Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana 6 456.8 (454.6, 458.9) N/A 35,999 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 449.4 (449.1, 449.7) N/A 1,728,431 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Fountain County 6 533.0 (490.2, 578.9) 1 (1, 39) 124 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.2)
Morgan County 6 526.4 (504.6, 548.9) 2 (1, 18) 471 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.9, -0.9)
Shelby County 6 526.0 (499.2, 554.1) 3 (1, 22) 305 stable stable trend -3.4 (-8.3, 1.7)
White County 6 513.7 (478.5, 551.0) 4 (1, 46) 175 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Grant County 6 511.9 (490.2, 534.3) 5 (1, 28) 457 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Knox County 6 508.9 (479.6, 539.7) 6 (1, 42) 243 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.9)
Benton County 6 505.0 (446.4, 569.6) 7 (1, 80) 57 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.4)
Hancock County 6 502.8 (481.9, 524.3) 8 (1, 34) 461 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.6)
Blackford County 6 498.6 (451.3, 550.1) 9 (1, 74) 89 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Howard County 6 496.9 (477.8, 516.7) 10 (2, 37) 550 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Jefferson County 6 496.5 (465.6, 529.1) 11 (1, 52) 206 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Wabash County 6 496.0 (465.4, 528.2) 12 (1, 54) 217 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.5)
Tipton County 6 495.9 (452.4, 542.8) 13 (1, 72) 106 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.7)
Jennings County 6 495.1 (461.3, 530.9) 14 (1, 59) 169 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.4)
Putnam County 6 493.9 (465.2, 524.0) 15 (1, 50) 231 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Rush County 6 493.3 (451.5, 538.1) 16 (1, 72) 110 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Vermillion County 6 490.7 (448.3, 536.4) 17 (1, 74) 107 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Warren County 6 487.9 (432.4, 549.4) 18 (1, 84) 60 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Madison County 6 485.6 (470.5, 501.2) 19 (6, 42) 820 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
Johnson County 6 485.5 (470.7, 500.6) 20 (6, 42) 841 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.6, 2.0)
Henry County 6 484.5 (460.3, 509.8) 21 (3, 53) 318 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Starke County 6 483.1 (448.2, 520.3) 22 (1, 71) 152 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Lawrence County 6 482.2 (457.5, 508.0) 23 (4, 56) 309 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.1)
Jasper County 6 481.1 (451.0, 512.8) 24 (2, 64) 202 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Jackson County 6 478.8 (452.4, 506.4) 25 (3, 62) 256 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Clinton County 6 478.2 (447.3, 510.8) 26 (3, 68) 189 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Marion County 6 475.9 (469.6, 482.2) 27 (17, 40) 4,647 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.9, 0.4)
Decatur County 6 475.5 (442.0, 511.1) 28 (2, 72) 157 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.0)
Carroll County 6 474.7 (437.6, 514.3) 29 (1, 77) 131 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Clay County 6 473.7 (440.9, 508.5) 30 (3, 76) 164 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Scott County 6 470.7 (435.7, 507.9) 31 (2, 80) 142 falling falling trend -12.1 (-21.7, -1.3)
Union County 6 469.5 (408.7, 537.5) 32 (1, 91) 46 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Delaware County 6 469.3 (452.8, 486.3) 33 (13, 57) 652 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Porter County 6 467.7 (454.2, 481.5) 34 (15, 54) 970 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Orange County 6 467.2 (430.0, 507.1) 35 (2, 83) 126 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Lake County 6 467.2 (459.3, 475.2) 36 (22, 48) 2,814 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Pike County 6 467.2 (421.6, 516.8) 37 (1, 86) 83 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.3)
LaPorte County 6 466.3 (450.1, 482.9) 38 (14, 58) 669 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.1)
Hendricks County 6 464.1 (449.8, 478.8) 39 (16, 60) 828 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.0, -2.3)
Boone County 6 462.3 (439.8, 485.8) 40 (11, 71) 329 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
DeKalb County 6 462.3 (436.0, 489.8) 41 (8, 75) 245 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Vigo County 6 461.4 (444.4, 479.0) 42 (16, 65) 586 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Pulaski County 6 461.3 (415.4, 511.3) 43 (2, 88) 80 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Owen County 6 458.8 (423.5, 496.7) 44 (5, 84) 137 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Martin County 6 457.8 (407.7, 512.9) 45 (1, 90) 66 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Daviess County 6 457.7 (426.7, 490.3) 46 (8, 82) 172 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Kosciusko County 6 455.7 (436.3, 475.8) 47 (17, 72) 437 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.7)
Floyd County 6 455.2 (435.5, 475.6) 48 (17, 72) 428 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Huntington County 6 454.0 (426.2, 483.3) 49 (12, 80) 212 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Gibson County 6 453.4 (424.7, 483.6) 50 (12, 82) 198 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.2)
Hamilton County 6 446.0 (435.5, 456.6) 51 (38, 70) 1,452 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Bartholomew County 6 445.9 (427.0, 465.3) 52 (24, 77) 438 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Brown County 6 445.1 (405.7, 487.9) 53 (6, 90) 111 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.8)
Jay County 6 442.5 (406.2, 481.4) 54 (10, 90) 116 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Clark County 6 442.4 (426.5, 458.7) 55 (32, 77) 618 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Randolph County 6 442.0 (410.4, 475.6) 56 (13, 87) 156 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Whitley County 6 442.0 (413.6, 471.9) 57 (17, 87) 194 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Tippecanoe County 6 441.5 (427.2, 456.2) 58 (34, 76) 752 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Vanderburgh County 6 440.3 (427.7, 453.1) 59 (39, 75) 994 falling falling trend -6.5 (-12.5, -0.1)
Allen County 6 439.6 (430.3, 448.9) 60 (44, 72) 1,818 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Noble County 6 436.0 (411.2, 461.9) 61 (25, 87) 248 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
St. Joseph County 6 435.8 (425.3, 446.6) 62 (45, 77) 1,380 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Warrick County 6 435.0 (414.1, 456.7) 63 (32, 85) 347 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Sullivan County 6 433.6 (398.2, 471.5) 64 (15, 90) 117 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Washington County 6 433.5 (402.5, 466.4) 65 (20, 89) 155 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4)
Dearborn County 6 432.9 (409.8, 457.0) 66 (31, 87) 283 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7)
Wayne County 6 430.8 (411.0, 451.3) 67 (39, 86) 382 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Greene County 6 430.0 (402.6, 459.0) 68 (27, 88) 195 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Montgomery County 6 427.2 (401.0, 454.6) 69 (30, 89) 213 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Fulton County 6 427.1 (392.1, 464.7) 70 (17, 91) 118 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.8)
Fayette County 6 426.7 (394.1, 461.6) 71 (23, 91) 136 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Crawford County 6 425.9 (378.0, 478.7) 72 (5, 92) 64 stable stable trend -11.9 (-22.6, 0.3)
Dubois County 6 424.3 (399.3, 450.5) 73 (37, 89) 230 stable stable trend -6.6 (-13.0, 0.2)
Adams County 6 421.1 (392.1, 451.8) 74 (32, 90) 166 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Elkhart County 6 420.9 (408.8, 433.3) 75 (56, 85) 952 falling falling trend -6.0 (-9.3, -2.6)
Cass County 6 416.7 (391.1, 443.6) 76 (39, 90) 209 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Harrison County 6 416.2 (390.8, 442.9) 77 (42, 91) 215 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Newton County 6 413.5 (372.5, 458.2) 78 (18, 92) 81 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Ripley County 6 412.8 (383.0, 444.4) 79 (36, 91) 151 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Monroe County 6 412.6 (397.3, 428.2) 80 (58, 89) 585 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Miami County 6 411.9 (385.5, 439.7) 81 (45, 91) 189 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Posey County 6 410.5 (379.5, 443.5) 82 (41, 92) 142 falling falling trend -8.8 (-15.8, -1.2)
Wells County 6 409.5 (379.6, 441.2) 83 (43, 92) 150 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
LaGrange County 6 409.3 (381.1, 439.0) 84 (42, 91) 164 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Steuben County 6 409.1 (382.7, 436.9) 85 (44, 91) 198 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Franklin County 6 400.5 (368.0, 435.3) 86 (45, 92) 121 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Parke County 6 394.6 (357.7, 434.4) 87 (41, 92) 91 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Marshall County 6 389.1 (366.3, 413.0) 88 (67, 92) 231 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Perry County 6 383.1 (349.0, 419.9) 89 (57, 92) 99 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Spencer County 6 380.7 (348.3, 415.6) 90 (59, 92) 110 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Ohio County 6 358.3 (302.6, 422.8) 91 (43, 92) 33 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.0, 0.1)
Switzerland County 6 357.0 (313.0, 405.9) 92 (61, 92) 50 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -0.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/30/2023 3:44 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top