Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Melanoma of the Skin, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Illinois 6,10 18.0 (17.7, 18.3) 2,442 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.4, 3.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 20.3 (20.2, 20.3) 68,242 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.9)
Piatt County 6,10 40.3 (28.2, 56.0) 8 stable stable trend -3.5 (-27.4, 28.1)
Hamilton County 6,10 31.2 (18.3, 50.8) 4 rising rising trend 39.1 (24.1, 55.9)
McLean County 6,10 30.2 (26.4, 34.4) 48 stable stable trend 1.4 (-10.2, 14.4)
Jersey County 6,10 29.8 (20.8, 41.5) 8 stable stable trend -15.9 (-36.2, 10.8)
Monroe County 6,10 29.6 (22.2, 38.6) 11 falling falling trend -14.1 (-24.8, -1.9)
Marshall County 6,10 27.1 (15.9, 43.3) 4 stable stable trend -15.4 (-68.0, 123.6)
Richland County 6,10 26.8 (17.7, 39.3) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-15.9, 20.8)
Mercer County 6,10 26.7 (17.3, 39.7) 5 stable stable trend 3.9 (-38.3, 75.0)
Livingston County 6,10 26.6 (20.0, 34.7) 12 stable stable trend 4.1 (-24.6, 43.6)
Ogle County 6,10 26.4 (21.0, 32.9) 17 stable stable trend 2.1 (-12.8, 19.6)
Rock Island County 6,10 26.4 (23.0, 30.2) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-10.3, 10.7)
Marion County 6,10 26.3 (19.7, 34.5) 11 stable stable trend 14.4 (-6.9, 40.5)
La Salle County 6,10 26.3 (22.4, 30.7) 35 stable stable trend 3.3 (-6.7, 14.2)
Knox County 6,10 26.2 (20.8, 32.6) 18 stable stable trend 3.3 (-18.8, 31.4)
Perry County 6,10 26.2 (17.9, 37.1) 7 stable stable trend 10.1 (-2.4, 24.1)
Jefferson County 6,10 25.9 (19.7, 33.6) 12 stable stable trend 7.5 (-18.6, 42.0)
Franklin County 6,10 25.9 (19.7, 33.4) 13 rising rising trend 18.9 (0.1, 41.3)
Henry County 6,10 25.8 (20.4, 32.4) 16 stable stable trend -2.8 (-13.6, 9.4)
Clinton County 6,10 25.8 (19.5, 33.6) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-16.2, 18.0)
Mason County 6,10 25.6 (15.9, 39.4) 5 stable stable trend -10.9 (-47.5, 51.3)
Union County 6,10 25.5 (16.0, 38.5) 5 stable stable trend 6.0 (-67.0, 240.8)
Lee County 6,10 25.3 (19.0, 33.2) 11 rising rising trend 25.8 (10.6, 43.1)
Bureau County 6,10 25.2 (18.8, 33.1) 11 stable stable trend 16.4 (-8.2, 47.6)
Champaign County 6,10 24.9 (21.6, 28.5) 44 stable stable trend 4.7 (-4.8, 15.1)
Winnebago County 6,10 24.3 (21.9, 26.9) 78 stable stable trend 7.6 (-3.5, 20.0)
Hancock County 6,10 24.3 (15.8, 35.9) 6 stable stable trend 10.2 (-24.8, 61.6)
Macon County 6,10 24.3 (20.5, 28.5) 32 stable stable trend 1.2 (-32.6, 52.0)
Warren County 6,10 24.3 (15.4, 36.5) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-15.7, 13.7)
Edgar County 6,10 24.1 (15.8, 35.6) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-36.2, 50.5)
Tazewell County 6,10 24.1 (20.7, 27.9) 38 stable stable trend 0.0 (-6.9, 7.4)
Woodford County 6,10 24.0 (17.7, 31.8) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-24.8, 31.7)
Williamson County 6,10 23.9 (19.2, 29.5) 19 stable stable trend 7.6 (-2.8, 19.0)
Peoria County 6,10 23.8 (20.8, 27.0) 49 stable stable trend -3.6 (-8.3, 1.2)
Wayne County 6,10 23.6 (15.0, 35.7) 5 stable stable trend -9.0 (-41.1, 40.7)
Moultrie County 6,10 23.6 (13.9, 37.4) 4
*
*
Ford County 6,10 23.4 (13.7, 37.6) 4 stable stable trend 18.0 (-21.5, 77.4)
Jo Daviess County 6,10 23.4 (15.8, 33.6) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-41.0, 78.2)
Cumberland County 6,10 23.4 (13.2, 38.8) 3
*
*
Washington County 6,10 23.1 (14.0, 36.3) 4 stable stable trend -17.1 (-53.5, 47.6)
McDonough County 6,10 23.1 (16.0, 32.2) 8 stable stable trend -4.2 (-32.8, 36.6)
Boone County 6,10 23.0 (17.6, 29.5) 13 stable stable trend -12.6 (-39.4, 26.1)
Douglas County 6,10 22.9 (14.8, 34.0) 5 stable stable trend -10.4 (-38.1, 29.7)
Christian County 6,10 22.9 (16.6, 30.9) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-28.5, 42.2)
Effingham County 6,10 22.8 (16.4, 31.0) 9 stable stable trend -6.7 (-37.8, 40.0)
Saline County 6,10 22.7 (15.4, 32.4) 7 stable stable trend -14.8 (-47.1, 37.3)
Lake County 6,10 22.7 (21.1, 24.4) 158 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.7, -0.8)
Jackson County 6,10 22.7 (17.2, 29.3) 12 stable stable trend -5.1 (-30.2, 29.0)
Cass County 6,10 22.5 (13.2, 36.2) 4 stable stable trend 11.6 (-25.3, 66.8)
Adams County 6,10 22.4 (17.9, 27.7) 19 stable stable trend 8.3 (-15.3, 38.5)
Whiteside County 6,10 22.3 (17.6, 28.1) 16 stable stable trend 5.3 (-15.1, 30.7)
De Witt County 6,10 22.2 (13.9, 33.9) 5 stable stable trend -15.5 (-50.0, 42.7)
Sangamon County 6,10 21.8 (19.1, 24.9) 48 stable stable trend 4.7 (-3.3, 13.3)
Grundy County 6,10 21.6 (16.1, 28.4) 11 stable stable trend 11.1 (-26.3, 67.5)
Kendall County 6,10 21.4 (17.3, 26.2) 20 falling falling trend -10.1 (-15.6, -4.2)
Stephenson County 6,10 21.4 (16.1, 27.9) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-30.5, 45.8)
Fulton County 6,10 21.1 (15.4, 28.4) 10 stable stable trend -14.9 (-37.9, 16.6)
Massac County 6,10 21.1 (12.7, 33.3) 4 stable stable trend -15.0 (-33.7, 8.8)
Clay County 6,10 21.1 (12.1, 34.4) 4 stable stable trend -4.6 (-54.0, 97.7)
Madison County 6,10 21.1 (18.8, 23.6) 63 stable stable trend 11.7 (-8.1, 35.8)
Randolph County 6,10 21.0 (15.2, 28.5) 9 stable stable trend -9.8 (-26.6, 10.9)
Macoupin County 6,10 20.8 (15.6, 27.1) 12 stable stable trend -9.4 (-28.6, 15.1)
Menard County 6,10 20.6 (11.7, 34.2) 3
*
*
Johnson County 6,10 20.6 (11.5, 34.4) 3
*
*
Fayette County 6,10 20.4 (13.2, 30.3) 5 stable stable trend -8.3 (-21.9, 7.6)
Coles County 6,10 20.3 (15.3, 26.4) 12 stable stable trend 11.5 (-13.2, 43.1)
Vermilion County 6,10 20.2 (16.3, 24.9) 19 stable stable trend -2.0 (-35.7, 49.2)
DeKalb County 6,10 20.2 (16.2, 24.9) 18 stable stable trend -2.6 (-26.7, 29.4)
Shelby County 6,10 20.1 (13.1, 29.7) 6 stable stable trend 25.9 (-19.4, 96.5)
Morgan County 6,10 20.0 (14.2, 27.5) 9 stable stable trend 11.9 (-30.0, 79.0)
McHenry County 6,10 19.9 (17.7, 22.4) 61 stable stable trend -6.3 (-20.3, 10.0)
Clark County 6,10 19.8 (11.9, 31.3) 4 stable stable trend 21.2 (-1.1, 48.5)
St. Clair County 6,10 19.2 (17.0, 21.7) 54 rising rising trend 17.5 (7.6, 28.4)
Montgomery County 6,10 19.2 (13.3, 27.0) 7 stable stable trend -5.4 (-44.6, 61.3)
Iroquois County 6,10 18.9 (13.0, 26.6) 8 stable stable trend 15.4 (-35.7, 107.2)
Pike County 6,10 18.5 (11.1, 29.5) 4 stable stable trend 15.0 (-28.2, 84.2)
Logan County 6,10 18.3 (12.4, 26.1) 6 stable stable trend -7.5 (-50.0, 71.1)
Kane County 6,10 17.9 (16.2, 19.6) 88 stable stable trend 2.2 (-10.8, 17.0)
Will County 6,10 16.4 (15.0, 17.9) 105 stable stable trend 3.1 (-4.7, 11.4)
DuPage County 6,10 16.2 (15.1, 17.4) 159 falling falling trend -4.6 (-5.8, -3.4)
Kankakee County 6,10 15.1 (12.2, 18.6) 19 stable stable trend -13.4 (-31.2, 9.1)
Carroll County 6,10 14.9 (8.9, 24.4) 4 stable stable trend 41.0 (-11.2, 123.8)
Cook County 6,10 13.4 (12.9, 13.8) 717 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.2)
Alexander County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bond County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stark County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/28/2016 8:25 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top