Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois 7 18.9 (18.6, 19.2) N/A 2,842 falling falling trend -0.3 (-1.6, -0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 18.6 (18.5, 18.7) N/A 70,394 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -0.9)
Moultrie County 7 14.7 (8.3, 24.7) 78 (4, 82) 3
*
*
Marshall County 7 18.9 (10.6, 32.3) 50 (1, 82) 3
*
*
Menard County 7 21.7 (12.2, 36.1) 18 (1, 82) 3
*
*
Perry County 7 11.2 (6.5, 18.5) 82 (28, 82) 3 stable stable trend -4.6 (-47.0, 8.0)
Bond County 7 16.2 (9.6, 26.2) 74 (2, 82) 4 falling falling trend -9.0 (-35.0, -2.7)
Edgar County 7 13.3 (7.9, 21.9) 80 (11, 82) 4
*
*
Mason County 7 19.0 (11.1, 31.1) 49 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Richland County 7 16.9 (10.1, 27.2) 67 (2, 82) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-6.0, 6.5)
Ford County 7 21.8 (13.1, 34.6) 17 (1, 82) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.7, 2.1)
Wabash County 7 25.8 (15.6, 41.0) 3 (1, 82) 4
*
*
De Witt County 7 21.9 (13.4, 34.1) 16 (1, 82) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.8, 6.4)
Pike County 7 19.5 (11.9, 30.8) 39 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Union County 7 17.8 (10.9, 27.9) 62 (2, 82) 4 stable stable trend -3.5 (-8.0, 0.5)
Clay County 7 21.9 (13.8, 34.0) 15 (1, 82) 5
*
*
White County 7 20.3 (12.7, 31.7) 30 (1, 82) 5
*
*
Douglas County 7 21.0 (13.2, 32.0) 23 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.3, 5.7)
Hancock County 7 17.3 (10.7, 27.1) 64 (2, 82) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.0, 3.5)
Jo Daviess County 7 14.5 (8.6, 23.3) 79 (5, 82) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.4, 2.5)
Warren County 7 21.1 (13.3, 32.3) 22 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.2, 3.2)
Wayne County 7 17.3 (11.1, 26.6) 65 (2, 82) 5
*
*
Carroll County 7 18.5 (11.7, 28.9) 56 (1, 82) 5
*
*
Greene County 7 27.5 (17.6, 41.6) 2 (1, 79) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-3.4, 8.4)
Lawrence County 7 24.9 (15.9, 37.4) 6 (1, 81) 5 rising rising trend 40.0 (4.0, 72.3)
Saline County 7 16.6 (10.5, 25.3) 69 (3, 82) 5 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.5, -0.7)
Piatt County 7 20.7 (13.4, 31.2) 25 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.2, 7.9)
Clark County 7 24.0 (15.6, 35.8) 8 (1, 81) 5 stable stable trend 3.3 (-2.6, 10.8)
Fayette County 7 20.0 (13.3, 29.2) 36 (1, 82) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.3, 2.0)
Crawford County 7 21.6 (14.6, 31.4) 19 (1, 81) 6 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.2, 7.6)
Shelby County 7 18.6 (12.3, 27.4) 55 (2, 82) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.4, 4.2)
McDonough County 7 19.5 (13.3, 27.7) 40 (2, 82) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.1)
Mercer County 7 32.9 (22.6, 46.8) 1 (1, 62) 7 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.1, 7.4)
Livingston County 7 16.0 (11.2, 22.3) 75 (8, 82) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.1, 1.2)
Effingham County 7 18.3 (12.8, 25.4) 58 (3, 82) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.9, 2.4)
Jersey County 7 25.8 (18.0, 36.1) 4 (1, 76) 8
*
*
Jefferson County 7 15.4 (10.9, 21.3) 77 (11, 82) 8 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.8, 0.6)
Montgomery County 7 19.2 (13.5, 26.7) 44 (2, 81) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.6, 4.0)
Bureau County 7 16.4 (11.7, 22.7) 72 (9, 82) 8 falling falling trend -17.0 (-29.5, -3.0)
Clinton County 7 17.5 (12.4, 24.1) 63 (6, 82) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.1, 2.3)
Iroquois County 7 20.6 (14.6, 28.6) 27 (1, 81) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.2, 2.9)
Logan County 7 21.2 (15.2, 29.0) 21 (1, 80) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.6)
Knox County 7 12.5 (9.0, 17.0) 81 (45, 82) 9 falling falling trend -23.6 (-42.0, -3.6)
Randolph County 7 20.8 (15.1, 28.1) 24 (2, 81) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.1)
Morgan County 7 20.5 (14.9, 27.6) 28 (2, 80) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 3.9)
Woodford County 7 19.8 (14.5, 26.7) 38 (2, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.0, 4.2)
Christian County 7 20.7 (15.2, 27.7) 26 (2, 80) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.5, 2.9)
Franklin County 7 19.1 (13.9, 25.8) 46 (3, 81) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.6, 1.7)
Marion County 7 20.2 (14.8, 27.1) 33 (2, 80) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.6, 3.1)
Monroe County 7 22.1 (16.3, 29.4) 14 (1, 78) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 3.1)
Coles County 7 16.5 (12.3, 21.9) 70 (10, 82) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.3)
Fulton County 7 21.3 (15.8, 28.3) 20 (1, 79) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.2)
Grundy County 7 20.3 (15.3, 26.4) 31 (2, 79) 11 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.8, 1.7)
Lee County 7 23.8 (17.9, 31.3) 9 (1, 73) 12 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.2, 5.4)
Jackson County 7 19.4 (14.6, 25.2) 42 (3, 80) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.5)
Stephenson County 7 20.2 (15.4, 26.2) 34 (2, 79) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.6, 2.2)
Boone County 7 22.1 (17.0, 28.2) 13 (1, 76) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.4)
Macoupin County 7 18.8 (14.6, 24.2) 54 (6, 80) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.1, 4.4)
Adams County 7 16.3 (12.6, 20.8) 73 (16, 82) 15 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 0.6)
Whiteside County 7 19.1 (14.9, 24.1) 48 (5, 79) 16 stable stable trend -7.9 (-27.1, 3.6)
Williamson County 7 18.9 (14.9, 23.6) 53 (6, 79) 17 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 3.1)
Ogle County 7 24.8 (19.6, 31.0) 7 (1, 65) 17 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.7)
Henry County 7 23.8 (18.8, 29.8) 10 (1, 70) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 3.5)
Vermilion County 7 16.5 (13.1, 20.6) 71 (17, 81) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.3)
DeKalb County 7 19.5 (15.8, 23.8) 41 (6, 77) 20 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 3.0)
Kendall County 7 18.3 (14.8, 22.2) 57 (10, 79) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.3)
La Salle County 7 17.8 (14.8, 21.3) 61 (15, 78) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.2)
Kankakee County 7 20.3 (16.9, 24.1) 32 (6, 73) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 1.9)
McLean County 7 15.7 (13.1, 18.6) 76 (32, 81) 28 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Macon County 7 22.1 (18.7, 25.9) 12 (3, 64) 33 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.4)
Rock Island County 7 18.2 (15.4, 21.3) 59 (15, 78) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Tazewell County 7 19.9 (16.9, 23.2) 37 (9, 73) 34 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.1)
Champaign County 7 16.8 (14.3, 19.6) 68 (25, 79) 35 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.3)
Peoria County 7 19.1 (16.5, 21.9) 47 (12, 73) 43 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
St. Clair County 7 17.1 (15.0, 19.4) 66 (28, 77) 53 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.7)
Sangamon County 7 24.9 (22.2, 27.9) 5 (2, 32) 64 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.6, 3.5)
Madison County 7 18.9 (16.9, 21.2) 51 (16, 71) 66 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
Winnebago County 7 19.3 (17.2, 21.6) 43 (16, 69) 68 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
McHenry County 7 19.1 (17.1, 21.4) 45 (16, 70) 68 stable stable trend 4.7 (-1.3, 9.0)
Kane County 7 18.9 (17.3, 20.6) 52 (22, 68) 109 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Will County 7 20.1 (18.6, 21.6) 35 (16, 58) 146 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Lake County 7 22.2 (20.7, 23.7) 11 (8, 42) 173 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
DuPage County 7 20.5 (19.3, 21.7) 29 (15, 50) 224 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Cook County 7 18.0 (17.5, 18.5) 60 (41, 65) 1,044 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Alexander County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Massac County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stark County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/16/2024 2:54 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alexander, Brown, Calhoun, Cass, Cumberland, Edwards, Gallatin, Hamilton, Hardin, Henderson, Jasper, Johnson, Massac, Pope, Pulaski, Putnam, Schuyler, Scott, Stark, Washington

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top