Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

Oral Cavity & Pharynx (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois 7 12.2 (11.9, 12.4) N/A 1,872 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.9, 1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 12.0 (11.9, 12.0) N/A 46,911 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Woodford County 7 11.2 (7.3, 16.6) 67 (10, 70) 5 stable stable trend 5.0 (-0.2, 10.6)
Winnebago County 7 11.6 (10.0, 13.3) 60 (30, 69) 43 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Williamson County 7 16.1 (12.4, 20.6) 19 (3, 64) 14 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.5, 4.5)
Will County 7 11.7 (10.6, 12.8) 59 (37, 68) 90 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.0)
Whiteside County 7 12.2 (9.2, 16.2) 55 (13, 70) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 3.7)
White County 7 18.9 (10.4, 31.8) 6 (1, 70) 3
*
*
Washington County 7 19.5 (10.7, 32.6) 4 (1, 70) 3
*
*
Vermilion County 7 12.4 (9.4, 16.2) 52 (10, 70) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1)
Tazewell County 7 14.5 (12.0, 17.4) 29 (8, 63) 25 stable stable trend 2.7 (0.0, 5.5)
Stephenson County 7 10.3 (7.1, 14.8) 69 (16, 70) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.6, 3.5)
St. Clair County 7 13.1 (11.4, 15.1) 46 (18, 65) 42 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.2)
Shelby County 7 15.9 (9.7, 24.8) 21 (1, 70) 5
*
*
Sangamon County 7 14.7 (12.6, 17.1) 28 (9, 57) 37 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.6)
Saline County 7 14.0 (8.7, 21.6) 37 (2, 70) 5
*
*
Rock Island County 7 13.0 (10.7, 15.7) 47 (14, 68) 25 stable stable trend -15.7 (-40.5, 19.5)
Randolph County 7 9.7 (6.0, 15.1) 70 (15, 70) 4 falling falling trend -7.0 (-13.3, -0.1)
Pike County 7 28.4 (18.3, 42.3) 1 (1, 47) 6 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.9, 8.2)
Peoria County 7 12.3 (10.3, 14.6) 53 (21, 69) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Ogle County 7 14.9 (11.0, 19.9) 25 (3, 69) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.1, 3.4)
Morgan County 7 11.6 (7.8, 16.9) 62 (9, 70) 6 stable stable trend -18.8 (-36.1, 3.3)
Montgomery County 7 16.2 (10.9, 23.6) 16 (1, 69) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.3, 7.4)
Monroe County 7 12.6 (8.4, 18.4) 50 (4, 70) 6
*
*
Mercer County 7 16.9 (9.6, 27.9) 12 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Menard County 7 23.1 (13.1, 37.9) 2 (1, 70) 4
*
*
McLean County 7 13.6 (11.2, 16.3) 41 (12, 67) 23 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.7, 5.1)
McHenry County 7 13.8 (12.2, 15.7) 39 (15, 59) 53 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 2.8)
McDonough County 7 11.9 (7.0, 19.1) 57 (5, 70) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.1, 3.7)
Marshall County 7 16.2 (9.1, 27.8) 18 (1, 70) 3
*
*
Marion County 7 14.1 (9.8, 19.9) 36 (4, 70) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.6)
Madison County 7 13.8 (12.0, 15.8) 40 (14, 60) 47 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.3, 3.7)
Macoupin County 7 18.2 (13.6, 24.0) 8 (1, 58) 11 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.5, 4.8)
Macon County 7 17.9 (14.8, 21.4) 9 (2, 45) 26 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 2.6)
Logan County 7 16.4 (11.1, 23.6) 15 (1, 69) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.1, 5.0)
Livingston County 7 13.4 (9.0, 19.4) 44 (4, 70) 6
*
*
Lee County 7 16.5 (11.7, 22.8) 14 (2, 69) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.4)
Lake County 7 10.4 (9.4, 11.5) 68 (49, 70) 87 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
La Salle County 7 16.2 (13.4, 19.5) 17 (4, 53) 24 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.0, 5.1)
Knox County 7 11.9 (8.5, 16.2) 58 (11, 70) 9
*
*
Kendall County 7 14.5 (11.5, 18.1) 30 (6, 67) 17 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 4.8)
Kankakee County 7 14.8 (12.0, 18.0) 27 (6, 64) 21 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 3.0)
Kane County 7 11.4 (10.2, 12.7) 63 (38, 69) 69 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Jo Daviess County 7 17.5 (11.4, 26.2) 10 (1, 69) 6
*
*
Jersey County 7 12.8 (7.5, 20.8) 49 (3, 70) 4 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.3, 6.1)
Jefferson County 7 16.8 (12.0, 23.1) 13 (2, 68) 8 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.4, 5.5)
Jackson County 7 13.3 (9.4, 18.2) 45 (6, 70) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.8, 4.8)
Iroquois County 7 15.0 (9.9, 22.1) 24 (2, 70) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.7, 6.6)
Henry County 7 14.8 (10.8, 20.0) 26 (3, 69) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.9, 3.5)
Hancock County 7 12.2 (6.9, 20.7) 54 (3, 70) 4
*
*
Grundy County 7 13.5 (9.6, 18.6) 43 (5, 70) 8
*
*
Fulton County 7 15.9 (11.2, 22.1) 22 (2, 69) 8 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.8, 8.1)
Franklin County 7 14.3 (10.1, 19.8) 33 (4, 70) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.3)
Ford County 7 18.8 (11.0, 30.6) 7 (1, 70) 4 stable stable trend 3.0 (-2.3, 8.6)
Fayette County 7 14.4 (8.9, 22.5) 31 (2, 70) 4
*
*
Effingham County 7 11.6 (7.1, 17.8) 61 (5, 70) 5
*
*
Edgar County 7 13.5 (7.9, 22.3) 42 (2, 70) 4
*
*
DuPage County 7 11.3 (10.4, 12.2) 64 (42, 68) 130 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.4, 2.1)
DeKalb County 7 12.5 (9.6, 16.0) 51 (11, 70) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.3)
Crawford County 7 11.3 (6.4, 19.0) 65 (5, 70) 3
*
*
Cook County 7 11.2 (10.8, 11.6) 66 (48, 66) 667 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Coles County 7 14.3 (10.3, 19.4) 32 (4, 70) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.2)
Clinton County 7 15.5 (10.8, 21.8) 23 (2, 70) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.8, 5.9)
Clay County 7 19.3 (11.1, 31.9) 5 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Clark County 7 15.9 (9.3, 26.0) 20 (1, 70) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.4, 3.8)
Christian County 7 14.2 (9.5, 20.6) 35 (3, 70) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.2, 4.8)
Champaign County 7 12.2 (10.0, 14.7) 56 (19, 69) 24 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.7)
Cass County 7 17.4 (9.9, 29.1) 11 (1, 70) 3
*
*
Carroll County 7 19.8 (11.7, 32.1) 3 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Bureau County 7 14.2 (9.6, 20.4) 34 (3, 70) 7 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.2, 6.4)
Boone County 7 13.0 (9.3, 17.8) 48 (7, 70) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.1, 3.0)
Adams County 7 13.9 (10.6, 18.1) 38 (5, 69) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Alexander County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bond County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
De Witt County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Massac County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moultrie County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Piatt County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stark County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/29/2022 5:13 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2021 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top