Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

Oral Cavity & Pharynx (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana 6 12.7 (12.4, 13.1) N/A 1,017 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.3, 1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 12.0 (11.9, 12.0) N/A 46,911 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Fountain County 6 21.8 (13.4, 33.8) 1 (1, 68) 5
*
*
Sullivan County 6 20.2 (13.4, 29.6) 2 (1, 67) 6
*
*
Pike County 6 20.0 (11.0, 33.8) 3 (1, 73) 3
*
*
Vermillion County 6 19.3 (11.5, 30.9) 4 (1, 72) 4 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.7, 8.5)
Shelby County 6 19.0 (14.1, 25.1) 5 (1, 50) 11 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.2, 8.3)
Jay County 6 19.0 (11.9, 28.9) 6 (1, 72) 5 stable stable trend -11.9 (-43.9, 38.3)
Madison County 6 18.5 (15.7, 21.8) 7 (1, 28) 32 stable stable trend -12.3 (-24.5, 1.9)
Fulton County 6 18.0 (11.4, 27.4) 8 (1, 71) 5
*
*
Morgan County 6 16.7 (12.9, 21.3) 9 (1, 59) 14 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.9, 6.9)
Wabash County 6 16.7 (11.5, 23.7) 10 (1, 68) 7 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.0, 7.9)
Miami County 6 16.6 (11.7, 23.0) 11 (1, 67) 8
*
*
Franklin County 6 16.3 (10.5, 24.4) 12 (1, 72) 5
*
*
Jasper County 6 16.0 (11.1, 22.4) 13 (1, 70) 7 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.6, 7.7)
Howard County 6 15.9 (12.6, 19.8) 14 (2, 56) 17 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.9, 3.7)
Jackson County 6 15.6 (11.1, 21.4) 15 (1, 70) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.0, 5.9)
Montgomery County 6 15.6 (11.0, 21.5) 16 (1, 70) 8 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.9, 7.6)
Delaware County 6 15.4 (12.6, 18.8) 17 (3, 55) 21 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.7, 4.3)
White County 6 15.2 (9.2, 23.9) 18 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Starke County 6 14.5 (9.3, 22.0) 19 (1, 73) 5
*
*
Vigo County 6 14.4 (11.5, 17.8) 20 (4, 64) 18 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.6, 3.5)
Hancock County 6 14.4 (11.1, 18.4) 21 (3, 67) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.2)
Ripley County 6 14.3 (9.2, 21.4) 22 (1, 73) 5 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.2, 6.8)
Posey County 6 14.2 (9.0, 21.6) 23 (1, 73) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.1, 4.9)
Grant County 6 14.2 (10.6, 18.6) 24 (3, 69) 12 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.4, 4.5)
Porter County 6 14.1 (11.9, 16.7) 25 (8, 58) 31 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.6, 4.3)
Marion County 6 13.9 (12.9, 15.0) 26 (14, 45) 139 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.6)
Orange County 6 13.8 (7.6, 23.3) 27 (1, 73) 3
*
*
Cass County 6 13.6 (9.5, 19.1) 28 (2, 72) 7 stable stable trend 3.6 (-2.7, 10.2)
Carroll County 6 13.3 (7.8, 21.6) 29 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Clark County 6 13.1 (10.5, 16.3) 30 (8, 67) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.2)
Kosciusko County 6 13.0 (9.9, 16.8) 31 (7, 71) 12 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.5, 6.4)
Rush County 6 13.0 (7.4, 21.9) 32 (1, 73) 3 stable stable trend -0.9 (-7.2, 5.9)
LaPorte County 6 12.9 (10.4, 16.0) 33 (9, 68) 19 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.5, 3.5)
Noble County 6 12.9 (9.0, 18.1) 34 (3, 72) 7 stable stable trend 4.4 (-0.1, 9.1)
Jefferson County 6 12.8 (8.2, 19.3) 35 (2, 73) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.9, 4.7)
Greene County 6 12.8 (8.6, 18.5) 36 (3, 73) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.4, 3.6)
Knox County 6 12.7 (8.2, 18.9) 37 (3, 73) 6 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.4, 7.3)
Boone County 6 12.7 (9.3, 17.0) 38 (6, 72) 10 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.4, 6.9)
Marshall County 6 12.6 (8.8, 17.7) 39 (4, 73) 8 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.4, 6.9)
Vanderburgh County 6 12.6 (10.6, 15.0) 40 (13, 67) 29 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 3.7)
Henry County 6 12.6 (8.8, 17.5) 41 (4, 72) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.6, 4.2)
DeKalb County 6 12.6 (8.4, 18.1) 42 (3, 73) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.0, 7.0)
Jennings County 6 12.5 (7.8, 19.3) 43 (2, 73) 5
*
*
Johnson County 6 12.3 (10.1, 14.9) 44 (13, 69) 22 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.4, 5.0)
Wells County 6 12.2 (7.7, 18.6) 45 (3, 73) 5
*
*
Allen County 6 12.2 (10.7, 13.9) 46 (20, 64) 50 stable stable trend 1.6 (0.0, 3.3)
Adams County 6 11.9 (7.5, 18.1) 47 (3, 73) 5
*
*
Washington County 6 11.9 (7.3, 18.5) 48 (3, 73) 4 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.6, 6.4)
Bartholomew County 6 11.8 (8.9, 15.4) 49 (10, 72) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.5, 4.3)
Hendricks County 6 11.6 (9.5, 14.1) 50 (18, 70) 21 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.2)
Lake County 6 11.5 (10.3, 12.9) 51 (29, 65) 71 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 2.0)
Dearborn County 6 11.5 (8.0, 16.1) 52 (7, 73) 8
*
*
Lawrence County 6 11.5 (7.9, 16.2) 53 (7, 73) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.9, 4.0)
Decatur County 6 11.4 (6.8, 18.3) 54 (4, 73) 4
*
*
St. Joseph County 6 11.3 (9.7, 13.2) 55 (25, 69) 36 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.0)
Steuben County 6 11.3 (7.5, 16.6) 56 (7, 73) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.2, 4.3)
Huntington County 6 11.2 (7.4, 16.5) 57 (7, 73) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.4, 4.1)
Floyd County 6 11.0 (8.1, 14.6) 58 (14, 73) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.3, 4.0)
Wayne County 6 10.9 (8.0, 14.6) 59 (14, 73) 10 falling falling trend -8.5 (-14.0, -2.6)
Putnam County 6 10.9 (7.0, 16.4) 60 (7, 73) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.1, 4.1)
Owen County 6 10.9 (6.1, 18.5) 61 (3, 73) 3
*
*
Hamilton County 6 10.9 (9.3, 12.6) 62 (29, 71) 36 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.1)
Elkhart County 6 10.8 (9.0, 12.9) 63 (25, 71) 25 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.2)
Monroe County 6 10.7 (8.4, 13.4) 64 (20, 73) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.4)
Tippecanoe County 6 10.5 (8.4, 12.9) 65 (24, 73) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 2.1)
Clay County 6 10.3 (6.1, 16.6) 66 (6, 73) 4
*
*
Clinton County 6 10.2 (6.2, 15.9) 67 (8, 73) 4
*
*
LaGrange County 6 10.0 (6.0, 15.6) 68 (9, 73) 4
*
*
Dubois County 6 9.5 (6.3, 14.1) 69 (14, 73) 6
*
*
Gibson County 6 9.4 (5.7, 14.7) 70 (12, 73) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.4, 6.0)
Warrick County 6 9.4 (6.6, 13.0) 71 (20, 73) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.6)
Harrison County 6 8.4 (5.2, 13.1) 72 (21, 73) 4
*
*
Whitley County 6 7.3 (4.2, 12.0) 73 (25, 73) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-7.6, 5.1)
Benton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Spencer County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tipton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/08/2023 4:26 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top