Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana 6 *** 499.0 (495.7, 502.4) N/A 17,863 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 487.4 (486.9, 487.8) N/A 859,984 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Switzerland County 6 *** 376.5 (311.0, 452.3) 92 (48, 92) 25 falling falling trend -5.7 (-8.6, -2.7)
Parke County 6 *** 424.7 (371.0, 484.8) 91 (24, 92) 48 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Spencer County 6 *** 427.0 (378.3, 480.7) 90 (32, 92) 60 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Noble County 6 *** 428.2 (392.2, 466.6) 89 (49, 92) 115 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
LaGrange County 6 *** 430.2 (388.2, 475.5) 88 (38, 92) 81 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.4)
Steuben County 6 *** 436.9 (398.2, 478.6) 87 (38, 92) 103 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Cass County 6 *** 446.3 (407.5, 487.9) 86 (31, 92) 102 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Montgomery County 6 *** 446.3 (407.9, 487.5) 85 (32, 92) 104 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.2)
Whitley County 6 *** 448.3 (406.3, 493.6) 84 (23, 92) 91 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.6)
Elkhart County 6 *** 448.6 (430.1, 467.7) 83 (54, 90) 464 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Perry County 6 *** 449.2 (397.0, 506.9) 82 (14, 92) 56 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Ohio County 6 *** 453.0 (363.9, 560.3) 81 (1, 92) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.8, 2.1)
Fulton County 6 *** 453.3 (401.4, 510.3) 80 (12, 92) 59 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.4)
Marshall County 6 *** 456.8 (420.9, 495.0) 79 (30, 91) 126 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Tippecanoe County 6 *** 457.5 (435.7, 480.0) 78 (48, 90) 350 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Miami County 6 *** 459.4 (419.5, 502.2) 77 (18, 92) 103 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Daviess County 6 *** 462.8 (417.9, 511.1) 76 (18, 92) 82 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Harrison County 6 *** 463.1 (423.5, 505.7) 75 (16, 91) 108 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.1)
Newton County 6 *** 465.5 (404.6, 533.8) 74 (6, 92) 45 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Posey County 6 *** 465.6 (418.4, 517.1) 73 (11, 92) 77 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
St. Joseph County 6 *** 465.8 (449.6, 482.4) 72 (48, 85) 669 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -1.8)
Dubois County 6 *** 466.9 (428.6, 507.7) 71 (16, 91) 117 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.1)
Pulaski County 6 *** 467.7 (402.5, 541.2) 70 (3, 92) 39 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.4)
Sullivan County 6 *** 468.6 (416.4, 525.7) 69 (9, 92) 62 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
Greene County 6 *** 472.1 (430.8, 516.6) 68 (14, 91) 102 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Franklin County 6 *** 472.3 (421.6, 527.9) 67 (7, 92) 68 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.1)
DeKalb County 6 *** 472.9 (433.8, 514.7) 66 (14, 91) 116 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Gibson County 6 *** 473.8 (431.2, 519.7) 65 (10, 91) 95 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Crawford County 6 *** 475.5 (402.5, 558.8) 64 (2, 92) 34 stable stable trend -13.8 (-29.9, 6.0)
Hamilton County 6 *** 475.7 (459.0, 492.9) 63 (39, 81) 673 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Bartholomew County 6 *** 476.2 (447.5, 506.3) 62 (22, 88) 214 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Allen County 6 *** 476.3 (461.9, 491.0) 61 (40, 79) 884 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Brown County 6 *** 479.4 (422.0, 543.7) 60 (4, 92) 58 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Warrick County 6 *** 479.7 (447.4, 513.8) 59 (18, 89) 175 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Boone County 6 *** 481.2 (446.5, 517.8) 58 (14, 88) 155 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Clinton County 6 *** 485.4 (440.6, 533.7) 57 (7, 90) 90 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
Monroe County 6 *** 486.4 (461.7, 512.2) 56 (21, 81) 306 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Washington County 6 *** 490.2 (442.3, 542.2) 55 (5, 90) 82 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Jay County 6 *** 490.3 (434.2, 551.9) 54 (2, 91) 58 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Wells County 6 *** 490.4 (442.9, 542.0) 53 (5, 90) 83 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Benton County 6 *** 492.4 (408.0, 589.7) 52 (1, 92) 26 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.4)
Adams County 6 *** 492.4 (446.6, 541.8) 51 (5, 90) 88 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.4)
Ripley County 6 *** 493.1 (446.1, 544.0) 50 (5, 90) 85 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Clark County 6 *** 493.4 (467.9, 520.0) 49 (16, 78) 303 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Huntington County 6 *** 496.6 (453.7, 542.6) 48 (5, 88) 105 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Kosciusko County 6 *** 499.0 (469.3, 530.1) 47 (11, 80) 224 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Hendricks County 6 *** 499.8 (477.2, 523.3) 46 (14, 74) 396 stable stable trend -7.1 (-13.8, 0.1)
Randolph County 6 *** 500.3 (451.9, 552.9) 45 (4, 88) 82 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.3)
Henry County 6 *** 500.5 (465.1, 538.1) 44 (7, 83) 154 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Porter County 6 *** 503.3 (482.4, 524.8) 43 (14, 68) 475 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Wayne County 6 *** 503.6 (472.3, 536.4) 42 (9, 79) 203 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Carroll County 6 *** 504.0 (448.4, 564.9) 41 (1, 90) 64 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.4)
Warren County 6 *** 504.2 (424.6, 596.3) 40 (1, 92) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Orange County 6 *** 504.7 (450.0, 564.7) 39 (1, 89) 66 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Rush County 6 *** 506.6 (446.1, 573.7) 38 (1, 90) 53 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.2)
Tipton County 6 *** 506.9 (445.3, 575.4) 37 (1, 90) 53 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Jasper County 6 *** 507.7 (463.1, 555.7) 36 (3, 87) 101 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Fayette County 6 *** 508.8 (457.7, 564.4) 35 (2, 89) 76 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Decatur County 6 *** 509.8 (458.8, 565.1) 34 (1, 87) 77 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
White County 6 *** 511.1 (461.7, 564.8) 33 (1, 88) 84 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Hancock County 6 *** 511.8 (480.7, 544.5) 32 (7, 73) 214 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Vermillion County 6 *** 512.2 (449.7, 581.5) 31 (1, 90) 53 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.9)
Marion County 6 *** 513.4 (503.4, 523.6) 30 (17, 48) 2,188 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.2, -0.9)
Johnson County 6 *** 515.1 (492.0, 539.0) 29 (9, 61) 395 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Scott County 6 *** 516.0 (461.8, 575.1) 28 (1, 87) 71 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.9, 2.4)
Jennings County 6 *** 516.5 (466.1, 571.0) 27 (2, 84) 84 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Vanderburgh County 6 *** 517.7 (497.3, 538.7) 26 (9, 57) 518 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Madison County 6 *** 519.2 (496.4, 542.8) 25 (8, 59) 407 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Floyd County 6 *** 519.7 (487.7, 553.2) 24 (4, 69) 215 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Clay County 6 *** 520.1 (469.8, 574.4) 23 (1, 84) 83 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Lake County 6 *** 520.4 (507.9, 533.2) 22 (12, 46) 1,397 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Pike County 6 *** 524.6 (455.5, 602.1) 21 (1, 90) 45 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.4)
Howard County 6 *** 526.3 (497.6, 556.2) 20 (4, 61) 267 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Jackson County 6 *** 527.2 (486.2, 570.7) 19 (2, 74) 128 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
Lawrence County 6 *** 527.8 (490.3, 567.7) 18 (2, 67) 157 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Owen County 6 *** 530.0 (475.4, 589.7) 17 (1, 83) 77 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Vigo County 6 *** 531.3 (504.0, 559.7) 16 (4, 56) 302 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
LaPorte County 6 *** 532.2 (506.9, 558.5) 15 (4, 52) 356 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Delaware County 6 *** 534.0 (508.5, 560.6) 14 (3, 52) 341 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Martin County 6 *** 535.4 (458.5, 622.5) 13 (1, 90) 37 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Dearborn County 6 *** 536.0 (498.4, 575.8) 12 (1, 64) 165 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Wabash County 6 *** 539.1 (493.9, 587.7) 11 (1, 70) 110 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.0)
Union County 6 *** 544.0 (447.7, 656.1) 10 (1, 91) 24 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 2.9)
Knox County 6 *** 544.3 (500.1, 591.5) 9 (1, 67) 119 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Fountain County 6 *** 547.5 (485.5, 615.8) 8 (1, 80) 60 rising rising trend 4.8 (1.5, 8.2)
Blackford County 6 *** 559.1 (486.9, 639.9) 7 (1, 83) 46 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.2)
Putnam County 6 *** 564.0 (519.6, 611.3) 6 (1, 54) 124 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Starke County 6 *** 569.1 (515.1, 627.7) 5 (1, 57) 87 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Shelby County 6 *** 571.1 (530.1, 614.6) 4 (1, 42) 154 stable stable trend -6.1 (-15.0, 3.7)
Morgan County 6 *** 581.0 (547.3, 616.3) 3 (1, 24) 243 falling falling trend -5.7 (-10.1, -1.2)
Grant County 6 *** 582.3 (548.6, 617.6) 2 (1, 21) 239 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Jefferson County 6 *** 583.4 (534.1, 636.3) 1 (1, 42) 112 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2021 2:51 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top