Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

Ovary (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois 7 10.7 (10.4, 11.1) N/A 845 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 10.4 (10.4, 10.5) N/A 20,692 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.6, -2.9)
Adams County 7 10.9 (6.8, 16.7) 17 (1, 31) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.5, 3.6)
Boone County 7 11.5 (6.6, 18.9) 9 (1, 31) 3
*
*
Champaign County 7 12.8 (9.7, 16.4) 6 (1, 26) 13 stable stable trend -18.0 (-34.6, 2.9)
Christian County 7 14.5 (8.0, 24.5) 3 (1, 31) 3
*
*
Cook County 7 11.2 (10.6, 11.7) 14 (7, 20) 346 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
DeKalb County 7 9.2 (5.8, 13.8) 25 (3, 31) 5 falling falling trend -10.9 (-16.6, -4.9)
DuPage County 7 11.5 (10.2, 12.8) 10 (5, 22) 67 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Henry County 7 15.1 (9.1, 23.7) 2 (1, 30) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.7, 3.3)
Iroquois County 7 18.2 (10.0, 30.8) 1 (1, 29) 3 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.5, 6.1)
Jackson County 7 10.3 (5.8, 17.0) 21 (1, 31) 3
*
*
Kane County 7 9.6 (8.1, 11.3) 23 (9, 29) 30 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.0)
Kankakee County 7 12.9 (9.3, 17.5) 5 (1, 28) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.7)
Kendall County 7 7.6 (4.7, 11.6) 28 (8, 31) 4 stable stable trend -3.6 (-7.4, 0.3)
La Salle County 7 11.4 (8.2, 15.7) 11 (2, 30) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.6)
Lake County 7 11.4 (10.0, 13.0) 12 (4, 23) 48 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.2)
Macon County 7 10.4 (7.0, 14.9) 20 (2, 31) 7 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.5)
Madison County 7 11.2 (9.0, 13.8) 13 (3, 28) 19 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.8)
McHenry County 7 12.3 (10.1, 14.9) 7 (2, 24) 23 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
McLean County 7 9.0 (6.4, 12.4) 27 (6, 31) 8 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.8, -1.8)
Ogle County 7 11.0 (6.5, 17.8) 16 (1, 31) 4
*
*
Peoria County 7 7.5 (5.5, 10.1) 30 (15, 31) 10 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.1, 1.0)
Rock Island County 7 9.6 (6.9, 13.1) 22 (4, 31) 9 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.2, 1.1)
Sangamon County 7 14.3 (11.5, 17.7) 4 (1, 19) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
St. Clair County 7 10.7 (8.5, 13.3) 18 (3, 29) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.2)
Stephenson County 7 10.5 (6.0, 17.4) 19 (1, 31) 4 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.4, 0.5)
Tazewell County 7 9.2 (6.5, 12.8) 24 (5, 31) 8 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.4, 0.7)
Vermilion County 7 7.0 (4.2, 11.1) 31 (10, 31) 4 falling falling trend -20.3 (-34.2, -3.6)
Whiteside County 7 11.1 (7.1, 16.9) 15 (1, 31) 5 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.6, -0.9)
Will County 7 9.0 (7.7, 10.5) 26 (14, 30) 36 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.0)
Williamson County 7 7.6 (4.4, 12.3) 29 (6, 31) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.4, 4.3)
Winnebago County 7 11.7 (9.5, 14.4) 8 (2, 26) 21 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Alexander County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bond County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bureau County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coles County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
De Witt County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edgar County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Effingham County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jersey County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jo Daviess County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Livingston County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macoupin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Massac County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDonough County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moultrie County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Piatt County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Saline County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stark County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodford County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/27/2022 9:44 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alexander, Bond, Brown, Bureau, Calhoun, Carroll, Cass, Clark, Clay, Clinton, Coles, Crawford, Cumberland, De Witt, Douglas, Edgar, Edwards, Effingham, Fayette, Ford, Franklin, Fulton, Gallatin, Greene, Grundy, Hamilton, Hancock, Hardin, Henderson, Jasper, Jefferson, Jersey, Jo Daviess, Johnson, Knox, Lawrence, Lee, Livingston, Logan, Macoupin, Marion, Marshall, Mason, Massac, McDonough, Menard, Mercer, Monroe, Montgomery, Morgan, Moultrie, Perry, Piatt, Pike, Pope, Pulaski, Putnam, Randolph, Richland, Saline, Schuyler, Scott, Shelby, Stark, Union, Wabash, Warren, Washington, Wayne, White, Woodford

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top