Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Indiana 6 41.1 (40.4, 41.8) N/A 3,196 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.7, -1.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 37.7 (37.6, 37.7) N/A 143,166 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Franklin County 6 37.8 (28.1, 50.0) 69 (7, 92) 11 stable stable trend 2.9 (-4.5, 10.8)
Crawford County 6 46.7 (32.0, 66.7) 30 (1, 92) 7 stable stable trend 2.8 (-3.0, 8.9)
Decatur County 6 47.3 (37.2, 59.4) 26 (2, 87) 16 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.8, 3.0)
Benton County 6 62.4 (42.7, 88.5) 2 (1, 86) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.7, 4.4)
Warren County 6 62.9 (43.7, 88.6) 1 (1, 86) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.7, 4.0)
Jennings County 6 49.4 (39.3, 61.4) 15 (1, 85) 17 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.6)
Putnam County 6 47.0 (38.3, 57.2) 27 (2, 83) 21 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 3.0)
Owen County 6 47.5 (36.6, 61.1) 24 (1, 89) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.0, 3.4)
Rush County 6 52.6 (39.5, 69.0) 9 (1, 85) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.5, 2.7)
Brown County 6 36.3 (25.6, 50.7) 76 (7, 92) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.1, 4.2)
Vermillion County 6 45.7 (33.7, 61.1) 36 (1, 91) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 3.0)
Jefferson County 6 62.0 (51.3, 74.3) 3 (1, 40) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 2.9)
Carroll County 6 54.5 (42.1, 69.7) 7 (1, 81) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.2)
Wabash County 6 52.8 (43.4, 63.9) 8 (1, 75) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Grant County 6 51.1 (44.4, 58.7) 12 (2, 57) 45 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Jasper County 6 48.0 (38.7, 59.0) 23 (2, 83) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Pike County 6 41.5 (28.9, 58.5) 56 (2, 92) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.4, 2.8)
Clinton County 6 49.0 (39.5, 60.2) 18 (2, 84) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.8)
Jackson County 6 50.2 (42.0, 59.6) 14 (1, 72) 27 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Shelby County 6 46.4 (38.8, 55.3) 33 (4, 83) 27 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Dubois County 6 38.3 (31.2, 46.7) 66 (15, 92) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.0)
Fountain County 6 58.5 (44.9, 75.3) 4 (1, 76) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.8)
Morgan County 6 46.6 (40.2, 53.8) 31 (6, 77) 40 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.7)
Tippecanoe County 6 42.3 (37.9, 47.0) 54 (18, 80) 71 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Starke County 6 57.6 (45.9, 71.6) 5 (1, 60) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.4)
Whitley County 6 44.1 (35.2, 54.5) 46 (4, 89) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.9)
Fayette County 6 47.3 (36.8, 60.1) 25 (2, 87) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.1, 1.5)
Johnson County 6 37.8 (33.7, 42.2) 70 (38, 88) 65 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Miami County 6 42.9 (34.6, 52.7) 51 (5, 90) 19 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.8)
Ohio County 6 50.4 (31.2, 78.9) 13 (1, 92) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.7, 3.1)
Sullivan County 6 56.7 (44.0, 72.0) 6 (1, 79) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.7)
White County 6 49.2 (38.6, 62.0) 16 (1, 85) 16 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.8)
Howard County 6 45.4 (39.7, 51.7) 37 (8, 75) 49 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.3, 0.0)
Madison County 6 39.7 (35.4, 44.3) 61 (28, 85) 67 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Randolph County 6 51.3 (41.0, 63.8) 11 (1, 80) 18 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.7)
Steuben County 6 48.7 (39.9, 59.0) 20 (2, 81) 23 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 0.6)
Clark County 6 45.1 (40.1, 50.6) 39 (9, 73) 62 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.0)
Elkhart County 6 39.1 (35.4, 43.0) 65 (33, 85) 87 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
Greene County 6 41.4 (33.2, 51.2) 57 (7, 90) 19 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.4, 0.9)
Hancock County 6 42.9 (36.8, 49.7) 52 (11, 83) 37 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.1)
Jay County 6 46.0 (34.8, 59.7) 35 (2, 90) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.6, 1.0)
Pulaski County 6 46.4 (32.9, 64.1) 34 (1, 91) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.2, 1.7)
Wayne County 6 44.2 (38.0, 51.3) 43 (8, 81) 38 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Kosciusko County 6 42.9 (37.1, 49.4) 50 (11, 84) 41 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Lake County 6 47.0 (44.5, 49.6) 28 (14, 48) 282 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4)
Lawrence County 6 44.2 (37.0, 52.6) 45 (6, 85) 28 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Orange County 6 39.6 (29.5, 52.4) 62 (6, 92) 11 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.3)
Vigo County 6 45.0 (39.7, 50.8) 40 (9, 74) 57 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.4)
LaPorte County 6 44.3 (39.4, 49.7) 42 (12, 74) 63 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.3)
Fulton County 6 46.9 (35.7, 60.7) 29 (1, 90) 13 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.1, 0.8)
DeKalb County 6 48.0 (39.7, 57.7) 22 (3, 79) 24 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Hamilton County 6 31.2 (28.4, 34.1) 90 (73, 92) 100 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.2)
Monroe County 6 33.2 (29.0, 38.0) 86 (55, 92) 46 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Tipton County 6 39.3 (28.6, 53.3) 64 (5, 92) 9 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.4, 1.0)
Boone County 6 42.6 (35.9, 50.1) 53 (10, 86) 30 stable stable trend -2.4 (-21.0, 20.6)
Vanderburgh County 6 37.2 (33.5, 41.1) 74 (43, 89) 83 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.1)
Bartholomew County 6 35.7 (30.5, 41.5) 79 (33, 91) 35 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.7, -0.2)
Daviess County 6 43.6 (34.6, 54.3) 48 (4, 89) 17 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.3)
Blackford County 6 52.2 (38.2, 70.6) 10 (1, 90) 10 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.2, 0.1)
Knox County 6 49.1 (40.3, 59.3) 17 (1, 79) 23 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -0.8)
Marion County 6 38.2 (36.4, 40.0) 67 (51, 80) 367 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -2.0)
Clay County 6 43.4 (33.7, 55.1) 49 (3, 91) 15 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.5)
Henry County 6 44.2 (37.2, 52.3) 44 (7, 85) 29 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.7)
Porter County 6 39.3 (35.5, 43.5) 63 (32, 84) 81 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.5)
Cass County 6 41.3 (33.5, 50.5) 59 (8, 90) 20 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.0, -0.7)
Harrison County 6 44.8 (36.7, 54.2) 41 (4, 87) 23 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.5, -0.2)
Posey County 6 43.7 (34.0, 55.7) 47 (3, 90) 15 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -0.7)
Ripley County 6 41.3 (32.3, 52.2) 58 (6, 91) 15 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -0.9)
Allen County 6 37.5 (34.8, 40.3) 71 (47, 85) 153 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.6, -2.3)
Gibson County 6 48.6 (39.4, 59.5) 21 (2, 84) 20 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.4, -0.6)
Noble County 6 38.0 (30.9, 46.3) 68 (15, 91) 21 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.8, -1.2)
LaGrange County 6 36.1 (28.1, 45.7) 77 (18, 92) 14 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.0)
Martin County 6 48.9 (33.2, 70.1) 19 (1, 92) 7 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.2, -1.2)
Adams County 6 34.9 (27.1, 44.3) 81 (21, 92) 14 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.8, -0.8)
Delaware County 6 37.4 (32.9, 42.4) 72 (35, 89) 52 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.5, -2.1)
Huntington County 6 45.2 (36.5, 55.3) 38 (3, 87) 20 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.5, -1.0)
Hendricks County 6 36.9 (32.9, 41.3) 75 (40, 89) 63 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.9, -1.8)
St. Joseph County 6 35.8 (32.8, 39.1) 78 (52, 88) 111 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.2, -2.6)
Newton County 6 33.3 (22.2, 48.4) 85 (10, 92) 6 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.0, -1.4)
Washington County 6 34.7 (26.1, 45.2) 82 (16, 92) 12 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.2, -1.2)
Marshall County 6 37.3 (30.4, 45.3) 73 (22, 92) 22 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.0, -2.5)
Perry County 6 32.7 (23.6, 44.6) 89 (20, 92) 9 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.1, -0.5)
Switzerland County 6 27.8 (16.8, 44.1) 92 (16, 92) 4 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.0, 0.4)
Montgomery County 6 35.3 (27.9, 44.1) 80 (22, 92) 17 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.9, -2.0)
Dearborn County 6 33.1 (27.0, 40.2) 88 (41, 92) 22 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.1, -2.0)
Spencer County 6 33.2 (24.2, 44.9) 87 (17, 92) 9 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.0, -1.2)
Warrick County 6 33.8 (28.1, 40.4) 84 (41, 92) 26 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.9, -2.6)
Union County 6 34.0 (19.0, 57.3) 83 (2, 92) 3 stable stable trend -4.9 (-9.6, 0.0)
Scott County 6 46.5 (35.8, 59.6) 32 (1, 90) 13 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.8, -2.3)
Wells County 6 41.7 (32.6, 52.7) 55 (6, 91) 15 stable stable trend -10.6 (-23.2, 4.1)
Floyd County 6 41.1 (35.4, 47.6) 60 (16, 86) 39 stable stable trend -12.1 (-28.3, 7.8)
Parke County 6 28.0 (19.0, 40.2) 91 (31, 92) 7 falling falling trend -12.8 (-20.3, -4.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2022 7:44 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top