Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana 6 *** 231.2 (229.6, 232.9) N/A 15,744 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 227.6 (227.4, 227.9) N/A 750,329 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Morgan County 6 *** 272.9 (255.9, 290.8) 1 (1, 26) 213 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.1)
Tipton County 6 *** 270.8 (234.0, 312.3) 2 (1, 77) 44 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.8, 4.6)
Howard County 6 *** 268.6 (252.5, 285.4) 3 (1, 29) 231 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.4, 3.1)
Shelby County 6 *** 266.3 (245.4, 288.6) 4 (1, 44) 132 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.2)
Knox County 6 *** 265.3 (241.4, 291.1) 5 (1, 53) 102 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.3)
Grant County 6 *** 264.7 (246.8, 283.7) 6 (1, 39) 184 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Crawford County 6 *** 264.6 (223.1, 312.3) 7 (1, 86) 33 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.1)
Jefferson County 6 *** 264.4 (239.7, 291.1) 8 (1, 61) 93 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.0)
Dearborn County 6 *** 262.7 (243.2, 283.4) 9 (1, 45) 150 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.3, 2.6)
Fountain County 6 *** 261.9 (227.2, 300.7) 10 (1, 80) 45 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 3.1)
Jennings County 6 *** 261.1 (234.8, 289.8) 11 (1, 64) 78 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.5)
White County 6 *** 257.4 (228.9, 288.6) 12 (1, 75) 68 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.7)
Benton County 6 *** 256.8 (211.0, 310.2) 13 (1, 92) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.3)
Hancock County 6 *** 256.0 (239.8, 273.1) 14 (1, 48) 199 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Madison County 6 *** 255.1 (242.7, 268.0) 15 (2, 39) 342 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.4)
Union County 6 *** 252.1 (202.4, 311.2) 16 (1, 92) 20 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.3, 6.1)
Starke County 6 *** 251.5 (224.0, 281.8) 17 (1, 79) 68 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Vigo County 6 *** 251.1 (237.3, 265.7) 18 (3, 51) 266 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Blackford County 6 *** 249.3 (210.8, 293.3) 19 (1, 90) 34 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 0.9)
Lawrence County 6 *** 248.7 (228.4, 270.4) 20 (1, 68) 124 stable stable trend 1.1 (0.0, 2.3)
Clark County 6 *** 245.9 (233.3, 259.1) 21 (6, 55) 302 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.5)
Wabash County 6 *** 245.9 (221.0, 272.8) 22 (1, 80) 81 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 3.1)
Carroll County 6 *** 244.8 (214.4, 278.5) 23 (1, 88) 53 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 2.9)
Ripley County 6 *** 242.9 (217.4, 270.7) 24 (1, 84) 73 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Floyd County 6 *** 241.4 (226.2, 257.5) 25 (6, 68) 203 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Delaware County 6 *** 239.4 (225.9, 253.5) 26 (9, 68) 259 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Henry County 6 *** 238.7 (219.6, 259.1) 27 (5, 78) 126 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Marion County 6 *** 238.5 (233.9, 243.1) 28 (20, 49) 2,219 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.8, -0.1)
Clay County 6 *** 238.5 (212.6, 266.7) 29 (2, 87) 68 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Jasper County 6 *** 237.5 (214.0, 262.9) 30 (2, 85) 82 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
Rush County 6 *** 237.3 (205.3, 273.2) 31 (1, 90) 44 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.7)
Scott County 6 *** 237.2 (210.6, 266.5) 32 (1, 88) 63 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Lake County 6 *** 237.2 (231.1, 243.5) 33 (20, 55) 1,232 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.5)
Franklin County 6 *** 234.2 (206.7, 264.6) 34 (2, 90) 59 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.5)
Boone County 6 *** 233.8 (217.3, 251.3) 35 (8, 79) 155 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.0)
Putnam County 6 *** 233.8 (212.0, 257.4) 36 (4, 86) 92 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Sullivan County 6 *** 233.5 (205.0, 265.1) 37 (1, 90) 52 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.5)
LaPorte County 6 *** 233.0 (220.4, 246.2) 38 (14, 74) 281 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
Wayne County 6 *** 232.6 (216.1, 250.2) 39 (11, 80) 162 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Daviess County 6 *** 232.4 (208.1, 258.7) 40 (3, 88) 73 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.6, 2.8)
Johnson County 6 *** 232.2 (221.2, 243.6) 41 (19, 74) 351 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Washington County 6 *** 231.8 (207.2, 258.6) 42 (3, 90) 72 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.9)
Jay County 6 *** 231.4 (201.8, 264.2) 43 (2, 92) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Porter County 6 *** 230.9 (220.7, 241.5) 44 (18, 72) 419 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Clinton County 6 *** 230.7 (207.4, 256.1) 45 (6, 88) 77 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Bartholomew County 6 *** 230.7 (215.8, 246.4) 46 (13, 79) 189 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Owen County 6 *** 230.5 (202.8, 261.3) 47 (2, 91) 58 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 2.9)
Decatur County 6 *** 230.1 (204.4, 258.3) 48 (4, 90) 64 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.4)
Hendricks County 6 *** 229.3 (218.9, 240.1) 49 (21, 75) 377 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Orange County 6 *** 228.3 (199.0, 261.0) 50 (2, 91) 49 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
DeKalb County 6 *** 228.1 (208.3, 249.3) 51 (10, 88) 107 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.9)
Vanderburgh County 6 *** 228.0 (218.0, 238.3) 52 (23, 75) 436 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.3)
Harrison County 6 *** 227.8 (207.0, 250.3) 53 (8, 88) 98 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Posey County 6 *** 227.0 (201.3, 255.3) 54 (5, 91) 65 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.8)
Jackson County 6 *** 226.6 (206.7, 247.9) 55 (10, 87) 102 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Pike County 6 *** 225.9 (190.0, 267.1) 56 (1, 92) 32 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.3)
Ohio County 6 *** 224.7 (175.6, 285.3) 57 (1, 92) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.4)
Vermillion County 6 *** 223.7 (191.2, 260.6) 58 (2, 92) 38 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Pulaski County 6 *** 223.5 (187.2, 265.2) 59 (1, 92) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Noble County 6 *** 223.5 (204.4, 243.9) 60 (15, 89) 110 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.7)
Kosciusko County 6 *** 222.1 (207.0, 238.0) 61 (22, 87) 177 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Huntington County 6 *** 222.0 (200.7, 245.1) 62 (11, 90) 89 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Elkhart County 6 *** 220.7 (211.3, 230.4) 63 (34, 82) 435 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Fayette County 6 *** 220.3 (194.1, 249.3) 64 (7, 92) 56 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Newton County 6 *** 219.7 (186.8, 257.3) 65 (3, 92) 36 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.6)
Randolph County 6 *** 219.7 (194.3, 247.7) 66 (9, 92) 60 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Allen County 6 *** 219.1 (212.2, 226.2) 67 (44, 80) 807 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Dubois County 6 *** 219.1 (199.1, 240.5) 68 (15, 91) 99 stable stable trend -8.1 (-17.4, 2.3)
St. Joseph County 6 *** 218.8 (210.7, 227.2) 69 (43, 83) 597 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Montgomery County 6 *** 218.7 (197.7, 241.4) 70 (16, 91) 88 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.2)
Greene County 6 *** 218.4 (196.4, 242.4) 71 (15, 91) 80 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.1)
Hamilton County 6 *** 217.4 (210.1, 224.9) 72 (45, 82) 683 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Whitley County 6 *** 215.7 (194.0, 239.2) 73 (16, 92) 82 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0)
Brown County 6 *** 214.4 (182.4, 251.0) 74 (5, 92) 40 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.3)
Gibson County 6 *** 212.1 (190.3, 235.7) 75 (20, 92) 77 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.6)
Warren County 6 *** 211.2 (170.6, 259.7) 76 (1, 92) 21 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.9)
Perry County 6 *** 210.9 (183.4, 241.7) 77 (11, 92) 46 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.5)
Martin County 6 *** 210.5 (173.2, 254.3) 78 (3, 92) 25 rising rising trend 11.6 (0.8, 23.5)
Tippecanoe County 6 *** 210.5 (200.0, 221.4) 79 (48, 89) 320 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Adams County 6 *** 209.5 (186.6, 234.3) 80 (19, 92) 67 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Wells County 6 *** 208.7 (184.8, 235.0) 81 (15, 92) 63 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Cass County 6 *** 208.2 (188.1, 229.9) 82 (24, 92) 86 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Parke County 6 *** 208.1 (178.3, 241.7) 83 (10, 92) 39 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.7)
Steuben County 6 *** 204.0 (182.6, 227.3) 84 (33, 92) 77 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Miami County 6 *** 203.3 (183.1, 225.3) 85 (31, 92) 79 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Spencer County 6 *** 203.2 (176.6, 232.9) 86 (20, 92) 48 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.1)
Monroe County 6 *** 201.9 (190.3, 214.0) 87 (59, 92) 247 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Fulton County 6 *** 201.4 (174.2, 231.8) 88 (20, 92) 44 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Warrick County 6 *** 201.0 (185.4, 217.5) 89 (51, 92) 134 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Switzerland County 6 *** 193.3 (157.9, 234.8) 90 (13, 92) 23 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.9, 0.2)
Marshall County 6 *** 188.4 (170.8, 207.4) 91 (64, 92) 93 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
LaGrange County 6 *** 185.6 (164.8, 208.2) 92 (62, 92) 62 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2021 9:28 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top