 39) 11 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.6, 1.3)
Idaho County 7 112.4 (90.8, 139.5) 23 (3, 38) 20 stable stable trend 24.8 (-2.2, 45.9)
Bear Lake County 7 112.0 (69.9, 172.5) 24 (1, 40) 5 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.8, -0.4)
Payette County 7 111.3 (89.5, 137.3) 25 (4, 39) 18 stable stable trend 6.9 (-7.3, 24.6)
Franklin County 7 109.5 (78.8, 148.5) 26 (2, 40) 9 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.5, -0.4)
Nez Perce County 7 107.9 (91.7, 126.5) 27 (7, 37) 32 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.4, -2.4)
Boundary County 7 106.9 (79.6, 142.5) 28 (3, 40) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.9, 2.8)
Bingham County 7 106.0 (88.8, 125.6) 29 (8, 38) 28 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.3, -1.6)
Owyhee County 7 101.8 (72.8, 139.7) 30 (3, 40) 8 falling falling trend -5.1 (-9.4, -1.1)
Minidoka County 7 98.3 (75.2, 126.6) 31 (7, 40) 13 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.9, -2.4)
Adams County 7 97.0 (64.5, 155.1) 32 (3, 40) 6
*
*
Teton County 7 94.7 (64.4, 135.4) 33 (3, 40) 7 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.6, -1.6)
Jerome County 7 93.8 (70.5, 122.2) 34 (9, 40) 11 falling falling trend -5.0 (-8.5, -1.8)
Twin Falls County 7 90.2 (78.5, 103.1) 35 (24, 40) 44 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.8, -3.2)
Bannock County 7 87.9 (76.2, 101.0) 36 (26, 40) 43 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.8, -2.1)
Benewah County 7 87.1 (60.7, 124.2) 37 (8, 40) 7 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.2, -2.4)
Cassia County 7 85.0 (63.7, 111.2) 38 (17, 40) 11 rising rising trend 20.7 (1.6, 42.5)
Power County 7 81.7 (49.3, 129.0) 39 (5, 40) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.2, 4.5)
Gooding County 7 81.6 (58.8, 111.3) 40 (16, 40) 9 falling falling trend -9.0 (-29.7, -4.9)
Butte County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camas County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oneida County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/23/2024 5:32 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Butte, Camas, Clark, Oneida

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top