Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois 7 N/A 33.7 (33.1, 34.3) N/A 2,782 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -1.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 32.1 (31.9, 32.2) N/A 65,900 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.8)
Adams County 7 Rural 35.3 (27.6, 44.6) 54 (11, 83) 16 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Bond County 7 Urban 35.2 (21.0, 56.4) 57 (2, 85) 4
*
*
Boone County 7 Urban 29.4 (21.6, 39.4) 73 (23, 85) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.1, 1.4)
Bureau County 7 Rural 25.2 (17.6, 35.8) 81 (33, 85) 8
*
*
Carroll County 7 Rural 23.6 (12.5, 42.6) 84 (16, 85) 3 stable stable trend -2.8 (-9.7, 3.0)
Cass County 7 Rural 34.0 (19.7, 56.3) 60 (2, 85) 3 stable stable trend -3.3 (-31.6, 2.0)
Champaign County 7 Urban 29.1 (24.6, 34.3) 77 (42, 84) 31 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.3, -0.1)
Christian County 7 Rural 38.1 (27.4, 52.1) 44 (4, 83) 9 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.4, -0.3)
Clark County 7 Rural 55.1 (35.4, 82.3) 3 (1, 82) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.2, 4.8)
Clay County 7 Rural 44.4 (27.3, 69.8) 18 (1, 85) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.8, 3.1)
Clinton County 7 Urban 38.2 (27.5, 52.0) 42 (4, 83) 9 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.0, -0.4)
Coles County 7 Rural 40.7 (31.2, 52.5) 28 (4, 80) 14 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.9)
Cook County 7 Urban 32.9 (32.0, 33.8) 61 (46, 67) 1,086 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -1.9)
Crawford County 7 Rural 23.4 (13.3, 39.5) 85 (20, 85) 3 falling falling trend -5.1 (-10.2, -1.3)
Cumberland County 7 Rural 50.5 (30.2, 81.2) 10 (1, 84) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.0, 5.2)
De Witt County 7 Rural 42.6 (26.5, 66.0) 26 (1, 85) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.9, 3.3)
DeKalb County 7 Urban 39.2 (31.9, 47.6) 35 (8, 75) 21 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.1)
Douglas County 7 Rural 38.2 (24.3, 57.6) 43 (2, 85) 5 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.8, -0.8)
DuPage County 7 Urban 30.8 (28.8, 32.9) 67 (48, 77) 186 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.4)
Edgar County 7 Rural 28.9 (16.8, 47.6) 78 (7, 85) 4 falling falling trend -8.7 (-45.4, -3.6)
Effingham County 7 Rural 50.0 (37.4, 65.7) 11 (1, 68) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.1)
Fayette County 7 Rural 39.5 (25.7, 59.0) 32 (1, 85) 6 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.7, -0.5)
Ford County 7 Urban 40.2 (23.3, 65.7) 30 (1, 85) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.0, 0.9)
Franklin County 7 Rural 38.7 (29.0, 51.2) 39 (5, 82) 11 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.7, -0.2)
Fulton County 7 Rural 50.6 (38.7, 65.7) 9 (1, 61) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.4, 2.3)
Greene County 7 Rural 42.8 (25.1, 69.8) 25 (1, 85) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.3, 1.4)
Grundy County 7 Urban 43.1 (33.0, 55.4) 23 (2, 76) 13 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.7)
Hancock County 7 Rural 37.9 (24.6, 57.4) 45 (2, 85) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.8, 2.7)
Henry County 7 Urban 29.6 (22.2, 39.1) 71 (23, 85) 12 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -1.2)
Iroquois County 7 Rural 47.1 (33.2, 65.1) 14 (1, 78) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.8, 2.8)
Jackson County 7 Rural 36.6 (27.4, 48.1) 52 (6, 83) 12 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.8, -0.3)
Jasper County 7 Rural 51.9 (28.9, 87.4) 7 (1, 85) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.1, 3.0)
Jefferson County 7 Rural 45.5 (34.3, 59.6) 16 (1, 76) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.4)
Jersey County 7 Urban 54.1 (37.7, 75.8) 5 (1, 73) 8 rising rising trend 14.6 (0.6, 38.3)
Jo Daviess County 7 Rural 31.9 (20.1, 49.3) 64 (7, 85) 6 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.9, -1.5)
Kane County 7 Urban 30.6 (27.8, 33.5) 68 (46, 80) 92 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.6)
Kankakee County 7 Urban 37.0 (30.7, 44.2) 50 (13, 77) 26 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Kendall County 7 Urban 35.3 (28.9, 42.7) 55 (16, 81) 22 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.1)
Knox County 7 Rural 38.3 (29.5, 49.2) 41 (6, 81) 15 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.7)
La Salle County 7 Rural 37.3 (31.3, 44.2) 49 (14, 76) 30 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.0)
Lake County 7 Urban 31.9 (29.5, 34.5) 63 (43, 76) 138 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.7, 7.9)
Lee County 7 Rural 35.2 (24.0, 50.0) 56 (5, 85) 8 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.5)
Livingston County 7 Rural 43.5 (32.7, 57.2) 22 (2, 77) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.9, 1.5)
Logan County 7 Rural 40.6 (28.2, 57.0) 29 (2, 83) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.7, 6.2)
Macon County 7 Urban 44.3 (37.5, 52.1) 20 (5, 55) 34 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Macoupin County 7 Urban 37.8 (28.5, 49.4) 46 (7, 82) 13 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.7)
Madison County 7 Urban 38.9 (34.8, 43.3) 37 (16, 60) 72 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -1.0)
Marion County 7 Rural 49.6 (37.4, 64.6) 12 (1, 67) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.1)
Marshall County 7 Urban 57.1 (35.0, 89.1) 1 (1, 81) 5
*
*
Mason County 7 Rural 40.1 (23.9, 64.6) 31 (1, 85) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.2, 2.9)
Massac County 7 Urban 39.4 (23.4, 63.4) 33 (1, 85) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.8, 2.5)
McDonough County 7 Rural 42.8 (29.5, 60.4) 24 (1, 83) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.1, 1.6)
McHenry County 7 Urban 32.2 (28.6, 36.2) 62 (37, 79) 61 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.5)
McLean County 7 Urban 30.3 (25.3, 36.0) 69 (37, 84) 28 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.7, -1.6)
Menard County 7 Urban 54.6 (34.0, 84.2) 4 (1, 82) 5
*
*
Mercer County 7 Urban 53.0 (35.1, 77.9) 6 (1, 81) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.5, 5.5)
Monroe County 7 Urban 25.0 (16.3, 37.0) 82 (26, 85) 6 stable stable trend 20.0 (-5.3, 37.5)
Montgomery County 7 Rural 31.4 (20.5, 46.5) 65 (9, 85) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.0, 1.0)
Morgan County 7 Rural 51.3 (38.7, 67.1) 8 (1, 58) 13 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 1.1)
Moultrie County 7 Rural 43.9 (27.0, 68.3) 21 (1, 85) 5
*
*
Ogle County 7 Rural 36.3 (28.1, 46.5) 53 (9, 81) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.7, 2.2)
Peoria County 7 Urban 39.2 (34.2, 44.7) 36 (13, 64) 49 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Perry County 7 Rural 56.0 (38.8, 79.0) 2 (1, 72) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.4, 3.4)
Piatt County 7 Urban 26.7 (14.8, 45.5) 80 (10, 85) 3 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.6, -0.7)
Pike County 7 Rural 38.4 (22.4, 62.2) 40 (1, 85) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.5, 3.4)
Randolph County 7 Rural 47.6 (34.9, 63.9) 13 (1, 77) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.8)
Richland County 7 Rural 37.3 (23.2, 58.2) 48 (2, 85) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.0, 4.7)
Rock Island County 7 Urban 29.3 (24.6, 34.6) 74 (39, 84) 31 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.6)
Saline County 7 Rural 38.8 (27.1, 54.8) 38 (3, 84) 8 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.8, -1.1)
Sangamon County 7 Urban 39.3 (34.5, 44.6) 34 (14, 62) 54 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.6)
Shelby County 7 Rural 46.8 (32.8, 65.8) 15 (1, 81) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.0, 3.0)
St. Clair County 7 Urban 29.5 (25.9, 33.5) 72 (46, 82) 51 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.8, -2.5)
Stephenson County 7 Rural 29.1 (21.0, 39.6) 76 (21, 85) 11 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.2, 0.7)
Tazewell County 7 Urban 36.9 (31.5, 43.0) 51 (17, 73) 37 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.1)
Union County 7 Rural 37.7 (24.0, 57.7) 47 (2, 85) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.8, 1.4)
Vermilion County 7 Rural 44.8 (36.9, 54.1) 17 (3, 60) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Wabash County 7 Rural 44.3 (23.8, 75.8) 19 (1, 85) 3 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.7, 4.1)
Warren County 7 Rural 34.1 (18.9, 56.9) 59 (2, 85) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 2.1)
Washington County 7 Rural 34.7 (18.9, 59.2) 58 (1, 85) 3 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.8, 0.6)
Wayne County 7 Rural 23.7 (14.0, 39.6) 83 (26, 85) 4 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.9, 0.1)
Whiteside County 7 Rural 26.8 (19.9, 35.6) 79 (33, 85) 11 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.5, 0.0)
Will County 7 Urban 30.1 (27.7, 32.7) 70 (50, 80) 120 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.6)
Williamson County 7 Rural 41.7 (33.6, 51.3) 27 (5, 74) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Winnebago County 7 Urban 31.3 (27.8, 35.2) 66 (40, 80) 62 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.1)
Woodford County 7 Urban 29.2 (20.6, 40.7) 75 (19, 85) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.1, 0.3)
Alexander County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stark County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/14/2026 12:10 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top