Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana 6 463.8 (461.4, 466.1) N/A 32,018 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.5, -1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) § 1 466.6 (466.3, 467.0) N/A 1,305,791 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Fountain County 6 532.6 (489.2, 579.1) 1 (1, 46) 121 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.1)
Shelby County 6 532.1 (504.4, 560.9) 2 (1, 24) 298 falling falling trend -5.5 (-9.6, -1.1)
Morgan County 6 528.6 (506.5, 551.5) 3 (1, 21) 464 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.3, -1.3)
White County 6 521.2 (484.5, 560.1) 4 (1, 46) 170 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Grant County 6 519.6 (496.4, 543.6) 5 (1, 30) 419 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Benton County 6 519.0 (458.2, 586.2) 6 (1, 76) 57 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Knox County 6 513.7 (483.8, 545.1) 7 (1, 42) 239 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.0)
Hancock County 6 504.6 (483.2, 526.7) 8 (1, 38) 443 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Howard County 6 503.7 (483.5, 524.7) 9 (1, 39) 510 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
Jefferson County 6 502.7 (471.0, 536.1) 10 (1, 50) 202 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Blackford County 6 502.0 (454.1, 554.2) 11 (1, 76) 88 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Putnam County 6 501.1 (471.6, 532.2) 12 (1, 51) 226 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Wabash County 6 500.2 (469.1, 533.1) 13 (1, 55) 214 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.6)
Jennings County 6 498.7 (464.4, 535.2) 14 (1, 62) 166 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Tipton County 6 498.0 (453.9, 545.7) 15 (1, 74) 105 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Madison County 6 496.2 (480.0, 512.8) 16 (4, 39) 761 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Rush County 6 495.2 (452.8, 540.8) 17 (1, 73) 108 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Vermillion County 6 494.5 (451.5, 540.9) 18 (1, 77) 106 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Clinton County 6 493.7 (460.8, 528.6) 19 (1, 67) 182 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Marion County 6 493.3 (485.5, 501.2) 20 (9, 32) 3,293 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.1, 1.8)
Johnson County 6 492.2 (476.9, 507.9) 21 (6, 42) 810 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.4, 1.7)
Starke County 6 490.3 (454.4, 528.5) 22 (1, 67) 149 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Jackson County 6 489.0 (461.5, 517.8) 23 (2, 61) 249 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Henry County 6 487.9 (463.1, 513.8) 24 (2, 58) 310 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Lawrence County 6 484.5 (459.5, 510.7) 25 (4, 61) 304 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.1)
Lake County 6 483.7 (473.6, 494.0) 26 (13, 41) 1,890 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Warren County 6 481.2 (425.7, 543.0) 27 (1, 89) 58 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Decatur County 6 481.1 (446.9, 517.4) 28 (2, 76) 155 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
Jasper County 6 480.9 (450.1, 513.4) 29 (2, 71) 195 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Union County 6 476.8 (414.6, 546.6) 30 (1, 90) 46 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.5)
Clay County 6 476.6 (443.4, 511.8) 31 (3, 78) 162 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Carroll County 6 476.2 (438.5, 516.7) 32 (1, 80) 129 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Porter County 6 475.1 (460.7, 489.8) 33 (14, 53) 893 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
LaPorte County 6 474.7 (457.2, 492.9) 34 (10, 59) 603 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Delaware County 6 474.7 (457.4, 492.6) 35 (11, 59) 611 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Pike County 6 474.3 (427.9, 524.8) 36 (1, 86) 83 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.4)
Orange County 6 473.8 (435.7, 514.5) 37 (2, 81) 125 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Hendricks County 6 473.4 (458.2, 488.9) 38 (15, 57) 772 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.8, -1.2)
Vigo County 6 473.2 (455.1, 491.9) 39 (12, 60) 550 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Scott County 6 472.4 (436.9, 510.2) 40 (2, 81) 139 falling falling trend -12.3 (-20.9, -2.7)
DeKalb County 6 465.4 (438.7, 493.5) 41 (8, 76) 240 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Daviess County 6 465.1 (433.1, 498.8) 42 (5, 82) 168 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Pulaski County 6 463.6 (416.6, 514.9) 43 (1, 89) 77 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Kosciusko County 6 461.1 (440.9, 482.1) 44 (18, 72) 420 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Huntington County 6 460.1 (431.7, 490.0) 45 (10, 81) 209 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Owen County 6 459.9 (424.1, 498.2) 46 (5, 85) 134 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Floyd County 6 459.3 (438.8, 480.6) 47 (19, 75) 404 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Boone County 6 459.2 (436.1, 483.3) 48 (16, 77) 310 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.6)
Martin County 6 459.1 (408.4, 514.9) 49 (1, 91) 65 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Hamilton County 6 457.7 (446.5, 469.0) 50 (31, 65) 1,342 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Gibson County 6 455.7 (426.5, 486.5) 51 (11, 82) 193 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Bartholomew County 6 454.3 (434.4, 475.1) 52 (23, 77) 415 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Tippecanoe County 6 453.3 (437.9, 469.1) 53 (29, 74) 694 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Allen County 6 452.0 (441.7, 462.4) 54 (36, 69) 1,574 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Brown County 6 451.7 (411.4, 495.5) 55 (4, 89) 110 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Randolph County 6 448.5 (416.1, 483.0) 56 (10, 86) 155 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Clark County 6 447.0 (430.2, 464.4) 57 (33, 77) 567 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Jay County 6 446.3 (409.3, 485.9) 58 (10, 89) 115 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Whitley County 6 445.0 (416.3, 475.4) 59 (17, 86) 192 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Vanderburgh County 6 443.8 (430.5, 457.5) 60 (39, 77) 905 stable stable trend -6.7 (-13.8, 1.1)
Noble County 6 443.7 (417.8, 470.8) 61 (25, 85) 238 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Warrick County 6 440.7 (419.2, 463.0) 62 (31, 84) 337 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
St. Joseph County 6 437.5 (425.9, 449.3) 63 (47, 80) 1,176 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Fulton County 6 437.1 (400.7, 476.1) 64 (14, 90) 116 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Washington County 6 436.5 (405.1, 469.9) 65 (20, 89) 153 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Wayne County 6 434.7 (414.0, 456.3) 66 (35, 86) 360 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Sullivan County 6 434.0 (397.8, 472.9) 67 (17, 90) 113 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.5, 0.0)
Dearborn County 6 433.7 (410.3, 458.1) 68 (36, 87) 278 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Greene County 6 433.6 (405.8, 462.9) 69 (29, 89) 194 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Montgomery County 6 432.7 (405.8, 461.1) 70 (29, 89) 208 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Cass County 6 432.4 (404.8, 461.6) 71 (31, 89) 199 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Crawford County 6 432.3 (383.5, 486.3) 72 (7, 92) 63 stable stable trend -11.9 (-23.1, 1.0)
Fayette County 6 426.3 (393.2, 461.7) 73 (24, 91) 133 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
Dubois County 6 425.1 (399.5, 452.0) 74 (38, 89) 224 stable stable trend -6.7 (-13.9, 1.0)
Adams County 6 424.6 (394.9, 456.0) 75 (32, 90) 162 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Miami County 6 424.5 (396.6, 453.9) 76 (36, 90) 183 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Monroe County 6 421.4 (405.4, 437.9) 77 (53, 88) 557 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Harrison County 6 420.4 (394.6, 447.7) 78 (41, 90) 213 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Ripley County 6 418.6 (388.2, 450.8) 79 (36, 91) 150 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Elkhart County 6 417.6 (404.6, 430.9) 80 (62, 88) 831 falling falling trend -6.4 (-10.1, -2.6)
Newton County 6 417.2 (374.8, 463.5) 81 (25, 92) 78 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Steuben County 6 415.1 (388.0, 443.6) 82 (45, 91) 195 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Posey County 6 412.7 (381.3, 446.3) 83 (40, 91) 140 falling falling trend -8.7 (-15.8, -0.9)
Wells County 6 412.1 (381.7, 444.5) 84 (47, 92) 148 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
LaGrange County 6 405.6 (377.1, 435.6) 85 (49, 92) 158 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Parke County 6 403.3 (365.3, 444.4) 86 (38, 92) 91 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Franklin County 6 400.3 (367.5, 435.5) 87 (45, 92) 119 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Marshall County 6 389.6 (366.0, 414.5) 88 (68, 92) 220 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Spencer County 6 386.5 (353.3, 422.2) 89 (59, 92) 109 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Perry County 6 386.0 (351.2, 423.5) 90 (57, 92) 97 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Switzerland County 6 363.7 (318.7, 413.8) 91 (60, 92) 50 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.7)
Ohio County 6 358.9 (302.1, 424.6) 92 (47, 92) 32 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.9, 0.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/08/2023 4:50 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top