Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana 6 2,013.6 (2,001.1, 2,026.3) N/A 20,192 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.8, -1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 1,977.8 (1,976.1, 1,979.6) N/A 977,751 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Adams County 6 1,879.9 (1,714.8, 2,056.3) 67 (17, 90) 98 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.2)
Allen County 6 1,950.0 (1,895.6, 2,005.7) 55 (39, 72) 1,007 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.8, 0.1)
Bartholomew County 6 1,966.1 (1,858.1, 2,078.7) 53 (18, 78) 252 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Benton County 6 2,078.8 (1,762.4, 2,435.5) 34 (1, 91) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.6)
Blackford County 6 2,227.3 (1,971.5, 2,507.0) 8 (1, 76) 55 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Boone County 6 2,005.3 (1,870.0, 2,147.9) 47 (10, 79) 168 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Brown County 6 1,974.1 (1,763.3, 2,203.6) 51 (3, 89) 68 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.9)
Carroll County 6 2,120.8 (1,916.6, 2,340.8) 23 (1, 78) 81 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Cass County 6 1,803.5 (1,660.1, 1,956.0) 78 (34, 91) 118 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Clark County 6 1,927.2 (1,834.3, 2,023.6) 63 (28, 81) 336 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Clay County 6 2,135.1 (1,946.7, 2,336.7) 20 (1, 73) 96 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Clinton County 6 2,126.1 (1,948.8, 2,315.1) 21 (1, 72) 109 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Crawford County 6 1,665.7 (1,416.2, 1,947.2) 90 (21, 92) 33 stable stable trend -12.4 (-23.7, 0.6)
Daviess County 6 1,939.2 (1,768.6, 2,121.9) 59 (9, 88) 97 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
DeKalb County 6 2,075.4 (1,921.1, 2,238.7) 36 (3, 74) 138 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Dearborn County 6 1,832.2 (1,702.1, 1,969.7) 76 (39, 90) 152 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.0)
Decatur County 6 2,150.3 (1,956.5, 2,358.1) 18 (1, 72) 92 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.2)
Delaware County 6 2,095.8 (2,004.4, 2,190.3) 27 (7, 58) 400 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Dubois County 6 1,846.4 (1,706.1, 1,995.1) 73 (29, 90) 131 stable stable trend -8.3 (-17.8, 2.3)
Elkhart County 6 1,832.4 (1,762.3, 1,904.7) 75 (53, 85) 527 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Fayette County 6 1,791.0 (1,617.5, 1,978.1) 79 (28, 92) 80 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Floyd County 6 2,002.3 (1,886.9, 2,122.8) 48 (13, 78) 234 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Fountain County 6 2,321.5 (2,092.7, 2,568.4) 2 (1, 54) 76 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Franklin County 6 1,711.3 (1,533.3, 1,904.4) 85 (43, 92) 69 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.5)
Fulton County 6 1,846.6 (1,656.5, 2,052.6) 72 (16, 91) 70 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.7)
Gibson County 6 2,031.4 (1,867.3, 2,206.0) 42 (4, 81) 115 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.2)
Grant County 6 2,245.2 (2,128.0, 2,367.1) 6 (1, 38) 278 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Greene County 6 1,939.2 (1,784.5, 2,103.8) 58 (13, 86) 118 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Hamilton County 6 2,009.5 (1,944.0, 2,076.7) 44 (22, 65) 744 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Hancock County 6 2,165.4 (2,046.4, 2,289.6) 15 (2, 50) 255 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Harrison County 6 1,838.2 (1,693.5, 1,992.0) 74 (29, 90) 123 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Hendricks County 6 2,036.1 (1,949.9, 2,125.1) 41 (15, 64) 435 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Henry County 6 2,116.4 (1,982.1, 2,257.3) 25 (2, 67) 187 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Howard County 6 2,079.0 (1,978.0, 2,183.8) 33 (7, 64) 321 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Huntington County 6 1,995.3 (1,837.3, 2,163.3) 49 (7, 83) 120 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Jackson County 6 2,191.3 (2,037.0, 2,354.2) 11 (1, 58) 151 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Jasper County 6 2,088.0 (1,920.2, 2,266.5) 29 (2, 77) 116 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Jay County 6 2,024.1 (1,818.0, 2,247.1) 43 (2, 87) 72 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Jefferson County 6 2,139.8 (1,966.5, 2,324.4) 19 (1, 71) 116 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Jennings County 6 2,168.6 (1,972.8, 2,378.9) 14 (1, 72) 93 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Johnson County 6 2,220.9 (2,132.1, 2,312.4) 9 (1, 33) 481 stable stable trend -2.6 (-7.2, 2.3)
Knox County 6 2,186.1 (2,026.7, 2,354.7) 12 (1, 59) 141 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Kosciusko County 6 2,088.5 (1,975.5, 2,206.4) 28 (5, 63) 261 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
LaGrange County 6 1,938.8 (1,770.1, 2,119.3) 60 (8, 88) 99 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
LaPorte County 6 2,043.0 (1,951.2, 2,138.0) 38 (11, 66) 384 falling falling trend -4.9 (-9.4, -0.2)
Lake County 6 2,083.5 (2,037.4, 2,130.2) 31 (16, 47) 1,599 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Lawrence County 6 2,085.2 (1,951.4, 2,225.9) 30 (3, 69) 184 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Madison County 6 2,083.4 (1,999.7, 2,169.7) 32 (10, 57) 475 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Marion County 6 2,075.9 (2,037.9, 2,114.4) 35 (18, 46) 2,367 stable stable trend -3.8 (-8.3, 0.8)
Marshall County 6 1,734.0 (1,604.7, 1,870.9) 82 (56, 92) 136 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Martin County 6 2,007.8 (1,733.1, 2,314.0) 46 (1, 91) 39 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Miami County 6 1,775.0 (1,626.4, 1,933.7) 81 (40, 92) 108 stable stable trend -8.9 (-21.1, 5.1)
Monroe County 6 1,864.4 (1,774.8, 1,957.4) 68 (43, 85) 334 stable stable trend -9.2 (-18.6, 1.4)
Montgomery County 6 1,859.2 (1,715.4, 2,011.8) 69 (26, 89) 124 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.9)
Morgan County 6 2,289.0 (2,163.1, 2,420.4) 4 (1, 32) 257 stable stable trend -5.1 (-10.4, 0.6)
Newton County 6 1,696.8 (1,478.1, 1,938.8) 86 (33, 92) 44 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Noble County 6 1,908.1 (1,763.6, 2,061.1) 64 (20, 88) 136 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Ohio County 6 1,430.8 (1,146.1, 1,765.2) 92 (56, 92) 18 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.8, -0.9)
Orange County 6 2,067.9 (1,863.1, 2,289.1) 37 (1, 83) 76 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.0)
Owen County 6 2,161.2 (1,954.3, 2,384.2) 16 (1, 74) 84 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Parke County 6 1,652.6 (1,455.8, 1,868.8) 91 (45, 92) 52 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Perry County 6 1,685.0 (1,492.3, 1,895.7) 88 (41, 92) 57 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.3)
Pike County 6 2,040.1 (1,793.1, 2,311.8) 39 (1, 89) 50 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.2)
Porter County 6 2,157.1 (2,076.5, 2,240.1) 17 (4, 43) 562 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Posey County 6 1,732.0 (1,562.7, 1,914.8) 83 (44, 92) 79 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Pulaski County 6 2,039.7 (1,788.7, 2,315.9) 40 (1, 89) 48 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Putnam County 6 2,282.1 (2,113.3, 2,460.7) 5 (1, 49) 137 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Randolph County 6 1,895.8 (1,726.4, 2,077.4) 66 (15, 90) 93 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Ripley County 6 1,718.7 (1,555.6, 1,894.1) 84 (45, 92) 83 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Rush County 6 2,117.9 (1,889.1, 2,366.6) 24 (1, 83) 63 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Scott County 6 2,115.3 (1,908.9, 2,338.1) 26 (1, 80) 80 stable stable trend -13.8 (-25.8, 0.1)
Shelby County 6 2,334.4 (2,178.5, 2,498.5) 1 (1, 32) 170 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Spencer County 6 1,695.4 (1,514.4, 1,892.2) 87 (43, 92) 65 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6)
St. Joseph County 6 1,943.3 (1,882.0, 2,006.1) 57 (36, 74) 790 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Starke County 6 2,192.4 (1,990.1, 2,410.0) 10 (1, 70) 89 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Steuben County 6 1,784.7 (1,640.2, 1,938.6) 80 (39, 91) 116 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Sullivan County 6 1,825.9 (1,630.3, 2,038.5) 77 (20, 92) 65 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Switzerland County 6 1,680.9 (1,421.4, 1,974.4) 89 (12, 92) 30 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.2)
Tippecanoe County 6 1,971.0 (1,885.7, 2,059.2) 52 (22, 75) 415 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Tipton County 6 1,935.2 (1,719.4, 2,170.6) 61 (3, 90) 59 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Union County 6 1,983.4 (1,652.7, 2,361.2) 50 (1, 92) 26 stable stable trend -15.2 (-40.1, 20.1)
Vanderburgh County 6 1,928.4 (1,857.0, 2,001.9) 62 (37, 77) 565 falling falling trend -9.0 (-14.6, -3.0)
Vermillion County 6 2,244.7 (2,008.6, 2,500.9) 7 (1, 68) 67 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Vigo County 6 1,944.0 (1,849.6, 2,042.0) 56 (25, 80) 325 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.6)
Wabash County 6 2,124.9 (1,964.4, 2,294.8) 22 (1, 71) 133 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Warren County 6 2,289.6 (1,972.0, 2,644.1) 3 (1, 80) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Warrick County 6 2,008.4 (1,886.5, 2,136.2) 45 (12, 76) 209 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Washington County 6 1,901.4 (1,723.6, 2,092.7) 65 (12, 90) 86 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Wayne County 6 1,853.1 (1,746.0, 1,965.1) 70 (42, 88) 227 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Wells County 6 1,848.3 (1,680.2, 2,028.6) 71 (23, 91) 91 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
White County 6 2,171.9 (1,985.7, 2,370.9) 13 (1, 70) 103 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Whitley County 6 1,964.8 (1,802.5, 2,137.7) 54 (9, 87) 111 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/27/2022 1:24 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top