Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois 7 N/A 8.1 (7.9, 8.3) N/A 1,316 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,841 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.6)
Winnebago County 7 Urban 9.1 (7.8, 10.6) 12 (3, 31) 37 stable stable trend 1.5 (-11.0, 5.7)
Williamson County 7 Rural 6.7 (4.5, 9.6) 38 (6, 47) 6 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.1, 7.3)
Will County 7 Urban 7.3 (6.5, 8.2) 32 (15, 41) 57 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.1, 4.0)
Whiteside County 7 Rural 11.0 (8.0, 14.8) 2 (1, 36) 9 rising rising trend 4.9 (2.3, 8.8)
Vermilion County 7 Rural 8.2 (6.0, 11.1) 22 (2, 45) 9 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.4, 6.6)
Tazewell County 7 Urban 8.5 (6.7, 10.7) 20 (3, 42) 16 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.3, 7.2)
Stephenson County 7 Rural 6.2 (4.0, 9.7) 41 (6, 47) 5
*
*
St. Clair County 7 Urban 9.4 (8.0, 11.1) 9 (1, 31) 31 stable stable trend -6.0 (-14.5, 0.9)
Sangamon County 7 Urban 9.8 (8.2, 11.7) 8 (1, 30) 28 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.7, 6.5)
Rock Island County 7 Urban 7.6 (6.0, 9.5) 27 (5, 44) 17 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.5, 6.9)
Randolph County 7 Rural 8.7 (5.4, 13.6) 17 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Peoria County 7 Urban 8.4 (6.8, 10.2) 21 (3, 40) 21 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.1, 6.3)
Ogle County 7 Rural 4.9 (2.9, 7.8) 47 (18, 47) 4
*
*
Morgan County 7 Rural 9.3 (6.0, 14.2) 11 (1, 46) 5 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.6, 9.2)
Monroe County 7 Urban 7.7 (4.6, 12.3) 25 (1, 47) 4
*
*
McLean County 7 Urban 5.3 (3.9, 7.1) 45 (23, 47) 10 stable stable trend -2.9 (-18.9, 3.2)
McHenry County 7 Urban 7.7 (6.4, 9.1) 26 (8, 42) 29 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.1, 5.4)
Marion County 7 Rural 7.1 (4.2, 11.5) 34 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Madison County 7 Urban 7.6 (6.3, 9.0) 28 (9, 42) 28 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.9, 4.4)
Macoupin County 7 Urban 8.7 (5.8, 12.8) 18 (1, 47) 6 rising rising trend 5.8 (1.3, 12.1)
Macon County 7 Urban 8.9 (6.8, 11.4) 14 (1, 43) 14 rising rising trend 4.6 (0.8, 9.8)
Logan County 7 Rural 8.8 (5.3, 14.3) 15 (1, 47) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-6.7, 8.1)
Lee County 7 Rural 9.4 (5.7, 14.7) 10 (1, 47) 4 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.3, 8.5)
Lake County 7 Urban 7.4 (6.6, 8.3) 30 (14, 41) 63 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.0, 4.1)
La Salle County 7 Rural 7.5 (5.7, 9.8) 29 (5, 46) 12 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.1, 5.4)
Knox County 7 Rural 7.4 (4.7, 11.2) 31 (2, 47) 5
*
*
Kendall County 7 Urban 5.8 (4.0, 8.1) 43 (13, 47) 7 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.6, 8.7)
Kankakee County 7 Urban 7.9 (5.9, 10.3) 24 (3, 45) 11 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.0, 5.2)
Kane County 7 Urban 6.9 (6.0, 8.0) 36 (17, 43) 41 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.6, 4.9)
Jefferson County 7 Rural 10.2 (6.8, 15.1) 4 (1, 44) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.0, 5.2)
Jackson County 7 Rural 11.1 (7.6, 15.8) 1 (1, 40) 7 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.7, 8.3)
Iroquois County 7 Rural 9.8 (6.0, 15.6) 7 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Henry County 7 Urban 7.1 (4.7, 10.6) 33 (3, 47) 6
*
*
Grundy County 7 Urban 6.2 (3.7, 9.9) 40 (4, 47) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.3, 5.4)
Fulton County 7 Rural 10.6 (6.9, 15.8) 3 (1, 44) 5
*
*
Franklin County 7 Rural 9.9 (6.5, 14.7) 6 (1, 45) 6
*
*
Effingham County 7 Rural 6.8 (3.9, 11.2) 37 (2, 47) 3
*
*
DuPage County 7 Urban 6.6 (5.9, 7.3) 39 (24, 44) 78 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.9, 2.5)
DeKalb County 7 Urban 5.7 (3.8, 8.2) 44 (14, 47) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.5, 5.8)
Cook County 7 Urban 9.1 (8.7, 9.4) 13 (6, 22) 572 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 1.8)
Coles County 7 Rural 8.8 (5.8, 13.1) 16 (1, 47) 6
*
*
Clinton County 7 Urban 7.1 (4.1, 11.7) 35 (1, 47) 3
*
*
Christian County 7 Rural 9.9 (6.4, 14.9) 5 (1, 46) 5 falling falling trend -21.6 (-37.6, -13.8)
Champaign County 7 Urban 6.2 (4.8, 8.0) 42 (16, 47) 13 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.9, 3.8)
Bureau County 7 Rural 8.2 (5.3, 12.6) 23 (1, 47) 5
*
*
Boone County 7 Urban 5.0 (2.9, 8.1) 46 (13, 47) 3 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 4.0)
Adams County 7 Rural 8.6 (6.1, 11.9) 19 (1, 46) 8 stable stable trend -14.9 (-29.2, 6.8)
Alexander County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bond County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
De Witt County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edgar County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ford County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jersey County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jo Daviess County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Livingston County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Massac County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDonough County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moultrie County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Piatt County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Saline County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stark County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodford County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/05/2024 6:22 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alexander, Bond, Brown, Calhoun, Carroll, Cass, Clark, Clay, Crawford, Cumberland, De Witt, Douglas, Edgar, Edwards, Fayette, Ford, Gallatin, Greene, Hamilton, Hancock, Hardin, Henderson, Jasper, Jersey, Jo Daviess, Johnson, Lawrence, Livingston, Marshall, Mason, Massac, McDonough, Menard, Mercer, Montgomery, Moultrie, Perry, Piatt, Pike, Pope, Pulaski, Putnam, Richland, Saline, Schuyler, Scott, Shelby, Stark, Union, Wabash, Warren, Washington, Wayne, White, Woodford

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top