Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois 7 N/A 2,058.5 (2,049.5, 2,067.6) N/A 40,784 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 1,975.2 (1,973.5, 1,977.0) N/A 1,010,129 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Cook County 7 Urban 1,938.9 (1,924.8, 1,953.1) 88 (77, 93) 14,772 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
DuPage County 7 Urban 2,015.9 (1,982.7, 2,049.5) 76 (62, 85) 2,903 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Lake County 7 Urban 2,098.4 (2,057.7, 2,139.7) 65 (45, 74) 2,097 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.8, 4.2)
Will County 7 Urban 2,165.0 (2,121.3, 2,209.3) 49 (32, 66) 1,938 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.9, -0.6)
Kane County 7 Urban 2,003.7 (1,956.4, 2,051.7) 78 (62, 88) 1,414 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Madison County 7 Urban 2,226.1 (2,164.3, 2,289.2) 34 (22, 59) 1,004 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.2)
McHenry County 7 Urban 2,171.6 (2,110.0, 2,234.6) 46 (28, 68) 980 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.1, 4.9)
Winnebago County 7 Urban 1,958.5 (1,903.1, 2,015.2) 85 (65, 95) 967 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
St. Clair County 7 Urban 2,167.5 (2,102.5, 2,234.1) 48 (28, 69) 869 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Sangamon County 7 Urban 2,366.9 (2,293.8, 2,441.8) 20 (8, 36) 819 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Peoria County 7 Urban 2,226.9 (2,152.3, 2,303.4) 33 (20, 60) 690 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Tazewell County 7 Urban 2,268.7 (2,184.3, 2,355.6) 29 (16, 57) 555 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 4.8)
Champaign County 7 Urban 2,013.8 (1,936.3, 2,093.7) 77 (52, 92) 530 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 2.2)
Rock Island County 7 Urban 1,878.0 (1,805.8, 1,952.3) 91 (75, 100) 518 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Macon County 7 Urban 2,484.1 (2,387.5, 2,583.6) 10 (2, 26) 510 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
La Salle County 7 Rural 2,218.7 (2,126.6, 2,313.6) 35 (18, 68) 447 falling falling trend -0.8 (-4.5, -0.4)
McLean County 7 Urban 1,889.1 (1,808.3, 1,972.6) 90 (70, 100) 426 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.4, -1.0)
Kankakee County 7 Urban 2,129.5 (2,033.9, 2,228.5) 57 (26, 82) 382 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Vermilion County 7 Rural 2,358.7 (2,246.9, 2,474.7) 21 (6, 49) 338 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
DeKalb County 7 Urban 2,533.3 (2,409.3, 2,662.0) 5 (1, 25) 322 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
Kendall County 7 Urban 2,196.2 (2,081.3, 2,315.8) 39 (17, 75) 289 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Adams County 7 Rural 2,206.3 (2,091.6, 2,325.5) 36 (16, 72) 284 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.4, 6.4)
Williamson County 7 Rural 2,135.6 (2,021.8, 2,254.2) 55 (23, 83) 267 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 0.0)
Whiteside County 7 Rural 2,144.2 (2,025.0, 2,268.5) 53 (23, 86) 246 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Macoupin County 7 Urban 2,472.9 (2,327.5, 2,624.9) 12 (2, 36) 222 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.0)
Knox County 7 Rural 1,966.6 (1,848.4, 2,090.4) 83 (46, 100) 210 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Ogle County 7 Rural 2,188.5 (2,057.2, 2,325.9) 43 (15, 81) 210 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.4, 7.8)
Henry County 7 Urban 2,001.0 (1,878.2, 2,129.7) 79 (36, 98) 201 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Stephenson County 7 Rural 1,945.1 (1,823.8, 2,072.2) 87 (50, 100) 196 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Jackson County 7 Rural 2,289.7 (2,142.5, 2,444.3) 27 (7, 69) 187 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.9, 9.0)
Franklin County 7 Rural 2,328.2 (2,177.2, 2,487.0) 24 (5, 64) 178 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Grundy County 7 Urban 2,469.4 (2,307.5, 2,639.7) 13 (1, 44) 178 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Marion County 7 Rural 2,447.9 (2,286.9, 2,617.2) 14 (2, 47) 175 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Morgan County 7 Rural 2,617.8 (2,444.5, 2,800.1) 4 (1, 26) 172 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.8)
Coles County 7 Rural 2,053.0 (1,914.2, 2,199.2) 70 (25, 95) 166 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Fulton County 7 Rural 2,435.2 (2,270.3, 2,608.9) 16 (1, 49) 165 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Boone County 7 Urban 1,957.9 (1,824.9, 2,098.2) 86 (40, 100) 164 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Christian County 7 Rural 2,489.1 (2,318.9, 2,668.4) 8 (1, 40) 161 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Bureau County 7 Rural 2,149.3 (1,998.9, 2,307.9) 52 (16, 90) 154 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Jefferson County 7 Rural 2,188.4 (2,035.3, 2,350.1) 44 (13, 86) 154 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Clinton County 7 Urban 2,304.4 (2,137.4, 2,481.0) 25 (5, 75) 144 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Woodford County 7 Urban 2,101.3 (1,948.0, 2,263.5) 63 (19, 95) 144 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Livingston County 7 Rural 2,134.1 (1,978.7, 2,298.4) 56 (17, 93) 143 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Lee County 7 Rural 2,041.7 (1,890.4, 2,201.9) 71 (28, 98) 138 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Effingham County 7 Rural 2,259.3 (2,090.9, 2,437.6) 30 (6, 81) 135 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Randolph County 7 Rural 2,189.7 (2,023.9, 2,365.5) 42 (12, 88) 132 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Iroquois County 7 Rural 2,227.2 (2,057.9, 2,406.6) 32 (9, 84) 129 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.1)
Logan County 7 Rural 2,427.4 (2,239.1, 2,627.3) 17 (1, 59) 125 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.7)
Monroe County 7 Urban 2,063.7 (1,901.9, 2,235.5) 69 (22, 98) 124 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Montgomery County 7 Rural 2,091.4 (1,924.1, 2,269.3) 66 (20, 96) 118 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Jo Daviess County 7 Rural 1,854.1 (1,704.0, 2,013.9) 93 (58, 102) 114 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Shelby County 7 Rural 2,397.6 (2,202.6, 2,605.1) 19 (1, 64) 113 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
McDonough County 7 Rural 2,117.6 (1,936.0, 2,311.4) 60 (15, 97) 103 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Saline County 7 Rural 2,087.1 (1,907.3, 2,279.4) 67 (18, 97) 100 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Jersey County 7 Urban 2,279.6 (2,075.3, 2,498.5) 28 (3, 84) 93 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.6)
Fayette County 7 Rural 2,170.3 (1,966.1, 2,390.0) 47 (8, 96) 84 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Perry County 7 Rural 2,078.4 (1,882.5, 2,289.2) 68 (16, 100) 84 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Union County 7 Rural 2,111.5 (1,910.7, 2,327.6) 61 (12, 97) 82 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Pike County 7 Rural 2,488.7 (2,246.1, 2,750.1) 9 (1, 62) 78 stable stable trend 1.8 (-4.5, 6.6)
Douglas County 7 Rural 2,164.8 (1,950.7, 2,395.8) 50 (8, 97) 76 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.7)
Hancock County 7 Rural 1,847.0 (1,663.8, 2,044.8) 94 (47, 102) 75 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Carroll County 7 Rural 2,017.2 (1,815.9, 2,234.6) 75 (20, 101) 74 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Mason County 7 Rural 2,511.3 (2,258.5, 2,784.5) 7 (1, 63) 73 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Crawford County 7 Rural 2,033.8 (1,827.1, 2,257.5) 72 (16, 101) 72 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Warren County 7 Rural 2,152.9 (1,934.1, 2,389.7) 51 (8, 98) 72 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 6.5)
Piatt County 7 Urban 2,198.0 (1,974.2, 2,440.1) 37 (5, 96) 71 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Wayne County 7 Rural 1,961.9 (1,759.7, 2,181.0) 84 (25, 102) 69 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.3)
Edgar County 7 Rural 1,803.1 (1,615.7, 2,006.1) 98 (56, 102) 68 falling falling trend -2.3 (-5.9, -1.2)
Bond County 7 Urban 2,196.2 (1,962.1, 2,450.6) 38 (4, 97) 66 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Clay County 7 Rural 2,476.1 (2,212.6, 2,762.2) 11 (1, 70) 66 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.7)
Mercer County 7 Urban 1,979.8 (1,770.1, 2,207.6) 81 (22, 102) 66 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Richland County 7 Rural 2,025.0 (1,807.2, 2,261.5) 74 (18, 101) 64 falling falling trend -2.2 (-7.2, -0.7)
De Witt County 7 Rural 2,120.4 (1,890.7, 2,370.3) 59 (7, 100) 63 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Menard County 7 Urban 2,689.2 (2,395.1, 3,009.5) 1 (1, 45) 62 rising rising trend 11.4 (1.5, 18.1)
Washington County 7 Rural 2,136.1 (1,897.9, 2,395.9) 54 (7, 100) 59 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Greene County 7 Rural 2,444.3 (2,171.0, 2,742.6) 15 (1, 77) 59 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.3)
Ford County 7 Urban 2,358.0 (2,091.0, 2,649.4) 22 (1, 87) 58 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
White County 7 Rural 1,845.8 (1,636.6, 2,074.1) 95 (41, 102) 58 falling falling trend -11.7 (-24.7, -1.0)
Moultrie County 7 Rural 2,194.2 (1,943.6, 2,467.9) 40 (4, 99) 57 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Lawrence County 7 Rural 2,098.8 (1,860.9, 2,358.7) 64 (9, 100) 57 falling falling trend -11.5 (-20.1, -0.6)
Clark County 7 Rural 1,838.5 (1,625.7, 2,071.5) 96 (39, 102) 55 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4)
Johnson County 7 Rural 2,124.7 (1,878.6, 2,394.2) 58 (6, 100) 54 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Marshall County 7 Urban 1,970.9 (1,740.8, 2,222.9) 82 (21, 102) 54 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Massac County 7 Urban 1,788.9 (1,578.0, 2,020.0) 99 (49, 102) 53 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.7)
Wabash County 7 Rural 2,193.7 (1,930.6, 2,482.4) 41 (3, 99) 52 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Cass County 7 Rural 2,187.4 (1,920.0, 2,481.6) 45 (3, 99) 49 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Jasper County 7 Rural 2,243.9 (1,941.5, 2,579.7) 31 (1, 99) 41 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.8)
Cumberland County 7 Rural 1,899.6 (1,637.3, 2,191.8) 89 (18, 102) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Alexander County 7 Urban 2,651.6 (2,256.6, 3,095.8) 2 (1, 78) 33 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.8)
Schuyler County 7 Rural 2,028.7 (1,719.8, 2,377.0) 73 (4, 102) 31 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.1)
Henderson County 7 Rural 1,869.6 (1,583.8, 2,191.9) 92 (21, 102) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.9)
Hamilton County 7 Rural 1,776.1 (1,502.9, 2,084.2) 100 (28, 102) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.6)
Stark County 7 Urban 2,409.6 (2,032.2, 2,836.9) 18 (1, 98) 29 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.8)
Pulaski County 7 Rural 2,515.2 (2,113.6, 2,971.0) 6 (1, 95) 28 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.4, 2.9)
Putnam County 7 Rural 2,106.4 (1,759.1, 2,502.5) 62 (1, 102) 27 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.3)
Scott County 7 Rural 2,640.9 (2,197.3, 3,147.1) 3 (1, 87) 25 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 3.2)
Calhoun County 7 Urban 2,290.3 (1,899.6, 2,737.3) 26 (1, 101) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Edwards County 7 Rural 1,776.1 (1,466.1, 2,132.1) 101 (19, 102) 23 falling falling trend -7.6 (-32.2, -0.5)
Brown County 7 Rural 2,354.3 (1,930.2, 2,844.0) 23 (1, 102) 22 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 2.9)
Gallatin County 7 Rural 1,812.5 (1,483.7, 2,193.3) 97 (19, 102) 22 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.5, -0.3)
Hardin County 7 Rural 1,987.2 (1,612.8, 2,424.2) 80 (2, 102) 20 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Pope County 7 Rural 1,764.8 (1,424.8, 2,161.8) 102 (18, 102) 19 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 3.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/12/2024 3:46 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top