Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana 6 *** 69.9 (69.1, 70.7) N/A 5,556 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.6, -2.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 57.3 (57.1, 57.4) N/A 222,811 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
Hamilton County 6 *** 42.1 (38.8, 45.7) 92 (89, 92) 124 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.3, -2.3)
Dubois County 6 *** 49.0 (41.1, 58.2) 91 (74, 92) 28 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.0)
Union County 6 *** 50.3 (32.6, 75.6) 90 (11, 92) 5 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.5, -1.0)
Boone County 6 *** 53.4 (45.8, 61.9) 89 (58, 92) 37 stable stable trend -20.0 (-42.5, 11.3)
Monroe County 6 *** 56.9 (51.3, 62.9) 88 (62, 91) 79 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.4)
Tippecanoe County 6 *** 58.8 (53.6, 64.4) 87 (58, 90) 97 stable stable trend -3.8 (-17.9, 12.8)
Posey County 6 *** 58.8 (48.0, 71.7) 86 (21, 92) 21 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.2, -0.5)
Daviess County 6 *** 59.4 (48.9, 71.4) 85 (30, 91) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 1.9)
Adams County 6 *** 59.6 (49.0, 71.8) 84 (25, 91) 23 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.0)
Ripley County 6 *** 60.3 (49.6, 72.9) 83 (23, 92) 23 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.0, -1.8)
Switzerland County 6 *** 61.9 (44.9, 83.9) 82 (3, 92) 9 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.9, -0.6)
Wabash County 6 *** 62.6 (52.6, 74.3) 81 (20, 91) 29 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.6)
LaGrange County 6 *** 62.7 (52.1, 74.9) 80 (17, 91) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 2.9)
Steuben County 6 *** 62.7 (53.1, 73.8) 79 (23, 91) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.5)
Decatur County 6 *** 62.9 (51.5, 76.3) 78 (14, 91) 22 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.2)
Spencer County 6 *** 62.9 (50.6, 77.7) 77 (11, 91) 19 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.4, 1.6)
Marshall County 6 *** 64.1 (55.3, 74.0) 76 (24, 90) 39 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.8)
Hendricks County 6 *** 64.5 (59.1, 70.3) 75 (39, 87) 109 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Hancock County 6 *** 64.5 (57.2, 72.5) 74 (28, 89) 59 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.2)
Warrick County 6 *** 65.1 (57.4, 73.7) 73 (25, 90) 53 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.3)
Allen County 6 *** 65.2 (61.7, 68.9) 72 (43, 83) 269 stable stable trend -3.9 (-7.9, 0.2)
Lake County 6 *** 65.8 (62.9, 68.8) 71 (45, 80) 399 stable stable trend -5.2 (-11.5, 1.5)
Huntington County 6 *** 66.1 (56.1, 77.5) 70 (15, 90) 32 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.8)
Franklin County 6 *** 66.2 (53.6, 81.0) 69 (7, 91) 20 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.7)
Elkhart County 6 *** 66.2 (61.5, 71.2) 68 (37, 84) 151 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
St. Joseph County 6 *** 66.7 (62.6, 70.9) 67 (38, 81) 213 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Gibson County 6 *** 66.8 (56.3, 78.7) 66 (10, 90) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.4)
Pulaski County 6 *** 66.8 (50.3, 87.5) 65 (2, 92) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 2.9)
Ohio County 6 *** 67.3 (46.1, 97.4) 64 (1, 92) 7 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.9, 1.8)
Miami County 6 *** 67.6 (57.4, 79.3) 63 (12, 89) 32 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.9)
Porter County 6 *** 68.1 (63.0, 73.5) 62 (27, 81) 140 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Bartholomew County 6 *** 68.3 (61.2, 76.0) 61 (21, 86) 69 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
White County 6 *** 68.4 (56.5, 82.2) 60 (7, 90) 25 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.5)
Jasper County 6 *** 68.4 (57.7, 80.7) 59 (10, 90) 30 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Wells County 6 *** 68.8 (57.2, 82.2) 58 (7, 90) 26 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.5, 3.1)
Lawrence County 6 *** 68.9 (60.2, 78.7) 57 (13, 88) 47 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Carroll County 6 *** 69.1 (55.7, 85.1) 56 (4, 91) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.4)
Orange County 6 *** 69.1 (55.9, 84.7) 55 (4, 90) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.9, 1.9)
Parke County 6 *** 69.7 (55.3, 87.0) 54 (2, 91) 17 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.6, 1.2)
Randolph County 6 *** 69.7 (58.2, 83.3) 53 (6, 89) 26 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.5)
Clinton County 6 *** 70.1 (58.9, 83.0) 52 (5, 89) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.6)
Fulton County 6 *** 70.2 (57.0, 85.8) 51 (4, 90) 21 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.6, 0.1)
Fountain County 6 *** 70.3 (56.3, 87.3) 50 (3, 91) 18 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.6)
Johnson County 6 *** 70.5 (64.9, 76.5) 49 (22, 79) 120 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Vanderburgh County 6 *** 70.6 (65.8, 75.8) 48 (23, 76) 163 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Warren County 6 *** 70.7 (51.4, 96.1) 47 (1, 92) 9 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.0, 0.2)
Jay County 6 *** 71.1 (57.3, 87.5) 46 (3, 90) 19 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.4, 0.0)
Jackson County 6 *** 71.6 (61.8, 82.5) 45 (8, 86) 40 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 1.0)
Perry County 6 *** 71.7 (57.6, 88.5) 44 (2, 90) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.1, 2.1)
Sullivan County 6 *** 71.8 (58.3, 87.9) 43 (3, 90) 20 falling falling trend -28.1 (-44.1, -7.5)
Newton County 6 *** 72.0 (56.4, 91.2) 42 (1, 91) 15 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -1.0)
Kosciusko County 6 *** 72.0 (64.6, 80.1) 41 (11, 82) 71 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Montgomery County 6 *** 72.1 (62.0, 83.4) 40 (7, 87) 38 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.8)
Howard County 6 *** 72.2 (65.4, 79.7) 39 (13, 79) 85 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Wayne County 6 *** 72.4 (64.7, 80.8) 38 (11, 81) 67 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.2)
Tipton County 6 *** 73.1 (57.5, 92.0) 37 (1, 90) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 2.7)
Brown County 6 *** 73.6 (58.6, 92.1) 36 (1, 90) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.1)
Martin County 6 *** 74.0 (55.7, 97.3) 35 (1, 91) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.0, 4.1)
Marion County 6 *** 74.6 (72.1, 77.2) 34 (23, 52) 709 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Greene County 6 *** 74.8 (63.8, 87.4) 33 (4, 85) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.5)
Crawford County 6 *** 75.3 (57.5, 98.0) 32 (1, 91) 13 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.5, 0.2)
LaPorte County 6 *** 75.8 (69.5, 82.5) 31 (10, 67) 112 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Knox County 6 *** 76.1 (65.4, 88.2) 30 (3, 85) 38 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.6)
Pike County 6 *** 76.2 (59.5, 96.8) 29 (1, 90) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.7)
Fayette County 6 *** 77.3 (64.4, 92.3) 28 (2, 85) 26 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.1)
Vigo County 6 *** 77.4 (70.6, 84.6) 27 (7, 65) 100 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Cass County 6 *** 77.7 (67.1, 89.7) 26 (3, 81) 40 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.0)
Benton County 6 *** 77.7 (56.4, 105.2) 25 (1, 91) 9 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.1, -0.3)
Madison County 6 *** 78.0 (72.1, 84.2) 24 (8, 59) 135 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Noble County 6 *** 78.5 (68.2, 90.0) 23 (2, 77) 45 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Henry County 6 *** 78.7 (69.4, 89.0) 22 (2, 72) 54 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Delaware County 6 *** 79.6 (73.1, 86.5) 21 (5, 56) 115 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.9)
Whitley County 6 *** 79.7 (68.3, 92.7) 20 (1, 78) 36 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 2.9)
Dearborn County 6 *** 80.2 (70.6, 90.9) 19 (2, 72) 53 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.3)
Floyd County 6 *** 80.5 (72.4, 89.4) 18 (3, 62) 75 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6)
Owen County 6 *** 81.7 (67.8, 98.0) 17 (1, 81) 26 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.3)
DeKalb County 6 *** 82.0 (71.4, 93.8) 16 (1, 69) 45 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.1, 3.2)
Morgan County 6 *** 83.0 (74.7, 92.2) 15 (2, 54) 75 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Clark County 6 *** 83.3 (76.6, 90.6) 14 (3, 44) 117 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Grant County 6 *** 83.6 (75.3, 92.6) 13 (2, 52) 79 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Rush County 6 *** 84.0 (67.9, 103.1) 12 (1, 84) 20 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.8)
Shelby County 6 *** 84.3 (73.9, 95.9) 11 (1, 58) 49 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Jennings County 6 *** 84.8 (71.4, 100.2) 10 (1, 72) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.6)
Vermillion County 6 *** 86.9 (70.5, 106.6) 9 (1, 81) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.5, 2.7)
Harrison County 6 *** 88.0 (76.8, 100.5) 8 (1, 51) 46 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.9)
Scott County 6 *** 88.4 (73.9, 105.2) 7 (1, 65) 27 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -0.4)
Jefferson County 6 *** 90.2 (77.7, 104.4) 6 (1, 50) 39 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.4)
Clay County 6 *** 90.6 (76.9, 106.1) 5 (1, 58) 32 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.0)
Washington County 6 *** 90.8 (77.4, 106.1) 4 (1, 54) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.4)
Putnam County 6 *** 90.9 (78.9, 104.2) 3 (1, 44) 43 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.6)
Blackford County 6 *** 93.9 (75.0, 116.9) 2 (1, 78) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 2.2)
Starke County 6 *** 99.5 (84.6, 116.5) 1 (1, 36) 33 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/24/2022 7:35 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top