Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois 6 *** 111.5 (110.3, 112.6) N/A 8,174 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 3.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 106.2 (106.0, 106.4) N/A 200,677 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.6, 6.3)
Washington County 6 *** 155.1 (122.2, 195.2) 1 (1, 58) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.9, 2.9)
Effingham County 6 *** 154.8 (132.0, 180.7) 2 (1, 35) 34 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.8, -1.2)
Grundy County 6 *** 144.3 (124.4, 166.5) 3 (1, 45) 41 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.5)
Clay County 6 *** 141.3 (108.5, 181.9) 4 (1, 87) 13 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.3, -0.4)
Marion County 6 *** 139.2 (119.5, 161.5) 5 (1, 51) 37 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.9, 0.0)
Scott County 6 *** 138.4 (87.9, 211.2) 6 (1, 100) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.1, 4.3)
Pulaski County 6 *** 137.2 (91.1, 202.5) 7 (1, 99) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.2, 2.8)
Jasper County 6 *** 136.2 (99.4, 183.9) 8 (1, 94) 9 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.7, 3.1)
Brown County 6 *** 135.2 (87.4, 200.5) 9 (1, 100) 5 stable stable trend 24.0 (-17.4, 86.0)
Menard County 6 *** 134.4 (102.0, 175.3) 10 (1, 92) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.7, 3.4)
Calhoun County 6 *** 134.1 (88.7, 200.5) 11 (1, 100) 6 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.1, 1.3)
Fayette County 6 *** 133.4 (108.1, 163.4) 12 (1, 83) 20 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.7, -0.2)
Shelby County 6 *** 131.3 (107.8, 159.3) 13 (1, 76) 22 stable stable trend 9.9 (-1.4, 22.6)
Morgan County 6 *** 130.4 (110.1, 153.8) 14 (1, 75) 30 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.5)
Livingston County 6 *** 130.2 (110.5, 152.9) 15 (1, 73) 32 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.9, -0.1)
Sangamon County 6 *** 129.8 (120.7, 139.5) 16 (4, 41) 160 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.1)
Christian County 6 *** 129.4 (109.2, 152.5) 17 (1, 70) 30 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.8)
Alexander County 6 *** 129.0 (88.0, 186.6) 18 (1, 99) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.9, 1.8)
Woodford County 6 *** 128.3 (109.3, 149.8) 19 (2, 72) 34 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.5, -0.7)
DeKalb County 6 *** 127.9 (113.8, 143.3) 20 (3, 56) 63 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.5)
Jefferson County 6 *** 127.5 (108.5, 149.2) 21 (2, 71) 33 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.9, -1.0)
Kendall County 6 *** 126.4 (112.4, 141.8) 22 (4, 57) 65 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Will County 6 *** 125.9 (120.6, 131.5) 23 (9, 37) 451 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.9, -1.7)
Champaign County 6 *** 124.8 (114.7, 135.5) 24 (6, 51) 121 stable stable trend 9.8 (-3.9, 25.5)
Douglas County 6 *** 122.8 (96.7, 154.4) 25 (1, 92) 16 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.9)
Peoria County 6 *** 122.7 (113.5, 132.5) 26 (8, 52) 137 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.4)
Stark County 6 *** 122.2 (78.9, 184.9) 27 (1, 100) 5
*
*
Lawrence County 6 *** 121.7 (92.7, 157.2) 28 (1, 95) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.8, 3.6)
Macon County 6 *** 121.5 (110.1, 133.9) 29 (7, 61) 87 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.1, -1.6)
Schuyler County 6 *** 120.7 (83.4, 172.4) 30 (1, 99) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.8, 4.6)
Richland County 6 *** 120.5 (93.7, 153.6) 31 (1, 93) 14 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.3, 1.9)
Logan County 6 *** 116.4 (95.1, 141.3) 32 (3, 91) 21 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.8, -0.3)
Cook County 6 *** 116.0 (114.2, 117.9) 33 (25, 47) 3,188 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.5, 3.6)
Marshall County 6 *** 115.5 (86.2, 153.2) 34 (1, 97) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.4, 1.4)
Clinton County 6 *** 115.3 (96.7, 136.8) 35 (5, 88) 28 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.2)
Massac County 6 *** 113.4 (85.1, 149.1) 36 (1, 98) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.4)
Tazewell County 6 *** 111.1 (101.3, 121.7) 37 (17, 76) 98 stable stable trend 10.7 (-1.2, 24.1)
Saline County 6 *** 111.1 (89.4, 137.1) 38 (5, 95) 19 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.3)
Mason County 6 *** 110.7 (84.3, 144.5) 39 (3, 98) 12 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.0, 0.0)
Vermilion County 6 *** 110.7 (98.0, 124.6) 40 (14, 84) 58 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -0.7)
Monroe County 6 *** 110.6 (91.6, 132.8) 41 (5, 95) 25 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.0, -1.6)
Hamilton County 6 *** 110.3 (75.9, 157.5) 42 (1, 100) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.3, 3.4)
Pope County 6 *** 110.0 (68.9, 177.7) 43 (1, 100) 5 stable stable trend 3.0 (-2.4, 8.8)
DuPage County 6 *** 109.7 (105.7, 113.9) 44 (31, 64) 596 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.1)
Jersey County 6 *** 109.3 (86.4, 137.2) 45 (4, 97) 16 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.3)
Greene County 6 *** 109.3 (80.7, 145.8) 46 (2, 99) 10 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.1, -0.3)
White County 6 *** 109.3 (82.8, 142.9) 47 (3, 99) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.8, 3.6)
Franklin County 6 *** 108.8 (92.1, 128.1) 48 (9, 91) 31 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.1, -0.3)
La Salle County 6 *** 108.6 (98.2, 120.0) 49 (21, 81) 82 falling falling trend -11.0 (-18.1, -3.4)
Wayne County 6 *** 108.2 (83.7, 138.6) 50 (3, 98) 14 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.5, -0.3)
McDonough County 6 *** 108.1 (87.3, 132.9) 51 (6, 96) 20 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.9, -0.4)
Macoupin County 6 *** 107.1 (91.5, 125.0) 52 (12, 91) 35 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.6, 5.9)
Kankakee County 6 *** 106.4 (95.6, 118.2) 53 (23, 86) 73 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.7, -2.7)
Henry County 6 *** 106.1 (91.6, 122.6) 54 (15, 91) 39 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.9, -0.9)
Bond County 6 *** 106.1 (81.2, 137.0) 55 (4, 98) 13 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.7, 1.3)
Kane County 6 *** 105.6 (100.1, 111.3) 56 (36, 74) 297 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.7, -2.6)
Carroll County 6 *** 105.4 (80.6, 137.0) 57 (4, 99) 13 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.3, 0.0)
Lake County 6 *** 105.4 (100.7, 110.2) 58 (37, 73) 419 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.7, 4.8)
Rock Island County 6 *** 105.1 (96.1, 114.9) 59 (28, 82) 102 rising rising trend 6.1 (2.5, 9.7)
Pike County 6 *** 104.8 (79.3, 136.8) 60 (4, 99) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.0, 2.3)
St. Clair County 6 *** 103.8 (96.4, 111.6) 61 (32, 81) 157 stable stable trend 0.7 (-7.7, 9.9)
Iroquois County 6 *** 102.6 (83.8, 125.0) 62 (9, 97) 21 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.9, -1.4)
Crawford County 6 *** 102.6 (79.3, 131.3) 63 (5, 99) 14 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.7, -0.9)
Bureau County 6 *** 102.5 (85.6, 122.4) 64 (12, 96) 26 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.0, -0.2)
Piatt County 6 *** 102.3 (77.9, 133.1) 65 (6, 99) 12 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.8, -1.3)
Edwards County 6 *** 102.3 (66.3, 154.5) 66 (1, 100) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.5, 2.6)
McHenry County 6 *** 102.1 (95.4, 109.3) 67 (38, 82) 185 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.0, -3.3)
Williamson County 6 *** 102.0 (88.9, 116.6) 68 (22, 93) 45 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.9)
Jo Daviess County 6 *** 101.6 (82.7, 124.8) 69 (12, 97) 21 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -1.6)
Union County 6 *** 101.4 (78.5, 130.1) 70 (8, 99) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.4, 3.3)
Whiteside County 6 *** 101.0 (87.6, 116.2) 71 (22, 93) 42 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.4)
Hancock County 6 *** 101.0 (79.0, 128.4) 72 (8, 99) 15 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.8, -2.9)
Mercer County 6 *** 100.1 (76.1, 130.6) 73 (7, 100) 12 stable stable trend -3.3 (-6.9, 0.4)
Ford County 6 *** 99.7 (72.2, 135.4) 74 (3, 100) 9 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.8, -1.3)
Adams County 6 *** 98.7 (85.9, 113.1) 75 (29, 95) 44 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.2, -3.5)
Jackson County 6 *** 96.6 (81.1, 114.2) 76 (25, 97) 29 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.9, -1.1)
McLean County 6 *** 96.1 (87.0, 106.0) 77 (41, 92) 85 falling falling trend -9.3 (-14.1, -4.3)
Cass County 6 *** 95.3 (67.7, 131.4) 78 (5, 100) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.1, 1.8)
Edgar County 6 *** 95.1 (72.9, 123.2) 79 (11, 100) 13 stable stable trend -3.9 (-7.7, 0.1)
Fulton County 6 *** 92.5 (76.3, 111.4) 80 (24, 99) 23 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.7, -2.2)
Cumberland County 6 *** 92.2 (63.1, 131.5) 81 (6, 100) 7 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.9, -0.4)
Knox County 6 *** 92.0 (78.5, 107.4) 82 (36, 98) 34 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.1, 0.0)
Ogle County 6 *** 91.6 (77.7, 107.6) 83 (35, 98) 32 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.6, -1.2)
Madison County 6 *** 90.9 (84.3, 97.8) 84 (61, 94) 149 rising rising trend 9.1 (1.5, 17.3)
Perry County 6 *** 88.8 (67.9, 114.5) 85 (18, 100) 13 falling falling trend -5.8 (-9.1, -2.4)
Lee County 6 *** 88.2 (72.6, 106.7) 86 (33, 100) 23 falling falling trend -5.9 (-7.4, -4.4)
Wabash County 6 *** 88.1 (62.3, 122.7) 87 (7, 100) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.0, 3.1)
Boone County 6 *** 87.9 (73.8, 104.1) 88 (39, 99) 28 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.9, -1.9)
Putnam County 6 *** 87.9 (55.1, 138.6) 89 (3, 100) 5 stable stable trend -3.0 (-8.3, 2.6)
Winnebago County 6 *** 87.2 (81.0, 93.7) 90 (68, 96) 157 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.3, -2.7)
Montgomery County 6 *** 84.5 (67.4, 105.0) 91 (33, 100) 17 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.7, -0.7)
Randolph County 6 *** 84.2 (67.9, 103.5) 92 (38, 100) 19 falling falling trend -6.0 (-8.1, -3.9)
Stephenson County 6 *** 83.0 (70.0, 98.2) 93 (53, 100) 29 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.9, -1.2)
Henderson County 6 *** 81.5 (52.4, 126.0) 94 (9, 100) 5 stable stable trend 14.9 (-2.8, 35.8)
Johnson County 6 *** 80.9 (57.4, 112.0) 95 (19, 100) 8 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.5, -0.4)
De Witt County 6 *** 79.5 (57.7, 108.0) 96 (27, 100) 9 falling falling trend -18.4 (-32.1, -2.0)
Moultrie County 6 *** 73.6 (51.1, 103.6) 97 (29, 100) 7 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.0, -1.3)
Clark County 6 *** 70.9 (50.4, 98.1) 98 (40, 100) 8 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.1, -1.3)
Coles County 6 *** 69.9 (57.0, 84.9) 99 (78, 100) 21 falling falling trend -6.4 (-8.1, -4.7)
Warren County 6 *** 66.8 (47.8, 91.8) 100 (60, 100) 8 falling falling trend -9.3 (-13.4, -5.1)
Gallatin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2021 3:18 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top