Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana 6 *** 431.5 (428.6, 434.5) N/A 17,607 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 422.7 (422.3, 423.2) N/A 843,265 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Shelby County 6 *** 503.6 (466.6, 543.0) 1 (1, 38) 147 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.6, 2.7)
Knox County 6 *** 502.2 (461.5, 545.8) 2 (1, 43) 125 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.1)
Morgan County 6 *** 496.8 (467.2, 527.9) 3 (1, 30) 224 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Jennings County 6 *** 488.8 (441.8, 539.7) 4 (1, 61) 84 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 3.2)
Tipton County 6 *** 487.4 (425.5, 556.3) 5 (1, 78) 51 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.4, 5.9)
Dearborn County 6 *** 484.7 (450.5, 520.9) 6 (1, 50) 161 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.1)
Fountain County 6 *** 482.7 (425.3, 546.3) 7 (1, 75) 57 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.1)
Hancock County 6 *** 477.6 (449.2, 507.5) 8 (1, 51) 222 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Benton County 6 *** 472.5 (394.5, 562.6) 9 (1, 89) 28 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.6)
White County 6 *** 471.5 (423.7, 523.5) 10 (1, 74) 81 stable stable trend 1.1 (0.0, 2.3)
Rush County 6 *** 469.0 (412.6, 531.6) 11 (1, 81) 54 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Madison County 6 *** 465.7 (444.5, 487.6) 12 (4, 46) 400 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.5, 2.4)
Jay County 6 *** 465.0 (413.2, 521.8) 13 (1, 80) 64 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Howard County 6 *** 461.8 (436.2, 488.7) 14 (3, 56) 267 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
DeKalb County 6 *** 461.8 (425.1, 501.0) 15 (1, 68) 125 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.4)
Putnam County 6 *** 461.6 (421.4, 504.9) 16 (1, 73) 105 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Clark County 6 *** 460.5 (438.3, 483.7) 17 (4, 51) 341 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.0)
Johnson County 6 *** 460.2 (440.2, 480.9) 18 (5, 49) 413 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.0)
Floyd County 6 *** 460.1 (433.1, 488.5) 19 (3, 59) 230 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Jefferson County 6 *** 459.8 (418.9, 503.8) 20 (1, 73) 100 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Scott County 6 *** 458.2 (410.9, 509.8) 21 (1, 80) 72 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Henry County 6 *** 458.1 (424.5, 493.9) 22 (2, 69) 152 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Clay County 6 *** 457.6 (412.7, 506.4) 23 (1, 77) 81 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Noble County 6 *** 455.2 (419.2, 493.5) 24 (2, 71) 127 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.2)
Warren County 6 *** 454.2 (379.1, 541.4) 25 (1, 91) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 2.9)
Decatur County 6 *** 451.2 (405.7, 500.7) 26 (1, 83) 77 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.4, 2.8)
Whitley County 6 *** 450.9 (410.9, 494.0) 27 (1, 78) 102 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Owen County 6 *** 450.7 (400.7, 505.8) 28 (1, 85) 66 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0)
Porter County 6 *** 450.3 (431.9, 469.4) 29 (9, 56) 478 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Blackford County 6 *** 450.2 (387.0, 521.7) 30 (1, 90) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Vermillion County 6 *** 449.5 (393.2, 512.4) 31 (1, 88) 50 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.8)
Grant County 6 *** 447.0 (419.0, 476.6) 32 (4, 69) 212 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Wabash County 6 *** 446.4 (405.6, 490.4) 33 (2, 81) 102 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.2, 3.0)
Carroll County 6 *** 446.2 (395.6, 502.0) 34 (1, 86) 62 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Bartholomew County 6 *** 446.0 (419.5, 473.9) 35 (5, 70) 223 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.3)
Marion County 6 *** 444.7 (436.4, 453.0) 36 (19, 48) 2,335 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.0)
Pulaski County 6 *** 444.3 (380.3, 516.7) 37 (1, 90) 38 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Harrison County 6 *** 441.4 (404.6, 480.8) 38 (3, 79) 115 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.3)
Kosciusko County 6 *** 440.4 (413.3, 468.8) 39 (7, 73) 212 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.8)
Crawford County 6 *** 440.1 (371.8, 518.5) 40 (1, 91) 32 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Lake County 6 *** 438.5 (427.9, 449.3) 41 (21, 56) 1,392 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.5)
Orange County 6 *** 436.3 (385.2, 492.7) 42 (1, 89) 58 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.7)
Vigo County 6 *** 433.9 (410.5, 458.3) 43 (12, 74) 284 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Huntington County 6 *** 433.8 (396.0, 474.5) 44 (3, 83) 104 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Hendricks County 6 *** 433.5 (414.3, 453.4) 45 (17, 71) 396 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Starke County 6 *** 432.2 (385.6, 483.3) 46 (2, 88) 67 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Union County 6 *** 430.7 (351.7, 524.2) 47 (1, 92) 22 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.0)
Boone County 6 *** 430.7 (400.7, 462.5) 48 (9, 80) 158 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.4)
Clinton County 6 *** 430.7 (389.5, 475.2) 49 (4, 85) 87 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Washington County 6 *** 428.3 (385.1, 475.2) 50 (4, 87) 77 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Elkhart County 6 *** 427.3 (410.3, 444.7) 51 (23, 72) 504 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.9)
Delaware County 6 *** 423.6 (401.6, 446.6) 52 (19, 78) 307 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
LaPorte County 6 *** 422.3 (400.2, 445.3) 53 (20, 78) 303 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Jackson County 6 *** 420.1 (385.4, 457.2) 54 (9, 87) 115 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Montgomery County 6 *** 420.0 (383.5, 459.3) 55 (9, 87) 106 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Lawrence County 6 *** 419.9 (387.3, 454.7) 56 (11, 85) 137 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.9)
Hamilton County 6 *** 419.5 (405.5, 434.0) 57 (34, 74) 698 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 0.9)
Allen County 6 *** 418.2 (405.7, 430.9) 58 (36, 73) 903 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
St. Joseph County 6 *** 417.4 (403.1, 432.0) 59 (36, 75) 698 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Gibson County 6 *** 416.9 (378.3, 458.6) 60 (10, 89) 93 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.8)
Daviess County 6 *** 416.5 (375.1, 461.4) 61 (8, 90) 80 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Sullivan County 6 *** 415.9 (365.0, 472.3) 62 (3, 91) 54 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.9)
Jasper County 6 *** 413.4 (374.2, 455.7) 63 (10, 89) 88 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Wayne County 6 *** 412.7 (385.8, 441.1) 64 (21, 86) 194 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Franklin County 6 *** 412.6 (366.2, 463.6) 65 (5, 91) 62 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 2.0)
Switzerland County 6 *** 409.0 (341.7, 486.5) 66 (1, 92) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Dubois County 6 *** 408.7 (373.8, 446.0) 67 (17, 90) 112 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.4)
Brown County 6 *** 406.0 (351.7, 467.4) 68 (4, 92) 48 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.1)
Ripley County 6 *** 405.5 (363.7, 451.1) 69 (12, 91) 74 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Tippecanoe County 6 *** 404.9 (385.9, 424.7) 70 (40, 83) 357 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Vanderburgh County 6 *** 404.4 (387.7, 421.7) 71 (43, 83) 484 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Wells County 6 *** 393.9 (353.1, 438.3) 72 (20, 92) 76 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Perry County 6 *** 393.1 (342.7, 449.3) 73 (8, 92) 49 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.2)
Fulton County 6 *** 392.6 (345.5, 444.7) 74 (14, 92) 56 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Warrick County 6 *** 389.6 (362.1, 418.8) 75 (40, 90) 160 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Greene County 6 *** 389.0 (352.0, 429.2) 76 (27, 92) 88 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0)
Posey County 6 *** 384.9 (341.8, 432.2) 77 (22, 92) 65 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Pike County 6 *** 383.3 (324.7, 450.3) 78 (9, 92) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.5)
Fayette County 6 *** 381.3 (339.0, 427.9) 79 (21, 92) 65 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Miami County 6 *** 380.3 (343.4, 420.2) 80 (32, 92) 85 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Adams County 6 *** 379.9 (341.0, 422.0) 81 (33, 92) 77 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Randolph County 6 *** 378.8 (338.2, 423.3) 82 (27, 92) 71 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.5)
LaGrange County 6 *** 377.8 (339.4, 419.3) 83 (34, 92) 74 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Spencer County 6 *** 376.2 (330.2, 427.3) 84 (27, 92) 53 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.8)
Newton County 6 *** 376.1 (320.4, 439.6) 85 (14, 92) 36 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.3)
Monroe County 6 *** 375.9 (355.6, 397.1) 86 (62, 91) 275 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Cass County 6 *** 375.4 (341.2, 412.3) 87 (43, 92) 96 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Steuben County 6 *** 364.9 (328.8, 404.2) 88 (48, 92) 84 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Marshall County 6 *** 356.2 (325.7, 388.9) 89 (63, 92) 109 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Parke County 6 *** 349.7 (301.0, 404.4) 90 (38, 92) 40 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.3)
Martin County 6 *** 337.3 (278.6, 406.1) 91 (31, 92) 25 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.9, 0.4)
Ohio County 6 *** 336.8 (262.5, 428.8) 92 (11, 92) 16 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.6, -1.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/20/2022 6:13 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top