Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana 6 69.2 (68.4, 70.0) N/A 5,623 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.3, -1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 56.3 (56.2, 56.4) N/A 223,216 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.8)
Whitley County 6 72.4 (61.6, 84.7) 39 (5, 87) 34 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.2)
White County 6 68.1 (56.4, 81.9) 59 (6, 90) 25 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Wells County 6 60.9 (50.2, 73.4) 80 (18, 91) 24 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.5)
Wayne County 6 62.5 (55.4, 70.3) 78 (32, 91) 59 stable stable trend -18.2 (-33.3, 0.3)
Washington County 6 89.1 (75.9, 104.2) 3 (1, 54) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.2)
Warrick County 6 66.9 (59.2, 75.5) 65 (17, 87) 57 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Warren County 6 69.5 (50.5, 94.6) 53 (1, 92) 9 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.1, -0.2)
Wabash County 6 66.7 (56.3, 78.7) 66 (10, 90) 31 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.6)
Vigo County 6 74.5 (68.0, 81.6) 29 (9, 72) 99 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Vermillion County 6 85.6 (69.4, 105.1) 8 (1, 82) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Vanderburgh County 6 67.2 (62.4, 72.2) 63 (32, 81) 157 stable stable trend -11.5 (-23.9, 2.9)
Union County 6 51.5 (34.0, 76.4) 91 (9, 92) 6 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.7)
Tipton County 6 73.0 (57.3, 92.1) 36 (1, 91) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.2)
Tippecanoe County 6 61.2 (55.9, 66.8) 79 (47, 89) 103 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.5, 4.1)
Switzerland County 6 59.6 (43.3, 80.8) 82 (4, 92) 9 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.7, -1.1)
Sullivan County 6 64.5 (51.9, 79.6) 74 (7, 91) 19 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.4, 0.9)
Steuben County 6 68.0 (58.0, 79.4) 60 (10, 89) 34 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.2)
Starke County 6 100.5 (85.6, 117.5) 1 (1, 29) 34 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
St. Joseph County 6 65.9 (61.9, 70.1) 68 (39, 82) 215 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Spencer County 6 56.3 (45.0, 70.0) 85 (23, 92) 18 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.8, 0.8)
Shelby County 6 88.6 (78.0, 100.3) 5 (1, 44) 53 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.7)
Scott County 6 92.2 (77.6, 108.9) 2 (1, 57) 29 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.4)
Rush County 6 74.6 (59.6, 92.7) 28 (1, 89) 18 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.3)
Ripley County 6 58.6 (48.1, 70.9) 83 (27, 92) 22 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.9)
Randolph County 6 70.6 (59.0, 84.2) 49 (4, 89) 27 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.2)
Putnam County 6 88.8 (77.2, 101.9) 4 (1, 50) 43 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Pulaski County 6 79.0 (61.0, 101.0) 22 (1, 90) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.8)
Posey County 6 55.7 (45.3, 68.1) 87 (34, 92) 21 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.2, -1.0)
Porter County 6 69.1 (64.1, 74.5) 56 (24, 78) 146 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Pike County 6 73.4 (56.9, 94.1) 33 (1, 91) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.4)
Perry County 6 69.3 (55.5, 85.8) 55 (3, 91) 18 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.1, 1.5)
Parke County 6 69.3 (55.2, 86.4) 54 (2, 90) 17 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.1)
Owen County 6 79.5 (65.9, 95.5) 18 (1, 83) 25 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.1)
Orange County 6 79.1 (65.0, 95.7) 20 (1, 85) 23 stable stable trend 10.9 (-3.2, 27.0)
Ohio County 6 57.6 (38.3, 85.7) 84 (2, 92) 6 falling falling trend -38.8 (-61.9, -1.7)
Noble County 6 79.1 (69.0, 90.4) 19 (2, 74) 47 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.8)
Newton County 6 71.0 (55.7, 89.9) 47 (1, 91) 15 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.2)
Morgan County 6 81.7 (73.5, 90.6) 12 (2, 55) 76 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Montgomery County 6 68.4 (58.7, 79.3) 58 (10, 89) 36 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.3)
Monroe County 6 54.3 (49.0, 60.1) 89 (70, 91) 79 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.8)
Miami County 6 68.8 (58.6, 80.6) 57 (7, 89) 33 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.9)
Martin County 6 72.0 (54.0, 94.9) 42 (1, 91) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.5)
Marshall County 6 60.1 (51.7, 69.6) 81 (31, 91) 38 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.4)
Marion County 6 73.9 (71.5, 76.5) 31 (21, 54) 719 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)
Madison County 6 84.4 (78.3, 90.8) 11 (2, 35) 148 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Lawrence County 6 73.0 (64.0, 83.1) 35 (6, 83) 49 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Lake County 6 65.6 (62.7, 68.6) 70 (45, 80) 405 falling falling trend -5.0 (-9.4, -0.3)
LaPorte County 6 73.9 (67.8, 80.5) 32 (12, 71) 112 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
LaGrange County 6 72.5 (61.2, 85.4) 38 (3, 86) 30 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 3.7)
Kosciusko County 6 71.6 (64.2, 79.6) 44 (11, 80) 71 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Knox County 6 80.2 (69.2, 92.5) 16 (1, 78) 40 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.7)
Johnson County 6 70.0 (64.5, 75.9) 51 (21, 78) 123 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.0)
Jennings County 6 87.1 (73.6, 102.5) 7 (1, 66) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.5)
Jefferson County 6 85.3 (73.2, 99.0) 9 (1, 62) 37 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.9)
Jay County 6 69.6 (56.1, 85.5) 52 (2, 91) 19 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.4)
Jasper County 6 70.5 (59.7, 82.9) 50 (6, 88) 31 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Jackson County 6 70.8 (61.2, 81.7) 48 (6, 86) 39 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Huntington County 6 66.5 (56.5, 77.9) 67 (11, 90) 33 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Howard County 6 72.7 (65.9, 80.1) 37 (10, 78) 87 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Henry County 6 76.7 (67.5, 86.8) 25 (3, 78) 53 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Hendricks County 6 65.9 (60.5, 71.6) 69 (30, 85) 116 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Harrison County 6 78.8 (68.5, 90.4) 23 (2, 76) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.5)
Hancock County 6 65.2 (58.1, 73.1) 73 (24, 88) 63 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.3)
Hamilton County 6 42.2 (39.0, 45.7) 92 (89, 92) 132 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.8, -2.1)
Greene County 6 75.6 (64.7, 88.2) 26 (2, 83) 35 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Grant County 6 84.9 (76.5, 93.9) 10 (1, 46) 80 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Gibson County 6 67.6 (57.2, 79.5) 61 (9, 89) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Fulton County 6 75.5 (61.8, 91.5) 27 (1, 88) 22 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.6)
Franklin County 6 54.6 (43.3, 68.3) 88 (33, 92) 17 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.1, 0.2)
Fountain County 6 72.3 (58.1, 89.3) 41 (1, 90) 18 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.7)
Floyd County 6 77.6 (69.7, 86.1) 24 (4, 67) 74 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.8)
Fayette County 6 73.0 (60.5, 87.7) 34 (2, 88) 25 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Elkhart County 6 65.4 (60.7, 70.3) 72 (34, 84) 152 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Dubois County 6 51.9 (43.8, 61.3) 90 (60, 92) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6)
Delaware County 6 79.1 (72.6, 86.0) 21 (5, 54) 115 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Decatur County 6 64.5 (52.9, 78.0) 75 (10, 91) 22 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Dearborn County 6 67.6 (58.8, 77.3) 62 (13, 87) 45 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.3)
DeKalb County 6 80.5 (70.1, 92.2) 15 (1, 70) 45 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.9)
Daviess County 6 67.0 (55.9, 79.8) 64 (9, 90) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.0)
Crawford County 6 71.5 (54.1, 93.8) 45 (1, 91) 12 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.4, -0.3)
Clinton County 6 72.0 (60.6, 84.9) 43 (4, 86) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.3)
Clay County 6 81.2 (68.4, 95.9) 13 (1, 79) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.8)
Clark County 6 81.0 (74.4, 88.0) 14 (3, 48) 117 falling falling trend -13.3 (-24.3, -0.6)
Cass County 6 79.8 (69.1, 91.9) 17 (2, 75) 41 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.9)
Carroll County 6 72.4 (58.8, 88.5) 40 (2, 90) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Brown County 6 71.3 (56.8, 89.1) 46 (2, 91) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9)
Boone County 6 55.8 (48.1, 64.4) 86 (50, 91) 39 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.2)
Blackford County 6 87.8 (69.4, 110.3) 6 (1, 81) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.9)
Benton County 6 74.5 (54.4, 100.5) 30 (1, 92) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.2)
Bartholomew County 6 65.5 (58.7, 73.1) 71 (25, 87) 68 stable stable trend -8.4 (-18.5, 3.0)
Allen County 6 63.4 (60.0, 67.0) 76 (48, 84) 267 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.6, -1.4)
Adams County 6 62.8 (52.1, 75.1) 77 (15, 91) 25 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/29/2022 5:55 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top