Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana 6 497.8 (494.4, 501.1) N/A 18,186 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.5, -2.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 488.3 (487.8, 488.7) N/A 875,592 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Crawford County 6 434.4 (364.4, 514.8) 85 (9, 92) 31 falling falling trend -16.1 (-28.1, -2.1)
Scott County 6 512.8 (459.1, 571.3) 33 (1, 86) 72 falling falling trend -12.0 (-22.5, -0.1)
Dubois County 6 445.5 (408.6, 485.0) 80 (36, 92) 115 stable stable trend -9.9 (-19.2, 0.4)
Owen County 6 481.3 (429.8, 537.8) 56 (5, 91) 71 stable stable trend -9.9 (-19.6, 1.0)
Elkhart County 6 439.2 (421.1, 457.9) 82 (63, 90) 462 stable stable trend -7.4 (-14.2, 0.0)
Morgan County 6 559.6 (527.0, 593.8) 7 (1, 39) 240 falling falling trend -7.4 (-11.2, -3.3)
Monroe County 6 475.5 (451.5, 500.5) 62 (32, 84) 311 stable stable trend -6.3 (-15.2, 3.6)
Switzerland County 6 373.1 (308.7, 447.6) 92 (49, 92) 26 falling falling trend -5.6 (-7.7, -3.3)
Hendricks County 6 497.1 (475.0, 519.9) 44 (19, 71) 409 stable stable trend -5.0 (-9.9, 0.1)
Vanderburgh County 6 509.9 (489.9, 530.6) 36 (14, 60) 520 stable stable trend -5.0 (-11.6, 2.1)
Marion County 6 518.8 (508.8, 528.8) 29 (17, 43) 2,252 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.7, -0.8)
Johnson County 6 524.5 (501.6, 548.1) 27 (8, 52) 416 stable stable trend -4.0 (-11.1, 3.8)
Fulton County 6 462.5 (410.3, 520.0) 72 (13, 92) 61 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.2)
Newton County 6 446.2 (386.8, 513.0) 79 (13, 92) 43 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -1.0)
Harrison County 6 429.8 (392.3, 470.0) 89 (45, 92) 105 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.1)
Clark County 6 465.8 (441.1, 491.5) 68 (37, 87) 289 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.6)
Floyd County 6 486.5 (456.0, 518.6) 51 (17, 82) 205 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -0.9)
St. Joseph County 6 459.8 (443.9, 476.2) 75 (50, 86) 671 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.7)
Vermillion County 6 526.3 (462.8, 596.7) 26 (1, 86) 54 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Vigo County 6 532.8 (505.7, 560.9) 21 (4, 50) 307 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Whitley County 6 442.0 (400.7, 486.5) 81 (36, 92) 91 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Miami County 6 449.7 (410.7, 491.7) 77 (28, 92) 102 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Spencer County 6 407.7 (360.9, 459.5) 91 (53, 92) 59 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
DeKalb County 6 476.4 (437.3, 518.2) 60 (13, 90) 118 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Marshall County 6 437.8 (403.0, 475.0) 83 (45, 92) 123 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Montgomery County 6 460.2 (421.4, 501.8) 73 (24, 91) 109 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Ohio County 6 429.7 (342.3, 535.4) 90 (5, 92) 19 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.7, 1.3)
Steuben County 6 446.9 (408.4, 488.4) 78 (31, 92) 108 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.6)
Washington County 6 474.2 (427.4, 525.0) 63 (11, 91) 81 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Wells County 6 459.8 (414.0, 509.5) 74 (16, 92) 79 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Benton County 6 529.5 (443.1, 628.7) 23 (1, 91) 28 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Clay County 6 514.8 (465.4, 568.3) 32 (1, 84) 84 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Jay County 6 466.9 (412.4, 526.7) 66 (8, 92) 56 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Cass County 6 465.2 (425.8, 507.3) 69 (21, 90) 108 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Perry County 6 432.7 (381.3, 489.4) 86 (23, 92) 54 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Sullivan County 6 496.3 (442.5, 555.1) 46 (3, 90) 65 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Pulaski County 6 481.6 (416.0, 555.3) 55 (2, 92) 41 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Ripley County 6 464.1 (419.3, 512.7) 71 (17, 91) 83 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Allen County 6 469.9 (455.8, 484.4) 65 (45, 79) 888 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Bartholomew County 6 466.0 (438.0, 495.3) 67 (33, 88) 215 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Franklin County 6 431.1 (383.0, 483.9) 87 (31, 92) 64 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.6)
Jackson County 6 534.9 (494.1, 578.1) 19 (2, 67) 133 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Noble County 6 430.8 (395.3, 468.8) 88 (46, 92) 119 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Porter County 6 502.8 (482.2, 524.1) 41 (17, 66) 487 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Wayne County 6 480.4 (450.0, 512.4) 57 (19, 85) 195 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Lake County 6 517.6 (505.2, 530.2) 30 (15, 47) 1,413 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Jefferson County 6 548.2 (500.3, 599.6) 9 (1, 65) 106 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Madison County 6 520.1 (497.5, 543.6) 28 (8, 56) 415 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Orange County 6 478.6 (425.8, 536.6) 59 (7, 91) 64 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Randolph County 6 505.8 (457.3, 558.5) 38 (3, 86) 83 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Brown County 6 500.7 (442.4, 566.0) 42 (2, 90) 62 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Grant County 6 579.9 (546.2, 615.3) 3 (1, 24) 237 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Henry County 6 517.5 (481.6, 555.4) 31 (4, 74) 162 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
LaGrange County 6 435.5 (393.5, 480.7) 84 (36, 92) 83 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Tipton County 6 481.6 (422.7, 547.2) 54 (3, 91) 52 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Clinton County 6 511.4 (465.6, 560.6) 34 (2, 81) 96 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Dearborn County 6 465.0 (430.3, 501.9) 70 (23, 90) 145 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.2)
Greene County 6 485.9 (444.2, 530.7) 52 (9, 88) 106 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Shelby County 6 563.6 (523.4, 606.3) 6 (1, 44) 156 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Fayette County 6 488.6 (438.7, 543.0) 49 (5, 90) 74 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Warrick County 6 475.9 (444.3, 509.3) 61 (21, 87) 179 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Blackford County 6 589.0 (514.8, 671.9) 2 (1, 61) 49 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Delaware County 6 543.4 (517.7, 570.2) 12 (3, 45) 349 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Huntington County 6 504.0 (460.9, 550.2) 39 (4, 84) 108 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.7)
Jasper County 6 532.4 (487.0, 581.0) 22 (1, 71) 108 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Jennings County 6 510.0 (460.8, 563.3) 35 (2, 84) 85 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
LaPorte County 6 527.3 (502.3, 553.2) 25 (5, 52) 358 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Martin County 6 544.8 (466.9, 632.9) 11 (1, 88) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Rush County 6 498.7 (438.9, 564.8) 43 (2, 91) 53 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Daviess County 6 482.9 (437.4, 532.0) 53 (9, 90) 87 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.7)
Hamilton County 6 479.6 (463.3, 496.3) 58 (36, 76) 714 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Knox County 6 545.2 (501.1, 592.2) 10 (1, 64) 121 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Posey County 6 470.0 (422.9, 521.2) 64 (11, 91) 79 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Carroll County 6 539.6 (483.2, 601.3) 16 (1, 79) 72 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Decatur County 6 509.6 (459.1, 564.3) 37 (2, 86) 78 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Kosciusko County 6 497.0 (467.7, 527.6) 45 (13, 78) 229 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Hancock County 6 538.8 (507.3, 571.8) 17 (3, 51) 232 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Lawrence County 6 538.4 (500.7, 578.3) 18 (1, 58) 163 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Parke County 6 455.7 (399.9, 517.8) 76 (11, 92) 52 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Starke County 6 540.1 (487.5, 597.3) 15 (1, 73) 83 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Adams County 6 489.1 (443.8, 537.8) 48 (7, 89) 89 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Boone County 6 503.9 (468.9, 540.8) 40 (8, 78) 166 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Putnam County 6 569.6 (525.5, 616.7) 4 (1, 44) 128 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Howard County 6 542.4 (513.4, 572.6) 14 (2, 47) 278 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Wabash County 6 534.7 (489.8, 583.0) 20 (1, 70) 111 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Warren County 6 543.4 (461.8, 637.2) 13 (1, 89) 33 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Union County 6 527.6 (434.0, 636.9) 24 (1, 92) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 2.8)
Gibson County 6 492.9 (449.5, 539.6) 47 (7, 87) 100 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Pike County 6 550.5 (479.8, 629.6) 8 (1, 81) 47 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.6)
Tippecanoe County 6 488.2 (466.0, 511.1) 50 (24, 76) 385 stable stable trend 4.2 (-4.5, 13.6)
Fountain County 6 597.3 (533.0, 667.8) 1 (1, 49) 67 rising rising trend 6.2 (4.7, 7.8)
White County 6 566.6 (514.2, 623.2) 5 (1, 56) 93 stable stable trend 8.4 (-0.8, 18.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/28/2022 4:57 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top