Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana 6 69.2 (68.4, 70.0) N/A 5,623 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.3, -1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 56.3 (56.2, 56.4) N/A 223,216 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.8)
Adams County 6 62.8 (52.1, 75.1) 77 (15, 91) 25 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.1)
Allen County 6 63.4 (60.0, 67.0) 76 (48, 84) 267 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.6, -1.4)
Bartholomew County 6 65.5 (58.7, 73.1) 71 (25, 87) 68 stable stable trend -8.4 (-18.5, 3.0)
Benton County 6 74.5 (54.4, 100.5) 30 (1, 92) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.2)
Blackford County 6 87.8 (69.4, 110.3) 6 (1, 81) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.9)
Boone County 6 55.8 (48.1, 64.4) 86 (50, 91) 39 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.2)
Brown County 6 71.3 (56.8, 89.1) 46 (2, 91) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9)
Carroll County 6 72.4 (58.8, 88.5) 40 (2, 90) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Cass County 6 79.8 (69.1, 91.9) 17 (2, 75) 41 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.9)
Clark County 6 81.0 (74.4, 88.0) 14 (3, 48) 117 falling falling trend -13.3 (-24.3, -0.6)
Clay County 6 81.2 (68.4, 95.9) 13 (1, 79) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.8)
Clinton County 6 72.0 (60.6, 84.9) 43 (4, 86) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.3)
Crawford County 6 71.5 (54.1, 93.8) 45 (1, 91) 12 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.4, -0.3)
Daviess County 6 67.0 (55.9, 79.8) 64 (9, 90) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.0)
DeKalb County 6 80.5 (70.1, 92.2) 15 (1, 70) 45 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.9)
Dearborn County 6 67.6 (58.8, 77.3) 62 (13, 87) 45 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.3)
Decatur County 6 64.5 (52.9, 78.0) 75 (10, 91) 22 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Delaware County 6 79.1 (72.6, 86.0) 21 (5, 54) 115 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Dubois County 6 51.9 (43.8, 61.3) 90 (60, 92) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6)
Elkhart County 6 65.4 (60.7, 70.3) 72 (34, 84) 152 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Fayette County 6 73.0 (60.5, 87.7) 34 (2, 88) 25 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Floyd County 6 77.6 (69.7, 86.1) 24 (4, 67) 74 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.8)
Fountain County 6 72.3 (58.1, 89.3) 41 (1, 90) 18 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.7)
Franklin County 6 54.6 (43.3, 68.3) 88 (33, 92) 17 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.1, 0.2)
Fulton County 6 75.5 (61.8, 91.5) 27 (1, 88) 22 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.6)
Gibson County 6 67.6 (57.2, 79.5) 61 (9, 89) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Grant County 6 84.9 (76.5, 93.9) 10 (1, 46) 80 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Greene County 6 75.6 (64.7, 88.2) 26 (2, 83) 35 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Hamilton County 6 42.2 (39.0, 45.7) 92 (89, 92) 132 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.8, -2.1)
Hancock County 6 65.2 (58.1, 73.1) 73 (24, 88) 63 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.3)
Harrison County 6 78.8 (68.5, 90.4) 23 (2, 76) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.5)
Hendricks County 6 65.9 (60.5, 71.6) 69 (30, 85) 116 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Henry County 6 76.7 (67.5, 86.8) 25 (3, 78) 53 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Howard County 6 72.7 (65.9, 80.1) 37 (10, 78) 87 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Huntington County 6 66.5 (56.5, 77.9) 67 (11, 90) 33 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Jackson County 6 70.8 (61.2, 81.7) 48 (6, 86) 39 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Jasper County 6 70.5 (59.7, 82.9) 50 (6, 88) 31 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Jay County 6 69.6 (56.1, 85.5) 52 (2, 91) 19 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.4)
Jefferson County 6 85.3 (73.2, 99.0) 9 (1, 62) 37 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.9)
Jennings County 6 87.1 (73.6, 102.5) 7 (1, 66) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.5)
Johnson County 6 70.0 (64.5, 75.9) 51 (21, 78) 123 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.0)
Knox County 6 80.2 (69.2, 92.5) 16 (1, 78) 40 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.7)
Kosciusko County 6 71.6 (64.2, 79.6) 44 (11, 80) 71 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
LaGrange County 6 72.5 (61.2, 85.4) 38 (3, 86) 30 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 3.7)
LaPorte County 6 73.9 (67.8, 80.5) 32 (12, 71) 112 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Lake County 6 65.6 (62.7, 68.6) 70 (45, 80) 405 falling falling trend -5.0 (-9.4, -0.3)
Lawrence County 6 73.0 (64.0, 83.1) 35 (6, 83) 49 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Madison County 6 84.4 (78.3, 90.8) 11 (2, 35) 148 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Marion County 6 73.9 (71.5, 76.5) 31 (21, 54) 719 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)
Marshall County 6 60.1 (51.7, 69.6) 81 (31, 91) 38 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.4)
Martin County 6 72.0 (54.0, 94.9) 42 (1, 91) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.5)
Miami County 6 68.8 (58.6, 80.6) 57 (7, 89) 33 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.9)
Monroe County 6 54.3 (49.0, 60.1) 89 (70, 91) 79 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.8)
Montgomery County 6 68.4 (58.7, 79.3) 58 (10, 89) 36 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.3)
Morgan County 6 81.7 (73.5, 90.6) 12 (2, 55) 76 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Newton County 6 71.0 (55.7, 89.9) 47 (1, 91) 15 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.2)
Noble County 6 79.1 (69.0, 90.4) 19 (2, 74) 47 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.8)
Ohio County 6 57.6 (38.3, 85.7) 84 (2, 92) 6 falling falling trend -38.8 (-61.9, -1.7)
Orange County 6 79.1 (65.0, 95.7) 20 (1, 85) 23 stable stable trend 10.9 (-3.2, 27.0)
Owen County 6 79.5 (65.9, 95.5) 18 (1, 83) 25 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.1)
Parke County 6 69.3 (55.2, 86.4) 54 (2, 90) 17 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.1)
Perry County 6 69.3 (55.5, 85.8) 55 (3, 91) 18 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.1, 1.5)
Pike County 6 73.4 (56.9, 94.1) 33 (1, 91) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.4)
Porter County 6 69.1 (64.1, 74.5) 56 (24, 78) 146 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Posey County 6 55.7 (45.3, 68.1) 87 (34, 92) 21 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.2, -1.0)
Pulaski County 6 79.0 (61.0, 101.0) 22 (1, 90) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.8)
Putnam County 6 88.8 (77.2, 101.9) 4 (1, 50) 43 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Randolph County 6 70.6 (59.0, 84.2) 49 (4, 89) 27 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.2)
Ripley County 6 58.6 (48.1, 70.9) 83 (27, 92) 22 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.9)
Rush County 6 74.6 (59.6, 92.7) 28 (1, 89) 18 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.3)
Scott County 6 92.2 (77.6, 108.9) 2 (1, 57) 29 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.4)
Shelby County 6 88.6 (78.0, 100.3) 5 (1, 44) 53 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.7)
Spencer County 6 56.3 (45.0, 70.0) 85 (23, 92) 18 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.8, 0.8)
St. Joseph County 6 65.9 (61.9, 70.1) 68 (39, 82) 215 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Starke County 6 100.5 (85.6, 117.5) 1 (1, 29) 34 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Steuben County 6 68.0 (58.0, 79.4) 60 (10, 89) 34 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.2)
Sullivan County 6 64.5 (51.9, 79.6) 74 (7, 91) 19 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.4, 0.9)
Switzerland County 6 59.6 (43.3, 80.8) 82 (4, 92) 9 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.7, -1.1)
Tippecanoe County 6 61.2 (55.9, 66.8) 79 (47, 89) 103 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.5, 4.1)
Tipton County 6 73.0 (57.3, 92.1) 36 (1, 91) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.2)
Union County 6 51.5 (34.0, 76.4) 91 (9, 92) 6 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.7)
Vanderburgh County 6 67.2 (62.4, 72.2) 63 (32, 81) 157 stable stable trend -11.5 (-23.9, 2.9)
Vermillion County 6 85.6 (69.4, 105.1) 8 (1, 82) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Vigo County 6 74.5 (68.0, 81.6) 29 (9, 72) 99 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Wabash County 6 66.7 (56.3, 78.7) 66 (10, 90) 31 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.6)
Warren County 6 69.5 (50.5, 94.6) 53 (1, 92) 9 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.1, -0.2)
Warrick County 6 66.9 (59.2, 75.5) 65 (17, 87) 57 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Washington County 6 89.1 (75.9, 104.2) 3 (1, 54) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.2)
Wayne County 6 62.5 (55.4, 70.3) 78 (32, 91) 59 stable stable trend -18.2 (-33.3, 0.3)
Wells County 6 60.9 (50.2, 73.4) 80 (18, 91) 24 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.5)
White County 6 68.1 (56.4, 81.9) 59 (6, 90) 25 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Whitley County 6 72.4 (61.6, 84.7) 39 (5, 87) 34 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2022 3:52 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top