Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois 7 N/A 23.0 (22.6, 23.4) N/A 3,427 rising rising trend 3.2 (2.7, 3.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 22.7 (22.6, 22.8) N/A 86,630 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.5)
Piatt County 7 Urban 53.3 (39.4, 70.7) 1 (1, 42) 11 rising rising trend 5.3 (2.9, 8.8)
Putnam County 7 Rural 47.9 (26.0, 81.3) 2 (1, 88) 3
*
*
Washington County 7 Rural 47.1 (33.9, 64.2) 3 (1, 59) 9
*
*
Brown County 7 Rural 47.0 (27.2, 76.4) 4 (1, 87) 3
*
*
Mason County 7 Rural 45.4 (31.4, 63.8) 5 (1, 71) 8 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.1, 9.4)
Cumberland County 7 Rural 45.0 (29.0, 66.9) 6 (1, 83) 6
*
*
Woodford County 7 Urban 44.4 (35.7, 54.6) 7 (1, 40) 19 stable stable trend 2.7 (0.0, 6.0)
Menard County 7 Urban 43.9 (30.2, 62.3) 8 (1, 76) 7
*
*
Bureau County 7 Rural 42.0 (33.3, 52.5) 9 (1, 51) 19 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.9, 8.2)
Shelby County 7 Rural 41.8 (30.8, 55.4) 10 (1, 64) 12 rising rising trend 7.0 (3.4, 12.4)
Mercer County 7 Urban 41.5 (29.0, 57.6) 11 (1, 77) 8 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.8, 9.2)
Douglas County 7 Rural 41.3 (30.7, 54.7) 12 (1, 70) 11
*
*
Ogle County 7 Rural 38.5 (31.9, 46.1) 13 (2, 51) 26 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.8, 6.4)
Tazewell County 7 Urban 38.5 (34.2, 43.1) 14 (4, 39) 64 rising rising trend 9.1 (5.0, 18.0)
McLean County 7 Urban 37.5 (33.4, 41.9) 15 (6, 40) 64 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.7, 3.6)
Marion County 7 Rural 37.2 (29.5, 46.5) 16 (2, 66) 18 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.2, 4.9)
Effingham County 7 Rural 37.2 (29.1, 46.9) 17 (2, 66) 16 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.2, 7.4)
Vermilion County 7 Rural 37.1 (31.6, 43.4) 18 (4, 50) 36 rising rising trend 6.5 (4.1, 9.6)
DeKalb County 7 Urban 37.1 (31.9, 42.9) 19 (4, 48) 38 rising rising trend 5.6 (3.7, 8.4)
Franklin County 7 Rural 36.5 (29.1, 45.3) 20 (2, 68) 18 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.7, 7.8)
Logan County 7 Rural 36.4 (27.9, 47.0) 21 (2, 75) 13 rising rising trend 6.2 (3.9, 14.2)
Monroe County 7 Urban 36.3 (28.3, 46.0) 22 (2, 69) 15 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.5, 6.2)
Adams County 7 Rural 36.1 (30.3, 42.8) 23 (4, 57) 31 rising rising trend 5.0 (3.1, 7.3)
Pike County 7 Rural 36.0 (23.9, 52.2) 24 (1, 85) 6 rising rising trend 6.0 (1.3, 12.4)
Champaign County 7 Urban 36.0 (32.3, 40.0) 25 (7, 44) 73 rising rising trend 4.3 (2.7, 6.3)
Henry County 7 Urban 35.6 (28.9, 43.4) 26 (4, 63) 22 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.5, 4.4)
Clinton County 7 Urban 34.9 (27.4, 43.9) 27 (3, 76) 16 rising rising trend 5.8 (3.4, 9.2)
Ford County 7 Urban 34.4 (23.2, 49.6) 28 (2, 87) 6
*
*
Iroquois County 7 Rural 33.5 (25.0, 44.2) 29 (3, 81) 12 rising rising trend 5.2 (2.6, 8.5)
Stephenson County 7 Rural 33.3 (26.7, 41.2) 30 (5, 76) 20 rising rising trend 7.0 (3.7, 11.6)
Jasper County 7 Rural 33.1 (19.5, 53.0) 31 (1, 89) 4
*
*
Clay County 7 Rural 33.0 (22.0, 48.0) 32 (2, 88) 6 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.9, 7.7)
Jersey County 7 Urban 32.6 (23.4, 44.4) 33 (3, 86) 9 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.2, 7.4)
Sangamon County 7 Urban 32.6 (29.3, 36.1) 34 (15, 57) 78 rising rising trend 5.4 (4.2, 8.3)
Hamilton County 7 Rural 32.3 (18.4, 53.5) 35 (1, 89) 4
*
*
McHenry County 7 Urban 32.1 (29.5, 35.0) 36 (19, 53) 116 rising rising trend 3.7 (2.1, 5.9)
Jefferson County 7 Rural 32.0 (24.9, 40.5) 37 (5, 79) 15 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.9, 7.2)
Hancock County 7 Rural 32.0 (22.7, 44.3) 38 (3, 85) 9 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.1, 8.7)
Macoupin County 7 Urban 32.0 (25.6, 39.5) 39 (7, 76) 20 rising rising trend 14.3 (0.5, 35.3)
Bond County 7 Urban 31.7 (21.4, 45.4) 40 (2, 87) 7 rising rising trend 4.8 (2.0, 8.4)
Knox County 7 Rural 31.3 (25.3, 38.3) 41 (7, 76) 22 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.5, 5.5)
Marshall County 7 Urban 30.6 (18.7, 47.7) 42 (2, 89) 5
*
*
Peoria County 7 Urban 29.6 (26.4, 33.2) 43 (24, 67) 64 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.5, 3.7)
Williamson County 7 Rural 29.5 (24.3, 35.5) 44 (14, 78) 24 rising rising trend 4.2 (2.4, 6.4)
Lake County 7 Urban 29.4 (27.7, 31.2) 45 (32, 59) 234 rising rising trend 6.3 (4.8, 9.0)
Macon County 7 Urban 28.9 (24.7, 33.6) 46 (21, 76) 38 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.8, 5.3)
Christian County 7 Rural 28.6 (21.7, 37.1) 47 (10, 84) 13 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.2, 6.6)
De Witt County 7 Rural 28.6 (18.9, 41.8) 48 (4, 89) 6 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.2, 9.1)
Perry County 7 Rural 28.4 (20.0, 39.5) 49 (6, 88) 8 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.1, 7.5)
Livingston County 7 Rural 28.2 (21.5, 36.5) 50 (11, 85) 13 stable stable trend 2.7 (0.0, 5.9)
Fulton County 7 Rural 28.0 (21.3, 36.3) 51 (12, 85) 13 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.3, 5.4)
Coles County 7 Rural 27.9 (21.8, 35.3) 52 (13, 84) 16 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.2, 9.4)
Greene County 7 Rural 27.4 (17.3, 42.0) 53 (4, 89) 5
*
*
La Salle County 7 Rural 27.4 (23.5, 31.8) 54 (27, 78) 39 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.4, 2.0)
Grundy County 7 Urban 27.1 (21.3, 34.0) 55 (16, 85) 15 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.3, 5.4)
Jackson County 7 Rural 26.9 (20.9, 34.0) 56 (17, 85) 15 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.4, 7.0)
Kendall County 7 Urban 26.5 (22.6, 31.0) 57 (30, 81) 33 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.5, 4.6)
Moultrie County 7 Rural 26.4 (16.1, 40.9) 58 (6, 89) 4
*
*
Crawford County 7 Rural 26.3 (17.6, 38.0) 59 (8, 89) 6
*
*
Johnson County 7 Rural 26.2 (16.3, 40.5) 60 (6, 89) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.3, 0.2)
Carroll County 7 Rural 26.2 (17.8, 38.0) 61 (9, 89) 7 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.9, 10.0)
Madison County 7 Urban 26.2 (23.7, 28.9) 62 (38, 77) 84 rising rising trend 3.6 (2.5, 5.0)
Fayette County 7 Rural 25.8 (17.9, 36.3) 63 (11, 89) 7
*
*
Lee County 7 Rural 25.6 (19.3, 33.5) 64 (18, 87) 12 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.4, 6.4)
Rock Island County 7 Urban 25.2 (21.9, 28.9) 65 (39, 82) 46 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 4.1)
Randolph County 7 Rural 24.3 (17.8, 32.5) 66 (20, 88) 10 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.2, 4.8)
DuPage County 7 Urban 24.2 (22.9, 25.5) 67 (54, 77) 270 falling falling trend -3.0 (-8.4, -0.3)
Kane County 7 Urban 23.8 (22.0, 25.7) 68 (52, 81) 135 rising rising trend 3.7 (2.6, 5.0)
Clark County 7 Rural 23.5 (14.6, 36.1) 69 (8, 89) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.9, 4.2)
St. Clair County 7 Urban 23.5 (21.0, 26.1) 70 (50, 83) 72 rising rising trend 4.0 (2.4, 5.8)
Whiteside County 7 Rural 23.3 (18.6, 28.9) 71 (36, 87) 19 stable stable trend -23.4 (-47.4, 4.3)
Winnebago County 7 Urban 23.3 (21.0, 25.8) 72 (52, 83) 81 stable stable trend -0.7 (-9.2, 2.1)
Montgomery County 7 Rural 23.3 (16.4, 32.2) 73 (21, 89) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 3.0)
Warren County 7 Rural 23.2 (14.8, 35.1) 74 (12, 89) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-8.8, 10.9)
Kankakee County 7 Urban 23.2 (19.5, 27.5) 75 (42, 85) 29 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.1, 6.6)
Morgan County 7 Rural 22.4 (16.4, 30.0) 76 (27, 89) 10 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.3, 5.7)
Lawrence County 7 Rural 22.0 (13.8, 33.8) 77 (17, 89) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.6, 5.8)
Edgar County 7 Rural 21.7 (13.2, 33.8) 78 (14, 89) 4
*
*
Boone County 7 Urban 21.3 (16.4, 27.3) 79 (42, 89) 13 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.9, 6.2)
McDonough County 7 Rural 21.2 (14.4, 30.4) 80 (25, 89) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.1, 2.8)
Will County 7 Urban 21.0 (19.5, 22.6) 81 (66, 85) 158 rising rising trend 3.2 (2.5, 4.0)
Jo Daviess County 7 Rural 20.9 (14.5, 29.8) 82 (27, 89) 8 falling falling trend -25.7 (-42.1, -3.6)
Richland County 7 Rural 20.3 (12.4, 31.7) 83 (19, 89) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.6, 3.6)
Saline County 7 Rural 19.5 (13.3, 28.0) 84 (37, 89) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-3.2, 6.8)
Wayne County 7 Rural 19.5 (11.7, 30.7) 85 (25, 89) 4
*
*
White County 7 Rural 16.6 (9.5, 27.8) 86 (35, 89) 4
*
*
Union County 7 Rural 16.3 (9.9, 25.9) 87 (42, 89) 4
*
*
Cook County 7 Urban 15.5 (15.1, 16.0) 88 (82, 89) 920 rising rising trend 2.7 (2.1, 3.3)
Massac County 7 Urban 14.2 (7.9, 24.3) 89 (49, 89) 3 stable stable trend -3.8 (-7.7, 0.1)
Alexander County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stark County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/11/2024 11:11 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alexander, Calhoun, Cass, Edwards, Gallatin, Hardin, Henderson, Pope, Pulaski, Schuyler, Scott, Stark, Wabash

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top