Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS) (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois 7 N/A 30.6 (30.1, 31.2) N/A 2,561 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.9, 1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 27.8 (27.7, 27.9) N/A 58,425 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Adams County 7 Rural 38.4 (30.4, 48.0) 11 (1, 57) 18 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.9, 6.6)
Bond County 7 Urban 28.2 (15.9, 47.7) 50 (2, 74) 3
*
*
Boone County 7 Urban 32.6 (24.6, 42.7) 24 (3, 71) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.5)
Bureau County 7 Rural 28.8 (20.1, 40.6) 46 (4, 74) 8 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.8, 5.6)
Carroll County 7 Rural 36.5 (21.8, 58.9) 12 (1, 74) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.6, 4.2)
Cass County 7 Rural 38.8 (21.7, 64.8) 10 (1, 74) 3
*
*
Champaign County 7 Urban 26.6 (22.3, 31.4) 60 (19, 71) 29 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.0)
Christian County 7 Rural 18.8 (12.0, 28.9) 74 (20, 74) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.3)
Clark County 7 Rural 41.6 (25.6, 64.7) 6 (1, 73) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.1, 5.4)
Clinton County 7 Urban 32.8 (23.1, 45.5) 23 (2, 73) 8
*
*
Coles County 7 Rural 27.8 (20.2, 37.8) 53 (7, 74) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.1, 2.8)
Cook County 7 Urban 31.7 (30.9, 32.6) 26 (18, 41) 1,057 rising rising trend 1.5 (1.2, 1.7)
Crawford County 7 Rural 27.5 (17.0, 43.6) 56 (3, 74) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.9, 5.4)
De Witt County 7 Rural 51.4 (33.7, 76.1) 1 (1, 61) 6
*
*
DeKalb County 7 Urban 27.4 (21.4, 34.6) 57 (11, 73) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.8, 2.5)
Douglas County 7 Rural 28.9 (16.1, 47.7) 44 (2, 74) 3
*
*
DuPage County 7 Urban 32.0 (30.0, 34.1) 25 (13, 47) 202 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 2.0)
Edgar County 7 Rural 27.6 (16.2, 45.5) 54 (2, 74) 4
*
*
Effingham County 7 Rural 33.3 (23.8, 45.9) 22 (2, 72) 8 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.7, 5.9)
Fayette County 7 Rural 28.1 (16.7, 45.2) 51 (2, 74) 4 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.5, 7.6)
Franklin County 7 Rural 26.9 (18.4, 38.3) 59 (5, 74) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 2.9)
Fulton County 7 Rural 24.0 (15.4, 36.1) 66 (8, 74) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.9, 1.9)
Grundy County 7 Urban 28.1 (20.3, 38.1) 52 (6, 74) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.9, 2.9)
Hancock County 7 Rural 40.0 (25.1, 61.4) 9 (1, 72) 5 stable stable trend 3.3 (-3.8, 11.4)
Henry County 7 Urban 28.8 (21.1, 38.8) 45 (6, 73) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.4, 3.0)
Iroquois County 7 Rural 22.3 (14.8, 33.4) 70 (14, 74) 6 stable stable trend -5.7 (-26.6, 0.2)
Jackson County 7 Rural 29.3 (20.8, 40.3) 40 (5, 74) 9 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.5, 5.1)
Jefferson County 7 Rural 25.9 (17.4, 37.4) 62 (6, 74) 7 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.9, 4.9)
Jersey County 7 Urban 35.7 (22.6, 54.2) 15 (1, 74) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.0, 7.2)
Jo Daviess County 7 Rural 21.6 (13.7, 34.5) 71 (14, 74) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.0, 3.6)
Kane County 7 Urban 29.0 (26.3, 31.8) 42 (19, 62) 91 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 2.1)
Kankakee County 7 Urban 31.0 (25.4, 37.5) 31 (8, 67) 23 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.6, 5.2)
Kendall County 7 Urban 30.2 (24.5, 36.9) 34 (8, 68) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 3.1)
Knox County 7 Rural 35.8 (26.3, 47.7) 14 (1, 68) 11 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.2, 5.7)
La Salle County 7 Rural 28.4 (23.0, 34.8) 48 (11, 71) 22 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.1, 4.1)
Lake County 7 Urban 30.2 (27.9, 32.6) 36 (18, 55) 136 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 0.9)
Lee County 7 Rural 35.3 (24.6, 49.4) 16 (1, 72) 8 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.2, 7.3)
Livingston County 7 Rural 27.6 (18.8, 39.6) 55 (4, 74) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.1, 1.7)
Logan County 7 Rural 36.4 (24.8, 51.9) 13 (1, 71) 7 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.7, 9.4)
Macon County 7 Urban 25.2 (20.1, 31.3) 64 (18, 73) 19 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.8, 4.8)
Macoupin County 7 Urban 34.4 (25.9, 45.2) 19 (2, 69) 12 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.8, 4.7)
Madison County 7 Urban 30.5 (26.9, 34.4) 33 (12, 60) 57 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.3, 2.5)
Marion County 7 Rural 29.9 (21.1, 41.5) 38 (3, 74) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.8, 6.1)
Marshall County 7 Urban 31.7 (18.2, 54.2) 27 (1, 74) 3
*
*
McDonough County 7 Rural 33.5 (21.4, 50.3) 21 (1, 74) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.7, 5.9)
McHenry County 7 Urban 31.4 (28.0, 35.1) 29 (12, 56) 66 rising rising trend 6.7 (2.0, 10.0)
McLean County 7 Urban 28.3 (23.6, 33.7) 49 (13, 70) 27 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.2, 12.9)
Mercer County 7 Urban 45.2 (27.5, 70.6) 3 (1, 73) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.5, 5.4)
Monroe County 7 Urban 22.8 (14.8, 33.9) 69 (12, 74) 6 stable stable trend 19.7 (-2.2, 38.7)
Montgomery County 7 Rural 34.7 (23.8, 49.5) 17 (1, 72) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.7)
Morgan County 7 Rural 29.3 (20.6, 41.1) 41 (5, 74) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.3)
Moultrie County 7 Rural 42.9 (25.5, 68.3) 4 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Ogle County 7 Rural 25.9 (19.1, 34.7) 61 (11, 74) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.7)
Peoria County 7 Urban 23.7 (19.8, 28.1) 68 (34, 73) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 0.9)
Perry County 7 Rural 24.4 (14.3, 40.1) 65 (5, 74) 4
*
*
Piatt County 7 Urban 30.6 (18.2, 49.5) 32 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Pike County 7 Rural 41.3 (25.0, 65.1) 7 (1, 73) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.6, 4.3)
Randolph County 7 Rural 20.5 (12.7, 32.2) 73 (15, 74) 5 falling falling trend -20.4 (-46.3, -3.0)
Rock Island County 7 Urban 28.9 (24.2, 34.3) 43 (13, 69) 30 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.4)
Saline County 7 Rural 20.9 (12.3, 34.1) 72 (8, 74) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.9, 5.6)
Sangamon County 7 Urban 30.2 (26.0, 34.8) 37 (12, 64) 42 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.8)
Shelby County 7 Rural 41.2 (26.8, 61.0) 8 (1, 71) 6 rising rising trend 4.7 (0.6, 10.1)
St. Clair County 7 Urban 34.6 (30.6, 38.9) 18 (6, 48) 59 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.3, 4.3)
Stephenson County 7 Rural 25.5 (18.6, 34.7) 63 (11, 74) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.3)
Tazewell County 7 Urban 27.1 (22.5, 32.5) 58 (16, 71) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.3)
Vermilion County 7 Rural 29.6 (23.3, 37.2) 39 (7, 71) 17 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.2)
Warren County 7 Rural 30.2 (17.5, 49.5) 35 (1, 74) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.2, 5.6)
Washington County 7 Rural 42.1 (24.8, 67.9) 5 (1, 74) 4 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.6, 7.7)
White County 7 Rural 45.2 (25.9, 73.8) 2 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Whiteside County 7 Rural 34.1 (26.5, 43.6) 20 (3, 66) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.4)
Will County 7 Urban 31.5 (29.1, 34.0) 28 (14, 51) 134 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.2)
Williamson County 7 Rural 23.7 (17.7, 31.3) 67 (18, 74) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 2.9)
Winnebago County 7 Urban 28.5 (25.0, 32.3) 47 (17, 65) 54 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.7)
Woodford County 7 Urban 31.0 (21.9, 43.0) 30 (3, 73) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.5, 4.5)
Alexander County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ford County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Massac County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stark County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2024 6:15 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alexander, Brown, Calhoun, Clay, Cumberland, Edwards, Ford, Gallatin, Greene, Hamilton, Hardin, Henderson, Jasper, Johnson, Lawrence, Mason, Massac, Menard, Pope, Pulaski, Putnam, Richland, Schuyler, Scott, Stark, Union, Wabash, Wayne

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top