Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

Bladder (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois 7 N/A 19.5 (19.2, 19.9) N/A 3,063 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.7, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.8 (18.7, 18.9) N/A 75,136 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.7)
Edgar County 7 Rural 32.7 (23.3, 45.3) 1 (1, 67) 9 rising rising trend 12.1 (0.8, 43.2)
Jasper County 7 Rural 30.9 (18.4, 49.5) 2 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Union County 7 Rural 29.6 (21.5, 40.5) 3 (1, 75) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.9)
Johnson County 7 Rural 29.2 (19.5, 42.8) 4 (1, 82) 6
*
*
Macon County 7 Urban 26.7 (23.1, 30.8) 5 (1, 48) 42 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Franklin County 7 Rural 26.1 (20.3, 33.2) 6 (1, 71) 15 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 4.4)
Whiteside County 7 Rural 26.0 (21.3, 31.6) 7 (1, 68) 22 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.5)
Kendall County 7 Urban 25.9 (21.6, 30.8) 8 (1, 63) 27 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 3.2)
Macoupin County 7 Urban 25.9 (20.7, 32.2) 9 (1, 67) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 2.1)
Wayne County 7 Rural 25.7 (17.2, 37.5) 10 (1, 84) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.9, 4.4)
Jackson County 7 Rural 25.7 (20.3, 32.2) 11 (1, 72) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.8, 2.8)
Adams County 7 Rural 25.3 (20.9, 30.4) 12 (2, 67) 24 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.2)
Morgan County 7 Rural 25.0 (19.2, 32.3) 13 (1, 78) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.7, 2.0)
De Witt County 7 Rural 24.9 (16.2, 37.2) 14 (1, 84) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.3, 4.9)
Jefferson County 7 Rural 24.9 (19.1, 32.0) 15 (1, 78) 13 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.0, 5.6)
White County 7 Rural 24.5 (16.2, 36.5) 16 (1, 84) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.0, 5.2)
Fulton County 7 Rural 24.4 (18.6, 31.6) 17 (1, 79) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6)
Perry County 7 Rural 24.2 (16.9, 33.9) 18 (1, 84) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.8, 5.8)
Kankakee County 7 Urban 24.1 (20.6, 28.1) 19 (3, 65) 34 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.2)
Clark County 7 Rural 23.9 (15.9, 35.2) 20 (1, 84) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 2.0)
La Salle County 7 Rural 23.7 (20.4, 27.6) 21 (4, 66) 37 stable stable trend -7.1 (-24.1, 0.6)
Livingston County 7 Rural 23.7 (18.2, 30.7) 22 (1, 82) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.6)
Carroll County 7 Rural 23.7 (15.9, 34.8) 23 (1, 84) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.4, 2.0)
Mason County 7 Rural 23.5 (14.9, 36.0) 24 (1, 84) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.8, 4.5)
Christian County 7 Rural 23.4 (17.8, 30.5) 25 (1, 81) 12 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 2.9)
Jo Daviess County 7 Rural 23.4 (17.2, 31.9) 26 (1, 83) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.6, 1.9)
Washington County 7 Rural 23.3 (15.1, 35.3) 27 (1, 84) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.9, 6.0)
Vermilion County 7 Rural 23.3 (19.3, 27.9) 28 (3, 74) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Clay County 7 Rural 23.2 (14.6, 35.8) 29 (1, 84) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.5, 3.5)
Shelby County 7 Rural 23.2 (16.6, 32.0) 30 (1, 83) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.5, 0.4)
Logan County 7 Rural 23.1 (16.7, 31.3) 31 (1, 83) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 2.8)
McLean County 7 Urban 23.0 (19.9, 26.5) 32 (7, 68) 41 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 1.0)
Tazewell County 7 Urban 23.0 (20.0, 26.3) 33 (6, 68) 44 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Clinton County 7 Urban 22.8 (17.1, 29.9) 34 (2, 82) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.5, 2.8)
Madison County 7 Urban 22.8 (20.5, 25.2) 35 (12, 63) 81 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Sangamon County 7 Urban 22.7 (20.2, 25.4) 36 (9, 66) 61 falling falling trend -1.4 (-6.4, -0.2)
Cass County 7 Rural 22.6 (13.5, 35.9) 37 (1, 84) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.9, 6.6)
Hancock County 7 Rural 22.5 (15.2, 32.6) 38 (1, 84) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.1)
DeKalb County 7 Urban 22.4 (18.4, 27.1) 39 (4, 78) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.8)
Fayette County 7 Rural 22.3 (15.3, 31.9) 40 (1, 84) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.7, 2.2)
Saline County 7 Rural 22.3 (15.7, 31.2) 41 (1, 84) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.3, 4.0)
Will County 7 Urban 22.0 (20.4, 23.6) 42 (19, 61) 158 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Greene County 7 Rural 21.7 (13.4, 34.2) 43 (1, 84) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 2.7)
Warren County 7 Rural 21.3 (14.1, 31.6) 44 (1, 84) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.9, 1.2)
Williamson County 7 Rural 21.3 (17.3, 26.0) 45 (6, 80) 21 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.1)
McHenry County 7 Urban 21.3 (19.2, 23.6) 46 (18, 69) 79 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Woodford County 7 Urban 21.2 (16.0, 27.8) 47 (4, 83) 12 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.1, 0.1)
St. Clair County 7 Urban 21.2 (18.9, 23.6) 48 (17, 72) 66 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Lake County 7 Urban 21.1 (19.7, 22.6) 49 (25, 65) 171 falling falling trend -1.9 (-11.1, -0.3)
Menard County 7 Urban 21.0 (12.2, 34.4) 50 (1, 84) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.2, 4.0)
Jersey County 7 Urban 20.9 (14.1, 30.2) 51 (2, 84) 6 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.5, 1.1)
Grundy County 7 Urban 20.9 (15.9, 26.9) 52 (5, 83) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.5)
Marion County 7 Rural 20.7 (15.6, 27.3) 53 (3, 83) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 0.7)
Montgomery County 7 Rural 20.7 (15.2, 28.0) 54 (3, 84) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.1)
DuPage County 7 Urban 20.7 (19.5, 22.0) 55 (30, 65) 237 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Effingham County 7 Rural 20.6 (15.2, 27.6) 56 (4, 84) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.5)
Lee County 7 Rural 20.5 (15.3, 27.2) 57 (4, 84) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.5)
Knox County 7 Rural 20.5 (16.1, 25.9) 58 (7, 83) 16 stable stable trend -16.6 (-37.3, 1.0)
Moultrie County 7 Rural 20.2 (12.3, 31.8) 59 (1, 84) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.1, 5.8)
Peoria County 7 Urban 20.2 (17.6, 23.0) 60 (21, 78) 48 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.2)
Stephenson County 7 Rural 20.1 (15.7, 25.7) 61 (7, 83) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.0, 3.9)
Kane County 7 Urban 20.0 (18.4, 21.8) 62 (30, 74) 114 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Winnebago County 7 Urban 19.4 (17.4, 21.5) 63 (31, 77) 74 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Lawrence County 7 Rural 19.3 (11.7, 30.4) 64 (2, 84) 4 falling falling trend -8.1 (-18.8, -0.2)
Mercer County 7 Urban 19.0 (11.9, 29.6) 65 (2, 84) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.6, 4.6)
Coles County 7 Rural 18.8 (14.2, 24.6) 66 (10, 84) 12 stable stable trend 2.2 (-8.8, 16.1)
Boone County 7 Urban 18.7 (14.3, 24.1) 67 (12, 84) 13 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.5, 0.6)
Ogle County 7 Rural 18.5 (14.3, 23.7) 68 (14, 84) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.7)
Rock Island County 7 Urban 18.4 (15.8, 21.3) 69 (32, 82) 38 falling falling trend -7.4 (-17.4, -2.2)
Bureau County 7 Rural 18.3 (13.3, 24.8) 70 (9, 84) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.7, 3.5)
Douglas County 7 Rural 18.1 (11.7, 27.1) 71 (4, 84) 5 stable stable trend -4.2 (-32.6, 0.2)
Champaign County 7 Urban 18.1 (15.5, 20.9) 72 (36, 83) 38 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.7)
Bond County 7 Urban 18.1 (11.1, 28.4) 73 (2, 84) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.3, 5.1)
Ford County 7 Urban 18.0 (10.3, 29.9) 74 (2, 84) 3 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.5, 4.8)
Massac County 7 Urban 17.4 (10.7, 27.6) 75 (4, 84) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.9, 1.7)
McDonough County 7 Rural 17.4 (11.9, 24.9) 76 (8, 84) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.7, 1.8)
Monroe County 7 Urban 17.1 (12.3, 23.4) 77 (13, 84) 9 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.5, 0.4)
Piatt County 7 Urban 16.9 (10.5, 26.4) 78 (5, 84) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-7.1, 4.9)
Iroquois County 7 Rural 16.8 (11.7, 23.8) 79 (11, 84) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.1, 1.5)
Cook County 7 Urban 16.8 (16.3, 17.2) 80 (64, 81) 1,017 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Henry County 7 Urban 16.3 (12.5, 21.1) 81 (27, 84) 13 falling falling trend -10.7 (-24.4, -5.5)
Crawford County 7 Rural 16.3 (10.4, 25.0) 82 (10, 84) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.3, 2.6)
Randolph County 7 Rural 15.0 (10.4, 21.3) 83 (25, 84) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.9, 2.5)
Richland County 7 Rural 14.7 (8.5, 24.3) 84 (11, 84) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.2, 2.1)
Alexander County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stark County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2024 3:52 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top